How are you able to keep up in so many games?In post 1673, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I stay? I'd like some more milkshake.
Just two-three is stressful for me
Extremely sorry for the low activity on my part
Finals are not helping :/
How are you able to keep up in so many games?In post 1673, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I stay? I'd like some more milkshake.
AgreedIn post 1674, Ginngie wrote:Oh.In post 1647, PMysterious wrote:I see that as Town, because that's not a vote on the wagon that could have lead to an early lynch. Had he voted, it could have lead to an early lynch, and not much discussion, which is something Scum want, and not Town.In post 1621, FourTrouble wrote: You love that he didn't vote Gamma despite reading him as scum? What's town about that?
Ya know, this is a really bad reason to town read someone and I have no idea how you came up with it.
Effort is not equivalent to alignmentIn post 1651, PMysterious wrote:Definitely may not be the best word, but contribution is key in a game of Mafia, and Theta showed a lot of that. Had he stayed, I think he'd be really good at keeping contributions up.
I have no life that's whyIn post 1675, WhyMafia wrote:How are you able to keep up in so many games?In post 1673, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I stay? I'd like some more milkshake.
Just two-three is stressful for me
Extremely sorry for the low activity on my part
Finals are not helping :/
Uhh which one?In post 1677, WhyMafia wrote:Effort is not equivalent to alignmentIn post 1651, PMysterious wrote:Definitely may not be the best word, but contribution is key in a game of Mafia, and Theta showed a lot of that. Had he stayed, I think he'd be really good at keeping contributions up.
I've been the victim of that
Remember FireBringer's game, Gamma?
OhIn post 1678, Gamma Emerald wrote:I have no life that's whyIn post 1675, WhyMafia wrote:How are you able to keep up in so many games?In post 1673, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I stay? I'd like some more milkshake.
Just two-three is stressful for me
Extremely sorry for the low activity on my part
Finals are not helping :/
Large normalIn post 1679, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uhh which one?In post 1677, WhyMafia wrote:Effort is not equivalent to alignmentIn post 1651, PMysterious wrote:Definitely may not be the best word, but contribution is key in a game of Mafia, and Theta showed a lot of that. Had he stayed, I think he'd be really good at keeping contributions up.
I've been the victim of that
Remember FireBringer's game, Gamma?
The one with NotFury/LaLightIn post 1681, WhyMafia wrote:Large normalIn post 1679, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uhh which one?In post 1677, WhyMafia wrote:Effort is not equivalent to alignmentIn post 1651, PMysterious wrote:Definitely may not be the best word, but contribution is key in a game of Mafia, and Theta showed a lot of that. Had he stayed, I think he'd be really good at keeping contributions up.
I've been the victim of that
Remember FireBringer's game, Gamma?
I got hammered in LYLO cause I had the worst contributions
UH now I'm completely lostIn post 1681, WhyMafia wrote:Large normalIn post 1679, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uhh which one?In post 1677, WhyMafia wrote:Effort is not equivalent to alignmentIn post 1651, PMysterious wrote:Definitely may not be the best word, but contribution is key in a game of Mafia, and Theta showed a lot of that. Had he stayed, I think he'd be really good at keeping contributions up.
I've been the victim of that
Remember FireBringer's game, Gamma?
I got hammered in LYLO cause I had the worst contributions
Hmm lemme find a linkIn post 1684, Gamma Emerald wrote:UH now I'm completely lostIn post 1681, WhyMafia wrote:Large normalIn post 1679, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uhh which one?In post 1677, WhyMafia wrote:Effort is not equivalent to alignmentIn post 1651, PMysterious wrote:Definitely may not be the best word, but contribution is key in a game of Mafia, and Theta showed a lot of that. Had he stayed, I think he'd be really good at keeping contributions up.
I've been the victim of that
Remember FireBringer's game, Gamma?
I got hammered in LYLO cause I had the worst contributions
OopsIn post 1688, Gamma Emerald wrote:That was a mini normal
Also I know jack shit about the play that game
But okay
True
How do you square 161 with the rest of PM's posts?In post 1692, massive wrote:So Ginngie talk to me about 161. This looks town, like, I can't see even bad scum wanting to take on Gamma based on things that seem so NAI they could make up an episode of That's So Mafiascum. They'd be putting their neck out against someone who they already know is possibly going to have "extreme" or "jerkish" reactions. Why does scum-PMysterious make this post?
In post 1694, Gamma Emerald wrote:Can you clarify what you mean Ginngie?