random.org says
Mafia 76: Desperate - Game over!
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
I'm of the opinion that The Eternal Newb is just shaking the bushes to see what comes flying out at this point; not a bad play....
Not quite liking/following what Tarhalindur was on about earlier (suggesting that another player wasn't advocating scumhunting midway through p. 1), but haven't seen anything telling enough to make me want to move my vote yet.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Staggering. Truly staggering it is...how much more suspicious I became when I voted for you....The Eternal Newb wrote:Honestly speaking, my entire strategy consists of "say stupid shit and see who responds to stupid shit how."
It's worked pretty well for me in the three or so years I've been playing.
Only about half of that was online, in case anybody cares.
Right now my list of who I think is scum consists of Korts, BigBen, Tarh, Goat, and Pyaar.
I honestly don't know why. I play from the gut as a townie.
Gosh Golly...could your list possibly consist of those other than the sheep who more or less decided: "Oh yes, oh mighty and all-knowing Eternal Newb; please show us your WISDOM!!!!!"
Or...you could do what I asked, and just answer the question, Claire.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
uhhh...there was the bickering between you and Superfly, followed by this after the lynch...noah hanson wrote:well Matt S has no dirt, not a thing on me so i have no idea why he is voting for me. I have a lot of problems with him voting for me without an ounce of proof. It seems really scummy to vote on someone without having a reason or proof.
Matt S
...Superfly wrote:JDGA way to hammer with no warning. If tEN is town you and L-1 boy noah will be everybody's first suspects.
...and then Superfly ends up dead. While I find that almost TOO convenient, you're overreacting to what could be considered "reasonable suspicion."
FOS: Noah Hanson-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Noah...answer me one thing.
What sort of "proof" are you seeking that would make it "acceptable" to vote you? You state thaqt nobody has "proof" against you.
There isn't PROOF against anyone. This is a game where voting is generally done through suspicion for the first few days.Through your logic, there's no justification for voting for ANYONE, because there isn't proof on anyone.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Sorry for my absence.
gonnavote Noah Hansonhere.
I really dislike how he railed against anyone who found him suspicious, demanding "proof," refused to answer questions, then snapped and voted for HIMSELF (much like TEN did yesterday), pulled the whole "oh, why should I care" routine, then UNVOTED himself just hours later, claiming that he wasn't going to help us lynch him.
Then...he disappears, and we start looking elsewhere.
Is it highly probable that he pulled a risky gambit like this in order to extend his life after looking suspicious? No.
Is it possible? Yep. It's still a hunch, but something in my gut is telling me all is not right there.
Vote stays until Noah at least answers my question from days ago.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
THANK you.noah hanson wrote:the thing that got me going was the fact that i had enough balls to put someone at L-1, SOMEONE THAT WAS BEGGING FOR IT. And i still got pegged as being scum, is it my fault that i had enough balls to do what other people wouldn't NO. I am and always will be a person that is for giving people what they ask for. TEN asked to be lynched and i stepped up and did it you can call me scum all you want makes no difference.
you want a list ok here ya goNoah, at the very least I want you to tell me who you think are the three players most likely to be scum, with reasons. Explanation for your actions (especially your explicit refusal to explain yourself), which has been severely lacking from you so far (no, repeatedly saying "I am town" is not a valid form of explanation), would also be a pro-town thing to do.
1.Kilroy8675309- He started the whole bandwagon by making up posts that i never made that alone should have thrown up red flags to people but it never did. And then he continued his push to lynch at post 220, he then got his buddy Matt S to join him in his little crusade to any attention away from him although he still has a few votes himself. Now i would say he is still acting scummy but i would just be repeating what i have said in many posts.
2. Matt S- He joined right in with Kilroy with post 224 even though Peers pointed out that Kiljoy was bussing to a lynch with post 221, nobody listened and the wagon rolled along by this time another had joined the wagon...
3.grintwig- she didnt waste any time, at post 216 the very next post after Kiljoy started his bandwagon campaign grintwig jumped right on. no other reason other than following someone else's word.
4. OhMyGodLife- at post 219 he switched gears so fast he begins his post by saying that things were coincidental as far as the deal between superfly dying after we argued then goes right into a mini list and votes me.
5. Springlullaby- post 226 the person says they are perfectly happy with voting for me even though grintwig is acting more scummy.
unvotebecause...well, because I said I would.
I've had a remarkable amount of beer, and will not procees further until tomorrow.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
As has been discussed, most of what you're referring to was paraphrasing - but I'm going to examine this train.noah hanson wrote:the thing that got me going was the fact that i had enough balls to put someone at L-1, SOMEONE THAT WAS BEGGING FOR IT. And i still got pegged as being scum, is it my fault that i had enough balls to do what other people wouldn't NO. I am and always will be a person that is for giving people what they ask for. TEN asked to be lynched and i stepped up and did it you can call me scum all you want makes no difference.
you want a list ok here ya goNoah, at the very least I want you to tell me who you think are the three players most likely to be scum, with reasons. Explanation for your actions (especially your explicit refusal to explain yourself), which has been severely lacking from you so far (no, repeatedly saying "I am town" is not a valid form of explanation), would also be a pro-town thing to do.
1.Kilroy8675309- He started the whole bandwagon by making up posts that i never made that alone should have thrown up red flags to people but it never did. And then he continued his push to lynch at post 220, he then got his buddy Matt S to join him in his little crusade to any attention away from him although he still has a few votes himself. Now i would say he is still acting scummy but i would just be repeating what i have said in many posts.
Believe it or not, I agree with you on this...and feel that Matt deserves a little more scrutiny for it.2. Matt S- He joined right in with Kilroy with post 224 even though Peers pointed out that Kiljoy was bussing to a lynch with post 221, nobody listened and the wagon rolled along by this time another had joined the wagon...
I believe grintwig was fishing for a reaction. Guess what? She got one.3.grintwig- she didnt waste any time, at post 216 the very next post after Kiljoy started his bandwagon campaign grintwig jumped right on. no other reason other than following someone else's word.
Could not disagree with you more, here...and this is the point. Is it a cut-and-dried argument to say "Superfly commented that Noah would be a prime suspect if TEN turned out to be pro-town, then Superfly was killed, so Noah must be the killer?" No...and that's what OhGodMyLife was saying. He simply gave a different reason for why he was voting you, which was mostly your reaction.4. OhMyGodLife- at post 219 he switched gears so fast he begins his post by saying that things were coincidental as far as the deal between superfly dying after we argued then goes right into a mini list and votes me.
By the above logic, JDGA is just as suspicious as you, and yet he didn't get near the attention (or votes) that you did. Why? Because he didn't completely flip out at the notion that he was suspect for what happened.
Again...granted, and I dislike going for the easy lynch rather than the correct one. However, this is a little hypocritical, as you nearly pulled the exact same thing TEN did...you voted for yourself. If you wanted yourself dead, and Springlullaby was happy to help you out with that, don't kvetch about it.5. Springlullaby- post 226 the person says they are perfectly happy with voting for me even though grintwig is acting more scummy.
Anyway, this whole thing was either a balls-out, brilliant scum gambit, or a temper tantrum by a pro-town player. For the moment I'll count it as the latter, butIGMEOY: Noah Hanson.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Yeah, I'm reading up on a few of Noah's reasons...not really sure about a couple of them.Matt_S wrote:
I really don't want to sound rude, but I didn't follow Kilroy onto any bandwagons. I was the first person to vote for him today.The Goat wrote:Believe it or not, I agree with you on this...and feel that Matt deserves a little more scrutiny for it.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
springlullaby wrote:Vote: noah hanson
I think the most suspicious are the ones who called for an early lynch on day 1. grintwig posts looks more suspicious, but I'm happy with voting voting noah atm.vote: Springlullaby
Another one of those "the more I look at it, the less I like it" posts.
You find those calling or an early lynch on day 1 suspicious, but then put Noah at four votes early on day 2?
Can I get a little bit of an explanation on this?-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Hmmm. That covers prety much everything EXCEPT what Noah himself pointed out...that you found somone else scummier, but were still content to vote Noah in the first place. Doesn't seem a particularly pro-town move for someone who was so concerned about being methodical on Day 1.springlullaby wrote:I don't see the contradiction that you seem to be perceiving.
Whether supported by scum or not, the quick lynch of tEN yesterday was a bad move for town as there is even less than normal to be going on today.
noah was one of the people with flimsy reason to go for the quicklynch so when the wagon on him started today I was happy to join in to get some reaction. after he claimed, then voted himself, along with his little fit, there was no point anymore in pursuing whatsoever with him in this manner, so I unvoted. With the way he acted, another quicklynch could happen, and I had questions to ask first.
Anyway, I'm feeling a bit numb and out of focus about this game after I worked myself up with the grintwig thing. So I'm sitting back and watching for the time being.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Yes, unfortunately.springlullaby wrote:
I believe I did answer to that. But for the sake of clarity, I was most suspicious of the people who went for the quicklynch, grintwig was my top suspect but noah was on my list as well. The momentum was on noah, so I voted noah to see where it would lead.The Goat wrote:
Hmmm. That covers prety much everything EXCEPT what Noah himself pointed out...that you found somone else scummier, but were still content to vote Noah in the first place. Doesn't seem a particularly pro-town move for someone who was so concerned about being methodical on Day 1.springlullaby wrote:I don't see the contradiction that you seem to be perceiving.
Whether supported by scum or not, the quick lynch of tEN yesterday was a bad move for town as there is even less than normal to be going on today.
noah was one of the people with flimsy reason to go for the quicklynch so when the wagon on him started today I was happy to join in to get some reaction. after he claimed, then voted himself, along with his little fit, there was no point anymore in pursuing whatsoever with him in this manner, so I unvoted. With the way he acted, another quicklynch could happen, and I had questions to ask first.
Anyway, I'm feeling a bit numb and out of focus about this game after I worked myself up with the grintwig thing. So I'm sitting back and watching for the time being.
Does that make sense to you?
I'll option #2 over a no-lynch. My scumfishing expedition today has come up empty...I may just be a sucky fisherman, but I'm satisfied with the answers I've received so far. I agree that we need more substance from Xtoxm.OhGodMyLife wrote:I agree with you Werebear, but I am still for option one. I would like to see more pressure on Xtoxm though, because what he is doing is very different from the kind of lurking that grintwig was attacking earlier.
vote Xtoxm. Speak up, my friend.
FOS, Kilroy. So...you're willing to follow, eh? Seems a little odd that you're not willing to stay on Noah unless it's a train with some momentum. It almost seems as though you're saying (and I'm paraphrasing here) "Now I'm not willing to really take a stand on Noah, but if you guys get him close enough to the cliff, I'll be happy to push him over the edge."-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Awwwwwwwww. Now who's worried about the "big bad meany-heads?"Kilroy8675309 wrote:EBWODP
I'm not sure if I responded to this yet, but even if I did, I'm confident I didn't make this point: Does nobody else see that he jumped on the voice of reason, using a stupid metaphor to attempt to downplay what I'd said?noah hanson wrote:quit crying kiljoy you're just pissed cause the wheels fell off your wagon and way to go trying to fix your little red wagon of lynching.
Of course nobody else sees this - it's a bastard mod game, and the joke's on me. I'm the only Townie.
Lighten up, Francis.
I'M KIDDING, AND I SWEAR TO GOD IF YOU SERIOUSLY USE THAT AGAINST ME I WILL DONKEY PUNCH YOUR MOTHER.
While this board isn't an English teacher's paradise, it's better than most. If you're going to play Grammar Lad, at least have the common courtesy to keep sentence fragments out of your posts that criticize the grammar of others.
In case you hadn't noticed, overreacting isn't the best course of action this game. Or...maybe you DID notice it, and are counting on us to interpret it as another pro-town player going a bit bonkers.
Hmmm.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
If this is directed toward me, I could quite sincerely give a rat's ass about who you feel deserves respect. Your behavior is not only unacceptable, but also creating a genuine diversion away from what we SHOULD be doing - hunting scum.Kilroy8675309 wrote:If you're seriously overanalyzing my "donkey punch" comment, you obviously deserve less respect than I had initially intended to give to you.
vote Kilroy.
You need to go.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
unvote, kilroy.
Suggesting that I "obviously don't actually read the English language at all" because I didn't peruse each of your posts in-depth is like suggesting I can't hear because I don't listen to Howard Stern for three hours a day.
Since you've apparently agreed to be a little more game-oriented with your content, I'm happy to get on with hunting scum.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Thought you voted for Noah Hanson, as well...my apologies, then.Xtoxm wrote:That's the only vote i've placed all game.
My point is that you were asked specifically why you didn't think NH was scum, and your basic reply was (paraphrased) "I've looked at his posts, and they seem pro town."
Then you jumped on the Kilroy train just minutes after I did, stating that the reason you were voting him was that insults like his didn't belong in the game.
Now you respond to my post almostimmediately...you're clearlyaround, just not contributing much, and not giving a whole lot of reasoning behind your actions/suspicions/reasoning.
In short, you're freaking me out. Please be a little more verbose, because what you're doing doesn't give anyone much to go on.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Us being wrong isn't nearly as unfortunate as you being wrong, and us lynching a cop. Letting scum live an extra day or two is far worse than losing a cop for the remainder of the game (particularly if there's only one cop). I find it a little...suspicious...that Kilroy was that combative with everyone as a cop, and that one of his investigations just so happened to be on a guy that ended up dead. However, these things have a way of working themselves out.noah hanson wrote:unvote
i hope you people are wrong in the worst way...
The fact that the above paragraph has to be STATED makes me really uneasy...but it's apparently necessary. Assuming there is a doctor, please take notice.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Not chastizing you, bud...that was more of a not-so-subtle signal flare for the doctor, whomever he or she is. Truth be told, my gut says that Kilroy is lying...and I'd bet a lot of people feel the same way. However, following our gut and being WRONG would be disastrous...so we kinda have to wait it out.noah hanson wrote:you know you're right goat i guess in the end i'll just follow all of you guys around and just go with the flow....
Independent thought is essential to the game. By the way, this past page put someone else smack dab in the middle of my radar.
vote JDGA-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Hey...teach?Kilroy8675309 wrote:
Not everyone goes begging for attention before they kill themselves, but more often than not, that's what they want. The lesson to be learned here is two-fold: 1. People lie, and 2. There is such a thing as lying through omission. I look forward to having your counterpart show up and not suck, even though I'm going to press that guy's lynch, too, because he's being set up in a terrible position.noah hanson wrote:not once have i asked for anyone's sympathy you rank amateur.
I give you one point, though: I expected you to counter-claim me just to ruin my experience of the game. Either you're not smart enough to do so, or there is a shred of decency in you.
I'm leaning towards the former.
As a side note to your "lesson," begging and baiting for a counterclaim positively reeks of scumminess.
I'm just sayin'.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
For someone who takes such pride in his logic and grammar, your reading comprehension is surprisingly inadequate.Kilroy8675309 wrote:I hope that has been able to clarify. And, The Goat? Don't be so upset that my plan is working flawlessly, and anyone with half a brain can see that I'm becoming more and more confirmed. Your futile attempts to discredit my claim are just that - futile. But if you're having fun, then hey - who am I to stop you?
Stating that my gut told me you were lying and trying to discredit you are two completely different things. In fact, I not only stated you WEREN'T the play, but also was making sure that the (presumed) Doctor knew that they should protect you tonight.
Regarding your "plan working flawlessly" I can only assume your plan is to basically piss everyone off and turn the town against you. If that is indeed the case, you're doing a bang-up job. Otherwise, I really don't know what you're yammering about, and I certainly can't figure out what you're trying to accomplish.
Additionally, your logic regarding a cop counterclaim is flawed; it's only win/win for the town short term. If you ARE scum, and a cop counterclaims, then...sure, a doc could protect him/her tonight. You die, but your scumbuddies now know who the cop is. If the doc eats it (or is forcecd to claim), then the town is screwed. It's a very risky play this early in the game. For such a "smart" player, I'm surprised that escaped you.
Then again, a "smart" Cop wouldn't have been as abrasive as you in the first place. Both the paragraph and the sentence previous to this one are what make me think you're scum.
But, like I said, you're not the play today. Your Cop claim is perfectly credible. I just think you suck at this game, regardless of your alignment.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
HEL-lo. That looked dirtier than hell.Xtoxm wrote:
Just to point out, this was SSK's last post.MafiaSSK wrote:
Same here, I received no prod. and mor einfo on my ssupects will be in my next post.Xtoxm wrote:
Didn't pick up any prod, you sure you sent it? I'm deft here.Cephrir wrote:Prodding andersonw, bigbenwd, MafiaSSK, Pyaar, Wizardcat and Xtoxm.
Wizardcat has 48 hours to post or he will be replaced despite the fact that he keeps responding to prods.
"Well...yeah...I'm just going to refute everything by saying 'I refute everyt..HEY, LOOKY! THIS GUY IS CONTRIBUTING LESS THAN ME! LET'S DIVERT OUR ATTENTION! LOOK OVER HERE! BRIGHT SHINY OBJECT! LOUD NOISES!"
vote Xtoxm-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Matt_S wrote:Or I expected a roleblocker when the cop wasn't killed.
OR?
Whoa. Okay...I was actuallyagreeingwith you up until this point. I was all ready to vote for Tarlindhur for jumping all over you - it's not THAT far of a stretch for you to expect a roleblocker. However, this post stunk to high heaven.
You're not giving usoptionsto choose from, here. Either you thought there was a roleblocker because of the size of the game, or you expected there to be one when Kilroy wasn't killed. Which is it? This looks suspiciouosly like you trying to wiggle out of an earlier statement by giving us choices as to why you thought there was a roleblocker...hoping we'll formulate something reasonable for you.
So, our options are apparently:
1) MattS thought there was a roleblocker because of the size of the game
2) MattS thought there was a roleblocker because Kilroy wasn't killed
3) MattS KNOWS there's a roleblocker because he's scum
I do not think that #2 makes ANY sense. It's perfectly reasonable to think that Kilroy wasn't killed because scum thought he'd be protected by a doc, and instead attacked Werebear in hopes hewasa doc.
That leaves options 1 and 3...I'm going with 3 until you elucidate further.
vote MattS-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
No, I'm not trying to suggest the game is broken. Now who's trying to twist logic?Matt_S wrote:The size of the game made me think there's a roleblocker, and the fact that Kilroy's still alive pretty much confirmed my suspicions. Of course I'm working on the assumption that a mod wouldn't put a cop and doc in the game without a roleblocker, assuming the old newbie setup was as broken as I've heard. If Kilroy had turned up dead, then I'd say, "Hey, there's no roleblocker. What are the odds?" But he was alive, so I though, "I knew it! There's a roleblocker!" You can try and twist my logic all you want, but it's hardly a stretch of logic for the mafia to kill the cop when they can't roleblock him. Again, assuming this game isn't already broken. Are you trying to tell me otherwise?
What set me off was that you DIDN'T originally say, "The size of the game made me think there's a roleblocker, and the fact that Kilroy's still alive pretty much confirmed my suspicions." Your responses were basically limited to the size of the game as a justification for your logic (which was perfectly sound)...and then all of a sudden you added (paraphrased), "Or maybe the fact that Kilroy wasn't killed was what made me think there was a roleblocker." It just seemed as though you were getting a little antsy under pressure.
Additionally, Istilldon't see how Kilroy not being killed makes it any more or less likely for there to be a roleblocker. Can someone explain what I'm missing?-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
That was a well thought-out and comprehensive reply to my question. Thank you. To be honest, I was completely unaware that the "cop and doc without a roleblocker game being broken" was such a hot topic of discussion. It makes sense, though.Matt_S wrote:
Not only was my question rhetorical(unless you want to claim scum with no roleblocker), but also the idea was to get you to drop the subject. I don't feel that I have to explain why a roleblocker is likely, but I will because I want to move on.The Goat wrote:No, I'm not trying to suggest the game is broken. Now who's trying to twist logic?
Unless someone is going to try and debate that a doc and cop without a roleblocker is broken, I think that part is a safe assumption. Now, let's assume that the mafia knows this. They also know directly whether they have a roleblocker. If they don't, then they could assume there's no doctor. Thus they kill Kilroy thinking it would probably succeed, in addition to that being the only way to shut him down. If they do have a roleblocker, then they know there could be a doctor. Thus they roleblock the cop so as not to risk the kill being blocked if there is a doctor, as well as potentially getting shots at other power roles.The Goat wrote:What set me off was that you DIDN'T originally say, "The size of the game made me think there's a roleblocker, and the fact that Kilroy's still alive pretty much confirmed my suspicions." Your responses were basically limited to the size of the game as a justification for your logic (which was perfectly sound)...and then all of a sudden you added (paraphrased), "Or maybe the fact that Kilroy wasn't killed was what made me think there was a roleblocker." It just seemed as though you were getting a little antsy under pressure.
Additionally, Istilldon't see how Kilroy not being killed makes it any more or less likely for there to be a roleblocker. Can someone explain what I'm missing?
I originally didn't want to bring Kilroy up because I expected the WIFOM option of "mafia doesn't block cop to get town to mistrust cop" to be mentioned. And I didn't think I'd even have to bother bringing Kilroy up to defend myself. Apparently you thought so too. But Tarhalindur didn't think it was enough. So I'd appreciate it if you didn't attack me for bringing in new evidence when my old evidence wasn't enough.
HOWEVER...
You can clearly see WHY I found your "bringing in new evidence" a little suspicious...so don't get all jammed up when I call you on it. I'd like to kill some scum today, so I'm gonna flesh some things out if I find them suspicious.
That being said...
unvote, vote Tarhalindur-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Short answer: Yes. If you read my posts, you'll understand why. If you feel I need to expound further, I will. But not tonight. It's Thirsty Friday, after all.Matt_S wrote:
I wouldn't exactly call it a hot topic, but I personally have strong feelings about it, and I know some others do. I do understand why you could have been suspicious, but I don't agree with attacking me, who you agreed with, for defending odd suspicions in odd ways. Now then, are you voting Tarhalindur just for attacking me?The Goat wrote:That was a well thought-out and comprehensive reply to my question. Thank you. To be honest, I was completely unaware that the "cop and doc without a roleblocker game being broken" was such a hot topic of discussion. It makes sense, though.
HOWEVER...
You can clearly see WHY I found your "bringing in new evidence" a little suspicious...so don't get all jammed up when I call you on it. I'd like to kill some scum today, so I'm gonna flesh some things out if I find them suspicious.
That being said...
unvote, vote Tarhalindur-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Because he's the one that initially suggested that your assumption that a roleblocker existed was a slip-up instead of a reasonable deduction, and he's the one voting for you.Matt_S wrote:
I think I'd like to hear this as well.Peers wrote:
I'd prefer to hear why you voted for Tar instead of the other people attacking Matt.The Goat wrote:
Short answer: Yes. If you read my posts, you'll understand why. If you feel I need to expound further, I will. But not tonight.Matt_S wrote:
Now then, are you voting Tarhalindur just for attacking me?The Goat wrote:
That being said...
unvote, vote Tarhalindur-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Believe it or not, if JDGA gets lynched and DOES turn up scum, I actually look forward to this.OhGodMyLife wrote:
When JDGA cardflips scum, I will also bring in further evidence illustrating the connection between him and The Goat.Korts wrote:I wouldn't say that's such a damning quote, OGML.
OGML, I'm not trying to derail a train. I will often vote for players who have been directly asked to contribute and do not...especially if I'm the one doing the asking. I did it yesterday with Xtoxm, specifically pointing out that I was voting for him in order to get him to contribute more.
I said I'll take a look at why everyone is voting JDGA, and Iwill- but I'm not going to blindly follow people onto a train just because you say so. You're going to have to pardon me while I pursue a tangent.
There's a specific reason I'd like to hear Killa's thoughts on the game.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
*sigh*OhGodMyLife wrote:I'm not against pressure on killa, but there are approximately four active people in this game right now and there's only so much we can get done. This is why I'm advocating keeping all the pressure on JDGA.
If its not clear from my statement when I quoted him, I was making note of The Goat's actions in steering away from JDGA to the next easiest target (and the most recent popular bandwagon), not the fact that he's after killa in particular. I agree that noah was scummy and killa hasn't been helpful, but having played with him before I don't see this behavior from k7 as being in any way indicative of his alignment. If you're that interested in going after him take a minute to read some from his other games, he acts like this all the time.
I'm notafterkilla in particular. I'd like to be able to get more of a read on him because the guy who was loudest about "not forgetting about noah" yesterday...ended up dead.
Of course, that line of thought ends up in a WIFOM-type conundrum. That's why I wanted to flesh it out a little with more than single-sentence posts from killa before the day ended.
Happy?-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Ya know....I'm not exactly sure what I was expecting, but this post did NOT make me feel any better about you.killa seven wrote:ok i read a few pages, and jdga does seem like he best lynch, hes all over the place, tryna 2 lynch a claimed cop (kilroy) then atacking tar for defending him. im comfortable lynching him.
vote jdga-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Am I the ONLY pro-town player left? Just checkin'...Matt_S wrote:
I normally enjoy it when people baselessly accuse each other of being scum, but you're just trying to justify wanting to kill someone by attacking me. It's kind of sad. You're probably just looking to get JDGA lynched as town so you can move past bussing your buddy The Goat. See, it doesn't feel good now does it? If you have any actual case to build against me, please do so. Otherwise don't act like it's innocent to want to kill someone who you think is the doc.OhGodMyLife wrote:
The former is still up in the air pending what JDGA has to say today. The latter is more than a little vague, and definitely making excuses for not having actual reasoning.Matt_S wrote:I want to see if his stance against JDGA is still as selfdestructive as he claimed yesterday. And his stance yesterday on you and JDGA being buddies just irks me.
You're probably just irked because your scumbuddy Korts died before he could NK me last night though, so I guess I can't blame you for grasping at straws like that.
Skitzer I can all but assure you that kilroy is the cop regardless of his hyperbolic statement about "all the mafia" taking it like men.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
I'm really starting to feel like this is something that can be said to a different player each day, but...
Skitzer: Your stance is either scummy or extremely bad. Please clarify which camp you're in so I can move on, because your FOS-ing "bordering on a vote" of Kilroy is creating a mental block of sorts for me. I keep staring at it, thinking, "What the HELL is he doing?"-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
I'm not entirely sure a massclaim is quite the way to go yet, although I think my reasoning WHY might be out the window. OGML...please be careful what you say/type. If I can make a reasonable guess at what you're doing, I'd imagine anyone else can, too.
If my thinking is wrong, and a massclaim is the concensus, I'll happily go along with it.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
While I'd normally suggest you're pushing this train a little hard, nothing else much has popped up (part of that is my fault for lack of participation, I suppose. Sorry about that.)Matt_S wrote:I can't help but notice that The Goat, The Eternal Newb, and killa seven have posted without voting for skitzerscum. And welcome, Cream147.
In case you haven't noticed, I don't vote for people just because all the cool kids are doing it, unless there's incontrovertible evidence that I should be doing so. I like to develop my own ideas.
Skitzer - was post 928 intended to be humorous or not?-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
Sorry; Pyaar.OhGodMyLife wrote:
Why do people keep wanting peers to claim? Did anybody read the thread yesterday?Peers wrote:Clarifying my claim: One-shot vig. I had one shot, I made it count, and I don't care who knows it 'cause now that my shot is used up... well, NKing me keeps the power roles alive for another night. C'mon, kill me tonight. Dare ya.
It wasdefinitelya P word.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
It means that I meant Pyaar, but typed Peers. That's pretty much it.The Eternal Newb wrote:I find it interesting that Skitzer, who is generally regarded as the SK, if I'm understanding the sentiment correctly, and The Goat both didn't notice that Peers already claimed.
Don't know if it means anything, but it's certainly interesting.-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006
-
-
The Goat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: April 8, 2006