Mini 546: House Mafia - Game Over

[Erg0]

Sorry, been sick (still am, in fact). How ironic.

Ages:
Erg0: 29
curiouskarmadog: 18
Near: 25
vollkan: 35
PookyTheMagicalBear: 30
Adel: 86 (with 7 cats)
shaft.ed: 20

I'm not very good at this.

[curiouskarmadog]

come on, younger than Near?

[Albert B. Rampage]

We're here to save lives, people, not make friends.

[vollkan]

And now we are just waiting on Pooky

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

1) Erg0 25.89
2) curiouskarmadog 22.42
3) vollkan 40.55
4) Near 42.54
5) Adel 27.44
6) shaft.ed 29.59

[vollkan]

This just came to my attention:

No two players can have the same age.

I gave Erg0 and shaft.ed the same age.

Thus, I vary my original response to the following:

1) Pooky - Enflaming remarks dominate. Puerile.

8

2) Near - Claims to be caving into emotion and is speculating wildly. Pre-teen that needs to grow up

12

3) CKD - Emotional outbursts at times. Hormonal, angsty teenager.

16

4) Erg0 - Calm and eloquent. Mature player.

35

5) shaft.ed - Ditto.

40

6) Adel Wise old tricky crone, with folksy wisdom about cod liver.

72

And, in case I was meant to do myself as well:
7) Vollkan - Awesomely fantastastic, full of wisdom and modest.

100

1) Erg0 25.89
2) curiouskarmadog 22.42
3) vollkan 40.55
4) Near 42.54
5) Adel 27.44
6) shaft.ed 29.59

You've gone and given everyone the same average or something haven't you?

[curiouskarmadog]

vollkan, we cant have the same ages at the end...but we can give the same ages at this point because it wont matter when we average them all together.

I dont think Pooky's numbers are averages.

I dont think we should use the ages we (adel and vollkan) provided for ourselves.

can someone run the numbers now..I seriously lack the time.

[Albert B. Rampage]

If you decide to go by the average, round it up. I need one list, not seven

[Erg0]

Average ages, according to my calculations:

Near 19.59
ckd 31.73666667
shaft.ed 32.59833333
Erg0 34.14833333
Pooky 35.5
vollkan 38.925
Adel 44.24

Feel free to check that I'm right.

[shaft.ed]

OK quick list someone double check if you want:

Erg0: 34
CKD: 31
Near: 20
vollkan: 39
pooky: 36
shaft.ed: 33
Adel: 44

rounded

[Erg0]

Looks about right.

[curiouskarmadog]

OK quick list someone double check if you want:

Erg0: 34
CKD: 31
Near: 20
vollkan: 39
pooky: 36
shaft.ed: 33
Adel: 44

rounded

I believe you (and two people have ran the numbers) so in order of Oldest to Youngest.

Adel: 44
Vollkan: 39
Pooky: 36
Ergo: 34
Shafted: 33
CKD: 31
Near: 20

I submit this as the our "ages" !!!

[Albert B. Rampage]

Adel: 44
Vollkan: 39
Pooky: 36
Ergo: 34
Shafted: 33
CKD: 31
Near: 20

I submit this as the our "ages" !!!

And so case 3 begins!

[Erg0]

Erm... good-o then.

Vote: Adel

[curiouskarmadog]

vote ergo

back to hunch voting.

[shaft.ed]

Ummm... Did you guys read the end of yesterday?

vote: Near

[Near]

Post #780

*facepalm* Says the guy who hammered, then wished he could un-hammer.

I really thought that would earn a headdesk.

Doesn't this sound like shaft.ed is "excusing" my voting on TG? It sounds like he's agreeing with Vollkan, that my mistake was most likely due to my lack of experience OR like everyone seems to think my immaturity.

But then, he says:

Ummm... Did you guys read the end of yesterday?

He seems to think that I am a scum. Yes, it's possible that upon a re-read, shaft.ed changed his mind. But it is very possible that his first "headdesk" post was to simply agree with vollkan.

Also, this above post (#840) is a response to CDK and Erg0's votes that (to me) look like "random votes" to get the conversations going, but shaft.ed doesn't seem to realize this. It's possible shaft.ed could have meant "let's get serious guys" but he starts the post with "Ummm" which to me, sounds like shaft.ed is simply missing this fact.

In my experience, scums are usually less logical in certain situations because they are more focused in looking less like a mafia, then to genuinely looking for a scum himself.

Also, read my post at 787.

Vote Shaft.ed

[Albert B. Rampage]

Vote count

Adel 1 - (Erg0)
Shafted 1 - (Near)
Near 1 - (Shafted)
Erg0 1 - (CKD)

[curiouskarmadog]

for the record..my vote is not random

[Erg0]

Mine neither.

[shaft.ed]

Near I would highly doubt anyone is random voting to open D3.

The "Umm" implies that I don't understand how anyone could not view you as scummy following your breakdown after the TG hammer.

[Erg0]

Day 1 has reminded me of the folly of attempting to use post-hammer reactions as scumtells. TG's sudden turnaround after the Beep! lynch looked bad to me, and he came up town.

[shaft.ed]

Post #780

*facepalm* Says the guy who hammered, then wished he could un-hammer.

I really thought that would earn a headdesk.

Doesn't this sound like shaft.ed is "excusing" my voting on TG? It sounds like he's agreeing with Vollkan, that my mistake was most likely due to my lack of experience OR like everyone seems to think my immaturity.

This headdesk argument is complete bunk. The player who ellicited headdesks my previous game with vollkan to which I am refering to was Roach in 492 who turned up as scum. Headdesk is performed in response to seriously illogical arguments regardless of alignment.

[shaft.ed]

Day 1 has reminded me of the folly of attempting to use post-hammer reactions as scumtells. TG's sudden turnaround after the Beep! lynch looked bad to me, and he came up town.

I personally don't think you can compare the two. Near was upset about it BEFORE TG's alignment was even revealed. That's the difference.

[Near]

Post #780

*facepalm* Says the guy who hammered, then wished he could un-hammer.

I really thought that would earn a headdesk.

Doesn't this sound like shaft.ed is "excusing" my voting on TG? It sounds like he's agreeing with Vollkan, that my mistake was most likely due to my lack of experience OR like everyone seems to think my immaturity.

This headdesk argument is complete bunk. The player who ellicited headdesks my previous game with vollkan to which I am refering to was Roach in 492 who turned up as scum. Headdesk is performed in response to seriously illogical arguments regardless of alignment.

"The player who ellicited headdesks my previous game with vollkan to which I am refering to was Roach in 492 who turned up as scum. "

How is that relevant? It's not.

But, OK, my headdesk argument sucked. And I was wrong about random voting by Erg0 and CDK. But read my post 780.

shaft.ed, to me, it looks like you are picking on a guy who made a mistake of being suspicious before day 1. you think i'm a good lynch target, I am a newbie, showed sign of being emotional (which you think you can take advantage of by keep accusing me) and I said stupid thing like "I wish I can take my vote back."

my vote stands. it's shaft.ed