Mini 546: House Mafia - Game Over

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:40 pm

The youngest and most inexperienced doctor has made a critical mistake that was fatal to our patient. Near, that means you.

You will be fired in exactly 48 hours. If the other doctors want to save you, they must come to a decision and lynch someone else before February 29th at 20:40 EST.

shaft.ed · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:51 pm

Well obviously letting Near be fired will not bother me.

Adel · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:54 pm

that is it? wtf? just a deadline?

vote shaft.ed

nevermind.

Erg0 · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:54 pm

I doubt I can swing an Adel wagon in 48 hours, so let's try a more realistic option.

Vote: shaft.ed

Erg0 · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:56 pm

Adel, what on earth are you doing?

shaft.ed · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:58 pm

Erg0 wrote:Adel, what on earth are you doing?

Wondering the same thing.

Erg0, Care to explain why you're voting along with her if you find her suspicious (yes I know I did the same with pooky and TG yesterday, but it's a valid point).

Erg0 · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:01 pm

It was a simulpost. I'm not paying a lot of attention to her voting patterns anyway since she's been all over the place so far.

Near · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:30 pm

Unvote

Erg0 · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:31 pm

Near · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:32 pm

Because he's L-1

Adel · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:34 pm

seriously? ...

seriously?

Near · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:34 pm

48 hour is still a lot of time, and I would like to hear from vollkan, CDK, and Pooky to say things.

And Erg0 and Adel both went up in scum-iness in my radar.

Adel · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:35 pm

seriously?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:42 pm

I am on the fence here, I think Near's action after the hammer was scummy, but something about his post (explaining it) ring geniune to me. I am not sure why Adel and Ergo are voting Shafted...he said he didnt like Near, so why is it a surprise...

I dont like Ergo's votes this game...something about them seem forced. I cant put my finger on it (which I know will drive vollkan mad), but something it not boding well with me...

Near, you unvoted because you wanted to hear from me, Pooky (doubtful) and vollkan, but you havent supplied any thoughts...

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:43 pm

shafted your thoughts on Near unvoting you because you were at -1?...was it a ploy to save his ass, or does he really want information in the next 48 hours?

Near · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:59 pm

curiouskarmadog wrote:shafted your thoughts on Near unvoting you because you were at -1?...was it a ploy to save his ass, or does he really want information in the next 48 hours?

CKD, 48 hours is a lot of time.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:00 pm

you didnt answer my question.

Near · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:05 pm

I am going to do a re-read tonight, and hopefully post something more meaningful later. First few thoughts: shaft.ed is still at the top of my scummy list. In fact his latest post:

shaft.ed wrote: Well obviously letting Near be fired will not bother me.

Here is what I find weird: even if shaft.ed suspects that I am a scum, when he finds out that I will be fired in 48 hours if no one else is lynched, I would expect shaft.ed to at least *reconsider* if he's making a mistake lynching me. The fact that he maintained "he's fine with letting me die" is something I would expect from a scum.

Both Adel and Erg0 so quickly jumping to vote on shaft.ed is also weird. It's especially weird for Erg0 who hasn't expressed his suspicions toward shaft.ed before (or am I wrong?) 48 hours is still 2 days away, and they voted immediately, which imo make both of them more scummy.

Adel · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:07 pm

unvote, vote:near

proving that "too townie" can be a valid tell!

Erg0 · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:08 pm

In short: yes, you are wrong. I found him scummiest after my armlx analysis yesterday and I have said that I supported wagoning him today. My vote for shaft.ed should not be a surprise to anyone.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:09 pm

Near, if shafted was up for lynching in 48 hours..would you act any differently than he?

Near · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:11 pm

curiouskarmadog wrote:Near, if shafted was up for lynching in 48 hours..would you act any differently than he?

Yes. In fact, when I saw Erg0 and Adel voted for shaft.ed at the same time, that was what I thought. Maybe this was the basis that provoked my suspicion for shaft.ed post.

Near · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:14 pm

Erg0 wrote:In short: yes, you are wrong. I found him scummiest after my armlx analysis yesterday and I have said that I supported wagoning him today. My vote for shaft.ed should not be a surprise to anyone.

I stand corrected. In that case, I am not surprised by the fact that either you or Adel voted for shaft.ed. In fact, now that I think about it, you guys didn't realize shaft.ed was at L-1 since you claim your votes were made simultaneously.

I would like to hear vollkan's analysis.

Near · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:18 pm

Adel wrote:
unvote, vote:near

proving that "too townie" can be a valid tell!

I can actually understand where your suspicion is coming from.

Adel · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:22 pm

mod

: can I ask Near how old he is in real life now that we moved on to another phase?