So, at least you've been consistently looking for the easy wagon for over a month.
No, I've been looking to lynch scum. Maybe you have other motives that you want to ascribe to people, but I fail to see what is so difficult to understand about a townie wanting to lynch scun, and expressing his (I should say mine) exasperation at the fact that I find wagon jumping to be scummy, such that if a multitude of people engage in it, it confuses me to no end.
Even with a night behind us, the entire purpose of today is to develop and look for the small reactions, the tiny links, the things that do not become obvious until a couple of days are behind us. Waiting for the case to be made, so you can get behind it is not scumhunting.
Again, you misunderstand. I am quite willing to make cases on my own, that is, if there were more to go on than Person A votes for person B, then C, Then D, and person B votes on person A, then C, and Person D votes on person X, then A, and person X then votes on....
This is exactlky what was going on, but add to that, few people were actually trying to justify their votes. Now, I am sure you didn't sleep through all of this, so you must have seen it as well. I'll admit you have taken the trouble to address some of my points here, which means you are at least trying to justify your vote. I'd cheer you on, if it weren't for the fact that you either are purposefully trying to twist what I say (scumtell) or you refuse to recognize the point as being valid.
So I will ask. Which is it. Were people not jumping around on random wagons with little to no reason given, or did I just imagine it?
There SHOULD be lots of votes thrown around, and lots of wagon-shifts today. This is not a problem, this is a good thing.
Oh well, nevermind then. You say its a good thing. I say that its not how I find scum. It could very well be we are both right, and we could both be town as well.
Basically, what you are saying here is because I don't throw votes around at random, like a fool, I must be scum. This argument is inherently weak (weak arguments are, for me, scumtells). This is the stuff I like to evaluate. Your point is: random nonsense good, logical reasoning bad!
This isn't an either or situation, presenting it as such is a fallacy. Specifially, the either/or fallacy. Making fallacious arguments doe not mandate that you are scum, but does make me a tad more suspicious of you.
This was almost a month ago. Who was it, and how do you feel about them now? You know what, it doesn't really matter, because this is the type of post I've seen that when a strong wagon begins to go you can point back at this, whomever it is, and claim you've been watching them.
Why ask if you don't want to hear the answer? Actually, if you go back and re-read my posts, the answer isn't hidden at all. Since the person first drew my attention i asked him several innocuous questions, and have been trying to follow him ever since. I have no problem saying that his latest ploy has me rather confused, but that is nothing new, there is much in this game that i am uncertain about.
But as you say, it is day 1. And We are all looking for little signs, here and there. Why is it for you, this becomes an excuse to act, but for someone who would wait and see, it becomes worthy of a vote? Have you ever read Hamlet? Not to spoil it, but at the end, after all that moping around and thinking things over, Hamlet does kill his uncle.
Ooh, here's one of those minor things you love so much. Why "them" and not "us"?
Who said I love minor things? Maybe you ahve confused me with yourself, and you just happen to love minors? Or maybe Miners?
Who knows. But if you are going to make stuff up I can as well.
Now, as to your point, why them and not us? Simple. BM doesn't lead me. You didn't see me jumping on the half dozen or so wagons he started do you?
Hope that answers your question.
Are you suggesting that if, in fact, the cult began with a leader and a separate recruiter, that both can recruit? Otherwise, why are you worried about them? The recruiter is the one who is dead.
Why mention it? Because I am playing a game right now off site where the cult recruiter died night one and the leader took over recruitment thereafter. There is nothing in the Wiki I've read that says Cult recruitment absolutely has to stop with the death of the recruiter.
Maybe it did, maybe it didn't. I just think it shouldn't be forgotten, lest it become a reality later. Why, does my mentioning it make you uncomforatble?
;);)
