Mini 578 - Mistery at Montescuro - Game Over!

[Evilgorrilaz]

/comfrimizzle

[Evilgorrilaz]

Vote: Joudas

Sounds too much like Judas.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Vote: Joudas

Indeed

[Evilgorrilaz]

epic failed quote.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Damn >.<

[Evilgorrilaz]

Would it have been more worthy of bandwagoning if I wrote a full paragraph?

One small instance should not merit a bandwagon.

FoS: Near

Failing to OMGUS is not scummy.

[Evilgorrilaz]

oh, and

Unvote: Joudas

[Evilgorrilaz]

Why doesn't Near's FOS count as 'one small instance'? Why is Near worthy of a bandwagon for one small instance, but Phox isn't?

I believe that Near's logic was more faulty than JtP's.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Why not?

I don't believe it should. No other reason.

I already answered your other two questions.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Evil, you haven't answered this.

Yes I have.

I believe that Near's logic was more faulty than JtP's.

Thats my answer.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Well, I thought it was serious, because you actually did FOS him and gave a reason, and gave no signs of it being a hilarious gag.

Exactly what I thought.

[Evilgorrilaz]

And if i wasn't joking, why does it make me suspicious? I am trying to start a wagon on three people at once?

Because your reasons sucked?

[Evilgorrilaz]

So it appeared.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Why would you find that suspicious if all you had was a gut feeling that the post was weird?

[Evilgorrilaz]

I don't see much of a "growing bandwagon" when only one person added a vote.

How is it not a bandwagon when 5 people are voting for him? Two people have voted for him since his "last" post (before he went inactive).

[Evilgorrilaz]

Still waiting for VH replacement.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Hi Coron!
<3 L ~desu

[Evilgorrilaz]

Will reread later today and post something.
Can't promise content though, most of this stuff is going above my head.

[Evilgorrilaz]

FoS: JamesThePhox

Sometime back he basically says his "random" vote was to spark discussion, which implicates that it wasn't a random vote at all.

He also responds to Near's questioning of JtP's fos by saying that he found Near more suspicious than Macavenger as the reason for his unvote. However, Macavenger was his "random" vote. He also votes for near after being sorta of pressured by yos2. Then he unvotes, stating that he still think near is scummy because of lack of contribution. But that was exactly the reason why he voted for near in the first place. I'll post more about JtP later.

I honestly think pyrodwarf was sincere in his attempt to hunt scum by directing attention to sensfan. Sure, he might have overreacted, but to me, it seemed sincere. I didn't see too much of a connection upon a reread.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Right now I think our plan should be this: get Near to L-2, L-1 if necessary, because he needs the kick up the jacksy to do anything, hear his claim, and make a call.

I will agree with that.

Vote: Near

[Evilgorrilaz]

I will

Unvote

Guardian, haven't MOST people expressed interest in lynching either near or JtP? With his post 227, all I see is that he attacks lurkers (including me). I get the feeling that his attack on you is actually sort of buddying up to you, while trying to distance himself at the same time. Also, I am not getting the scummy vibe from post 234 that you are mentioning.

[Evilgorrilaz]

(more duckscum votes plz)

Not sold on Dasquian=scum
To me it seems like you are pulling what you pulled on JtP

[Evilgorrilaz]

In addition, scum are more likely to jump in with a townie in such an obvious way than their scum partners(wifom of course but this is just my experience), both to gain their trust, and maybe incriminate them. This is why I pointed out that Guardians sheeping made me kind of suspicious.

Huh?
I don't quite get this. Could you clarify this a bit?

[Evilgorrilaz]

Not much time on my hand right now, will post something tomorrow

[Evilgorrilaz]

I still think a JtP lynch would be better than a Near lynch.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Also, like others have said, your vote on Near for "self-preservation" doesn't inspire confidence.

Huh?
Seems like someone just wanted to joke post, I don't see anything wrong with it.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Curious response considering you recently expressed desire to lynch the player she replaced. Or is that no good anymore now that he's been replaced by someone actually posting? Interested in actually answering any of the questions I've been asking you, or just posting more useless one liners?

I try not to lynch someone who just replaced into a game, nor do I feel like posting huge blobs of text. Yes, I have expressed interest in lynching her predecessor, but to judge a player based upon who they replaced is a bit unfair.
Oh and for your questions:
1. Not anymore, JtP was replaced.
2. I post when I get to it.

Joke posts don't usually put people at L-2.

I kinda took it as one because of the smiley, but w/e.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Uhh, isn't SL voting for Macavenger and not near?

/* No, He's not. That was obviously a broken quote tag from near.
* -- Claus
*/

[Evilgorrilaz]

actually nvm, that was sl quoting near

[Evilgorrilaz]

Whats the difference between a sk tell and a regular mafia tell?

[Evilgorrilaz]

Willing to hammer Near if he doesn't post in like 24 hours.

[Evilgorrilaz]

Bah.
Go town!

[Evilgorrilaz]

GG

I died so long ago I forgot who I even suspected -.-