Mini320: Urban Legends Mafia is over!

Drummer · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:20 am

When all the MithBusters show up for the day's meeting, they realize that stikey is no where to be found. They drive to the outskirts of New York(I mean, really, really out there) to the farmlands. They arrive on stikey's farm, but he has seemingly vanished. The only remaining sign is the huge cropcircle that has appeared in his corn field. Your good friend stikey has been abducted by aliens, along with some of his cows.

stikey--Farmer(pro-town) is dead.

It's Day 2! Up and at 'em, survivors!

VisMaior · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:23 am

Hm. Farmer(pro-town)? What might that be?

Anyways, any guilty copresults?

broomhead · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:45 am

yes, or innocents, don't tell us what they are, just that they're innocent.

VisMaior · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:46 am

eh? want to paint a target over someones head, broomhead?

stikey · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:48 am

They better not have taken Bessie! I loved that cow. (Oh, how I loved her. All night long. In the biblical sense. Sex with a cow.)

Der Hammer · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:57 am

Vote:Help Im A Bug

I get the ball rolling for today.

Sentinel99 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 2:58 am

Why, stikey, why???

Interesting developments... why would the mafia kill the one player who everyone suspected the day before? *shrug* I'm of the opinion that BrizzyBoi needs to post soon.

VisMaior · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 5:57 am

Stickey, you are a disturbing entity.

bluesoul · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 6:38 am

Meh, yesterday spoiled me. I don't really have a read on anyone yet. The reread only took like 10 seconds, too.

BrizzyBoi · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 8:31 am

Last night I investigated helpimabug on the theory that ziliu voted for him on day one possibly to throw off suspicion if one of them got caught.

Helpimabug is protown.

BrizzyBoi · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 8:42 am

After seeing who the night kill was (I am not overly surprised maybe the scum thought he was congratulating the doc so no-one would think he was the doc) I am starting to suspect Sentinel 99

Sentinel99 wrote:Why, stikey, why???

Interesting developments... why would the mafia kill the one player who everyone suspected the day before? *shrug* I'm of the opinion that BrizzyBoi needs to post soon.

I don't think everyone suspected stikey, and generalisations are bad. Especially since yesterday you were defending stikey and christ give me some time, the thread had only been open for 40 minutes when you thought I really needed to post soon. Australia is a way different time zone and I was asleep.

Anyway

Vote: Sentinel99

Yosarian2 · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 9:21 am

Der Hammer wrote:
Vote:Help Im A Bug

I get the ball rolling for today.

vote:Der Hammer

for voting for a good guy and not giving any reason behind his vote other then he wanted to "get the ball rolling".

help im a bug · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 9:26 am

vote: audacesiuvat

I have a role-based hunch.

VisMaior · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 9:31 am

This hunch business is getting out of hand :/

audacesiuvat · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 9:37 am

help im a bug wrote:
vote: audacesiuvat

I have a role-based hunch.

Anything more specific? Anything I can refute, maybe?

Osloboditelj · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 11:07 am

As I said before our quick lynch yesterday, we now have a lack of information to go on. Brizzy's point against Sentinel seems like our best lead yet, but it's not much. Let's see what conversation we can create. Oh, and I'm of the opinion that revealing innocent results without suspicion already being put on the investigatee is suboptimal, since it denies voting-pattern information. Oh well.

broomhead · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 12:34 pm

VisMaior wrote:eh? want to paint a target over someones head, broomhead?

why? the way i see it, the mafia already know whose protown and whose not. that information can only help the town.

Osloboditelj wrote: Oh, and I'm of the opinion that revealing innocent results without suspicion already being put on the investigate is suboptimal, since it denies voting-pattern information. Oh well.

i don't get your voting pattern reference, but what if the doc were to think that the mafia wouldn't hit the cop, then the mafia

did

hit the cop. then we'd be down one investigation. the way i see it, the more innocents we get the better. then we can just kill off the non-proven people and win the game.

to try and withhold innocent results in my mind is just plain scummy. there is no reason to not say something. the mafia have no more information then they already have. there will only be a slightly greater chance that they will kill the confirmed innocent just to get rid of another confirmed. but then that would make the cop a cop/one night delay vig. even better.

VisMaior · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 12:41 pm

why? the way i see it, the mafia already know whose protown and whose not. that information can only help the town.

Its called confirmed innocent. Bad thing if you are scum.

the way i see it, the more innocents we get the better. then we can just kill off the non-proven people and win the game

This is exactly why.

there will only be a slightly greater chance that they will kill the confirmed innocent

No, since the doc will protect the cop, they kill off the confirmed innocent. If they kill someone else, that would be worse for them, because we would increase the confirmed innocents number.

VisMaior · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 12:42 pm

You are no newbie, you should know that.

vote Broomhead

bluesoul · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 1:03 pm

Vote Sentinel99, FoS HIAB, IGMEOY audacesiuvat

Brizzyboi makes some good points, a generalization on that level seems like he's really just trying to blend in. HIAB, explain this hunch some. Even though the cop found you innocent you may very well be GF pushing for the quick lynch. That said, I'd like to know what makes you suspicious of audacesiuvat.

Sentinel99 · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 3:38 pm

It's cool, town, vote me. I'm no scum, but I am expendable. I'd much prefer you lynch me then somebody we need. Personally, however, I'm with Yosarian.

vote: Der Hammer

Also, IGMEOY bluesoul. I love that the cop called HIAB innocent, and you still gave him the finger.

bluesoul · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 4:01 pm

I just want him to elaborate on this hunch of his. I'm not saying "OMFG GF," but he should explain. Sharing info is good. Witholding info is bad. We're already ahead one scumbag so the more info we have to work with early the better our chances are of ending teh game quickly.

Sentinel99 · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 4:17 pm

Okay, in the interest of sharing information, would anybody like to know what stikey's role meant? Because I know. I don't know if anybody else does, but I can explain it. All anyone has to do is ask. That will also explain why I defended him. Oh, and I'm sorry, Brizzy.

I didn't realize the time difference. I was getting excited earlier.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 4:22 pm

Sentinel99 wrote:It's cool, town, vote me. I'm no scum, but I am expendable.

(shakes head)

Why do people say stuff like that?

I didn't really think the argumetn against you was that strong, but why would you suddenly claim to have a weak role and call yourself "expendable" like that? It's just not good for the town when people do that.

Sentinel99 · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Mon May 08, 2006 4:24 pm

I didn't really think the argumetn against you was that strong, but why would you suddenly claim to have a weak role and call yourself "expendable" like that?

I really do have a weak role, and I really am expendable.