Dynamite Stick Mafia! GAME OVER

Surye · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:06 am

@LML: I struck a light, as it seemed like a good stratagy for everyone to be equal in risk, and given day one everyone was striking like mad, I assumed there was the state we would be safe in, as it would be sort of like a cold war. However, after I woke up (I posted that at 2am), I had thought about it some more, and read some opinions on it, and realized it's like a cold war, but with some possibly not so civil and reasonable players, and that I was incorrect with my first assesment.

That said, I'm willing to possibly use my dynamite when we come to a decision so that town does not need to risk any more people, as I doubt scum will attack me, they would lose a 1 for 2 game far too quickly. If anyone else wants to strike a light, I'm not trying to say not too, just that since I did, and cannot undo it, I'll try to put it to good use later.

Marmalade · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:16 am

Surye wrote:@LML: I struck a light, as it seemed like a good stratagy for everyone to be equal in risk, and given day one everyone was striking like mad, I assumed there was the state we would be safe in, as it would be sort of like a cold war.

Conform much?

Surye wrote:That said, I'm willing to possibly use my dynamite when we come to a decision so that town does not need to risk any more people, as I doubt scum will attack me, they would lose a 1 for 2 game far too quickly. If anyone else wants to strike a light, I'm not trying to say not too, just that since I did, and cannot undo it, I'll try to put it to good use later.

This feels slightly off to me -- almost like an appeal to look more like a townie. This type of argument, however, is notoriously problematic, as GreasySpot's dynamite explosion of blazerunner demonstrates. It just is a bit of a gut suspicion that I have.

Flameaxe · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:59 am

Check in.

Nightson · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:23 pm

Surye = scum imo

Adel · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:10 pm

players who are alit = more likely than average to be scum imo

I wouldn't mind seeing ooba off PEG or Surye...

I have half of a mind to immolate myself and Surye pronto.

~~~

Assuming I am alive tomorrow,

I will kill myself and the first person to strike a light without town consensus.

After carfeul consideration, I think that is the only way to stop this reckless anti-town behavior. Sometimes it is best to fight fire with fire.

~~~

DGB's death makes me much more suspicious of newer players than normal.

Adel · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:11 pm

btw, I ffully endorse the idea of voting and having the #1 votee off the #2 votee or via versa.... it is the best path to a town win.

Flameaxe · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:13 pm

Adel wrote:btw, I ffully endorse the idea of voting and having the #1 votee off the #2 votee or via versa.... it is the best path to a town win.

Surye · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:27 pm

Adel wrote:players who are alit = more likely than average to be scum imo

Because we lit at the begining of the day, before we started discussing best strategy for lighting? Because if so, between day 1 and day 2, here's our list of suspects by the current line of reasoning:

Claus
Nightson x 2 (Both Day 1 and Day 2)
Erg0
Flameaxe
UltimaAvalon
elvis_knits
Marmalade
ooba
pickemgenius
Surye

I'm not sure why I am the scummiest on that list, when I realized that maybe I shouldn't have lit after some discussion, and tried to offer my lit as useful to the town. If anything, by your logic, Nightson should be the most suspicious. Not to mention him calling me out with no explanation what so ever, most likely because LML mentioned me.

Adel · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:33 pm

@Marmalade: are you an alt? how long have you been reading games here?
When did you read Bad Idea II?

ooba · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:15 pm

Cogito Ergo Scum wrote:Ooba, as soon as your 24 hours have passed, feel free to dynamite the hell outa Quag.

Quag, if you have anything to say in the meantime, I suggest you hurry up.

Which part of more discussion helps the town don't you get? Or was this supposed to be some joke ?

Nightson · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:49 pm

Adel wrote:players who are alit = more likely than average to be scum imo

I don't concur, while it might be anti-town as a whole for an individual scum to do it is not the best strategy, too much chance of randomly getting wiped out. Only scum purpose would be to blend in to be considered protown.

Adel · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:54 pm

Nightson wrote: Only scum purpose would be to blend in to be considered protown.

exactly. keeping that in mind reread ooba and Surye's posts.

if your bullshit detector doesn't go offf you may need to get it serviced.

Nightson · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:18 pm

Adel wrote:
Nightson wrote: Only scum purpose would be to blend in to be considered protown.
exactly. keeping that in mind reread ooba and Surye's posts.

if your bullshit detector doesn't go offf you may need to get it serviced.

Surye killing ooba works for me.

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:33 pm

@ooba - would you dynamite surye?
@surye - would you dynamite ooba?

I'm not asking you to... I'm asking.. would you?

ooba · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:37 pm

LoudmouthLee wrote:@ooba - would you dynamite surye?

I think its too early .. Later maybe if that's the consensus we reach .. However i'd rather not dynamite anyone seeing as i'm town ..

Adel · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:44 pm

ooba wrote: i'd rather not dynamite anyone seeing as i'm town ..

vote: ooba

pickemgenius · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:46 pm

Marmalade wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
STRIKE A LIGHT

Hello also.
Why?

why not?

it's now or later. and if i do it now i can act later instead of having to do this and waste time....

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:50 pm

Vote: ooba

to be killed.

Someone, anyone, talk me out of dynamiting him this second.

ooba · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:52 pm

Adel wrote:
ooba wrote: i'd rather not dynamite anyone seeing as i'm town ..

vote: ooba

Why? I'd rather not be chosen to kill someone as I know its a wasted cardflip. However if the town decides i should be the one dynamiting or blown up, I'd do it.

Nightson · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:53 pm

LoudmouthLee wrote: Someone, anyone, talk me out of dynamiting him this second.

Better to have surye do it.

Adel · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:54 pm

LoudmouthLee wrote:Someone, anyone, talk me out of dynamiting him this second.

no.

pickemgenius · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:55 pm

ooba wrote:
Adel wrote:
ooba wrote: i'd rather not dynamite anyone seeing as i'm town ..

vote: ooba
Why? I'd rather not be chosen to kill someone as I know its a wasted cardflip. However if the town decides i should be the one dynamiting or blown up, I'd do it.

you'd blow yourself up???

ooba · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:57 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
ooba wrote:
Adel wrote:
ooba wrote: i'd rather not dynamite anyone seeing as i'm town ..

vote: ooba
Why? I'd rather not be chosen to kill someone as I know its a wasted cardflip. However if the town decides i should be the one dynamiting or blown up, I'd do it.
you'd blow yourself up???

Umm no. I'd follow the consenses and blow up the other person the town deems scummy.

If you're going to have me blown up , fine - at least let the others chime in before you do that - more information that way ..

Adel · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:59 pm

I suspect that LML may be bluffing.

I now endorse ooba blowing up LML or surye

Quagmire · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:01 pm

Adel wrote:I suspect that LML may be bluffing.

I now endorse ooba blowing up LML or surye

I endorse the above post 100%.