Vi wrote:21.) You may make a string of consecutive posts if you like (i.e. EBWOPs); the successive posts will not count toward your post cap unless the total words in all of that consecutive string of posts exceeds 450. For instance, if over four consecutive posts you use 451 words, I will count that as two posts.If you post twice for 300 words, then someone else posts, and then you post twice again for 151 words, you will have used three posts.
-----------
I'm in favor of mass post # claims. The arguments against are that scum can lie. Um...it's easier for scum to lie later in the game with more information. So...voila. It's not like this hurts the town in any way shape or form. And I firmly believe it will help us. So, chalk me down as in favor of said claimage. Preview Edit: Sens makes a solid point, but if the scum are seriously going to make kills based on post counts alone, then don't we just win? Minor point against at best.
Mmm...One issue here Vice President Baltar. How can you trust your gut on Cobalt when your original vote was first post and a seemingly random vote. Pre-game gut???VP Baltar wrote:No one is going to run out on day 1 cobalt. You're eagerness to hear numbers is scummy. I knew i should have trusted my gut.Unvote, Revote:Cobalt
Is wagoning a bad thing? How should we feel about you putting the bajilionth vote on VP Baltar if you don't like wagoning?a cold starry night wrote:Vote: VP Baltarfor reasons Locke Lamora stated.Also wagoning.
-----
Mixed reads on Baltar for me so far. His play is ringing a bit fake, maybe too overeager, I really don't like the bit I pointed out above, but I also am not a big fan of the quick wagon that sprung up and some of the reasons for being on board. KMD, you've used the same number of posts as Baltar, and certainly his have been more informative than yours, no? Bad wagon vote?
I'm going to claim right now that my role PM informs me that there are 3 players in this game with fake claims. Based on my win-con being winning when the