Mini 891 - British Comedy Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
ok.
1. The first statement was actually directed at fuzzy showing the flaw in his post. However I do agree with your expanded view on this.
2. This is what I thought you were trying to say and it strikes me as odd. Voting no-lynch is a mildly scummy action and would be a bit more likely to generate conversation that a random vote, not less likely.
This implies that the RVS is bad in itself. (Which is wrong IMO)Josh wrote:Once someone votes (especially such a weird vote in RVS or a NL), this may tend to stifle discussion.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
@Snow, I like early wagons. What the big problem with it?
@Josh, why vote me?
I like Macavity's post 43.
Fuzzy is looking better now.
---
Additionally (to the rest of the case), Josh calls for prods (a little scummy, diverting attention).
---
QFTImaginality wrote: Josh isn't handling the minor pressure on him very well so far. I think more votes on Josh is a good idea.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
I've said this before and I say it again: "early wagons are good".
Fuzzy's no lynch vote was an attempt (albeit weakly done) to leave the RVS. It looked obv. intentional and as such wasn't really a tell at all. This is the context Macavity is talking about (assumption, correct me if I am wrong).
Also:
My vote on Locke was obv. random.
My vote into Fuzzy's wagon was weak, but not random.
My vote into the wagon on Josh was not random at all.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
"a bit better than random" = "was weak, but not random".Snow wrote:His contradiction on his stance regarding Fuzzy's vote ("a bit better than random" and "was weak, but not random")
Further clarification: better than random means not random but not strong either.
My "opportunism" is misjudged, and since when is asking questions scummy?
(I know I said I wouldn't but I can't help myself).
Lets not narrow down our options here.China wrote:B: really weigh who is the scummier.
Eh, true I guess.imaginality wrote:Budja's 83 misses BloodCovenant's point as I see it, which is not that all the votes on Josh are opportunistic, just that (BC thinks) Budja's one in particular is. It's not hypocritical for BC to think that Josh is scum and Budja might be bussing him, and to vote Josh.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
I'd like Lyman to elaborate on his claim. (Run it by the mod first if you are unsure)
@Net,
Josh: Scummy <- initial uncertainty, AtE, call for prods.
Locke: "meta" scum read. (dexter mafia)
Net: "meta" town read. (ongoing unfortunately)
Snow Bunny: Mildly Town
Macavity: Town, agree with pretty much all he says
Snow_Bunny: null - mildly town. I obv. disagree with her reasoning but if Josh town -> Snow likely town IMO.
jasonT1981: no read
ConfidAnon: no read
Chinaman: uncertain, leaning newb-town. Still a bit of a opportunistic feel.
Fuzzyman: town
imaginality: leaning town
BloodCovenent: null
So yeah, a lot of town reads but that doesn't really concern me. It narrows down my search.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
Your twice on my list due to bad editing . Just read the expanded one.
I don't particular want to expand further, I'd prefer to keep my views succinct. If theres anything in particular which bothers you, ask me.
What really matters IMO is who I think is scum. Josh's claim is vague and does nothing to change my mind. I await his further explanation.
@China, Josh is a pretty easy wagon to join, the fact Snow is instead pushing my, not so easy, wagon makes her more likely town. A bit WIFOMic I know, but my "gut" town read leans this way rather than the other.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
Eh, I'm believing it. Net is right, it is odd for a fakeclaim.
I assumed their would be an alignment flip but it is better to ask.
I like this ^.imaginality wrote: If we use it we should probably use it on someone who's (a) smart, (b) under suspicion, (c) doesn't claim a power role. If it's a day power that would be better, easier to direct.
BC's accusation is a bit hard to swallow .-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
@imaginality,
I played with Locke in Dexter Mafia and he had a very similar playstyle, generally only asking questions passively and lurking a lot.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
...and this "treestump" debate has gone on for far too long.
This sums up what will in all certainty happen to a stumped player.Imag wrote: The way I read it is that the targeted player is just as dead as if they'd been night-killed, except they can post. (Imagine a ruleset applying to that player alone which says, "After you die you can make unlimited 'bah' posts and these can contain content.")-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
Damn that took you a long while to respond to BC .
I'll have to reread to answer your earlier questions.
Your quoted question was quite useless. I am not waited for someone else to vote before I strike. I just happen to agree with the original voter. I'll admit I haven't been great with making my own leads here.
I don't have much of a case on you but your the scummiest of those who don't fit into my list of townie's.
---
I will try to read up/post on the last few pages soon (within a day).-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
I am Rowan Atkinson, with no powers. (i.e a VT).
I have little to add. I have been lax with this game (and lax with mafia in general lately).
I think Macavity and Net are obv. town.
Locke, BC, dana are good scum picks.
BC is inconsistant (take his view on me for one), reaction to Josh's claim (not the only one guilty of this but the only one I actually felt was scummy (China's looks more tunnelvisioned)) and quite frankly is the only one active who really gives me "scum vibes".-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
The Mason claim was horribly timed.
@China,
1. Are you and your partner confirmed town to each other? (v. important to know now)
2 Why claim?
Touchy ground here, but I suspect China misunderstood some role PM wording.
I have nothing but my vote and I am VT.
@Net, I don't see it. China's action was bad but I don't see any fishing. Your reaction claim was anti-town.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
re. BC.
you went to null in my post 11 after Imag. brought up a point.
---
I voted BC for his initial attack on Lyman after the claim (yes, it was after Net).
BC votes me back (implied its for opportunism).
BC says "not much on me".
Joins it with the pointless Josh WIFOM (not scummy but useless)
Attacks me again for points looked at a long, long time ago andafterhe says there is "not much on me".
So useless posting [/hypocrite] and his pushes on Josh and myself seem to follow the general trend rather than his opinion (see above).
(...and a giant bucket-load of gut. Quite frankly he is the only one who is really active and scummy. I don't have a case beyond gut and meta on Locke, but I think he is lurker-scum.)-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
I can see the point of the claim to save from a stumping but the whole vanilla thing is mod WIFOM. Doc, Cop are never guaranteed.
Basically...Net wrote:....You're a loony.
Net is not scum either. Scum would have hammered me and not attacked the mason.
@Imag, ML, if you really don't think I'm scum, help me lynch BC.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
China, not all mini-themes do. This theme may just be a normal game with flavour for all we know. It may have lots of PR's, it may have few PR's. We just don't know.
Nope, your claim (and mine and Net's) have only narrowed their field.China wrote:My claim also reduces that chances of them hitting a Doc or Cop
If I were scum, there is no way I would have claimed VT. [/WIFOM]
As far as I can tell, I was about to be lynched and no-one was posting otherwise. I expected to be hammered. It was not early, if not for your claim I'd probably be dead and I doubt anyone would say it was an early hammer.
@Macavity, then why no vote. Its all very nice of you not to think I'm scum and all but it would really be nice to have a bit of counter-wagonning rather than cruise to a deadline lynch.-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia