Oh yes! That's right!
Let's just get back to where we left off :')
Mafuyu wrote:Unvote Vote LLD
Mafuyu is interested.
Mafuyu wrote:Icebreaker.
Antihero wrote:Antitown? My name's Antihero.
How does it follow from your reasoning that LLD is more likely to be scum?
Parama wrote:I'm going to take a page from Ellibereth's book here.
Town:
Mafuyu
Antihero
Null:
Me=Weird
Espeonage
Scum:
LLD
smargaret
Can't translate atm:
chesskid3
Haven't Posted:
Everyone else
Call me when we stop discussing post restrictions, please.
smargaret wrote:Chesskid, if you find his reaction excessive, why are you still holding onto your RVS vote?
Antihero wrote:Oh, and chesskid was talking about me. The world doesn't revolve around you, you know. :pLady Lambdadelta wrote:smargaret wrote:Chesskid, if you find his reaction excessive, why are you still holding onto your RVS vote?
*her
smargaret wrote:Rereading, chesskid, why are you playing the newb card on LLD's behalf (if I'm interpreting you right)? I was under the impression she was an alt account and not a new player.
Mafuyu wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06s-exrK ... re=related
Warning: This is animu. You've now been warned.
Espeonage wrote:Aside: Mafuyu. What are your avvies of because they are cool.
Now to content. UNVOTE: chesskid[/vote] I think that went well but it has run it's course.
VOTE: LLD
Me=Weird wrote:LL's in this game?
Well, she's overreacted to a random vote, when a semi-random bandwagon pops up on her, she says she doesn't understand the point of RVS, despite seeming to know perfectly well a couple of her posts ago. Looks like she's just trying to remove the bandwagon on her.
And I would think it's obvious that there's no ulterior purpose of rvs, judging from the "random" part of it.
Why would you be afraid to ask for reasoning? Reads to me like scum trying to discredit her attacker, especially with the "Or is it just a list you threw together half assed, to make it look like you were contributing?".
A bunch of fluff(though if you're not an alt, why does your signature say "the one formerly known as 24mole"?
In general, LL hasYeah, this is better than a random vote.
- Overreacted.
- Insulted RVS when a wagon pops up on her.
- Insulting one of her attackers.
- Active lurked.
Vote: Lady Lamdadelta
Parama wrote:Town:
The Stove
Mafuyu
Espeonage
Twomz
Antihero
Null:
Me=Weird
Tasky
Reckamonic
Nero Cain
Nobody Special
chesskid3
smargaret
Scum:
sakshijain
Baby Spice
LLD
Haven't Posted:
Everyone else
EVERYONE ON THIS LIST:
bhavitgoyal
Blooderection
Framm 18
manho
Nero Cain
Nobody Special
Reckamonic
smargaret
Tasky
Please post more so I can read you. Some of these people have yet to post, the rest need to up the content level.
Also google translator is hilariousSide note: EM sucks now, LLD. I played for a while earlier this year, but... every single player there is just godawful now. Sigh.In essence, foam / scum entire city can be found by how they act - are usually more defensive because they know that the city is the city while the city is sending out probes everywhere to hear people. Overreact to these probes and also for events that occur are a particular favorite of mine.
Antihero wrote:Baby Spice wrote:The Stove wrote:Orly.Baby Spice wrote:I don't know about that since it got a reaction.
And what have you learned from the "reaction"?
That you and Parama are both scum.
unvoteMindread: Baby Spice
Antihero wrote:
Mafuyu: RVS vote and kept it on, I haven't seen a reason yet; I have seen a bunch of active lurking, though. IGMEOY
What does IGMEOY mean? :S Also, I'm not entirely convinced of Mafuyu's active lurking. I'm just thinking she probably left her vote on me, once some valid points were raised.
Parama: While the initial scumread isn't backed up, Parama does give implicit reasons for the LLD vote. I'm getting townvibes from him so far, so I think this is a good vote.
I gave a rather weak, but true, explanation for the points he raised. I can't blame him for calling me on them, TBQH. If I do somehow live through this, he would be someone I think is almost obvtown. Not quite, but very close.
Me=Weird: The vote is backed up with solid reasons. I'm thinking Me=Weird is town too.
The reasons he stated are basically cut and pasted from Parama. Not that there's anything WRONG with that... it just sort of comes out as a wash for me. Not a BAD vote, but certainly not... original.
Antihero: I supported my vote with legit reasons.
Eh. See Me=Weird.
Twomz: Not sure what to make of this one. The vote isn't backed up, but that doesn't stick out in his ISO...
Case #1 of Bandwagon riders who I suspect. No evidence provided. If you ask, I'm sure he'll recycle the points Parama/Me=Weird/Antihero made.
Reckamonic: The buddying with parama is sending up a few red flags for me. This wagon hop is scummy.
I don't have enough info for a read on this hydra ATM.
Nobody Special: Criticizes the first few pages of discussion, and then actively lurks, throwing an unexplained LLD vote in there. This wagon hop is scummy as well.
Case #2 of Bandwagon riders who I suspect. See Twomz.
chesskid3: I don't see a good reason with your vote. In fact, I think we left our first few pages argument at "I wasn't saying LLD was more likely to be scum, I was just helping her out." IGMEOY too.
Chesskid's stance was originally a wash on me. He states "I don't want to lynch LLD". He then flips his entire stance, in a matter of 2-3 pages. Very interesting. Case #3.
Blooderection: Misrepresentation of Espeonage + the awkward wagon hop = scummy; to me, this looks like scum eager to get to a lynch, which gives me some qualms with an LLD lynch...
This is something I don't get. At all. The vote he placed was so... confusing. I'd like to hear more from on him on why he switched his vote so suddenly.
Antihero wrote:.
@Lady Lamdadelta: IGMEOY = I've got my eye on you
Now, how about people not on your wagon? Whether or not you're town, I'm thinking the entire scumteam wouldn't want to be caught on your wagon. Anyone else stick out to you?
Baby Spice wrote:Bhavit was just replaced in a newbie game for not picking up a prod.
Don't know what to think about LLD, but I really don't like the wagon. Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
Nero Cain wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mwen rayi ou, moun ki touye m '
Blooderection wrote:Lol, so three out of nine players is ridden by scum. niceAntihero wrote:lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.
And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?
Baby Spice wrote:Parama wrote:>9 pagesBaby Spice wrote:Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
>Not enough to go on
Nice quote out of context there Parama. In your case though there's plenty to go on.
VOTE: Parama
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:OH SHIT.
My vote is still on Framm. LOL
Unvote
Baby Spice wrote:
Parama's first 11 posts. I'm aparently scum for 'opertunistic bandwagoning' Anything else from him is pretty much a response to me calling him scum.
It's what you were doing. You never provided a legit reason for your vote. It would be different if you had.
The Stove. "one of the worst votes I've seen on MS" The worst, and most scum, reason for voting someone. That's the entire reason btw, no explanation or anything. Nothing much after that for a while except some attempt to poo poo my responses. "Orly."
The vote was rather weak... not enough info to claim you are scum, but compiled with everything else... it's worth noting.
Oh, as for Antihero. "@NC: Could you please specifically point out the chesskid hypocrisy? Also, what do you think about Baby Spice and Tasky's first posts?"
N C, known scum, specifically quotes Anti-hero, who then directs a specific question at NC, who then answers it back, again with Antihero quoted. That is enough linkage in N C's two posts to make me seriously look at Antihero. His responses/interactions/budying to Parama, who you must note is pointedly not voting me, is enough to reinforce that back linkage. (25% of Anti's posts reference Parama in some way, from a RVS type vote for him to calling him obv town in a wagon analysis.)
Meaningless conjecture. The conclusion you are drawing here is that because Anti-hero was asked a question by a confirmed scum and happens to have similar point of view and someone else you have OMGUS'd, that makes him scum? I think not. Also, this is an example of you avoiding the OMGUS on Parama, and shifting your target elsewhere.
N C scum would make me suspect Antihero as scum. Parama scum would make me suspect Antihero as scum. hence, Antihero is scum.
See above. Stupid statement.
quote from The Stove. "Tasky and Baby Spice are scummy". (8 posts before N C was vigged you must note) Hmm, this is an echo of Antihero's question to NC, you know our only flipped scum. Why would we have two people actively suypporting/seeking the opinion of our only scum flip.
It's become quite clear to me that N C, Antihero, Parama, and The Stove are all working from the same plan, supporting each other, and that there can only be one reason for that.
If you can prove the connection, great. I see no proof yet. I still only see conjecture. Please provide more solid evidence than "they all target the same people as scum".
Scum, scum, scum, scum.
Espeonage is also on my list, though with nowhere near the certainty as the other three.
Shifting the target away from yourself, or attempting too... where's the evidence? Proof?
First 13 or so posts, 3 blatant bandwagon votes for no reason at all including comments on each change of vote about the wagon running it's course, and what I suspect is absolutely no content. iso #11 "I will make a post with content when there is something new happening."
I don't see this from Espenonage. I get a null read from him. His posts are dripping with content and evidence, but he has made some good points.
Now I might just go so what normally, but these 14 or so posts are exactly what Parama, The Stove, and N C are accusing me of, so I have to wonder why target me and not Espeonage. Especially Parama and The Stove.
POLICY LYNCH NOW PLEASE. I have a personal scum tell off anyone who asks "why me?" Why me is super scummy. Also, shifting the target from yourself and onto Espeonage. Majorly scummy.
[/color]
manho wrote: LLD is town for the reaction to the his own lynch.
Baby Spice wrote:WTF Manho. 4 posts in a 15 page game, and not a single bloody piece pf anything, culminated by voting as you go vla.
Parama wrote:*accidental fast hammerLady Lambdadelta wrote:That reminds me.
Vote: Tasky
Nice fast hammer you got der.
Parama wrote:I thought the mod said that he had missed an earlier vote. Unless I'm misreading something? .-.
Blooderection wrote:Yo... so why am i still the best lynch for today?
Yo... might I add that if we had lynched the claimed VT.... WE WOULDN'T HAVE LYNCHED THE COP!
slightly hypocritical of me to say, but still... the town sucks here -.-
Vote: Tasky
-gives off major scum vibes to me.
The case: OMGUS, and and just calling BS scummy without really saying why. This is a very weak vote, almost entirely based on OMGUS. It looks a bit to me like scum trying to get a bandwagon going. Conclusion:Right now I like Baby Spice as Scum more than BloodErection.
For the simple fact that BloodErection's vote swap MAY have been based upon some deluded town logic... where as Baby Spice is just scumming it up in every way. Cop out post to avoid being linked to any wagon + an OMGUS vote on Parama = Scummy
Vote: Baby Spice
lolwut?Tasky wrote: there is no such thing as OMGUS.
Tasky wrote:Maybe, if my theory gets confirmed, I can even explain it tomorrow. I am not promising that, though.