The delegate from Chile requests to be added to the speakers' list.
Noting an absense of other names on the list and in anticipation of recognition from the chair, and for the purposes of peeding up the discussion, the delegate from Chile will begin speaking immediately.
I do not see a problem with line 4 and feel it should remain. I strongly feel that there is every possibility of their being corrupt nations having a veto vote and these nations should be dealt with first as they have more power than other nations without the power of veto.
One problem I have is with line 3.
Is it not possible for the results of the investigation to be announced to everyone? If so then surely it would be better if all the nations know who is innocent in case they are nuked at the end of the meeting. If we feel they will be in danger of being attaked at night, then surely the following would be better suited:
3. Requires that inspection report be kept by the chair and only revealed publicly if the nation discovered was guilty or if the nation is under threat to being nuked by agreement from the member nations.
Perhaps someone could point out something I may be missing in a POI.
[size=75][color=darkblue]I'm never wrong... well I was wrong once but that was when I thought I'd made a mistake but hadn't.[/color][/size]