As soon as I received my role PM (which is
How DARE you steal my pocket-buddy? I literally signed up for this game because Comet asked me to (and so I can pocket her).
VOTE: Black
How DARE you steal my pocket-buddy? I literally signed up for this game because Comet asked me to (and so I can pocket her).
saaaameIn post 28, Black wrote: I miss the newbie queue
First of all, wtf Python? You have no business having the same thoughts as me. It's illegal!In post 67, usesPython wrote: VIP's probably town but I disagree with pretty much all of their reads
Second of all, I am gonna unvote you because I am nice, but don't expect me to be pocketed by these outrageously logical arguments.In post 66, usesPython wrote:We first did that style of posting in Weird Dreams Redux as town tho, and it's what got us to be the single most townread player d1. We mimic'd that in Open 880 cause it works great for getting townread but I don't actually think it's alignment indicative by itself (since it's in our natural townrange and our scumrange is wide enough to be able to mimic it) unless it's part of a larger vibe analysis that tries to find the actually scum indicative part of our posting which is
In post 8, usesPython from Open 880 Notes PT (Not this game) wrote: Gonna let the thread stew before I start posting more, already feeling the nervous energy we get when we're scum
Sure, why knott?
That's not fair, you know I have a weakness for people townlocking me. Now IIn post 65, Gimli wrote: I didn't want to townlock DE but life is short
I totally get the mindset you are coming from. However in this site it is very common to look for any sort of social cue or tiny detail in people's posting (or lack thereof) in search for things thatIn post 51, Kittiesecret wrote:I dunno... picking on the newb without so much as a "hi" seeeeeems kinda scummy imoIn post 48, usesPython wrote: Gimli's pretty obvtown
VOTE: Gimli
It's just a combination of good communication skills, my natural charm, and being honest to a fault.In post 71, Gimli wrote: you're overtly towny, I don't know how you do it lol (lowkey hoping you're scum and the game is hard)
Okay if the Newbie Scum Queen herself is calling me town, I guess I must be town. Oh well, I'm just gonna throw myself in the townbin then.In post 76, Black wrote: I agree with Gimli. DE70 feels townie so far
NoooooooooooIn post 83, Cometbright wrote:Dragon it's page two lmao this is a pretty wild gambit to be doing this early. I mean I'm pretty sure I've seen you do stuff like this as town before so I'm not reading it scummy as I would have with anyone else, but I doubt Python is going to have a solid position on you this early. Feels strange to do a self-vote play when the cases are nowhere near confident yet.In post 33, DragonEater70 wrote: Well go ahead and vote me
In fact, I'll make you a deal. If you vote me in your next post, I'll join you and vote myself. How's that?
Wow, I completely missed somehow that you are a DnD GM. That's sick! And you keep becoming more and more awesome every time we play, this has to stop somewhere!In post 26, Cometbright wrote: she seems rather calm about being suddenly transported to the feywild... perhaps she's an Archfey Warlock?
Are you somehow insinuating that all 4 of us are scum? Or that scum would mutually townlock like this? In a NEWBIE??In post 112, Aneninen wrote:How horrible that town-locking will be if one of them is scum... (Even more horrible if both!)In post 70, DragonEater70 wrote:That's not fair, you know I have a weakness for people townlocking me. Now IIn post 65, Gimli wrote: I didn't want to townlock DE but life is shorthaveto townlock you back. How dare you!
In post 73, Black wrote: fwiw I decided to pocket Comet when I signed up to the game. This feels like a good thought progression thoughHow horrible that town-locking will be if one of them is scum... (Even more horrible if both!)
I know you are contractually obligated to say this, but unfortunately she's not.In post 133, Black wrote: Comet is town
I know the struggleIn post 119, Black wrote: I wanted to make a readslist like the cool kids but I don't have any scumreads yet so it looks weird
Comet
Gimli
Python
VIP
DE70
Timmer
Afrayed
Kittie
Oh I'm sure you did because I would also do it if it were allowed.In post 137, Cometbright wrote: I'm sorry Dragon, I petitioned the mod to put you in a team with me and everything.
Sounds cool as heck, I need you to tell me more about this outside the game.In post 137, Cometbright wrote: I am! I'm doing a big ol' homebrew cowboy western-style campaign right now but with magic and demons chucked in, it's a little stressful NGL but the players seem to be enjoying it
It isn't *nothing*, but the hedge on me just feels really forced, and I see no reason why Python and Pigeon should be higher than both me and Black on your readlist. Like if you gave a good reason to TR them it would be different but i don't feel you have. Also like saying "Black locktown confirmed" and then putting her number 3 in your reads is ???In post 138, Cometbright wrote: Tbf I haven't townlocked you but I have said you're not in my day 1 limpool, that's not *nothing*.
I actually tried and it sounds pretty cute.In post 128, Aneninen wrote: (Irrelevant fact: that "oooooor" sounds much better in my native language and when one of my daughters say that. Try to imagine it. Oh. Never mind.)
In post 142, Aneninen wrote: Dragon, 130 - Care to explain this for someone who doesn't know your/their meta?
Okay that makes a lot better sense. I think the scum in this 4 is Comet so you are welcome to look at her posts and judge for yourself.In post 142, Aneninen wrote: Dragon, 134 - I think you misunderstood me. I strongly think that lock-towning on Day1 is terrible. If someone manages to get into a lock-pair (or even worse, a block) as scum, we'll have hard times later. I'm not saying all these four players (Gimli, you, Comet, Black) are scum. But I strongly think at least one scum is there in these two pairs. Maybe two. Also, it's a possibility that a scum-pair lock-towns each other and when one of them flips scum, people will ignore the possibility that the other one's scum too, because it would be soooo stupid if scums buddied each other...
Her.In post 142, Aneninen wrote: her. (Him? Them?)
Sure:In post 145, Aneninen wrote: By the way, you think Comet's scum. Yet you replied to Black that you knew the struggle (of not finding scumreads). Can you explain this?
I get this, but I still think it's ???In post 144, Black wrote: I don't want to speak for Comet but I'm 99% sure that was a joke
I will happily accept this cookie!In post 50, fferyllt wrote: Everyone deserves a cookie because all 9 players confirmed well within 24 hours!
I think you should realize there's more nuance than "100% serious" or "mostly a joke" here. It's not black or white.In post 156, Aneninen wrote:Okay, that makes sense. Anyway, I can lend you some scumreads if you need some ^_^In post 146, DragonEater70 wrote: Sure:
I meant I know the struggle in general, not from this game specifically.
Though even right now as I type this I realize i only have one scumread, which is much too little.
Also, those lock-towns are mostly jokes then?
In post 158, DragonEater70 wrote: One last post before I sleep:
@Comet, does Kittie give you IcetFeelsPain vibes?
I vibe with this because I also had a similar thought that nobody is overtly scummy this game.In post 169, usesPython wrote: What if there was major mod error and everyone is town
hmpphh fine.In post 163, Cometbright wrote: Because I have actual reasons to townread Python and Pigeon outside of our amicable truce here. For Python I have been consistently agreeing with their posts and even the ones I don't agree with I think their logic is sound. Pigeon I townread because as mentioned I thought his big post was, although I didn't agree with bits of it, still a genuine effort at content and sparked some good discussion with multiple people.
This I don't understand because you should know that I do this as town and there's literally no reason to think it's scummy of me - I don't think I've ever done that as scum, ever.In post 164, Cometbright wrote: As for why I'm hedging you it's because like I said some of your plays here have been kinda questionable to me - I'm not inherently reading them as scum because I know you do this as town as well but it's weird enough for me to put you in the middle for now and see if you sort yourself further as the game goes on.
Can you please explain what don't you like about them?In post 173, TimmerRC wrote: Dragon #125, "What do you think about usesPython and Afrayed Knott? And what do you think about Comet?" I'm not loving Afrayed at all, and frankly let's just VOTE: Afrayed while I'm sitting on this vibe. I'll get back to you on the other two in a minute, I'm still getting used to reading a game that moves like this, keeping organized is an effing challenge, lol.
This is a weird read to me. Can you please explain it?In post 176, Kittiesecret wrote: From my post, Python and Gimli seem to have a little something going on. feels like more than "we have played together vibes."
I can see the Comet thing, can you point me to where VIP does that though?In post 176, Kittiesecret wrote: but also... comet seems to be overly helpful with all their reads... VIP also seems to be concerned with being read as town. both have lots to say with out saying much just lots of round and round about the same players.
Who is the scum into whose hands are you playing? I didn't fully understand this.In post 190, Afrayed Knott wrote: You seem very absorbed in this campaign, and its pretty repetitive. Of course the worst thing I could possibly do is defend Gimli, but I'm not, as I have no idea about him, other than in the last game I played with him, which is ongoing so I can't really go there at the moment. Then of course if I say anything to refute your comments you could turn that around and say, "see defensive". But its strange that only after 4 posts you feel I am being defensive. Maybe ask yourself why that might be, maybe it might be based on what I have said previously. Anyway, don't want to hang around trying to divert this attention away from me and towards others, as I can see what it is doing now. I am just playing into scums hands. and it doesn't help town at all. So that's where I am now.
This I strongly agree with.In post 193, Aneninen wrote: Also, I can't see Gimli trying to make us believe that he's town.
Huh? That's her first game.In post 193, Aneninen wrote: Can anyone tell me whether Kittie's playing in this way all the time?
Explain?In post 194, Aneninen wrote: Gimli, 177 - Wellshirt, you're not the only one without scumreads here
Yes, I did read a bit from your PT - that's where I took the term react YouTuber from, lol. But I don't really understand why is that important. Do you think it's alignment indicative for me to have missed something you said?In post 236, usesPython wrote: No wait you read our Notes PT that game you should have seen our comment on that
In post 2042, DragonEater70 in Open 880 wrote:Quoting these so that I will read them when I have timeIn post 180, DragonEater70 in Open 880 usesPython Notes PT wrote:I'm impressed by you having a table of contents for a notes PTIn post 1, usesPython wrote: Table of Contents
Because of contextIn post 241, Cometbright wrote: I know you do it as town, but why does that make a play I would normally attribute to scum/scum-aligned no longer scummy?
This is an awful comparison because fakeclaiming has clear scum motivation behind it, and while townIn post 241, Cometbright wrote: It's not a full one-on-one comparison but lets say someone has a habit of fake-claiming and they do this as town too - if it later came to light that they fakeclaimed in a game then you'd still be justified seeing it as scummy, no?
This is not how it workssssIn post 241, Cometbright wrote: Like, I have taken that you do it as town into account - that's why I left you in the middle of my readlist as opposed to lower down.
Yes but I just realized it's actually fine for you to scumread me off that because the game you heavily townread me from the start was the one newbie game where I didn't do that.In post 245, Cometbright wrote: I'm not sure I'm wrapping my head around what we're discussing Dragon. What's the point of contention? My post #83 where I said the thing you did was, from my opinion, scummy but not as much in your case because I know you do it as town?
Why is it hard? Knott is townie as heck.
lol that's actually unfortunate, but only 55.5% percent of us know each other, the other 44.4% are complete strangers.In post 212, Kittiesecret wrote: To add clarification to this, my partner plays else where with an experienced group. When I showed interest in wanting to play too, he directed me to this site because they have space for newbs to learn the ropes instead of jumping in cold to a game with a bunch of players who all know each other... which it seems I wasn't able to avoid.
Isn't that what you TR about me though?
EBWOPIn post 262, DragonEater70 wrote:lol that's actually unfortunate, but only 55% percent of us know each other, the other 44% are complete strangers.In post 212, Kittiesecret wrote: To add clarification to this, my partner plays else where with an experienced group. When I showed interest in wanting to play too, he directed me to this site because they have space for newbs to learn the ropes instead of jumping in cold to a game with a bunch of players who all know each other... which it seems I wasn't able to avoid.
(Hey Nameless [that's one of the people that compose Python], isn't my math both technically correct and extremely irritating at the same time?)
I saw the hammer, post a response, then saw you guys talking about gimli and responded to that.In post 320, Black wrote: Why would you stop at the hammer and then come to read this page and ask this?
Me too tbhIn post 284, usesPython wrote:kinda hate this post tbhIn post 279, Gimli wrote: okay I'll play along
It's not only you.In post 285, Aneninen wrote: Erm... it may be only me, but that literally doesn't add up.
You have 2 townreads. 7 players to parse through, clear 3 for the win. 2+7=9, so you have to parse through... yourself, too? 2 are clear, 3 to clear, so you have to clear yourself, too?
Idk if it's "a thing", I think all strategies can exist and it's pretty fluid. Sometimes people chainsaw, sometimes they half chainsaw, sometimes they bus and none of these are explicitly "a thing".In post 285, Aneninen wrote:Can I get an answer for this?Aneninen wrote:Is Chainsaw Defense still a thing?
First of all, her*.In post 285, Aneninen wrote: DragonEater, 251. There are two things I don't like. Firstly, you post a wall, with this:
> In post 251, DragonEater70 wrote:
> I feel so frustrated because I know town!Comet pretty well and I know Comet knows me pretty well so I just don't get how Comet could ever reach the first conclusion instead of the second one.
Yet you gave him a townread.
Then you ask him to vote for Kittie.
Welp, it's not? I just kinda saw that nobody wanted to vote kittie or timmer, and you were the other person in my limpool.In post 285, Aneninen wrote: Your vote on me looked clearly opportunistic, like "Hey, here's a wagon, let's fabricate some reasons quickly to move there".
Please use the correct pronouns for people, it's driving me insane.In post 286, Aneninen wrote: No, it's just Python trolling. He'd been voting for me before the "hammer".
Oh okay this is what you guys were talking about.In post 295, Black wrote: Gimli this confuses me. If you thought Python hammered then your unvote doesn't do anything. You seemed fine putting VIP at e-1 so why the sudden fear over a fake hammer test?
WhatIn post 298, Gimli wrote: I unvoted cause I thought for a second it was L-1 and not python trolling (don't wanna put anyone in L-1)
WHAT???In post 299, Aneninen wrote: So, technically it's scummy if I don't put a wall-quote in my post when the quote would be way too long in itself? What the actual fork! But then, I'm double-scummy since I did the same with your post, too...
Earlier you said you are scumreading too many people. You still are. And I'm one of the people you are scumreading who is town, FYI.In post 299, Aneninen wrote: See above, Dragon's vote was clearly opportunistic.
I agree that this sounds really weird regardless.In post 299, Aneninen wrote: > In post 277, Gimli wrote:
> UNVOTE: VIP
> what
I just don't get this.
This made no sense regardless of knowing or not knowing that Python had been trolling.
FairIn post 324, Black wrote: Ok that's fair. I would probably just read instead of asking that personally but I don't really think it's scummy. A little performative but not really alignment indicative
Yep
I'm down for Tim I guessIn post 336, usesPython wrote: Probably at least one of VIP/Tim/Knott
I'll tell you a secret once someone who isn't you or VIP votes me.In post 350, usesPython wrote:I'm not interested in a Black wagon tbhIn post 341, DragonEater70 wrote: Python you wanted to generate content by jumping on wagons, didn't you? Let's do this.
VOTE: black
NOTE: DO NOT HAMMER BLACK OR YOU WILL BE POLICY LIMMED
Playing different as scum than as town comes from several reasons:In post 343, Kittiesecret wrote: 1) what would be the purpose between having 2 types of game play for scum or town? If your a regular player would it not make more sense to have a consistent game play to keep everyone guessing?? Just a thought. Having 2 game play types would just tip people off when you are indeed scum. no??
In what universe does voting Black make sense?In post 355, Aneninen wrote: IN what universe that self-vote makes sense?
Why are you technically asking others but Python to vote for you so that you can tell them a secret?