open 894: near vanilla (game over)
-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
VOTE: Skygazer
Caught in a lie already, game solvedV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Do you have a reason for this vote, or a belief that the game is still in RVS?In post 50, Afrayed Knott wrote: Hello All, game looked way off staring mid week. But great it’s kicked off.
VOTE: DannflorV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
There's less than 3 pages to read through, but there's been some non-RVS like interactions. I was curious if you had read and decided to still RVS, or if you had seen something to make a legit vote against Dann.In post 56, Afrayed Knott wrote:
Still RVS for me, but I’m considering making Dannflor a policy vote each game we are in….In post 54, shaddowez wrote:
Do you have a reason for this vote, or a belief that the game is still in RVS?In post 50, Afrayed Knott wrote: Hello All, game looked way off staring mid week. But great it’s kicked off.
VOTE: Dannflor
Why do you ask?V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I saw this differently - while yes, I could see it being antagonistic looking, scum could have played off it more subtly, or just ignored it at all. Being willing to poke at something and see reactions comes out as townier to me.In post 77, Aisa wrote:
Yes, this basically. T3's post pinged me because 1. he was playing on Bella's post, which I thought could be a way to try to insert himself into the conversation as scum, 2. he came off as kinda serious and antagonistic while doing so, which again I thought could be scum-indicativeIn post 63, T3 wrote:I don't want to answer for Aisa but I think that because my statement in 15 was intended to play on Bella's statement in 13, my 15 could appear to be more abrasive, in a sense.
What about this post feels townie to you? None of the discussion points seem to provide any useful information, and the explanations of self-consciousness almost feel like they're WKing Bella here (as does their random interjection defending Bella into the OutWorldER/Aisa posts).
I'm getting a TR on OutWorldER based on 93 and the interactions leading up to it.
That said, getting a ping here:
VOTE: Jupiter
It feel like they sawsomereason to vote T3 and have been hanging on to it. 70 sounds like they're starting to form a reason to back out of their vote, without having to look anywhere else just yet.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I hadn't searched my name in this thread yet and missed this on my readthrough - good catch, and something I want to look more into.In post 137, Aisa wrote: One thing about Kurtapika's post is that as of this comment:
The only thing shaddowez had said about me was this:In post 60, Kurtapika wrote: I'm mainly in agreement with shaddowez on Aisa, no comment on the others for now.And ehhh interesting that Kurtapika thought that was something worth voicing agreement with?
VOTE: Kurtapika
I don't completely dislike this wagon and I have nowhere better to put my vote, so
I had a similar feel for him...he mentions "vibes" for his reads so far, which isn't super helpful for convincing the rest of us why to/not to vote for somebody.In post 143, Aisa wrote: ...snip....
OutworldER: all he's done so far is ask questions. Which is great! But I don't feel like it's enough to give someone a townread. I'd like to see how his reads evolve.
From my understanding, that little interactionIn post 180, Afrayed Knott wrote: Nono in 94, I don’t see what you see with regard to T3. In fact its seems like a hurried list of things to do with no substance, why?
How do you get Titus as town on so little interaction? Even if you have a read on their meta?In post 141, Aisa wrote: I kinda think Titus is a little towny so far? I've definitely not read her wrong beforethe reason for the meta based town read.isV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
In post 101, Black wrote: I agree with OWER's read on Jupiter in 86 and I like how inquisitive and engaged OWER feelsIn post 150, Dannflor wrote: Jupiter and Project are both pretty towny too.In post 141, Aisa wrote: - JupiterXV also has that one very towny post, but my estimate of their towniness goes down if they have mafia experience from other places@Blackand@Dann- What about Jupiter is it you're seeing that's making you TR him?
@Aisa- are you talking about 69? Also, same question as above with the additional thought of does anything in 159 sway you one way or the other?V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
1) Do you feel this is something that scum can't/wouldn't do?In post 145, OutWorldER wrote: why I felt Jupiter's post was townie and it was just, they seemed invested in a way where they were spewing things off the top of their head, even if it wasn't super useful.
2) Do you feel it's townier or scummier to wallpost with not-useful information?
I'm a little more comfortable with this phrasing of it, but I don't read it as purely perspective - there's too many references to Bella's background/posting that make it feel more like they're trying to defend whyIn post 162, Kurtapika wrote: Jupiter's posts I would view as insubstantial but in more of a town playing devil's-advocate way than anything, personally, as that's what they've seemed to be doing so far in terms of providing perspectives to the existing arguments,shedid it that way, not why they would have.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
What more did you have from stuff up to this point? Future posts only respond to posts after yours, not any thoughts prior to that.In post 64, JupiterXV wrote: OK i gotta go now. bye gang i got some more stuff but business calls! see yaV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I'm not sure your reasoning here is on point, since that could have gone a completely different way if Aisa did have a different answer.In post 76, ProjEctRy wrote: I also don’t like 63. I don’t like that he answered for Asia, whilst saying not to answer for her. Asia has been prodding slightly at T3 and I’m conscious whether answering for her was almost doing her a favour to get her off his back. Almost a ‘look im on your side’.
This read could be completely off, but I’d be curious to know peoples thoughts.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Because he's my scumbuddy and I'm not bussing, obvs
V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I agree with this, to an extent. I feel that scum are more likely to be cognizant of consistency across their posts so that people can't do that. However, that said I don't feel that inconsistency is necessarily AI since it's pretty easily fakeable. I also think that stream of consciousness regarding reads or arguments may fall into this, but if it's rambling that's likely not to ever be come back to I'm not sure how much the idea of consistency matters.In post 198, Black wrote:
YepIn post 193, Bellaphant wrote: I do feel it's riskier for scum to do that stream of consciousness thing, as there's more to point back to later and say 'but you said...'V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
As a real answer, I don't see this as a worthwhile wagon. My primary SR right now is the first vote and it doesn't feel like a bus, so it'd be a pretty big swing for me to switch those reads right now. The second vote is an RVS vote from somebody with 2 posts. I do have a slight TR on both you and Aisa right now, but that's not enough for me to hop on just yet.
V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Catching up, going to try and do a few ISOs as well. I know I had a few quoted posts too, so will look for them and address them if needed.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
In post 288, JupiterXV wrote: never did i express a scumread on t3 in the posts they're claiming i do
Where do I say you expressed a scumread? In 119 I mention that it feels like you found a reason to vote him, but part of your SR on me is based on explicit wording that didn't happen.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
You can be wrong in two consecutive games, it's fineIn post 304, Dannflor wrote: I'm not saying don't vote her Jupiter but of your two scum reads I view shaddowez less favorably personallyV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
PoE, or reason?In post 348, Black wrote: I feel comfortable slotting Kurtapika as town for nowV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Following up on the above, Kurtapika is recommending a policy lim on low info players in 335, so why the TR and no questioning of this play if you don't like it?In post 350, Black wrote: To add to this I think fading low information slots is probably a lot worse than someone who's flip could give us some insight into the rest of the playerlistV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
+ TP for thisIn post 384, Titus wrote: Everyone, please try to use proper grammar. It's very hard to understand posts that don't have it.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Weird defense since this was directed at Black.In post 447, JupiterXV wrote:
i didn't really read it like a policy lim, more like a PoE?In post 442, shaddowez wrote:
Following up on the above, Kurtapika is recommending a policy lim on low info players in 335, so why the TR and no questioning of this play if you don't like it?In post 350, Black wrote: To add to this I think fading low information slots is probably a lot worse than someone who's flip could give us some insight into the rest of the playerlist
Regardless, PoE means process of elimination. That would mean that the decision to eliminate one of the group of people is because out of everyone else those are the ones they feel likely to be scum. This post specifically opposes that line of reasoning:
In post 335, Kurtapika wrote: The move at this point I'd think would be best lim the lowest posters over anything, I don't have a strong sr personally and I imagine it would be conducive to getting an overall better idea of who's solidly town when more of the table is producing content later down the line. Plus it'd root out whether we're dealing with scum on one of them or if and where we're going to be narrowing down existing townish reads.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I think I sounded like more of a jerk than I intended with the phrasing of that postV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I knew I saw this post and have been trying to find it.In post 233, JupiterXV wrote:
i find i agree with this actuallyIn post 223, OutWorldER wrote:
The latter. Lying is a very mentally strenuous task, so telling a half-truth is easier than making up a reason as to why he's ignoring the T3 wagon. I think this is further supported by the fact that shaddowez has so far declined to actually give a read of T3. Every reason he gave for it "not being a worthwhile wagon" has to do with the people who are on the wagon. It reads like scum trying to avoid faking a read.In post 217, Black wrote: Why do you think scum would say that out loud like that? Or do you just think he was trying to be open/honest and slipped?
while we're on the topic of voting/wagons:
shadow, why did you initially vote me? can you explain that? just curious.
While you're claiming your initial post was RVS, in that same post you voted T3 you also asked him about his SR, which to me felt as if you were looking to make a case from the get go. Your responses to T3 in 70 were very nonchalant, and felt as if you didn't really care about his answers.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
In a text game that's based on reading into how and what is said? AbsolutelyIn post 475, JupiterXV wrote: all the reasons people are townreading me AND scumreading me for just come down to my personality and how i present myselfV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Had less time than I hoped today - ISO's and reads list tomorrow.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
So because of work meetings and an unexpected medical appointment, I'm not going to get through everything today, but here's some of what I have so far:
Jupiter is doing nothing whatsoever to make himself look less like scum FMPOV. The only reason to manufacture a read on someone is if you already know their alignment. If he's town, there's no good defense for not reading a post and claiming it's AI (either way), then digging his heels in and finally saying he lied about reading it doesn't help at all. His vote on me and his reason for trying to get people to vote me also feels very OMGUSy, as it's "his push onmesucks, therefore he's scum"
Dann's openness to specifically calling out people to look at him (like in 264) are making me TR him, on top of which his playstyle is similar to recent games.
I'm hesitant on my Sky read. A previous game I had a SR on someone early on, partially because of their low content, but then they did participate in later Days but were scum. I'm not getting the same SR feel from Sky as I did on that player, but the playstyle claim makes me nervous now.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Do you feel that anti-town and scum are the same?In post 579, ProjEctRy wrote: Well if you’re not busy that’s even worse. Now it really does seem like you’re purposely avoiding contributing. I don’t think there is anything townie about that so…V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I've been asking myself the same question - they could be AtE, but more of them do feel genuine than not. My problem is they have two votes on them, and seem to be lashing out about one particular item that only the two people currently voting them have even really brought up.In post 769, Afrayed Knott wrote: I am not sure about Jupiter's outbursts, are they genuine or an actV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
1) Your main reason for SRing me that you've stated is because of my push on you. If I was pushing someone else, interactions would be completely different - how can you say that you'd be SRing me even if I was pushing someone else without knowing how those interactions would go?In post 667, JupiterXV wrote: also you haven't pushed anyone besides me. if you were pushing someone else i would still be scumreading you. i've been asking you about your reasoning and you've just let those responses drop. there's no reason for me to rescind my scumread when your responses on me are still scummy
2) So am I letting my responses drop, or are they scummy? You may not like them and SR them, but saying I'm not responding is disingenuous at best. In 420 I respond to your 288, in 470 I respond to your 233.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
@Titus- Do both of your other reads change if the first of any of them to flip are town?
There seem to be a lot of associative reads in this game, which is great until they're not.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Are you voting between the two based on an assumed associative? If not, why Kurta over Black? I have a reason for asking, but want your thoughts here before I provide mine.In post 828, Dannflor wrote: I think making multiple pre-flip reads on if Kurtapika flips scum is partner indicative because Black has been purportedly hard town reading Kurtapika since like the start of the game. These frequent interjections about possible partners for Kurtapika are also the type of reads to come from a buddy a lot - they feel safe to make because *half* of the read is true.
I don't think it really makes sense for Black to be hard townreading Kurtapika but also be constantly considering possible partners (not to mention the fact that her associative read between me and Kurtapika makes 0 amount of sense and I feel was just thrown out there to put something out there). It reads like preparing for kurtapika to flip redV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
You're still voting me, so you're not voting either of the people you're talking about in this postIn post 840, JupiterXV wrote:
^ what i was sayingIn post 832, Dannflor wrote: I still don't like project repeatedly using lack of experience or newb status as a defense
That's something I see from new scum a lot of the time
I don't really feel as good about it at the moment though and I can't really explain why
personally i want to move my vote to project but i'm also pretty convinced on kurtapika, especially considering the blatant lack of solving and scumreads coming from kurta (e.g i literally asked them hey what're your scumreads" and they didnt answer)V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
1) I did call it an OMGUS at one point, because that's what it felt like. However, you seem to be thinking about it backwards because my vote on you was prior to that, the push wasn'tIn post 812, JupiterXV wrote:
1. Iirc, you called my push on you OMGUS or something along those lines. What I’m trying to say is if you made that push on literally anyone else for the same reason I’d also find it absurd.In post 802, shaddowez wrote:
1) Your main reason for SRing me that you've stated is because of my push on you. If I was pushing someone else, interactions would be completely different - how can you say that you'd be SRing me even if I was pushing someone else without knowing how those interactions would go?In post 667, JupiterXV wrote: also you haven't pushed anyone besides me. if you were pushing someone else i would still be scumreading you. i've been asking you about your reasoning and you've just let those responses drop. there's no reason for me to rescind my scumread when your responses on me are still scummy
2) So am I letting my responses drop, or are they scummy? You may not like them and SR them, but saying I'm not responding is disingenuous at best. In 420 I respond to your 288, in 470 I respond to your 233.
2. I’m pretty sure I made more than just two posts about you? There’s certainly been more responses than that what
Tbh I’m willing to re evaluate you but you usually just come into the thread argue with me and disappear, so honestly it’d be nice to see more action from you since you’re borderline tunneling on mebecauseI saw your vote that way. That said, clearing up that the same argument on someone else would have led to the same conclusion makes more sense than the original phrasing.
2) I wasn't going to write an entire post with all of our interactions, I just brought up a few as examples to disprove what you said.
I'll admit it has been a pseudo-tunnel, I haven't had as much in any one go as I would like so I've been generally catching up and just responding to our interactions.
I may have missed them, but didn't recall seeing many (if any) others pushing based on that specific post. I did notice Afrayed's interactions with you, but again they seemed based on other things.In post 815, JupiterXV wrote:
People who aren’t voting me have also talked about it and I think Afrayed has been a bit shitty to me so I don’t know how you expect me to react to this in a winning fashionIn post 796, shaddowez wrote:
I've been asking myself the same question - they could be AtE, but more of them do feel genuine than not. My problem is they have two votes on them, and seem to be lashing out about one particular item that only the two people currently voting them have even really brought up.In post 769, Afrayed Knott wrote: I am not sure about Jupiter's outbursts, are they genuine or an actV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
VOTE: UNVOTE
There are things I still really don't like and may end up kicking myself later, but I'm losing a little of my SR with their recent postings. Just cleaning up the VC a little here until I get a chance to formulate them better.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
@ModForgot to post my standard weekend V/LA, will be back on MondayV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I am admittedly not at all caught up, so going backwards/random posts:
Why specifically Titus? She's been reading T3 as scum for a while, so may be missing something based on not having read yet but want your answer anyway.
V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
If you think Titus is scum, why the vote on Sky instead?In post 1060, T3 wrote: I'm not even sure if Titus is scum at this point. Maybe I'm confbiased but she probably isV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
VOTE: Black
Part of my reason for asking Dann his thoughts in 841 was because I was starting to lean here. There was a push on Kurta, and even though she was townreading him she kept making associatives with Kurta. Several people seemed to think it was Black parterning Kurta, but I see it a different way - if Kurta were to flip town, there's now an argument forallof those associatives to now become clear (i.e. they were only scum if Kurta was, but he wasn't so they're not).
901 also becomesveryimportant based on flips.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Jeez, I've got a lot to catch up on. Haven't read more than a page of D2 yet, but based on Black's interactions and everything else from D1 I'm gonna start here - nono/snivy. Reading might change my mind, but between the VCA and Black trying to associate nono with Kurta based on a very low activity player makes me not like that slot.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Mostly caught up (read all of the posts, but only skimmed most of the walls). Wasn't going to touch Titus today anyway (didn't pick up on the D1 crumb, but her and Dann were my only two solid TRs from D1).
I'm torn on T3. I've never liked his wagon formations, and in this setup we have a soft guilty at best.
I'm not a fan of Kurta, but the Black interactions make it too obv. WIFOM to be sure, but there's something about it I don't like. In my PoE, but not high. Waiting to see more in D2.
The AK interactions on D1 could definitely be scum theater. 591 could easily be distancing. Yes he was pushing Black all of D1, but there didn't seem to be any traction until it speedwagoned towards the end. Black's self-hammer defeats wagon analysis both from a bussing hammer, or from anyone that was bussing hopping off before the hammer.
More to come...V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Current high-level PoE pool: {Aisa, AK, camel, sky}V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
VOTE: snivy
This is where I want to be right nowV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Unless there's a counter claim, I'm not going to touch Titus. With a doctor still in play, the JK is a soft guilty at best. I'm not opposed to a T3 flip, because it would definitely be informational, but I don't read him as scummy enough to put my vote there yet.In post 1536, Dannflor wrote: do you have any comments on titus or t3
I don't agree with T3 that snivy's "using his vote". Yes, his vote is somewhere, but someone with one vote on them and not much if any conversation around them isn't going to make scum magically appear. I'm still of the opinion that Black was more likely to have been trying to clear her partners with the Kurta associations than partnering Kurta himself, and neither nono or snivy have done anything to make me TR them.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Sorry for not officially posting my weekend V/LA - I have a decent amount to catch up on. Was Aisa's vote hammer (guessing so based on 1668)?V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
It'll be like pisskop in 244 that you modded :/In post 1672, T3 wrote: honestly what if Dannflor is scumV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I'll sheep this, that's where I was voting yesterDay. If Titus counters it I'll move too.In post 1727, Aisa wrote: Like obviously consider my vote automatically on whoever Titus jailed, but I'm just gonna place it on Snivy for fun
VOTE: camelV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I have to say there's a pretty good chance Sky is where I was going to be looking today.In post 1729, Dannflor wrote: sorry skygazer for being a bit of an ass
i don't think you're scum anymore if it needs sayingV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Feel better!In post 1733, Aisa wrote: Unless I will have to cancel my plans because I'm sick, which is looking increasingly likely.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
VOTE: kurta
I was actually just looking at VCs and doubting my camel read. There were too many times where Black, T3, and camel were voting the same place to make it likely all 3 were scum together.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
What kind of reptile?In post 1721, schadd_ wrote: it takes 7 to repossess someone's reptileV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I agree we need to all slow down today, but why are you specifically blaming Titus for the speed of the wagon? Any one of us that voted could have held off to try and give more time. I know you're already considering voting Aisa, but that's where I'd say more of the blame should be than Titus since she hammered. Additionally, you're accusing Titus of not thinking about the fact scum could have no-killed when in her very first post of the Day where she claimed who she jailed she did say that:In post 1788, Afrayed Knott wrote: Titus you were hoodwinked D3. The fact it was a quick lim sucks. You had a lot of time to let everyone post yesterday and you simply threw that away thinking you were right and didn’t consider all angles. Did you not consider that Scum could be deliberately not night limming so that we would lim your night target? And win the game through mislims?
I restate my suspicion of Asia and feel that scum sits with them or with an experienced player. Possibly Dann or Sky should be considered for such a play tactic. But I’m going to wait to see who your target was last night.
But I intend to vote Aisa today unless there is a compelling reason not to.
In post 1737, Titus wrote: I jailed K. It's not an auto guilty as scum could have faked a no kill, but it's likely just K.
VOTE: KV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
If the doctor's doing anything but protecting the JK right now, they're doing it wrongV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Catching up - willing to continue voting Snivy, but want to confirm it won't be a derphammer before I do.
Current townbloc is {Titus, Dann, OWER, me}.
Current pool I'd be willing to vote in is {AK, Sky, Snivy}
Everyone else is various degrees of null, some above the line and some below.
Saw the brief convo about Jupiter's posts, and don't read those as scummy as all. I feel like the comment about not wanting to post in main is supported by his ask about the note thread, not weakened by it.
Now to read walls.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
226 and 227 have the same back to back posting they're exhibiting here.In post 1927, Afrayed Knott wrote: Then if you look at the construct of his immediate post it suggests a hurried rebuttal being typed, the way the sentence is broken and covers a few lines.
266 and 268 they have a continuing thought.
Soooo....I went into this not to explicitly defend Jupiter, but because I recalled them doing things similar in the past and wanted to call it NAI. However, going back through their ISO there's a LOT of "I'll be back later" or "I'll get to this" with no follow ups.
1099, 1108, and 1117 (<- this one specifically doing what I mentioned) have a realllly weird vibe to them after flips.
P-Edit:
Honestly largely because I misremembered who one of the T3/you interactions was with and thought it was someone else. Swapping you and Jupiter after my rereads.In post 1933, Skygazer wrote: how in the world are you still scumreading me lolV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Yeah, doing this for now....may revisit after another reread but I can't not
VOTE: SnivyV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I've been on and off voting you for a few Days now - why is my vote the one you don't like opposed to any others?In post 1963, camelCasedSnivy wrote:
yeahhhh this is not cutting it for meIn post 1942, shaddowez wrote: Yeah, doing this for now....may revisit after another reread but I can't not
VOTE: Snivy
VOTE: shaddowez
In post 1964, camelCasedSnivy wrote:
*also wanted to say that if shaddow isn't scum i don't think scum wants to be on my wagon rnIn post 1963, camelCasedSnivy wrote:
yeahhhh this is not cutting it for meIn post 1942, shaddowez wrote: Yeah, doing this for now....may revisit after another reread but I can't not
VOTE: Snivy
VOTE: shaddowez
What are your actual reasons for any of your reads? If you are town, giving the rest of us insight as to why to look at any of these people would be helpful. You're also being contradictory - Sky and I can't both be scum, you say if I'm not scum scum wouldn't be on your wagon, yet Sky is on your wagon and he's one of your reads. Can you explain?In post 1966, camelCasedSnivy wrote: dont really know how to get out of this vice because I'm not really sure how i got here in the first place
so just keep an eye out for shaddow, projectery and skygazer (only slightly) for now
also i do think it is optimal play to always lim the JK target but i forgot my reasoningV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
I agree with most of this. I've been TRing Dann all game, but with the narrowing pool the chance of a deepwolf is increasing. Not ready to vote there as of yet, since I don't have anything concrete to go on and there are other people I read as scummier, but worth looking into. Bella's in a similar position, but slightly less of a strong TR to begin with.In post 2090, Afrayed Knott wrote:
I’m suspicious of him, as you say it’s a worry, which is why I agree with you. I have expressed this previously. But is there anything to go on?In post 2088, Bellaphant wrote:
But you are voting with him?In post 2085, Afrayed Knott wrote:
I’m with you on the deep wolf thought.but more towards Dann thank ShaddowIn post 2084, Bellaphant wrote: My town core is me, Titus, sky. The next teir is like knot, dann, then shadowez and Jupiter, then I need to have another look at outer and project.
My poe is surprisingly small. My worry is 'deep wolf ' but it can only be Dan or shadow
I’m more convinced Jupiter or Asia are a good vote. And again I’ve maintained this thought from yesterday to today.
While I had a slight SR on AK, his continued push on the same people (for the most part) seems like a dumb, risky move to make as the last remaining scum. At this point if both of his pushes are town, it'd be a logical jump to lim him, and there's still enough town alive to make that happen.
I agree with Dann that I don't believe Jupiter's outbursts are AI. The first time around they seemed to me like they could've been AtE, but this current bout seems like more genuine frustration. There are still things I don't like, and he's definitely towards the bottom of my reads list, but want to make sure I'm not meshing a play style with a read (sorry Snivy, that's twice).
OWER's play, especially in D1, felt like he was legitimately trying to hunt, so he's a pretty solid TR in my list right now as well.
I never did my reread on Aisa, which I'll do today, as well as another dive on Project.
That was kinda all over the place, so I'll do a more organized list once I've done my rereads.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Realized I left Sky off my previous list, since not much has changed from my last position on him. Primarily his earlier interactions with T3, and then later interactions with Dann all seem to be coming from an informed perspective.
As for my bottom two reads (Aisa and Project), I'm slowly making my way through their ISOs and other interactions. One thing that is seriously pinging me is 101. I don't think Black would defend both of her scum buddies in the same post, making Aisa a slightly more likely suspect at this point.V/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
Weep womp. Stupid autocorrectIn post 2093, shaddowez wrote: an uninformedV/LA on Weekends-
-
shaddowez He/HimMafia ScumHe/Him
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: May 28, 2014
- Pronoun: He/Him
VOTE: Aisa
Throughout the game, Project's reads seem to develop naturally based on his questioning and interactions with the rest of the players. On the other hand, Aisa has some very weak reads she tries to defend (especially regarding T3), and her interactions with Black are off.