I don't understand what stands out about it, then. To me, it looks like he's stating something that's only common sense. You pointing that out seem like you're trying to associate what he said to his role.Jebus wrote:No, I'm just wondering what that was. I don't see how it can be stretched to that with no middle-ground.Zakeri wrote:So then, Jebus, are you outing what you suspect to be Nietzche?
Unvote, Vote: Jebus
-1Bloodmoney wrote:I support this.ting =) wrote:unvote. vote: zakeri.
unvote, vote: zakeri
Even though I don't see how the initial comment by Jebus was necessary, I don't see how he could've interpreted mm's line as a Nietzsche-slip, and even if he did, I don't see why he would openly fish for something like that.
I don't quite know what to do with this bit of information. I'm inclined to believe it, if only because it's too silly to fake.Jebus wrote:I thought that the "I wouldn't be so fast to use a one-shot kill" line meant that he had a one-shot kill to not be so fast to use. I didn't see it right away, but I can see how it could be easily taken as "If I were Nietzche..."anyway, playing agnostic kinda doesn't seem right,
think, at min there will be 9 agnostics next day(For the sake of not being retarded, I assume the min is 10, I wouldn't be so fast to use a one-shot kill =P) and 3 cult members, then 6 cult members and only 6 or 7 agnostics.
That was it. Really nothing to say there.
because, looking over Jebus's claim of not linking what he quoted directly to Nietzche and the way he phrased his original concern, it's apparent to me that he didn't have an end to the thought process he started and was asking others what that end was. It's something I've tucked under careless mistake, again because it sounded too silly to be fake :/X wrote:So you thought he had a one-shot kill? How did you think that was worth noting in-thread?Jebus wrote:I thought that the "I wouldn't be so fast to use a one-shot kill" line meant that he had a one-shot kill to not be so fast to use. I didn't see it right away, but I can see how it could be easily taken as "If I were Nietzche..."
And Zakeri, how did his statement clear up your suspicion?
What???? YOU are the cult leader scum!
Sounds like something a cult leader would say.
DGB: You're right! I'm the islam cult leader. Lynch me now!
What just happened here? I wish I could vote for both of you.OK
Reverse psychology will backfire on you.
confirm vote: zwetschenwasser
No, I said the reason was because he didn't know where he was going with the thought process. Yes it turned out to be a scummy process, but that's just carelessness on his part.X wrote:So you think he had no apparent reason for saying what he did? That makes very little sense. I don't buy it.Zakeri wrote:because, looking over Jebus's claim of not linking what he quoted directly to Nietzche and the way he phrased his original concern, it's apparent to me that he didn't have an end to the thought process he started and was asking others what that end was. It's something I've tucked under careless mistake, again because it sounded too silly to be fake :/X wrote:So you thought he had a one-shot kill? How did you think that was worth noting in-thread?Jebus wrote:I thought that the "I wouldn't be so fast to use a one-shot kill" line meant that he had a one-shot kill to not be so fast to use. I didn't see it right away, but I can see how it could be easily taken as "If I were Nietzche..."
And Zakeri, how did his statement clear up your suspicion?FoS: Zakeri.
No one can predict the amount, direction, and validaty of reactions. What matters is what happens in those reactions, and so far the only reaction I've gathered from it is the hundreds of questions from a single person asking why I would make a random vote three pages into a game.What reactions were you expecting by going back to random voting? Do you expect those reactions to be useful at all? Why does 'plan of attack falling through' lead to 'go back to random voting'? And again, how was random voting a better option than making a case on someone else?
Why is it inconsistent, and why is that bad enough to vote for me?X wrote:Zakeri wrote:It was possible for me to make a case against someone, but it was also a perfectly decent choice to get other to react to my vote change once the one case I had made had fallen though.What? Jebus is still bad, but I think this inconsistency is worse.Zakeri wrote:Okay, I admit it. I wasn't thinking about how other people will react at all.
It's not like changing back will get people off of it.Unvote: Jebus.Vote: Zakeri.
Actually, the line of questioning against me doesn't help find cults so much as helps find agnostics. You know, the people we don't want to vote for. I'm not going to share my thoughts because the last thing I want to do is make a "Cult These People:" List.Jebus wrote:Care to share?Zakeri wrote:There are valuable bits of information in these attacks on me, however, and I do think I can make an educated guess on the affiliation of some people.
I would rather assume that I will be converted then attempt to lynch god.
zwetschenwasser, srsly.
I was going to keep my vote on jebus, but...
!vote zwetschenwasser
Also, worst case is D2 we have 10:9 people not willing verses willing to lynch god.
best case it like, nobody get's recruited and someone dies. highly unlikely; in fact I think agnostics are totally screwed from the inside out all the way to mars stretched out can stabbed to death with a +5 cursed great sword of slinky >_>
unvote, vote: zakeri
Even though I don't see how the initial comment by Jebus was necessary, I don't see how he could've interpreted mm's line as a Nietzsche-slip, and even if he did, I don't see why he would openly fish for something like that.
...
No, I know that's what you meant. Read that post again. I'm saying I don't see how Jebus would've misinterpreted that post that much, when it's completely obvious it wasn't a Nietzsche-slip. Nevertheless, this is not much of a point, since I don't see accrediting stupidity to someone a scumtell. Jebus and populartajo's opportunistic votes are noted, in that order.
unvote, vote: Jebus
Erratus Apathos: Note that Jebus and PT both explicitly agreed with Blood's reasoning when voting Zakeri, so Blood attacking their votes is just hypocritical. It's like he's trying to scramble out of a botched distancing attempt.
ahahahahahaha
if your definition of contribution is "being vanilla town sucks. I agree with that guy", then I advise you to go to another site after this game, because HELLO we play this game through analysis and you're not doing a brilliant job right now. The very least you can do is work your heart out for us bringing evidence to the table while you're here.
ahahahaha
nice defense of your cult buddy there, SP. I attacked zach for his lack of info exactly because he didn't have any argument to attack. Or do you mean the post I quoted in my last post? Because all his argument there consists of is "hey look I contributed just as much as you did" which is, plain and clear, FALSE.
SP, where did I get personal? You don't want me getting personal.
Jahudo: Notice how the scum drops a serious vote for a joke one when pressure is applied to him.
unvote
Vote: Zakeri
Good point Jahudo. Why the vote for DGB zakeri?
vote: zakeri
In all honesty, I was surprised I wasn't lynched day one. I didn't have a good reason for switching to my joke vote other than to show that I believed my vote on Jebus was no longer needed. Reaction fishing is just the reason I use for when I do something stupid because otherwise I'd get voted off the island for doing something stupid. That said, I do not have the intention of letting reactions go to waste.This is enough to make me want to continue pressuring Zakeri to contribute to this game and explain what reactions he was looking for and what reactions he got way back when he switched from a serious wagon to a joke one.
I do. I've been looking back over the phase change and what happened before it.X wrote:Zakeri, are you serious? You have nothing else to say after 4 pages and 9 days of silence?
Oh, I see what I did wrong.Jebus wrote:Re-phrase the entire paragraph for me, please.Zakeri wrote:It's practically undeniable to me that Jebus is a cult leader based on what happened during phase change, and how Quints reacted towards him not being recruited. I don't think he's either God or a Cult leader because God didn't hit him, and I think he's a Cult Leader because Quintz wouldn't venge-out God just because he was being lynched.
I deny that I am lurking again. There wasn't really been much update when I checked yesterdayJahudo wrote:I think it still is a clear majority. 2 CL, plus 4 max recruits, plus god = 7 people who don't want to find god.mykonian wrote:new idea: while day one agnostics were still in a clear majority, this changed day 2.
Zakeri is starting to lurk again and I don't like it again. There's a handful of people I'm suspicious of though.