Bloodmoney wrote:ortolan wrote:Also, the fact God didn't night-kill Jebus last night (i.e. because he already knows he's not Nietzsche despite qwints tipping him off) means he's pretty much guaranteed to be a cult leader.
No. It more likely means that qwints was trying to fool us and Jebus is God.
I'm less inclined to believe that Jebus is god. I need to do a reread on qwints, but his last claim did sound like an act of desparation. We were talking about lynching Jebus the following day if he was still alive, and with the noose already around qwints' neck, he wouldn't want to throw in God's name and get him lynched as well.
Also, since qwints is dead, he lost. There's nothing he can do now, it's simply game over. There's little reason to try to fool us now, so it's reasonable he was telling the truth, which lends to the idea that jebus is a cult leader.
@anybody accusing me of being god, this sounds very opportunistic to get a lynch on just an anybody today. I replaced in, and didn't know anything of what everybody else knew as of that time. I didn't even know the rules that were stated in the signup thread, but not in the game thread. I had 5 posts before my vote for qwints:
1 saying I'm here
1 saying jebus didn't tell me anything in his update he gave me
1 saying it looks like SP made a scumslip, and an update on how far I've read (7 pages)
1 with another update on what I've read, unofficial vote count, and a comment on qwints:
alko wrote:I don't know why Qwints has so many votes, I expect it's something I haven't read yet.
1 reinforcing jahudo's catch of DGB unvoting and revoting the same person in one post. I noticed this only because I was doing the unofficial vote count.
So I hardly mentioned anybody in any of my prior posts. I also mentioned that I hadn't read everything yet, I was still on page 15. The last post of mine before voting qwints was on Feb 18. On Feb 20, qwints started digging his hole when he claimed he's been culted. Then he changed his mind and claimed cult leader. This is what he did that IMO made him very suspicious, and with the level of votes on him as opposed to any other player, there's no reason to attempt a lynch on another player so close to deadline with nobody else close to being lynched. Qwints's poor actions indicated that he wasn't agnostic or Nitz, that would be just stupid, so at the very worst, he was a cultist, and much better than a no lynch.
I threw on an extra "just in case" vote, and stated it was such as well, just in case there had been a mistake in the vote count, if somebody had unvoted in between, or if somebody who voted before me did similar to DGB and revoted the same player. That would be an incredibly stupid reason to not arrive at a lynch on such a suspicious player, so I placed my vote to make sure nothing small and stupid like that happened.
So any suspicion on me because of qwints is ridiculous. It's been stated qwints made no connections to me in any way, good or bad, and yet a small number of you are automatically assuming I'm God. The players that qwints was trying to protect are at the top of my suspicion list, but the ones attacking me for such faulty logic are right under them. I believe them most likely to be either CLs or cultists, though.