semioldguy wrote:What was your mistake?
Obviously voting his Godfather.
ekiM wrote:Good morning. Seems like random voting with so few players could be quite risky. So how do we get this party started?
Yosarian2 wrote: Eh...quick hammering isn't really a huge risk in this setup, especally since if a townie gets quick hammered they get a venge kill.
Scum will sometimes quick hammer anyway, though, to eliminate the risk of the gf being lynched day 1.
Anyway, I don't really think we need an especally "lengthy day"; I tend to think vengeful games should move quite quickly. Just figure out the scum, nail em, bam.
Yosarian2 wrote:Obviously lynching a scum is significantly better then venge-killing one, yes.
I'm not sure about a strict "no-voting" rule like you're trying to set up. Obv we have to be careful about putting people at lynch -1, and shouldn't without a good reason; but votes are also where you get most of your information. Also, if town people aren't willing to vote agressivly, we probably won't lynch scum today; town people need to be the ones starting bandwagons and such if we're going to be sucessfull.
semioldguy wrote: Scum putting a player at L-1 isn't really as big of an issue, because a town player is not likely to hammer this early knowing they would be the venge-kill and additionally that scum couldn't hammer because his vote is already on the L-1 player.
semioldguy wrote:Hoopla isn't the one I am attacking for it, as Hoopla wasn't the one to suggest it in the first place, merely went along with it which earned the FoS rather than the vote. I've caught scum that way previously. What doesn't make sense about it? Voting is a power the town has to both use and analyze, and in majority. An attempt to take away that power by using other less accountable voting systems is a suspicious thing to suggest.Yosarian2 wrote:Plus, I already thought semioldguy's origional attack on you didn't make sense.
Yosarian2 wrote:Could you explain that, hoopla?Hoopla wrote:I think either Yos or Far_cry is the godfather, and is where I'll probably vote.
Why, exactally, do you suspect me here?
Yosarian2 wrote:Well...townhunting is one of the best ways to go in a vengeful game, in my experence; in a game so small, if you can figure out one person is town, it really improves your chances.Hoopla wrote: As for you Yos, I think it would clever a position to take as godfather being the aggressor, as such, particularly in a meek, impressionable town. I see your play clearing town players early as a way to impose your opinions first, which seems a safe place for the godfather to be.
Plus, I understand how it might get you paranoid, but me being agressive here, in a town that was otherwise kind of stalled, is the best way for me to act as town.
Anyway, I'm incresingly confident Hoopla is town here; if she was scum, and I had just declared her town, I would expect her to use that to her advantage, to buddy up with me, and to use that to get a better endgame result.
I will say that if you're pretty sure that a certain person is the goon, lynching that person is a good play. Lynching the godfather on day 1 dosn't really happen all that often, and if you lynch a goon, it gives the town 2 more days to lynch the godfather.
Yosarian2 wrote:Anyway, it really sounds like you mostly think I'm scum because I've been active and leading the town; whereas the truth is, being active and leading the town are town tells, they're what the town should do. It's especally true in vengeful games, when every scum is hoping that two townies will get into a fight, one will get lynched, and then will vengekill the other; so scum tend to be quiet and stay out of the way.Hoopla wrote:
I don't know Yos, I think taking a punt that you're the godfather and lynching you instead would be a better play from my perspective. Another positive is that if you are actually town, I think the venge-kill would be in safer hands, than semioldguy's, who has barely participated. Convincing the town to lynch on a process of elimination play is hard to do though.
Yosarian2 wrote:
That's kind of a defeatist attitude. It really dosn't take that much to catch scum in a game this small.
Yosarian2 wrote:Anyway, none of that matters.
Semioldguy has been at lynch -1 for ages now, and is not dead. He MUST be SCUM. There is no way in hell he would still be alive here if he was town.
ekiM wrote:Can you link those games? Search doesn't seem to be working and he doesn't have a wiki.Far_Cry wrote:I read one of Far_Cry's scum games when this thread first opened to try and get a handle on him. The thing I noted was how abrasive and committed he was to his feigned suspicions. It seems the opposite here - where it took a few pages to actually talk about anything other than his scum mistake. The 'scum mistake' makes sense, as we now know his early vote was for the goon, but I'm still not buying it.
ekiM wrote: Reading her whole game in iso, she still feels pro-town, but she hasn't actually done as much pro-town stuff as I thought. I also find the uncommented decision to vote for SOG a little odd, she'd mostly been giving good reasons for everything before that. Hoopla, could you explain why you voted for SOG when you did? And why you didn't say much after that until he was lynched?
ekiM wrote:Hoopla
Why SOG over Yos D1?
ekiM wrote:Hoopla
You didn't direct a single question or to SOG after the theory discussion at the start. Why?
ekiM wrote: At the start of D2 you said Far_Cry was towniest. Then you said He was your second lynch choice behind Yos. Then he was your first lynch choice. Can you explain the thought process here?
ekiM wrote: You said you could really see Yos bussing SOG from the outset. What is that based on?
Yosarian2 wrote:You still think I'm suspicious, Hoopla? Really?
Yosarian2 wrote:...
Damn. I was sure it had to be far cry, especally after his confession.
I've got a hard choice here. I was sure hoopla was town day 1, but I still don't know how likely it is that likely strangercoug would have gone after his scumbuddy, and the way Hoopla's been talking all game about how she's suspicious of me without ever really being able to explain it beyond "paranoia" seems bad, and convinent.
Yosarian2 wrote: Well, of course when I'm town and nail scum like that, I expect town credit.
None of this stuff is arguments for my actions being more likely scum then town, Hoopla.
Yosarian2 wrote: Assume for one moment I am town (which I am.) Is there any reason you can think of why I shouldn't vote you over eikM?
Yosarian2 wrote:Ok, I've got a hard choice to make.
Hoopla, I asked you this before; can you think of a good reason why I should trust you over eikM?
I felt after D1 I played quite poorly, and toward the end it was probably my fault the town lost. I got a bit lazy on D3, and then evidence started stacking up against me which I couldn't really talk my way out of. I think Yos played a solid game, and it was probably SOG's bussing that didn't let me see him as town.BridgesAndBaloons wrote: Hoopla seemed to me pretty clearly town until Day 3. Something about her play didn't add up, and the final desperate appeal to emotions NEVER HELPS YOUR CASE. I had more comments about Hoopla, but unfortunately I just lost a big post I made, so I'll tell you them when I get to them.