Newbie 906 - Game Over!
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
I don't know if i wanna believe that XD@ Skill - Why yes indeed, another game with me. This time, I'm town,
yes, i am town, it is much more disappointing than getting that cop pmhow about you?
For those of you who don't already have one, an avatar would be nice. Hard to remeber people by their names alone-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
jmurph3, where are thee?
hah, I knew pranadevil wouldn't be the only one making bad jokes
i don't know if I'm allowed to be making all of these posts before the game even started, I just wanted a headstart against Ray ^_^
do mods automatically assume you want to be in another game, ray? they're just like "oh, my game needs another SE, I'll just pop Ray in"-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Aha, I have been waiting for this!
vote: RayFrost
You asked me a question, if I was town or not, I suppose in a friendly gesture. However, it seemed like the true purpose of your question was to find out if I had a power role or not.
You knew I was cop last game, so I was likely to compare my present role to my previous role. You even went as far as to cover your role fishing with playful joke stuff, so people wouldn't notice.
And you even put that I shouldn't say "I am not cop", to make your intentions less conspicious.
[/quote]-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Oh man. This is gonna be a rough game. Everyone is so intelligent. Oh well, 'least everyone has big avatars and good grammar. ^_^
apathy has good logic for just one post. I would point out that he's tunneling Ray (as i think fuzzy pointed out) if it weren't for the fact that I was too so...
fuzzylightning disturbed me when he contradicted himself in playstyle:
While you don't have a high volume of posts, your posts are so blocked together that it's scary to look at and I'm...well, discouraged to read it (although, i did read all of your posts through because I'm considerate like that ).fuzzylight wrote:while others may have a high volume of posts to clutter up the thread and discourage people from trying to figure out what they are saying
I dunno if anyone else feels that way, and I'm pretty sure it's just writing style (after all, everything you say is useful), but it's a bit hard to get through your stuff. My recommendation is to break it up a bit so people can read it, although if you don't want to that's fine.
Now for my actual read on you- You have been posting a considerable amount of information, but most of it is game theory and the like. When it's not, it's asking questions. While its good to ask questions, you just keep asking them, even after you get answers. When you get other people to open up about their case, it's easier to attack them.
It's kind of a mix of gut, a mix of posting style, but:
vote:fuzzylightning-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
You! quit trying to make it seem like people have claimed or not claimed. I don't think anyone has claimed anything yet. You're so worried about everybody's roles, it's making you look scummy.RayFrost wrote:
"townie" is a role.jmurph3 wrote:As an honestly confused person, is stating that I'm town role-claiming? When I've played, claiming an important role (i.e. cop, doctor, etc.) was frowned upon, but saying you're town is a valid defense.
Just want to know so I don't make the same mistakes in the future.
So you saying "I'm a townie" is saying that you are vanilla town, as in not a power role.
If you are, in fact, a townie, you should not claim cop/doctor, but you shouldn't be claiming at all at this point.
Saying you are town is about as good a defense as saying "but u guys should trust me because I say so," which isn't very convincing.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
No my attack was not really an attack, it was a failed attempt to get a game going that was already going, I didn't really believe much in that case. >.> He's gonna call me scummy, nowRayFrost wrote:aaaaaand I love how the defense I put forth is ignored by skillz0r, which means skillzzzz isn't reading the entire thread or didn't think that the defense was worthwhile but is too lazy to say that.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
well...ok. dat makes sense.RayFrost wrote:
Yah, sorry, I just don't like seeingSkill006 wrote:
You! quit trying to make it seem like people have claimed or not claimed. I don't think anyone has claimed anything yet. You're so worried about everybody's roles, it's making you look scummy.claimshappening prematurely.
TOWNIE is a common term for VT, so my thinking that was a claim is perfectly logical.
I feel that things like that will grate on my nerves, so I figure out why, and I realize it's because itseems like a claim because many claims are worded almost exactly the same, which makes me go into the lesson of don't claim prematurely.
it didn't even seem like a specific claim, though. town, townie, there's no difference to someone who hasn't played 5000+ games.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Gotcha. Well, not much action now, and I'm taking the game away from the thread soooo... Good Night, everyone ^_^RayFrost wrote:
my ability to play mafia != my ability to teach newbies / be patient / not get annoyed / etcSkill006 wrote:
O_O; That's prob. more than our actual IC...I don't understand why you be an SE. You seem more than confident enough in your ability.RayFrost wrote:I've only finished around 30.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Whew, the weekend!
@fuzzy: Alrighty, I get your playstyle, it makes sense enough. As for this bit:
I didn't mean that you were repaeting your questions. You aren't. I just meant that, after asking one question, you would ask another after that one instead of really giving much feedback (although when I take a better look, you are stating your beliefs, sooo..). You explained yourself fine here though:fuzzy wrote:As such, I don't believe that I have asked the same question to a single player more than once.
so anyway, I don't know why I placed a vote on you, it was kinda hasty.Every one of my questions helps me to decide whether or not I believe a person to be town or not, and that is how I scumhunt. By getting people to open up about their case, I can see if their case holds water, or if it is just a sinking ship, which also helps me determine how strongly they believe something.
unvote
Apathy, I know what you mean about repeating stuff until it gets ingrained, but I think they were jokes that were going to be ignored anyway. Whether our eyes pass over it or not, it probably wouldn't make anyone assume he is town, in fact it turns people against him.
The rest of your case is good. But I don't think Ray is scum.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
I'm back (again!), and this time things are rather tense. Oh, and welcome Jammer! Are you an SE? (i saw your status was mafia scum, so). I just wanted to reply to this right off the bat since I saw it first:
I disagree w/ this. Although it makes it harder to look through the thread amidst the clutter, if we're careful, more discussion helps town. There have been a heap of people (including myself) who have not posted yet, and it would be unfair to those people to lynch now. And on the note, "it gives scum a chance to dig themselves out of their holes", it also gives scum a chance to screw up. It's just safer and better for us to discuss more.Noone is going to hammer, yet. The "don't lynch continue discussion, we got 3 weeks." argument is rubbish, it stalls the game, if there is a majority ready to lynch someone, a lynch should happen.
pranadevil wrote:For the sake of expanding skill, why don't you think Ray is scum?
It's his playstyle, IMO. Honestly, whether he is scum or town, he plays defensively. However, I don't like how he is discrediting prana's arguments.jammer wrote:Overall he seems scummy to me, but some things could be explained with meta. So anyone who played with him before, I'm talking to you PE and skill. Could you say if his play at the start of this game is consistent with how you've played in earlier games?
when did I imitate himredbox wrote:flattering him through imitation ...
I tend to feel bad for the people who are being attacked, which tends to be RayFrost. And he was the only one I recognized @ the start, so i appeared "infatuated", I guess.redbox wrote:Skill006: Obviously infatuated with Ray and his swashbuckling ways, flattering him through imitation ... and likely to be totally blind to any faults he may display. I hope they're on the same side or our little drama could turn out to be a tragedy. She seems much too sincere to be leading a double life.
I don't like how apathy has virtually only posted twice. Despite all the beef on them, it seems like he is actively lurking. He could be masking his actions by huge posts.
prana, I believe, is town with a totally diff view of how to play/read into things than others. But he really needs to look at other players right now, trying to lynch somebody so soon, when other people have hardly spoken is not a wise course of action. There's no need to be rash.
I will post more tonight, I was typing this while I was supposed to be doing math ^.^;-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
@prana: did you see my post? You don't have to call it "stalling" btw, it's not as if it's set in stone that ray is gonna be lynched.
fuzzy and apathy haven't come back. They have no say in the matter? Maybe if you give them a chance, they can convince people to switch votes, etc. Or they may look scummier than ray, who knows.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
s'ok ^_^Sorry skill, I hadn't seen your post when I posted. Had planned to hit preview and wound up misclicking and hitting submit, lol.
It's not your points or views, just your line of thinking as a town player (assuming you are town). The best example was the eagerness to lynch. Usually town want to wait to lynch somebody, and get more discussion going. With more discussion, you can here what all the town members have to say, where everyone stands, and feel more unified as a town.You say I have a different view on how to play/read into things, but I don't really see that, people have actively agreed with some of my views, and you, yourself, have said you don't like how Ray's discrediting my points.
that's why I'm waiting for him to post. It seems like that may be the case.apathy wrote:However it could also be that he just doesn't get much chance to post and thus does so in a big post when able.
apathy might want to change his vote.As for Apathy and fuzzy having a say, Apathy already has pretty much, even before it got heated he was voting Ray, so really it's more fuzzy we're waiting for, and while there's some possibility on him, it's not strong.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
But the game is supposed to be about discussion. Lots of it won't kill us to read. Maybe you put too little faith in your future self, and feel scum will be able to cover their tracks. But it's not as if scum will brainwash us if we don't squish them as soon as we can.I do feel that lots of discussion doesn't help us though, for the reasons jammer posted, but then different people have different views on it, I've seen as much reading through various games where people have wanted to keep discussion going and stated that's a benefit, and others where people wanted to only say anything relevant once out of the RVS to keep from giving scum too much information as well. I guess it depends on playstyles in that sense.
And if we keep lynching someone as soon as we find them scummy, we don't consider that other people can just slip under your skin by agreeing with you. While you're so focused on Ray, you're not really fingering redbox and jmurph's posts, and they can hide under your shadow. Besides, the less townies we can avoid lynching, the better.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Ok, about RayFrost, like I said: I was just making up a random vote, and only partly believed my case. It was still during the RVS, so I didn't consider it to be an "actual case," if you will.
The thing with fuzzy: The vote on fuzzy was because I had nothing else, and I don't like to be not voting for anyone (even though I have been for the majority of this game). I did like my case on him, but it was weak and I realized that when he explained it to me. I'm not a very offensive person, so my cases are usually trash. But when I noticed he was only posting game theory posts and asking oodles of questions without much input of his own, I posted my opinion about it and THEN realized the motive behind it. After his post I realized I should've waited for his reaction/response and then put a vote, but yeah.
However, on this note:
He hasn't responded to me pointing out his confusion. (to go over the case again for those who forgot, he said that I accused him of him repeating questions, and I tried to clear up that he has been asking questions even after he got answers) Other than that... Guess he cleared up all of my initial suspicions. Oh, and don't get me wrong-there is nothing wrong with asking questions as a form of scumhunting. In fact, I think it's one of the better ways to scumhunt. @ the time, though, I felt all he was doing was asking questions while not inputting anything of his own or giving feedback to the answers.PaltryExcuse wrote:What accusations that you have made do you have any faith in?
mmmm...not so much that I think he's town, I just don't think he's scummy for the reasoning put against him. I'd rather focus my attention on other people right now, tbh.pe wrote:I know she thinks Ray is town, but I'm not sure as to why either.
As for this bit:
I am most suspicious of apathy (until he responds) and redboxpe wrote:However, I have no idea where her thoughts lie at all.
redbox because he was easily able to slip under prana and jmurph's skin. Prana and jmurph are two of the more active players (or were the more active ones while he was around), so if he just nodded and agreed w/ them there wouldn't be as much heat on him. Plus, he would get to put someone at l-1.
Ok, that'll do for now. I may not be around tomorrow, so go town! And please don't hammer anybody recklessly, it chops town up.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
don't like how my post ended up in front of yours. looks out of order. -.-;
Well, since I have been granted a few minutes, I'll explain my read on Ray.
I don't think he is scum based off of given reasons. (by mainly prana, might I add). That doesn't mean I think he is town (if I said that, sorry, I didn't mean it. At this point, no one is really town to me except myself)
His dicrediting of prana's points is something he did in the last game (where he was mafia) when he wanted to defend himself, and at the same time, try and make the voter seem like he doesn't know what he is doing. It kinda makes him look scummy, but all things considered, he could just be frustrated. Still, I don't like how some of his defenses are more of "your point stinks" rather than an adequate defense.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Hmm, I still have some time. Ok, just to show that I'm not absolutely opposed to questions (as my attack on fuzzy may have implied), I will ask some questions.
First, I will ask myself a couple questions (it's only polite):
What is your opinion on the argument going back and forth between Ray and Prana? (as well as a bit of jmurph and redbox, can't forget them)
Skill: Well, for one thing, I would like to point out that the debate over this:
is just plain silly, and somebody was taking it out as far as they could. There was one misunderstanding:redbox wrote:jmurph3: Even though I don't get the case fuzzy seems to have made for some of you, the lack of real content in her posts leads me to feel she may have something to hide and doesn't quite know how to go about it. My guess is she is inexperienced scum with a partner advising her not to say too much while the partner takes the heat.
and then a whole bunch of pointless arguing over that. Or call it misreprsentation, whatever. I still think it was a weak case. And it was one of redbox's only reasons for voting Ray.RayFrost wrote:Redbox's stuff about jmurph is a direct implication that I'm jmurphs scumbuddy. Contrast this with his supposed read on me below.
Um, I don't have as much time as I thought I did, so that'll be it on that for now, if anyone's curious to hear more (which I somehow doubt) I will gladly state everything else. For now, quick questions:
@prana: if ray flips town tomorrow, where will you go?
@jmurph, redbox, and apathy: do you have any other suspicions other than ray?
Ok, i'm increative, so I can't think of anymore questions but i will be back in a couple of days to ask more, this time i really have to go.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Hello! I wasn't as busy as I suspected today, and I might have a snow day tomorrow (chances are slim, but I'm hoping XD), so my activity level will -hopefully- increase.
Umm, to reply to prana's post:
Yeah I know, but I didn't have a heck of a lot of time last night, I was typing that while I was supposed to be doing English/Math hw, forgive the laziness to give feedback on the whole of it. If you want though, I'll give a better shot, I'm just not sure if it's totally worth it (seeing as how I only skimmed throught the bulk of the argument).prana wrote:Actually Skill, that debate over that issue was part of it, sure, but not all of it.
I could actually see where Ray was coming from when he thought redbox was implying he was scum buddies w/ jmurph. But, tbh it was odd when ray kept trying to argue that he was right as if ray himself wrote the post. Of course there are going to be misunderstandings, but since he argued it out so much, it seems like he was trying to convince somebody that redbox was jumping to conclusions.prana wrote:I also would point out that the debate raged because Ray took it as meaning him, when there was no indication of that whatsoever.
But, redbox should've just explained what he meant instead of vote for it, IMO. That was one of his only reasons to vote. If it was a misunderstanding abouthispost, he should explain what he meant, not vote as "misrepresentation".
I disagree, but I also don't want to defend for him (want the excuse to answer for himself).jammer wrote:I got a bit of scum on PE, the "don't lynch guys, we must discuss" seems something to fake sounding townish.
Urg, this is going out of order, but:
I don't think that kelyn's "appearance of seeming noob" was any kind of defense for himself. He wanted to let everyone know what his type of experience was for the forum game, and that was none. We can't really be the judge of his experience, as playing a game outside of this one could make you worse at this game, who knows (well, I don't). It's not much of a scumtell, IMO.prana wrote:I would say jammer, but that would be based off kelyn's previous appearance of seemingly noob questions, but yet has been playing it (albiet in real life) previously, but now we have a new player it's worth seeing where things go for now.
I'll get another post in shortly.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Sorry, I missed this bit:
Is this a scumtell? I'm just wondering, because I don't want my lack of confidence to confirm any suspicions. The explanation for this is, well, lack of confidence as a player in general, joking around a bit (as I really did bad on my first/most recent game), and letting everyone know that they shouldn't expect much from me.paltryexcuse wrote:Next she lowers our expectations of her when she answers kelyn's question of whether or not she considers herself a good scumhunter. This is fine, but I have no idea why she re-affirms this when RayFrost comments on it.
I will try not to use this as a defense for anything. Just saying. If I already did, well, it's my first nature to make up excuses-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Hello, this'll prob. be my last post tonight.
Sorry about this, I tend to write too much frufru stuff. You don't mind if I write this in my actual posts though, do you? I know it's a little much when there's a seperate post for it, but I still like writing that stuff.fuzzylightinthedistance wrote:To everyone who has said they are off to bed, it really isn't necessary, we know that there are times when people need to sleep, and posting that you are going to bed is something that I don't believe we need to know.
Well, it only stood out as a little suspicious. And now that you've cleared up what the motive was behind asking questions after questions was, it really isn't a suspicion anymore.fuzzy wrote:Skill: I am now confused that you thought I was confused. I ask questions all game, its how I glean information from people. The answers to my questions often bring up follow up questions which are often the direct result of an answer and therefore, analysis of the answer isn't prudent. I don't like to bring forth information unless I am making a legitimate case against someone, or if it is directly asked of me.
"Skimmed" wasn't the right word. I read every single one of the posts. But its hard to get my thoughts straight on all of it.prana wrote:Also, Skill, you say you skimmed over it and haven't properly looked into the issue, I have to ask why? The issue between me and Ray was rather a big one as far as D1 games are concerned, and something that all players should be looking at to get a read on both me and Ray, skimming over it, and not properly reading both players posts makes it seem like you feel you don't need to for whatever reason, and surely the only people who don't need a read off everyone would be scum?-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
No snow day, which means I had school. Can you believe it, school when there's a blizzard outside!
Alrighty, first order of business-adress all points directed towards me:
I don't jump on bandwagons, period. Even when I know the victim is scum (yeah, I know, real smart). Well, I guess you wouldn't know this.pranadevil wrote:...It makes me think she's just waiting for a half decent bandwagon to join in with.
The people I'm most suspicious of are the people who aren't around right now (apathy, redbox). In response to this:
The people I would vote for, who are apathy and redbox, aren't around right now to respond to all the attacks. I'd rather vote themjammer wrote:Bad thing is that she doesn't make a stance, got no serious votes.afterI hear what they say.
Is being passive necessarily bad?jammer wrote:...doing a ISO I noticed how passive she is in the game with making cases and voting.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
hello, Phaen. Must be rough replacing, many of the posts are pretty lengthy. Seeing as how it is rough, I would like to give you time to read through everything and post your reactions, so I'll hold off on comments/questions for your post (for now).
Sorry, I totally missed this @_@jammer wrote:Skill, do you have any idea who the mafia is?
Hmm...I'm actually having a really tough time deciding who is scum and who is not. With that said, I would have to aim suspicion at people who haven't been scum-hunting as much.
Non scum-hunters:
-redbox/phaen(not her fault yet, though)
-jmurph(voting and agreeing, not really scum-hunting)
-skill006(not that I am suspicious of myself, just, ye know)
redbox's posts still seem pretty scummy to me, but I'm starting to get some doubts...I want to hold off on my read for just a little longer.
jmurph's opinions/playstyle/defenses are easily swayed by many of the people who attack her. She also seems unsure of how to scumhunt. I could see her being newb scum, who needs a BW to jump on.
For now:FoS:jmurph
Question: Now that your argument on RayFrsot is dead, who do you find most suspicious? And how are you going to defend yourself against the 3 people voting you?
I've since changed my opinion onfuzzylightning. It took a little while, but I think I understand his way of scum hunting. All the same. Still, it's not very helpful when we don't know what's going through his mind (we know he's suspicious of jmurph).
Question: Is there anyone else you are suspicious of, fuzzy, besides jmurph?
RayFrosthas picked up a spear and is basically stabbing everyone's cases against him. Its almost as if he wants his attackers to look like scum who don't know what they are talking about.
PaltryexcuseI'm not sure of your read on redbox. When you said this:
You said you thought that this might make him town, but its possible that his scum buddy is non violently agreeing with the crowd (after all, there is only one vote on him). What is your read on him?pe wrote:The part that has me concerned is the sudden 'everybody finds him scummy'.
RayFrost and Skill were the first two to find him suspicious, and really don't constitute jumping on this nearly voteless bandwagon.
However, after Skill makes her comment on finding redbox scummy:
Prana, jmurph and fuzzy all chime in soon after with scummy reads on redbox as well.
Skill's post was 259, while Fuzzy was the last one on post 281. In 22 posts, Redbox = universally found scummy. Suspicious = yes. (Though obviously not all 3 could be scum.)
Plus, of the 5 who expressed this view, 3 are on my top 3 scum list. It's just negative feelings all round and gives me more of a town read on redbox.
The only person who had a post during this small stretch and didn't point at redbox was jammer. For me, I just went to sleep and redbox was found scummy by nearly all.
=.= uhh...too much hw nagging at me to write any more...already spent 4 hours pondering over this post...and sorry to make you all wait for this thingy...-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
0_0 Apathy lives! (go ahead and take your time catching up, by the way, as it is alot of material to consider, however please try not to dawdle too much as there are alot of players we aren't able to get a read on because of replacements/RL issues, such as yourself)
...everyone else is leaves as soon as he comes back...*sigh...
And its a good thing you're optimistic about it, or we would get nowhere! ^_^phaen wrote:Oh and dooooooon't wait up for me, please.
I'll catch up to you guys before you know it.
ooh, and a question all for me!
I was referring to my attack on ray. I think I quoted it in the post, but I don't blame you for missing it (I usually don't look at the quotes for some reason).Phaen wrote:Question for Skill: in Post #145 which attack were you referring to? The one on Ray or the one on fuzzy? Its not exactly clear to me.
Just to clear it up, I did believe in my attack on fuzzy somewhat, but as you could prob. tell I wasn't 100% confident on it. I felt it was something scummy I had picked out, but he refuted it clearly enough and I understand what I thought was scummy was a total difference in playstyle.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
I was gone for the weekend because I was too far away from the computer. I apologize for making this game so slow (or at least helping it become slow).
Ok jammer, so your vote is on fuzzy. I took a look at your reasoning:
(All thejammer wrote:fuzzy: I see a lot of questions,and a lack of analysis.
I got the idea his posts are filled with questions towards others and a lot oftext that to me they seem like a useless filler.
My interpretation is scum, that does a act on finding scum. I see rather little if any in his posts that would help me in finding scum.
The case on jmurph started weak, that's not bad as it was rather early in-game.The problem I more have with it, that when he is referring to jmurph, and reasons for voting her, as bad town, and not so much as possible scum.
I also don't like the contradiction, putting a FoS on prana for attacking RF, and later calling it town vs. town fight.violetstatements are his actual points)
The lack of analysis was explained by fuzzy. But, it doesn't hurt for someone else to explain it: he doesn't like giving answers to scum, or giving them hints as to who/what to attack/feel about. It's a difference in playstyle.
The "useless filler" part isn't really strong, IMO. Although a lot of his posts seem like blocks that no one wants to read, they are helpful for newbies, and fuzzy was just trying to help some of us out with some advice.
On your 3rd point, how is fuzzy "acting" as a scum-hunter? I see him asking questions and stating his suspicions (minimally, but it's still there).
I'm just totally confused on your [2nd to] last point. Do you think you could elaborate? (so there's no confusion, I'm talking about this one:
If you're saying what I think you're saying, fuzzy never said he thought jmurph was "bad town".The problem I more have with it, that when he is referring to jmurph, and reasons for voting her, as bad town, and not so much as possible scum.
I'll post part 2 a little later, I have a dinner to be eatin'.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Part 2:
here are thy reasons.jammer wrote:jmurph3:
Lot of useless talking in the start.
A OMGUS on one of her voters.
Did not defend herself because she thought defending yourself seems scummy.
Followed Apathy vote on RayFrost.(I think she decently explained later why she did, though.)
Lynching Ray, and looking at redbox if Frost flips town, looks really really bad.
Her "useless talking" isn't really scummy. It's hard to get right into a game from the RVS. Even after the RVS is over, its difficult getting the swing of scumhunting and how to do it.
Your point on her OMGUS vote was backed up (if you're talking about paltry's vote), as paltry really hadn't said much at the time. He went off of fuzzy's reasoning for that.
3rd point- wut? I don't get it; when did she say she thought defending herself seemed scummy? (I looked back and couldn't find anything remotely like this; post #s, or at least a page #, or even a quote would help ^_^)
I'll answer the last portion in my next post, because I don't want just jammer to get attacked for this. I didn't look at that argument in depth before, and I didn't realize something very odd...-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Ah, thank you. That helps.
Ahem...
I can see where you're coming from then, but at the same time, Ray was being attacked for being overdefensive. One does not want to make the same mistakes as another who is being attacked, so...jammer wrote:Did not defend herself because she thought defending yourself seems scummy.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
...This:
...Got blown up a lot more than it should have been. How is this scummy? How is this "setting up lynches?" I know there's a lot less steam then there was on this before, but I just wanted to bring it back up because so many people followed this case and I really can't understand why.jmurph3 wrote:To me, this only adds to the suspicion mounting on redbox, and while it's not enough yet for me to switch off of Ray, it is enough for me to think that he's prime suspect if Ray flips town.
...No. You're assuming that is what jmurph said/implied, and trying to use it as an attack.Ray wrote:So, basically, you are setting up lynches.
consider the following sequence...
ray flips town (I will)
go after redbox
redbox flips town
scum-jmurph would loooooveeee this.
setting up lynches like this is scummy.
First of all, what is the difference? actually=literally, right? More importantly, she explained what she meant in that she was...And then he wrote:And what you literally say isn't always what you actually say.nottrying to set up a lynch, but that she thought if her initial ray suspicions went down the drain/ were, byt the mod, proven wrong, then her "prime suspect" would then shift to redbox.
Him being stubborn and, well, discrediting jmurph...ray wrote:...'noted is jmurph's attempt to incite a blow up / discredit me without actually putting up a real defense'...
Last I checked, putting words in someone's mouth is scummy.ray wrote:You basically say 'u r putting words in mah mouth! u is scum!' as your defense (I did it in a patronizing way for emphasis).
It's less what you say than how you say it.
Keep this kind of distinction in mind.
prime suspect / most likely lynch target, same diff.
prime suspect=|=most likely lynch target.
You don't have to lynch your prime suspect. The prime suspect would be put under suspicion, not lynched automatically as you seem to be implying.
... Your reasoning is also assuming, and misinterpreting, what jmurph said. The "pretty much" does not mean sheprana wrote:The fact that shepretty muchsaid "We lynch Ray, then we lynch redbox" came across extremely scummy, and made me consider whether redbox is scum or not, as if jmurph is, then it would be pretty strange to be pre-arranging to lynch her scum partner as if we lynched Ray, then went after redbox, and she tried backpedalling then, it would be a huge red flag.didsay that. She never said "we should lynch one then the other", she said "redbox will beprime suspectif ray is lynched."
Not sure why other people (fuzzy, jammer) followed this, too. Seriously, this was a pointless argument that doesn't prove anyone is scum.
So, now that I have rebuttedthatpoint to the best of my ability...
well, jammer needs to post really soon.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
It was "restricted" because I was laying out a case against jammer, not everyone. And I'm really sorry about my slow movement in the game. I'll post more if I get the chance, but unfortunately it took me long enough to get that post up and I have a ton of math to do. I'll give some of my suspicions, so that I don't completely neglect my comittment, but I'll have to back it up later ^_^;;ray wrote:skill's posting is very restricted in what it covers.
GIVE A STANCE ON WHAT IS GOING ON ALREADY!
Mafia
jammer
phaen/redbox (more redbox)
|
fuzzylightning
apathy
|
RayFrost
pranadevil
jmurph
uhh, yeah...I think this is how I pictured it...
Sorry, I suck at this game AND I haven't been posting...but I have to go suck at life now.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
... a letter count? How did you do that? (More importantly, how am Inoton there? XD)
~~~~
jammer, you're either misinterpreting what jmurph said, or misrepresenting it (ahh, those 2 words look too much alike XD)
First of all, quote didjammer wrote:Wants to lynch Ray, as she votes him.
She(only)gets suspicious on redbox if Ray flips town. (quote pretty much said that)notpretty much say that. And she's not trying to imply she'sonlygoing to get suspicious of him if ray is lynched. Here:
She clearly means that Ray is the top suspect now (or she did, anyway). If he is proven town once he flips, redbox would be her prime suspect. I don't think she meant them to correlate in any way, if that's what you're saying.jmurph3 wrote:To me, this only adds to the suspicion mounting on redbox, and while it's not enough yet for me to switch off of Ray, it is enough for me to think that he's prime suspect if Ray flips town.
Think of it this way; if Ray was not in this game she would've targeted Redbox (of course, I'm speaking theoretically).
I think you're assuming too much about wat she said at this point, and using that assumption to come to a conclusion that ultimately makes her look scummier. She never said, or even implied, that she was "closing the doors" on the redbox lynch.jammer wrote:It seemsshe wants to close the door this day for a redbox lynch, and will open it completely if Ray is lynched as town.I believe Ray started suspecting redbox, jmurph listing redbox as a second suspect seems strange. Why mention that you would suspect redbox most if Ray gets lynchedandflips town. You're not sure at all of your suspicion if you think about lynching the one he suspected before he flipped. And at the same time pretty set on a Ray-lynch.
I don't really get the rest of your conclusions. How does that make her unsure of her suspicions if Ray flips town?
~~~
I may or may not have said this (I keep typing up posts and then deleting them because I don't have time to finish them, I know, real smart) but sorry for not posting much. School is busy this week, and will possibly be next week too.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
....well, no one has claimed willingness to hammer yet. So we don't know if we'll even get stuck in that situation.
However, its wisest not to hammer just yet, IMO. Whether he has an opinion-changing claim or not, we should still allow him to at least defend himself. If we don't give him the chance to defend himself and change our minds, perhaps, well...that would just be unfair to him because of availability issues (or whatever is making him inactive).
The said power role could have the special knowledge of knowing one of the scum. They can look for who their partner might be, and maybe help us in the end. Plus, scum wouldn't know their role, so they could still be useful at night. The lying player could eventually be ratted out by the real power role.prana wrote:WHat do you suggest the real town player does? Keep quiet and not become a sitting duck for N1 killing, but subsequently allow the lying player to continue sliding by everyone else happily?
Eh, I agree, not a good idea.prana wrote:Or do you suggest the town player role claims and outs themselves right off the bat so we don't ever get to use that PR?
If we let him role claim, we can gain info. Anyway, its only fair to let him do so. Even if he lies about having a power role, it wouldn't be the end of us, and he prob. wouldn't get away w/ it for too long. If he claims a power role, we can still consider him scum, and he wouldn't have gotten away with anything.
I dunno. Despite everything you say, I feel we should let him claim.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
(...they are all brawling amongst themselves, all of them, pushing for an apathy lynch. Apathy has only one more chance until they make the final decision. All is going according to plan...mwahahaha...)
OK. I have a question.
What don't you agree with me on? you've got me all curious.phaen wrote:Skill006 ->
I disagree with some of what she has said (but that might go in a separate post) but I don't find her posts scummy. I guess my read is neutral on her.
jammer, question:
What's apathy's "wishy-washiness" on the three of us? And do you think he's scum or not?Post 444 wrote:Basically the scummy stuff[about apathy].
He accuses Prana for pushing hard on Ray together with Ray as his prime suspect.
Wishy washy ness with redbox, skill and fuzzy.
Not willing to respond to points from prana, RF.
Paltry, what's your read on apathy? (Out of everyone, discluding me, you're the only one who hasn't made a stance on it, I believe)
~~~~~~~
Apathy
Post 380. Are you even reading the thread?apathy wrote:“So far, Ray has tossed in little bits and pieces against me after the bandwagon gained steam, held off his vote in a contradicting manor, placed his vote slightly later to put me at l-1 and so far has made the smallest and worst case against me.”
I'm assuming that in your precise post, you'll actually attack prana and ray instead of saying they are scummy/bad town. You haven't really convinced me of anything in your arguments, and I'm a pretty easy person to convince (ok, so some of your pointsdidconvince me...for a time...)
Implying he is town...apathy wrote:I am l-1, andyou'll see how bad of a choice it was to lynch me once it happens(im sure someone will hammer since Im not making big posts anymore)apathy wrote:Listen, you guys can vote me all you want. I know that I will flip town and you will have almost nothing to go on because of it.apathy wrote:You're about to lynch a vanilla because you cant pull back on your blind reigns and actually THINK about things before you make 10 irrational posts.apathy wrote:Again, if you are voting me off, you are being lead into a mislynch on a vanilla.
He did something that is scummy by his own logic; 4 times.apathy wrote:you have triedtwice(4 times)to convince us that you are town.... And you know how it goes: repeat something enough and people start to believe it.
Attention-diverting much? Not only are you asking random questions about random people (not necessarily bad)but you'reapathy wrote:Why dont we put our tiff behind us and actually work toward finding scum? Who else are you looking at? What about Skill006 or jammer?asking questions, as opposed to giving your own reads on the 2 of us, or asking the 2 of us directly some questions that would generate discussion and thought. When you ask other people about it, it gives you a chance to see how other people are thinking and makes it easier for you to either poke holes in their analysises or nod and agree w/ them to slip by.
I'm getting a scum read on apathy from recent posts (his older posts weren't as scummy, IMO). However, I have a slight doubt in my mind, as his "scumminess" (lack of defense and the like) may be due to RL issues. So, I'm going to patiently wait for his next post to set my analysis. ^.^-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
oh. I thought you were gonna put it in another post 'cause you said "that might go in a seperate post", so I thought it was something controversial. It would still be nice to hear what you disagree with, though (although if you think it'll take away from the thread...)phaen wrote:@Skill - I meant that I disagreed with your reads on people and your playstyle so far. I haven't picked up on anything that would actually be a tell, though. Hence the neutral read =/
I did see that post, but you phrased it as if it wasn't your own case on him. It looked more like you were stating the current arguments against him, and then you were going to post reactions/opinions but never did.paltryexcuse wrote:Wrongo.
It really isn't a huge tell, but its still contradicting himself, which he apparently finds to be a great scumtell, as he uses it in his attacks a lot. Although, normally, I find the town repetitiveness to be more of a town tell, it depends on the situation.phaen wrote:I still don't think its a huge tell, though.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Wait...why should you have to rethink anything? You don't know what was going through your brain at that time? We could take that to mean you were just typing something for the sake of attacking him.jammer wrote:
*shrug* Now I've got to rethink what I was thinking there.ray wrote:
How is this deflecting?jammer wrote:
Um, deflecting little much?ray wrote:skill's posting is very restricted in what it covers.
GIVE A STANCE ON WHAT IS GOING ON ALREADY!
Why do you want to get all the attention on Apathy.
Why don't you respond to skill discrediting your posts.
Skill had part of the post about you blowing up a case about jmurph.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Yeah, point C was your own which was the part that confused me. but its all cleared up now. tnxPaltryExcuse wrote:
It kinda is (although I believe point C in the original post is my own). Apathy's posts have been gone through with a fine-toothed comb by three players (phaen, Ray, and Prana) and so I highlighted the points I agreed with and put in one of my own.Skill006 wrote:
I did see that post, but you phrased it as if it wasn't your own case on him. It looked more like you were stating the current arguments against him, and then you were going to post reactions/opinions but never did.paltryexcuse wrote:Wrongo.
(you posted right before me so I have to look through that now...)-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
'cause he caught something that ray does a lot but no one points him out for. The quote I quoted was commended for "wiseness".pe wrote:W-w-w-wait. Wise jammer?
pe wrote:You can secede some points to a scummy player (cause people can make sense through lies) but we still haven't seen that case on jammer. Do you find him more town now? Why did you find him scummy? If your opinion has changed, why?Case On Jammer
Well, I don't find him any more "town-ish" at this point. His "scum reads" were a bit weak, and he does more agreeing than jmurph does (and tries to hide the fact that he does it).
He was restating other people's suspicions at that point. Of course, hejammer wrote:fuzzy: I see a lot of questions, and a lack of analysis.
I got the idea his posts are filled with questions towards others and a lot of text that to me they seem like a useless filler.
My interpretation is scum, that does a act on finding scum. I see rather little if any in his posts that would help me in finding scum.
The case on jmurph started weak, that's not bad as it was rather early in-game. The problem I more have with it, that when he is referring to jmurph, and reasons for voting her, as bad town, and not so much as possible scum.
I also don't like the contradiction, putting a FoS on prana for attacking RF, and later calling it town vs. town fight.
I say scum right here.
jmurph3:
Lot of useless talking in the start.
A OMGUS on one of her voters.
Did not defend herself because she thought defending yourself seems scummy.
Followed Apathy vote on RayFrost.(I think she decently explained later why she did, though.
Lynching Ray, and looking at redbox if Frost flips town, looks really really bad.
Scummy.hadjust replaced in, but that doesn't mean he should not bring anything of his own in.
Stuff other people said...jammer wrote:Basically the scummy stuff.
He accuses Prana for pushing hard on Ray together with Ray as his prime suspect.
Wishy washy ness with redbox, skill and fuzzy.
Not willing to respond to points from prana, RF.
If this is talking about apathy, I have no idea what he's reffering to...jammer wrote:The 'OMG ur role-fishing' bit is blown up. The VT could been made at the time as something shorter then towny. Altough, VT does mean vanilla towny I could easily see someone making the mistake.
(towny is not a role, vanilla towny is a role.)
This is good, actually. I can see the view of this.jammer wrote:Calling it a playing style is not going to stop me suspecting someone.
Already went over this bit, but the assuming of jmurph saying things ahe didn't say NOR imply. Plus, he was hopping on to ray/prana's argument for this one, to use it as his own against jmurph.jammer wrote:Why would she only get suspicious of redbox when Ray flips town. It doesn't seem she considers changing votes at all. (to me)It seems she wants to close the door this day for a redbox lynch, and will open it completely if Ray is lynched as town.
I believe Ray started suspecting redbox, jmurph listing redbox as a second suspect seems strange. Why mention that you would suspect redbox most if Ray gets lynched <b>and<b/> flips town. You're not sure at all of your suspicion if you think about lynching the one he suspected before he flipped. And at the same time pretty set on a Ray-lynch.
Basically saying here "yeah, I assumed, but that still is my reasoning against her, and it is enough for a vote" Or at least I think he's saying that, 'cause if he is...what kind of logicjammer wrote:Idd, I'm assuming, what you say is a possible explanation.
I didn't mean to state what I said as a fact merely trying to get out why I thought it was suspicious.
Note I'm not 100% sure my reasoning is the right one. If it was, it is with the 'lieing'(it would mean she lied heavily about what she meant) from her. Enough to place a vote on her.
The conclusions I get are majorly set on the assumption jmurph is lining up lynches.isthat?
And I already touched up on this bit. (post 530)jammer wrote:*shrug* Now I've got to rethink what I was thinking there.
Skill had part of the post about you blowing up a case about jmurph.
Don't have time to summarize the case. Don't have time to repeat my questions for jammer. (That I reelly want him to answer). I have to go watch a musical/eat breakfast. Peace.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Day 1 lynches are rarely scum, so someone who isn't contributing to the discussion or someone who is playing anti-town-ishly would be ok lynches, especially if we have nothing else to go on. Its better than a no-lynch, especially with the possibility of actually hitting scum. Besides, scumjmurph wrote:Twice now has fuzzy called for a lynch, knowing that either person could in fact be town, for the sheer fact of uselessness. The only people that I know who would actually call for a lynch of town is scum.wantto keep useless town players around.
I'd be ok with an apathy lynch at this point (prior to the long awaited post, that is). Btw, how long should we wait for him? Wouldn't it be kinda sad/frustrating if someone had to replace him? (i'm not up for lynching lurkers but we're 4 days, almost 3, from deadline)
I'm not too clear on the case on jmurph, actually. I know there's a bit on her agreeing too much and not enough of her own independent thought, but I'm not sure what else is making her so scummy (lining up lynches<--weak case, btw) so right now, opposed to that lynch.
Fuzzy lynch is better than no lynch, but apathy would be better (though he's not my main suspect). He only posts when someone directs some attention on him, and he's always in the defensive position, which doesn't really help us progress. And his form of scumhunting seems to only help him.
I also don't see why you were worried at those two (pe and pd) hopping on to apply pressure. And this "stupid scum" you speak of would be lynched the next day if they hammered jmurph that early in the game.fuzzy wrote:What did you find contradictory there, it was more of an advisory post, and plus, my vote was not meant to bring on a bandwagon,because at L-2 (which was what she was at after you and PD voted) scum, albeit stupid scum, can steamroll a lynch.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Yay, suspicion on me
Not exactly a "worthwhile strategy", but moreso I could understand his PoV. At the time of this one:prana wrote:But why does that make "lynch so-and-so, they're being useless" somehow a worthwhile strategy?
[vote on jmurph, btw] there wasn't much suspicion on anyone else, and like he said, its second preferred.fuzzy wrote:useless town is second preferred lynch to scum
If they aren't being help to town, why keep them? Not helping town doesn't equal scum all the time, but not only is there chance that apathyfuzzy wrote:My opinion on C is, I think we are better off without him regardless, because I haven't seen anything from him at all. The only positive from letting him live as a PR is that it makes scum "waste" a kill on eliminating PR-Apathy.isscum, but useless town can be dead weight in cases like lylo. I'm not saying "kill all useless townies, they are only weight". It just depends on the situation, and it seems to make sense on fuzzy's case.
I have a confidence defect >.> It prohibits me from saying anything good about myself. And I used that as a cover in my last game and it did NOT go well, so I wouldn't use that ever again even if I was scum.prana wrote:- Bad at scum hunting (Possible cover?)
Well, right now I'm not voting anyone because apathy is making us wait(s'already been two days) and I want to see jammer's defense for my case.prana wrote:- Has done no voting since RVS.
Your argument with Ray I wasn't around for, so no votes there.
After the argument, while I scanned things, only redbox caught my attention as scummy.
Although I would have placed a vote, he hadn't posted since after I came back. I wanted to see some sort of defense from him (as I usually do) before placing any kind of vote on him (or any case, for that matter T.T) Then, of course he got replaced.
I was also susicious of jammer for awhile now, but he put up a good defense from my attacks on him, that seemed to make sense. But I though I probably didn't ask the right questions, because I couldn't shake off this gut feeling. So now, I prodeth him some more.
...So I didn't vote because of a mix of what I just explained and my dislike of voting.
With all that being said, I really should vote. It's not gonna kill anybody and I need to get over myself.
vote:jammerNot only am I suspicious because of my case, but he needs to start talking. He has the least amount of stuff in this thread, now, and I could almost call him out for active lurking if it weren't for the fact that I'm pretty convinced he is gone due to RL issues.
Yeah, I do tend to do this (real life, games, anything). Aside from that, though, I try to turn my defenses into attacks of the other person's arguments. To see how the other person comes back at me/victim. In addition, I like to stand up for something I believe to be right, to weigh in my opinion on something (even if it doesn't concern me)prana wrote:- Solely defending people, not hunting (Possibly trying to keep everyone on side?)
Yep. Normally people under pressure look like town for some reason, and thats always the people who are being BW-->useless me, never votes. I know, people can't get lynched without a BW. I guess not jumping on BWs is just another personality defect that I really need to fight off (as this is just a game). So, no adequate defense for this bit.prana wrote:- Refuses to jump on a bandwagon,
Haha, this was just a refernce-joke to my last game. I was cop last game and I investigated Ray, who was scum. I formed a BW on him, then promptly jumped off when he got to L-1 (never again). It was quite silly of me.prana wrote:even when she "knows" the victim is scum.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
...I had a feeling apathy would replace out sooner or later, he seemed to be having some RL issues since he started posting.
I thought so...maybe it wasn't There's a lot to read through to find if you did restate or not, but it may not even be worth the trouble as restating a case prob. isn't that scummy (as many of us, including myself, have done it)jammer wrote:...fuzzy's suspicion was stated before?
Repeating a case on someone and not even giving a clear stance kind of seems...I dunno. I don't get the point of that. So you thought it was noteworthy, but in what way? You can't expound upon any of it?jammer wrote:I stated what I though was noteworthy, that it might been said before. Doesn't change what I think about it.
Last point 'not willing to respond back' has been said before I know I've seen it.
I know, not even scum would do that. But it still nicely fills your posts. Although, I have seen other things of yours that are from your own mouth, so I suppose you're ok-ish on that.jammer wrote:I'm not stealing points and pretending I made them myself.
Ok. That doesn't make it excusable, though.jammer wrote:pe's 'summary', could be explained as copying points as well, as you did explain it like that. Almost Fuzzys whole game could be explained this way.
Oh, I missed that. sorryjammer wrote:Apathy said with someone "if VT" or something along those lines, Ray got mad "You shall not rolefish" or something.
Really? Here's what you said:jammer wrote:I said it was not enough for a vote. Quite the opposite.
Ok, the bolded part is awfully confusing and could easily be misinterpreted (I'm not saying you put that there intentionally to fool someone, it just seems obscure). The reasoning you put forth depends on what she does in the future, so it really shouldn't have been used against her.jammer wrote:Idd, I'm assuming, what you say is a possible explanation.
I didn't mean to state what I said as a fact merely trying to get out why I thought it was suspicious.
Note I'm not 100% sure my reasoning is the right one. If it was, it is with the 'lieing'(it would mean she lied heavily about what she meant) from her.Enough to place a vote on her.
The conclusions I get are majorly set on the assumption jmurph is lining up lynches.
...What are you talking about? How could you "mix things up"? You quoted a quote from Ray and said "deflecting much?", Ray had said "Skill needs to take a stance". How can there be confusion there?jammer wrote:More in the sence I was mixing things up earlier. That comment came from it. And yes, you could interpretate it different ways.
Did you not find anything good in my defense, anything that you found some truth in? Anyhow, I'm trying to attack someone but its not someone you agree with me on. Sorry. And my other scum read would lead us in circles and if I did anything about it, would just "stall" the town.prana wrote:As for Skill, I'm still unsure. Wanting to defend people who are being targetted wrongly? That's fine by me, but defending everyone is... a strange tactic, if you don't make some form of attack, you're also not pressuring potential scum, just asking people to explain further why they think things (potentially drawing things out and making it harder to read... not that I've helped with that previously).
Yah. I voted him because he needed to post something, and he was slipping by without giving much. My case on him had little to do with my vote, its more his inactivity and his getting away with it. I'm not gonna take off my vote just yet.prana wrote:Erm... you want to wait to vote to hear his defense, but will still vote for him?
prana wrote:but I'm starting to get more of a feeling Skill could well be scum, even more so when you consider the rather weak case on jammer (to me at least) followed up with a vote on him a mere 2 days before deadline, when it's highly unlikely to end in a jammer lynch, as though voting just for the sake of it so it can't be said she hasn't voted.
Ok, what's scummy about me? Defending too many people? My "weak case" and vote on him before deadline isn't with the purpose of lynching him, I don't vote people just to form BWs. He just hasn't posted very much content. Although, you bring up the point that it's way too close to deadline. Now's not the time for me to be scumhunting.
unvoteI don't even care if this is scummy anymore, I just want to start focusing my attention on what we should do about apathy, rather than lead the town in 50 different ways.
I agree that it would be awful if somebody had to replace apathy at this point, both for the replacement and us. However, I'm gonna take a closer look at apathy to see if I really want to lynch him or not. I don't want to lynch him just because he's asking for a replacement (not the only reaosn, but I'm still gonna go back)-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Maybe there's something you could do about it yourself? Were you scumhunting in other areas? I know its dreadfully boring waiting for someone to post, but he isn't the only guy around.Phaen wrote:Apathy promises a post & then gives up and asks for a replacement?
My posts have been getting shorter because I'm losing interest. I feel like there really isn't much real development going on these past few RL days. I may be wrong though because I haven't been reading as closely as I used to. I've been waiting for Apathy to come up with a decent defense and he hasn't.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
May as well give him a chance. He'll be able to help us, I'm sure.Phaen wrote:Sigh, I can't really imagine getting much of a read on Troll in the ~30 hrs we have left =/
Anyway, are you gonna answer these [Phaen]?
They weren't rhetorical.I wrote:Maybe there's something you could do about it yourself? Were you scumhunting in other areas? I know its dreadfully boring waiting for someone to post, but he isn't the only guy around.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
...This is a pretty crappy position to be in. I guess I'm the only one to blame for that, since I didn't vote/input sooner.
I'm weakly confident that fuzzy is scum. However, as Zorblag mentioned, fuzzy is an IC, yet he has done nothing in the way of scumhunting.
@fuzzy: you said you only say things when they are worthwhile. Has there really been that little to say? Like you said here:
You know how to do it, and there is a good chunk of discussion to go through to ask questions, analyze, and use to scum hunt/pressure, but you're not doing any of that (except for the analyzing part). Why?fuzzy wrote:...but that doesn't mean that there is nothing you can do to facilitate discussion. Ask people questions (pertinent ones), re-read things that have been said and think to yourself, why would town say this and why would scum say this and which is more likely to be the case for a particular person. Not having anything to talk about should rarely be an excuse...
In fact, the more I think about it, the scummier fuzzy seems. By telling jmurph she needs to create discussion, and not do anything about it himself, makes it seem like he wants other people to post around and get the game going while he sits on the sidelines.
You know what, I think I could hammer fuzzy. Not before he answers those questions, but once he does, depending on how he responds, I could probably hammer.
So, there's my stance...Hopefully I will also be readily available throughout today.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Love the pics
It looks more like paltry got run over by a car, as opposed to being shot XD
Ok, notice:
And then here:The Final Vote Count wrote: Day One's Final Vote Count
fuzzylightning ( 5 ) : jammer, jmurph3, PaltryExcuse,PranaDevil, Zorblag
Zorblag ( 3 ) : Phaen, RayFrost, fuzzylightning
Not Voting ( 1 ) : Skill006
With 9 alive, 5 votes were required to lynch.
Opportunistic much?The Vote Count just before wrote: Day One: Vote Count
Apathy ( 4 ) : Phaen, RayFrost, fuzzylightning,PranaDevil
fuzzylightning ( 2 ) : jammer, jmurph3
jmurph3 ( 1 ) : PaltryExcuse
RayFrost ( 1 ) : Apathy
Not Voting ( 1 ) : Skill006
With 9 alive, it will take 5 votes to lynch.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Questions, now that it is day 2:
@pranadevil: why did you feel you should unvote apathy to switch to fuzzy? (By the way, I know you unvoted zorblag because he just replaced in, my question asks why you thought fuzzy was more worth lynching).
@phaen: who else is suspicious besides zorblag? I saw this:
But I don’t know if it has changed, and you never really said much about me or jmurph.phaen post 593 wrote: My top scum suspicions are
1) Apathy/Troll
2) jmurph
3) Skill
@jammer:
@zorblag: do you think anyone onskill long ago wrote:
What's apathy's "wishy-washiness" on the three of us?jammah wrote: Wishy washy ness with redbox, skill and fuzzy.yourwagon was scum?-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
I'm back. Clearly. I had alot of unexpected hw last couple of days, and my disappearance wasn't related to the game, I just happened to come under suspicion while I got toppled[w/ hw]. I still have a bit to finish up tonight, but hopefully (no promises) I'll be more attentive for the rest of the week.
Now...prana, while your attack on me is nice, you must've missed my posts where I defended against all of this:
See post # 544prana wrote:- Bad at scum hunting (Possible cover?)
- Has done no voting since RVS.
- Solely defending people, not hunting (Possibly trying to keep everyone on side?)
- Refuses to jump on a bandwagon, even when she "knows" the victim is scum.
post # 544 (I dunno why I have a seperate quote for this )prana wrote:How would she even "know" the victim is scum short of being their scum buddy? And even if it's just a turn of phrase (possible, but a strange wording, as "think" would be better for a town player surely, as none of us know who is scum and who isn't), that doesn't scream pro-town to me... in fact it's decidedly scummy, as the one and only way for town to win, is for us to have a majority vote for scum, the only way to do that, is to have a bandwagon form to lynch them.
I believe post #559, I defended myself [perhaps poorly, but still]prana wrote:As for Skill, I'm still unsure. Wanting to defend people who are being targetted wrongly? That's fine by me, but defending everyone is... a strange tactic, if you don't make some form of attack, you're also not pressuring potential scum, just asking people to explain further why they think things (potentially drawing things out and making it harder to read... not that I've helped with that previously).etc., etc.
I can understand why you missed them, though, they're kind of amidst a bunch of other clutter, hard to see what's directed at who in my posts ^.^;
As for the recent stuff:
Was there a person you didn't have suspicion on? One can spread all of their suspicions around the players and go back on whichever one they want at a convinient time.prana wrote:Opportunistic? I think you'll find the reason I was late on the fuzzy wagon is I was still pushing for the Apathy one until Zorblag came in, and gave a reason.
I explained why I didn't vote much. you may consider me on the fuzzy wagon (I said this), even though I wasn't voting him. I said I would vote him. The only reason I didn't was because Zorb had something he seemed to be waiting for.prana wrote:Through the lack of voting, in fact... the fact you avoided voting almost entirely in the first day, only to return with "so do you think people on the wagons were scummy?" Leads me to believe that perhaps you are trying to keep people suspicious in the wrong directions.
explanation?prana wrote:...along with obviously trying to twist things up above.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
>.> Posted at the same time
meh. I don't want to lynch jammer. I don't want to make him look scummy, either. My intention for attacking him was not with the intent to lynch scum/make town look like scum/other scummy deeds you might want to accuse me of.jmurph wrote:So they both don't like each other. Meaning if they were working together, each is trying to throw the other under the bus.
My unvote of jammer as soon as I voted him was because I just realized we were that close to deadline and I shouldn''t have been scum-hunting at that point.-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
...wait...wut?RayFrost wrote:Skill006 wrote:>.> Posted at the same time
meh.jmurph wrote:So they both don't like each other. Meaning if they were working together, each is trying to throw the other under the bus.I don't want to lynch jammer. I don't want to make him look scummy, either.
laughingelfman.jpgSkill wrote:My intention for attacking him was not with the intent to lynch scum/other scummy deedsyou might want to accuse me of.
unvote, vote: skill006-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
Phaen, I am looking forward to your post today. Please don't forget about this wonderful game ^_^
Why would I want toray wrote:make him look scummymakehim look scummy?
Not necessarily. No need to jump to conclusions.ray wrote:you don't want to lynch him...so why did you attack him? (shows scum that's trying to backtrack from an earlier position)
Ok, so you can make the general idea of "paranoia" a scumtell, but how is it a scum tell in my case?ray wrote:(apparantly, wishing to lynch scum is scummy to you, shows paranoia and anxiety that is attributable to scum)
@everyone: I'll explain why I was making a case on jammer. It was my way of trying to get a read off of him. He was posting quite similarly to fuzzy (although he was making more of an attempt at attacking people), and I wanted to pressure him some way. I couldn't get much of a read off of him. At that point in the game, though, I thought a "pressure" vote would be irrelevant to the matters at hand, but I still wanted to see what he would say to my case. I was somewhat suspicious of him, but I more wanted to see his reactions. I also wanted to see what other people would think of it, and how they would react.
Of course, it was kinda late in the day, and my case sucked, so it pretty much backfired on me, and made me look scummy.
Even so, I think now that this case has built up on me, I was able to observe something about a couple of the players, so it wasn't all bad. I'll post my observations in my next post (I want a quick chance to get my thoughts organized, something I rarely do).-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld
-
-
Skill006 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 530
- Joined: December 14, 2009
- Location: Netherworld