He wanted me to answer why I voted chesskid, and 6 minutes later he votes that player? What? 6 minutes isn't enough to read chesskids' ISO! You are very suscpicious to me.
Unvote
Vote: CoolDog
Exe wrote:NS: I challenged you to justify your vote for Chesskid.
Read the fucking thread. I shouldn't be spoonfeeding you, but, here's my RESPONSE:Nobody Special wrote:I evenExe wrote:I don't think so. Not until someone threatens a hammer.
Still waiting on NS to justify his vote.MADE IT HUGEfor you blind folk.
Exe, darling, don't hold your breath.
Nobody Special wrote:I made itNobody Special wrote:On re-reading:
unvote
Vote: chesskid
Evasiveness, fingerpointing (not the good kind, either), and just gut.
PrevEdit: Exe, umm. I shall look for these "points" you claim to have allegedly "made."BIGGERsince you're obviously unable to read my posts at normal size.
Now if you actually read, you may see that your "evasiveness and fingerpointing" is bullshit. So I want you to go back, and point out what exactly made you feel that Chesskid was being evasive and finger pointing.Exe in 116 wrote:NS: craplogic here. Evasiveness and fingerpointing? I don't really see the first anywhere, and the latter is only a scumtell in the right context.
My second game here. I'm much more used to irc mafiaWingless wrote:So, let's see.
ISO is the heap of posts of one given man. You can set it down:
Display post by users - > Wingless for exmaple. That'll show me my overall posts.
I thought you were scummy, because you unvoted someone and didn't vote anybody after it. I think you are new to this site(as I am too:D).
Ohh yes it is! Keep in mind all of his posts are one liners. The game was at page six at the time. 6 mins is plenty of time... And you still didn't answer my question.Wingless wrote:I have read only 1 page, but CoolDog is very very suscpicous to me. He changed his mind in 6 minutes.
He wanted me to answer why I voted chesskid, and 6 minutes later he votes that player? What? 6 minutes isn't enough to read chesskids' ISO! You are very suscpicious to me.
Unvote
Vote: CoolDog
It's now more than 3/12. 3/16 or 3/17 maybe.CooLDoG wrote:@TL so 3/12 posts don't have content? That’s 25% of your posts.
Go look at where Exe voted me and where chesskid voted me. He then links me to NS by saying NS hopped off the wagon, thus, we're connected somehow. You can also find that back there.Tasky wrote:wtf are you talking about?iTheLonging wrote: I am voting Tasky for wagon jumping (and the timing of the vote), his laziness to explain reading, his attitude seems like a really bad attempt at being genuinely defensive, and the fact that he tries to draw a link to me and NS, despite the fact that it's not even the fact that what NS did was not close to buddying; it's a really cheap tactic to draw up reasoning to try and call me scum later on.
yeeeee, chainsaw defense!Zang wrote:Tasky-please explain why cooldog is scum or at least post your thoughts on the game.
Unvote
Vote: Tasky
yes, you are scum. (lol, why am I telling you this, YOU should already know that.CooLDoG wrote:@tasky, I could go on a long discussion about how the chain saw def isn't real, or about how it only works in specific cases. However, I won't because I think its a given that not posting reasons is anti-town. A person asking you why you voted for me is perfectly legitimate until you tell us why I am scum. I have yet to completely shun the idea that you are an insane day cop... But, I really do want to know why you are voting me. So let me get this straight your voting me just for fun, but I'm still scum? Is that correct?
I don't have enough time to read the thread thoroughly. but I get the feeling CooLDoG is scum.TheLonging wrote:So you want to play Anti-town, along with NS? Very well.
This is a disturbing post, it just reeks scum to me. This is baseless and not supported by any evidence, and just looking for an excuse to jump onto the wagon later. Maybe just a rookie slip but gut tells me otherwise. Even after chesskid disappears from L-1, Uprising is still yet to place down a vote. I'm extremely happy with where my vote lies for now.Uprising wrote:chesskid3, you remind me of a child trying to guilt trip his parents into buying him a toy.
I do think you are a little scummy. I do think you are scum moreso than anyone else. However, I will not vote you yet because the day doesn't need to end yet (clearly).
People who don't express their opinions don't really tend to fall onto anyone's scum list and end up getting ignored, same deal goes for me. Doesn't mean we are confirmed town.chesskid3 wrote:well you (Uprising) aren't on my scumlist, so you did something right.