StrangerCoug's Worst Nightmare IIIS: The Dungeon (Game over)
-
-
Espeonage anySurvivorany
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11651
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Pronoun: any
- Location: Existential Dread of my Inner Thoughts
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
When the aliens have come and we're all slaves to their alien evil, will the world ever know how hard I tried?
BE's post seems lacking for someone who's being wagoned so hard. If we had lynched LLD we wouldn't have lynched BS? How is that even relevant?
Incorrect flips would be bastard moddery to me... so I suppose it's possible. It also appears as if the scum can mask their kill (at least for now, they don't have much of a track record right now). But the flips are what we have to go on now /sigh.
I suggest we wait for everyone to post before running up BE/someone else."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
BrookylnConstruction Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 1, 2010
Yo, that's not why i'm voting him.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Blooderection wrote:Yo... so why am i still the best lynch for today?
Yo... might I add that if we had lynched the claimed VT.... WE WOULDN'T HAVE LYNCHED THE COP!
slightly hypocritical of me to say, but still... the town sucks here -.-
Vote: Tasky
-gives off major scum vibes to me.
Try reading the thread next time. I asked the mod if the lynch yesterday was caused by a miscount of the votes. This was confirmed. Tasky was not at fault for the lynch.
Yo, because it was a lynch. I know i was on the wagon, but i would have MUCH rather lynched the claimed VT.Antihero wrote:xvart, please stop failing and read the thread.
I don't know, why was BS the best lynch for yesterday?Blooderection wrote:Yo... so why am i still the best lynch for today?
Yo... might I add YOU WERE ON THE WAGON!Yo... might I add that if we had lynched the claimed VT.... WE WOULDN'T HAVE LYNCHED THE COP!
Espeonage is scum.Espeonage wrote:Haven't thought about it tbh. I reckon the PRs should come under scrutiny. It wouldn't make too much sense for scum to not have a post restriction.
Several people BITCHED about not wanting to lynch a claimed VT which is A HORRIBLE REASON TO STOP A WAGON! REGARDLESS OF HOW EARLY IT IS IN THE DAY! I was just saying that if we had lynched the VT, there would be no need to complain about a Cop death day 1.Twomz wrote: BE's post seems lacking for someone who's being wagoned so hard. If we had lynched LLD we wouldn't have lynched BS? How is that even relevant?-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
I'd prefer if we do not lynch Blooderection today, there is something I have to check.
So, please, let us look elsewhere for today and not lynch him today.
We can lynch him tomorrow, but if my theory is right, he should die anyway tonight, so no need to waste our lynch on him.
I have a good reason for this. can't tell you, obviously.
N.B.: I am in no way suggesting that BE is town, nor have I any reason for not wanting his lynch tomorrow or later.-
-
Parama Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18799
- Joined: November 22, 2009
If you have a reason not to lynch BE today, you should claim why. Otherwise I am ignoring you.ShowEver wanted a playlist full of a lot of music I really dig? Here you go.
RateYourMusic page because song contests are like the only reason I'm still here.
GET TO KNOW ME
I basically post like I'm always on twitter, ignore my spamminess.-
-
xvart Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: September 11, 2009
- Location: Missouri
Yes, that tends to happen; but I don't see anyone claiming some damning results on BE to indicate he performed the kill or got investigated sooooo it would appear to me that the current evidence is exactly the same as yesterday pre lynch, so why wasn't BE the alternative wagon when everyone decided to not lynch a claimed VT day one?smargaret, 441 wrote:xvart, night happened.
Since the BE case seemed to be too complex to explain in simple terms by anyone that was online and rapid posting, I went back and searched for the justifications for the people on the BE wagon at the end of day yesterday: Parama, Antihero, Framm18. I figured this would be a good starting point, since no evidence has been brought forth today that contributes as "additional" evidence to BE being scum. With all the frantic hopping on the BE wagon today, it makes me wonder why he wasn't lynched yesterday instead, since his case today is exactly what it was yesterday.
Paramabelieves BE to be scum because of the wagon hop to LL (201). While not part of the original case, Parama did note that BE's vote on Baby Spice was a bus (274), that it is impossible for BE and BS to not be scum. Well, we know Baby Spices alignment, so pardon me while I disregard all of your alleged "scumhunting" and strong "case building" this game.
Antiherobelieves BE to be scum because of his "Your vote relies on Espeonage being scum, which I don't think is the case (given NC's comments on him). Either that, or it relies on the premise of "lynch LLD because she claimed VT," which is a pretty flimsy argument to me." This is very intriguing because I don't see the implicit connection between his voting LL and his Espeonage comments, other than he comments on Espeonage's unvote and then votes in sequential order.
And then there isFramm, in his second post of the game (post 214)votes BE because he is aggressive and also for the VT claim.
Now if the case on BE happens to be so much more obvious than this weaksauce case someone is going to at least need to hint at a direction for me to find it. The fact that I've asked multiple times of people that are currently voting for BE is astounding, considering the case as I have found is hardly complex and can be summarized in one sentence. If I'm missing something, please, for the love of all that is holy, enlighten me.
I will say this once:The fact that BE was for the LL lynch after her VT claim is a town tell in my book.
BE- can you explain post 176?
Parama(post 186) - I don't understand this post. Town claiming VT or scum fakeclaiming? Talk about a false dichotomy, as proven by the lynch flip. What was your intention with this post?
Parama(post 284) - I agree with The Stove. What you are doing is not scumhunting. You are emulating a recognizable playstyle and making some passing comments. Unless you think that your vote of BE because he voted for LL after claiming VT qualifies as "scumhunting." Let me just tell you how thrilled I am that I am going to have to ask and demand and beg for explanations of read changes just like I do with Elli and Drippereth.
I'm thinkingParamais the SK.
So my idea to scumhunt from a pool of three people is a bad idea, yet you think there is scum inside that pool of three?Antihero, 447 wrote:While xvart's idea of exculsively lynching people with PRs is a bad one, I'm willing to bet there is scum among people with PRs (yes, I looked at your math, chesskid; while I do not doubt your skills as a mathematician, I disagree with your conclusion). Personally, my pick for post-restricted scum is manho.
Blue part translated to MS Terms:chesskid3, 448, translated wrote:Google Translate made me sound arrogant, when all I actually said was that I was majoring in mathematics.
I also never said he could not be scum in people with pr, but treat it as nothing to say, otherwise it is likely to result in a misslynch down the road.
Finally, to avoid a quicklynch (since it is such as L-2 or something already)
Unvote [/ b]"I am going to remove my vote and say it is to avoid a quick lynch, even though me and my partner (should he/she exist) would never draw attention to ourselves by quick lynching BE because we are already down three teammates on day 2, while the real reason is because xvart has made such a stink about the wagon and nobody can really explain why it is such a solid wagon, and since xvart has rightfully accused me of being scum, when BE flips town I'll be dead tomorrow."
xvart.I only read quote walls.
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"-
-
The Stove Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 159
- Joined: October 6, 2010
- Location: Aiur
Lol@ trying to save your brohan. The case is outlined. Go read the thread.xvart wrote:Again, what's the case on BE? I've read BE's ISO, read the pages before the lynch; I'm just not seeing what happened since the day start that suggests BE is scum that would not have been obvious yesterday and BE been the lynch yesterday.
xvart.
Also, what's the case on CK3? Oh, you're just scum looking for an easy push on a PR based on math. How about this: Scumhunting > Math.
BAM.
QED.Tremble in fear. AGar and Zito are near.-
-
chesskid3 Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14658
- Joined: August 9, 2010
- Location: New Yawk
...xvart wrote:xvart wrote:xvart wrote:I'm thinkingParamais the SK.
...
...
Fissa Che Per Texvart wrote:I'm thinkingXvartis the SK.xvart wrote:
Blue part translated to MS Terms:chesskid3 wrote:Finally, to avoid a quicklynch (since it is such as L-2 or something already)Unvote"I am going to remove my vote and say it is to avoid a quick lynch, ............lamento si lamentano cagna lamento grido.">Che implica L-2 1 giorno in pagina 2 è una buona idea.Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"-
-
chesskid3 Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14658
- Joined: August 9, 2010
- Location: New Yawk
-
-
Parama Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18799
- Joined: November 22, 2009
I wouldn't be putting any effort into this game if I was the SK, just sayin'xvart wrote:I'm thinkingParamais the SK.
And obviously I need to write walls to justify each of my town reads NO.ShowEver wanted a playlist full of a lot of music I really dig? Here you go.
RateYourMusic page because song contests are like the only reason I'm still here.
GET TO KNOW ME
I basically post like I'm always on twitter, ignore my spamminess.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
No, I am not telling. it would give scum information they should not have.Parama wrote:If you have a reason not to lynch BE today, you should claim why. Otherwise I am ignoring you.
If you want BE dead, you trust me. just go on and lynch your second scum-pick. if my theory is right BE should die next night anyway. if my theory is wrong, you can lynch him tomorrow.
everything you need to know is that I have a serious reason for this and that reason is connected to my role.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
@mod, little curiosity: what does "disemboweled" mean? English is not my native language.-
-
Parama Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18799
- Joined: November 22, 2009
My #2 scum pick hasn't posted since they replaced in. And what you are telling us is not enough to make me change my mind.
I was wrong on 1 and right on two, but being wrong on one lets you discredit all my other reads? Lolno.xvart wrote:Paramabelieves BE to be scum because of the wagon hop to LL (201). While not part of the original case, Parama did note that BE's vote on Baby Spice was a bus (274), that it is impossible for BE and BS to not be scum. Well, we know Baby Spices alignment, so pardon me while I disregard all of your alleged "scumhunting" and strong "case building" this game.
You can't read, obviously. It was a hypothetical question: Say player A is scummy, and player B is scummier. Both are pushed up to claim. Player A is a townie and he claims townie. Player B is scum and claims a power role. Wouldn't you rather lynch the fakeclaiming scum over the townie?xvart wrote:Parama(post 186) - I don't understand this post. Town claiming VT or scum fakeclaiming? Talk about a false dichotomy, as proven by the lynch flip. What was your intention with this post?
I justified all my scum reads IIRC. I don't need to justify town or null reads because I don't want to lynch someone I don't have a scum read on.xvart wrote:Parama(post 284) - I agree with The Stove. What you are doing is not scumhunting. You are emulating a recognizable playstyle and making some passing comments. Unless you think that your vote of BE because he voted for LL after claiming VT qualifies as "scumhunting." Let me just tell you how thrilled I am that I am going to have to ask and demand and beg for explanations of read changes just like I do with Elli and Drippereth.
>SK theory starts being discussedxvart wrote:I'm thinkingParamais the SK.
>xvart attacks one of the players who started the discussion of SK theory
>xvart is grasping at strawsShowEver wanted a playlist full of a lot of music I really dig? Here you go.
RateYourMusic page because song contests are like the only reason I'm still here.
GET TO KNOW ME
I basically post like I'm always on twitter, ignore my spamminess.-
-
Parama Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18799
- Joined: November 22, 2009
Hmm.... There's 1 more scum max on this wagon, I'd think.StrangerCoug wrote:Lady Lambdadelta (9):, Parama, Espeonage, Me=Weird, Antihero, Twomz, Reckamonic,Mafuyu, chesskid3, (Nobody Special)Nero CainShowEver wanted a playlist full of a lot of music I really dig? Here you go.
RateYourMusic page because song contests are like the only reason I'm still here.
GET TO KNOW ME
I basically post like I'm always on twitter, ignore my spamminess.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
Antihero wrote:While xvart is annoyingly misguided about BE, I'm getting a townread on him.
While xvart's idea of exculsively lynching people with PRs is a bad one, I'm willing to bet there is scum among people with PRs (yes, I looked at your math, chesskid; while I do not doubt your skills as a mathematician, I disagree with your conclusion). Personally, my pick for post-restricted scum is manho. Let's go back to his post yesterday:
First off, he got Baby Spice's gender wrong, so I'm willing to bet he didn't look at her posts very closely.manho [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2575395#p2575395]Post 353[/url] wrote:why is Baby Spice still alive. he's the most obvscum i've seen.
BE's vote on LLD is not a scum tell to me, as i always thought that lynching a claimed VT is standard procedure.
LLD is town for the reaction to the his own lynch.
Tasky is scum for unwilling to read and scumhunt.
M=W is scum for doing nothing but pushing the well-established wagon on LLD and BS.
someone do an ISO on Twomz will find that if you remove the PR-first liner, he has no content at all. so he's scum also.
parama is town. and i will think the stove is town if not agar did the great job in the original SWNIII as scum.
other is a no read or no time to read for now.
VOTE: Baby Spice
He makes sure to specifically counter the point that BE's LLD wagon hop is perfectly OK (calling it "standard procedure," whatever that means).
He piles on to the people attacking Tasky without adding anything ... how original.
The M=W point doesn't make any sense at all, and looks like a bunch of spaghetti flinging. Not to mention the "pushing the wagon on BS" point is hypocritical.
Yeah, yeah, yeah... buddy up to parama so he doesn't publicly exhibit you on his list as scum.
1. i usually use he for everyone.
2. yeah i was defending BE for that vote.
3. yeah, as tasky is scum.
4. i don't know, maybe that's from gut feeling, but i just think that is scummy. and pushing a wagon with (seemingly) valid is different from putting down the last few votes.
5. parama's list is proven wrong, by the flips. but the behaviour is still town.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
do you think there are 5 scum?Parama wrote:
Hmm.... There's 1 more scum max on this wagon, I'd think.StrangerCoug wrote:Lady Lambdadelta (9):, Parama, Espeonage, Me=Weird, Antihero, Twomz, Reckamonic,Mafuyu, chesskid3, (Nobody Special)Nero Cain
@mod, could we have a votecount please?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
chesskid3 wrote:Uh, no.
Supponiamo che ci siano 20 giocatori, 5 feccia, con 3 PR assegnati casualmente. Il numero atteso di feccia con PRS è (3) (1 / 4) = 0,75.
Le probabilità sono: 0 PR feccia: 15 * 14 * 13 / (20 * 19 * 18) = 40%
1 feccia PR: 5 * (15 * 14 / 2) / (20 * 19 * 18 / 6) = 45%
2 PR feccia: (5 * 4 / 2) (15) / (20 * 19 * 18 / 6) = 13%
3 PR feccia: (5 * 4 * 3) / (20 * 19 * 18) = 1%
Ora che sappiamo che tre sono morti feccia senza PR, e un morto PR, abbiamo:
16 giocatori, 2 feccia, 2 PR assegnati in modo casuale:
Numero previsto di feccia con PRS è (2) (2 / 16) = 0,25
Le probabilità sono: 0 PR feccia: (14 * 13 / (16 * 15)) = 76%
1 feccia PR: (2 * 14) / (16 * 15 / 2) = 23%
2 feccia PR: (2 * 1) / (16 * 15) = 1%
Succhiarlo.
Sono un grande matematico. So come funziona probabilità.
you major in maths too? then i think the PRs are not randomly assigned. SC just gave PR to maths students.
so let's have maths now.
i think we should do the probability on [no scum with PR] given that [3 scums flipped with no PR and 1 PR flipped town]
assumption:
1. PR are randomly assigned.
2. the flips are correct.
3. there are only me and chesskid being the alive PRs.
4. there are 5 scums in 20 players.
P[(no scum with PR)|(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
= P[(no scum with PR) and (3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)] / P[(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
first we calculate
P[(no scum with PR) and (3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
= P[(no scum with PR)] <------- since (no scum with PR) implies (3 scums flipped no PR) and (1 PR flipped town)
= (15*14*13)/(20*19*18)
= 0.399
then we calculate
P[(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
= P[0 or 1 or 2 scums have PR]
= (15*14*13)/(20*19*18) + 3*(15*14*5)/(20*19*18) + 3*(15*5*4)/(20*19*18)
=0.991
so we have
P[(no scum with PR)|(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
=0.399/0.991
=0.403
so there is still a high chance that one of me/chesskid is scum.
intuitively, a flipped PR not being scum only remove the chance that there are 3 scums with PR, but that's too small to compensate the more than half chance that there is at least one scum with PR.
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
could you explain this step? thanks.manho wrote:
P[(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
= P[0 or 1 or 2 scums have PR]-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
I think you got it wrong there.manho wrote:Tasky wrote:
could you explain this step? thanks.manho wrote:
P[(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
= P[0 or 1 or 2 scums have PR]Spoiler: More maths here
P[(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
=P[(0 scums have PR)]+P[(1 scum has PR and he does not flip)]+P[(2 scums have PR and none of them flips)]
= (15*14*13)/(20*19*18) + 3*(15*14*5)/(20*19*18)*(4/10) + 3*(15*5*4)/(20*19*18)*(1/10)
<------- (4/10), (1/10) are the probability that if I choose 3 scums, none of them has a PR with 1 and 2 PR's in the scum group respectively. (4=C(4,3), 1=C(3,3), 10=C(5,3))
=0.596
therefore
P[(no scum with PR)|(3 scums flipped no PR and 1 PR flipped town)]
= 0.399/0.596
= 0.669-
-
smargaret Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: August 10, 2010
- Location: EST
-
-
Antihero al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- al;kdjfal;kj
- Posts: 15872
- Joined: March 30, 2009
Well, your book is a lot different from my book.The fact that BE was for the LL lynch after her VT claim is a town tell in my book.
Well, there's an easy way to find out.manho wrote:1. PR are randomly assigned.
StrangerCoug: Can you tell us if the PRs are assigned randomly?
You missed Twomz.manho wrote:3. there are only me and chesskid being the alive PRs.
You remember when I said I thought manho was scum? Yeah, that was all a dream. I'm actually reconsidering my opinion of chesskid and he's looking quite scummy (playing the VI card for scumBE, active lurking now w/ the math, the LLD wagon hop).The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.-
-
Tasky Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: June 28, 2010
- Location: in your head
the point is, if I am right, he will die anyway tonight. wouldn't that be ok for you? it would be a waste to lynch him if we could lynch someone else since BE dies anyway.smargaret wrote:Tasky, I have reasons relating to my role why BE should be the lynch today.
and I absolutely need to know whether I am right or not.
lulz. so basically the whole math has to be done again.Antihero wrote:
You missed Twomz.manho wrote:3. there are only me and chesskid being the alive PRs.-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
You can't hide forever! And if you can, then I'll wait forever!
No, you don't have to redo the math, the math is retarded and pointless. The fact that there was a 'post restricted cop' flip means that either there is a 'post restricted mafia' role or there isn't... 50% either way. If there is more than one scum PR, then it will become apparent as the game progresses... this whole 'lynch PR players instead of scum hunting' trend is retarded...
In fact,vote: xvart; FoS: Anyone else who even considered it.
"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
BrookylnConstruction Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 1, 2010
OH MY FUCK! THIS ISN'T A HARD CONCEPT! CLAIMING VT IS SUCH AN EASY CLAIM FOR SCUM TO DO UNLESS IT IS A VANILLA-LESS GAME.... WHICH THIS ONE ISN'T. IT'S BETTER TO LYNCH SOMEONE THAT IS CLAIMING VT THEN TO DERAIL THAT LYNCH BASED ON A VANILLA CLAIM (UNLESS THE OTHER PLAYER PRETTY MUCH CLAIMED SCUM. HOW COME YOU PEOPLE CAN'T SEE THIS!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.