google fail, 818 wrote:As might be scum like Espeonage, (he was happy to go into mathematics PR thing with me), and call it wishful thinking, but if he turns scum, the chances of me being scum down. If he runs the city, the chances of me being scum still go down.
Wanting to lynch someone that makes you more likely town regardless of that persons flip? Last I checked, unfortunately, nobody else thinks you are scummy besides me, so what is the point of trying to lynch someone to prove you are not scum? Still a little worried that I hit the nail a little close to the head yesterday?
Nachomamma8, 820 wrote:Reading chesskid's ISO is useless. But he posts a lot, and he has long posts. That's a terrible person to count someone as town, I know, but there's no way in hell I'm translating his entire ISO just to get a read on him.
Read my ISO and you'll see why chesskid is scummy.
The Stove, 831 wrote:xvart
xvart wrote:What kind of answer is this? Also, I am apparently on this scum list for an unknown reason.
It's a damn good one. State your issue with it. I'm sick of the vague generalities ITT. Also lol@worrying about your place on our list.
lol? Apparently you have a pretty broad definition of "worrying." I've now learned I have to be explicitly clear, but my comment about me making your scum list was because you seemed to blanket statement say I was scum just because I asked you about your priority/preference list. Explain to me my scum motivation for asking the questions I did. You obviously had (and still have) a terrible time justifying the BE lynch, as is evidenced by me repeatedly asking you what the case was. What did you say?
- The case has already been outlined.
Then I questioned you about the outlined cases location and asked you if what I pulled together was accurate. What did you say?
Go ISO him.
I asked again, was my interpretation of the case correct?
No answer.
The fact that I know you were just riding the wagon with no clue of why it was happening is I even put together what I believed the case to be, asked you about it, twice, and you never responded, saying "yes, that's it" or "no, that is not it."
Let me ask some specific questions:
- Is chronopie scum because he couldn't find a case on BE upon replacing in yesterday?
- Were you intentionally lying when you said the BE case had already been outlined? If not, why did you say it when it had not been outlined?
- Was the case on BE so complicated that you couldn't possibly sum it up in a couple of sentences?
- Was my case that I put together correct or not? Regardless of the answer, why didn't you bother to answer me when I asked a couple of times? It seems if you are confident in your lynch target you would want to rally the troops to get a lynch, and the fact that you really did not say anything about BE at all is very telling.
The Stove, 831 wrote:If you're town the answer the damn questions asked of you in the game.
This quote is especially ironic considering they have been dodging my questions all game. So, by your logic, are you not town since you haven't been "answer[ing] the damn questions asked of you in the game"?
Antihero, 834 wrote:No, but a town read nonetheless. Yes, I think I would rather stick my finger in a pencil sharpener than try to convince xvart of anything, but I don't see any scum motivation for what he's saying.
Nice. How is this for town motivation: may I suggest the town stop being so damn lazy and stop following along the people that say the lynches are obvious but can't formulate a case and keep lynching town?
As for manho, I'll add him to my list to read, but I still think chesskid is the post restricted mafia. I will say that trying to convince me of someone being scum will be slightly easier if they have a post restriction.
smargaret wrote:I'd like to hear thoughts on xvart or esp.
You obviously have an opinion if you are asking this question, so what are your thoughts on me?
VOTE: The Stove
I'm still willing to lynch chesskid, as his post I quoted at the top is especially scummy, and couple that with his behavior yesterday. The Stove or chesskid. Either way we profit.
xvart.