130.Mirror Mafia - Game Over
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Vote: Twistedspoon
Obvious scum is obvious - sheep me for more beard related win.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
If I didn't already have a serious reason to be voting Twistedspoon I'd be all over this one.Zombeh-Pug wrote:Using random.org to generate a number from 1-21 I got: 14.
That's two scum down.
@Ludi - I see little in game value to any of those questions. I'll answer that I'm a controlling jerk, I don't consider research to be cheating (rather the opposite), I don't steal, and I know how math works. Pleaase feel free to join the game anytime.
@evilpacman - I'd tend to do it after each night, as then you're functionally a weak cop. Also, there is a serious vote out on the table, feel free to join the voting of Twistedspoon (or Zombeh)-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
You can honestly look at Zombeh and Twistedspoon and decide the guy who hasn't posted yet looks more scummy? Hww does that work?Acronach wrote:vote pinefor not posting yet
@evilpacman - as exciting as the strategy discussion of your role is, I have $5 that says it's also possible to scumhunt while that is going on.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
No votes are random, all votes have meaning. Otherwise it would be impossible to leave RVS.Acronach wrote:random voting stage. operative word: random
If you really are just "randomly" putting out a vote, how about you vote in support of someone who claims to have information? Maybe I'm a Daycop and you should back me. This isn't the newbie queue y'know
So you're not voting Zombeh because...?evilpacman18 wrote:Zombeh I can see. However you're voting Twistedspoon for having the exact same thought I had when CJMiller said "at the" so I'll disagree on that one.
@Quilford - your opinion on evilpacman's claim? Why don't you have one?
@Ion67 - your read on my scumtell on Twistedspoon or Zombeh please, I'm curious to hear why they're so weak you won't back either of them. Clearly you have to disagree with them for some reason. What is that reason and why should I be voting whoever you're voting? (Acronach)-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
What page do votes become acceptable at?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Because you went out of your way to remove all evidence of your own opinions from the vote.Zombeh-Pug wrote:How was my RVS vote scummy?
Also, you did a 21 number random generation, which meant you were even willing to consider a self vote.
Neither action strikes me as pro-town.
You've now also failed to comment on the claim we had in thread, did respond to the pointless questions in thread, and went immediately into defense of yourself.
Yeah - scum.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Somebody totally missed my point.Acronach wrote:in all seriousness though, my vote was probably more serious than any of the other votes currently up, so ya.
unvoteif it makes you feel better. its just a RVS vote anyway, not like im gonna keep it there.
If you see no value to the RVS why did you make the vote in the first place? (I'll presume the old standby answer of 'conformity to site meta' if you want to skip answering this)
Now that we've established you don't use RVS to scumhunt...um...what are you doing to scumhunt? I can't see it, and that looks scummy to me when i don't see scumhunting. What am I missing?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
He's the only town read I have thus far. I'm nt sure about that wagon, what am I missing?Calcifer wrote:Thor, Twistedspoon is not a D1 lynch, and Zombeh isn't scummy yet. So, let's unite and kill ACRONACH.
Also, why is Twisted "not a Day 1 lynch" If we lynch him Day 1 seems pretty functional that he would become one, so I'm pretty sure it's possible.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Acro - evilpacman actually isn't a Day 1 lynch - you let Hider claims potentially be weak cops, or let scum try to double kill them or something. After a while you can kill the hider or he dies and you get to learn about his weak cops. Basic, brilliant, and I have a beard so you should listen to me.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
What does random and WIFOM have to do with each other? Sounds like you suspect you already know why I'm voting you and are trying to preemptively head it off.Twistedspoon wrote:thor, just interested, but is your vote on me a random one?
if not, what's the non-wifom reason again?
my reaction was normal as obvtown pacman pointed out
Also, love how you manage to bring up how "obvtown" pacman (he's obv. town? When did that happen?) is defending you - just yet another reason Thor is totally off his rocker.
You're scum because you were trying to push a scumtell onto a player who had not even had a in game and while we were in confirmation. Not to mention, if the scumtell was real we wouldn't even be having this conversation. It was a scummy move of trying to setup an easy lynch Day 1.
Also, quite frankly, it's why I'm against the Acronach wagon. I honestly believe that if that slot *was* scum than the mod would have restarted because the comment did look questionable. The fact he didn't suggests to me that the mod felt safe enough that no slip was there, giving that slot a higher likelihood of being town than scum as compared to the rest of y'all. Keep up that surge wagon though, it's good information. And, yes, I understand his sudden hop onto Twisted looks suspect - I'm emotionally okay with that.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Oh indeed, I shall 'fair' all over your face in this game...wait...I...? Let me go back and come in again.
What was the WIFOM?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
What was the WIFOM
And I think you're presuming a bit in trying to setup a lynch meaning you have to vote for him in the first 4 pages.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Well, if you have to ask - since you brought it up and seemed to have issue with it, why didn't you vote for him? Why bring it up if it wasn't a viable tell to you?Twistedspooni wrote:well surely it would have been a better vote had i suspected him, than a random vote on bub, no?
inb4 really weak explanation involving wanting to get on record those who will try to be solo stars or bend the rules versus those who will work with groups or within confines. Never mind the fact he could have asked with game related examples for more accuracy in the read.Magister Ludi wrote:I'll answer to the intent of my questions when everyone has had to a chance to either respond to them or reject them.
We'll have to wait and see if I'm right.
I'm not holding my breath for those questions to be worth anything but spit on a plate, for the record.
No commentary on claims, and accusations that are happening in thread as we speak? Why not?
In my world I believe people can be held accountable for their actions and decisions and it's scummy to claim otherwise.Nocmen wrote:Thor - So because of the random votes, those people are scum? If anything, I'm looking at you for grasping as that so suddenly.
In your world...the opposite...amazing that it's actually more scummy to claim you have reasons for a vote than the opposite, isn't it?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
So what's your read on Arcy and why?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Just putting a couple of these side by side to see if they make more sense - for the record, Bub's "buddying" was agreeing with me about potential uselessness of Magister's questions...evilpacman18 wrote:I'm liking Thor so far. This will be a good game.
Magister's questions seem to be doing nothing but distracting people from playing the game. They've been the biggest portion of several opening posts now. It's a bit of an annoyance.
Buddying up with the player that several people are calling town plus ignoring a lot of useful information to talk about whether or not I'm gonna be lynched today which is extremely moot currently.
That said, pacman did try to work in a 'ding' on me, so good on him I suppose.
I'll go out on a limb and suggest it's because you claimed Hider and that I don't lynch claimed Hider's day 1. if you hadn't claimed Hider I would be on you waaaaaay more - trust me, you're not sailing through due to awesome towniness exuding from your pores.evilpacman18 wrote:Now that Twistedspoon mentions it, I don't like Thor not mentioning my agreeing with Twistedspoon on CJ's /out and continuing to push him harder than I like after I made that post.
Because I like to look smart and clever, and I also hate the "ask random and nonsensical questions and act like somehow they have game meaning when they clearly do not except in the most vague psychological ways that never apply in game again even though the player implies they will" style questions...and I like to look smart. But, honestly, if he cribs my answer - whoo-hoo, his answer is meaningless and the most I gain is looking smart. If he comes up with something different well...I'll be *really* impressed.Zdenek wrote:
Why do you feel the need to answer for his questions for him?Thor wrote:inb4 really weak explanation involving wanting to get on record those who will try to be solo stars or bend the rules versus those who will work with groups or within confines. Never mind the fact he could have asked with game related examples for more accuracy in the read.
@Gollum - I'm not sure votes will count if your entire post is bolded...or did you mean for that vote to count?
That said, I have a town read on Gollum as the only person who voted Acronach while also noting that his link didn't work - which means a lot of people potentially sold him down the river without ever clicking the link to see where he was coming from.
I'd like to hear who currently voting Acronach is a member at EpicMafia. C'mon, don't be bashful, I'm pretty sure we won't make fun of you for it. (and by 'we' I mean everyone else - I'll make fun of you)
@Furc - what's the value of the Nocman wagon?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I can now see the Bub case.
I'm still extremely happy with the Twistedspoon case.
I'm feeling decent about Calcifer and flinter now.
Magister is starting to spiral down into scummitude. Cecily too. That's 4 people I now want dead for scumminess not even bringing into it the ones I just find to be lurking failstacks. I think I'd like to see more activity or more votes ( or *gasp* both) out of the bulk of the playerset. This is the sort of game that has me very early on wishing I was a 10 shot non-day ending Day Vig or something, gawds that role needs to exist in some game some where.
@Ion - what would you have said if Bub had continued to only respond to posts about him? Catch 22 much? Seriously, I want you to respond to this.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I'm happy to explain those scumreads!Cecily wrote:Four people on day one in 5 pages of actual content... goodness that's some confidence. Thor, can you please give me reasons why myself, bub, and magister are scum, because I feel like that may have come out of absolutely no where.
Bub acts like that in every game. His attitude is nothing new so I'm not convinced on any case of his as of yet. So far, so much has been posted with very little of it actually being useful I can see why he's only answering questions directed towards him. And jumping in when Thor is on the rampage doesn't seem like a good idea. :/
Cecily - I actually quoted your entire post above, and not just the question as is usually my wont, because your post encapsulates the reason you are scummy. let's look at it together and see the high points. Why does Thor suspect somebody? Defending Bub. Cecily doesn't come out and call Bub town though, no, just justifies his actions. No one attacking Bub looks scummy either just sort of...odd....that they are attacking him because Cecily sorta defends him I guess. But Thor is on a rampage - I won't actually call Thor scummy but let's throw out this "rampage" thing while also specifically asking him to explain his reads because *that* will chillax him, most assuredly.
Now, let's look at all of Cecily's other posts and examine them for reads...none? Okay, how about scumhunting...none? Okay, maybe some votes to at least stir stuff up...none? Okay, number of times suggesting that people who are actually trying to do something in thread are failing at life...2-3? Oh - and Cecily doesn't like hydras - good to know.
You're scum because you've done absolutely nothing that is helpful to town and yet you are attacking people even though you're not scumhunting.
Bub is scum because i agree with the call that he was being over focused on defending himself. Add in his awkward departure from the Acro wagon as soon as the pot started to boil there and the weird segueway onto "lurker vote that nobody should have an issue with" and you have a decent scum case on him.
Magister is scum for making up a questionnaire, hinting its worth something, being coy about dealing with it once people ask, leaving it out there as some sort of awkward red herring he wants people to respond to and waste time over before he explains it, and not having any issues with how much I'm bashing him and his methods even though I'm being fairly overt in the mockery of his methods. Also - I'm awesome and he bugs me, so he's scum.
Feel free to attempt to contribute 1/16th of what I just did in your next post, maybe you'll fool me into thinking you're town-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I'll agree they are unlikely scumbuddies, but see no definite beyond that.evilpacman18 wrote:I want everyone that's not Ion and Bub to answer this.
Buy or sell: If Bub is town, Ion is scum.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
And I will repeat what I said in my first non confirmation post where I also provided nothing on anyone: I do not have reads on people yet and am not performiong any actions to help me get those reads - I'm letting other people do all the work and acting like it makes me a...well, at least a "less annoying" player. I take as much time as I darn well please and don't actually need to help advance the game state and don't see the point in rushing it and making myself look stupid for having to take it back four times and, more importantly, lack of a paper trail of votes makes scummy Cecily go 'wheee!.' I can almost guarantee I will not be the leader of any wagon, or a vote on any wagon, or a commenter on any wagon...except randomly to defend Bud for some reason, at least in these first few days, never mind that we're already by the first few days and I still haven't done anything besides sorta defend myself here and make nothing posts, because I just do not have the time to be on here and carefully reading everything everyone posts constantly. Because, y'know, scumhunting of my caliber takes time now too...there is no clarification to be provided as to when "time" will come into my life or what needing time has to do with a belief that no reads should be given or are possible to be given in the beginning of the game.Cecily wrote:And I will repeat what I said in my first non confirmation post: I do not have reads on people yet. I take as much time as I damn well please and don't see the point in rushing it and making myself look stupid for having to take it back four times. I can almost guarantee I will not be the leader of any wagon at least in these first few days because I just do not have the time to be on here and carefully reading everything everyone posts constantly.
I have language filters in my head, they tell me things. This is what your post looked like to me (well, mine was actually sung A Capella to me by a hippopotamus wearing a unicorn outfit who actually looked strangely like my mother - but the doctors tell me not to dwell on that part too much.
If you don't have time to participate in the game shouldn't you just replace out as opposed to posting occasionally and not scumhunting?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
How many people haven't answered your questions and why aren't you pressuring them to?Magister Ludi wrote:Thors' a fellow of infinite jest, of the most excellent fancy, you must realize.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Lol.Cecily wrote:
I feel like the quote you posted actually does the opposite of make the two seem unrelated. I understand being cautious about voting, but withholding a vote because it is "too early" while there are very few other votes on the person could indicate scummy association. And now in a game of such a comfortable size that fear of an early lynch brought on by a scum partner is almost gone and so ion can vote as he wants.evilpacman18 wrote:
My question is specifically referring to this. Obv scum vote if Bub turns out to be a mislynch.Ion67 wrote:
Harsh. I see that as an attempt to nullify packman's claim of you only responding to posts about you. I am usually very cautious with my votes, but in a game this large, I don't think I need to be.Stop watching TV and get in the game, please.
VOTE: Bub Bidderskins
I agree at this point with a pine wagon, because not only his lack of posting here, but his excessive posting in other threads. After saying that he was watching 30 rock he proceeded to post 15 times in other places showing he did actually have the attention for posting. Scum pine hides from questions with indications that he'll be back later and yet never returns.
vote: pine
Unvote: Twistedspoon
Vote: Cecily-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
You missed the flow of my lol, for the record. I'll explain it, but I kinda want to see Ceily roll in and respond first.evilpacman18 wrote:Thor is right. Don't be silly.
Really not too found of Zombeh's deflection protection on pine...though I'll agree Jakalope responded awfully quickly to it. I'd add something, but I already have both of those guys on the scumlist already so...confirmation is me? Yes.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Magister Ludi
::Swish:: Thor is awesome. Now please join us more with the scumhunting already in progress.Thor665 wrote:"ask random and nonsensical questions and act like somehow they have game meaning when they clearly do not except in the most vague psychological ways that never apply in game again even though the player implies they will"
This may need to be sigged.Furcolow wrote:I said "almost willing to lynch for LAL". The reason it is almost is because it isTHORwe are talking about. The guy could confess as scum, and I wouldn't lynch him D1, because I would be praying to God that it was a ploy and he was on my side.
Also, as long as I have your attention;
@FURC
@CABOOSE
Furc - Caboose is right, you actually totally misunderstood what I was saying about Cecily. Go back to the post in question, read it again, and realize that the giant block wall isn't me being hypocritical because all I'm doing is taking the text from her and changing it up to mock it for how terrible it is.
Caboose - furc is actually quite reasonable is suggesting there is hypocrisy from you and he tagged you flat out. However, two things; 1. The hypocrisy isn't really scummy and I don't care that he called you on it and neither should you. 2. I'm a big boy and can defend myself, the scummiest thing I've seen you do thus far today is all the blatant buddying.
I personally would love it if that entire debate line from the two of you dropped, It's silly and is distracting, and even if either of you got somewhere I don't think the end result would be a town or a scum tell so...???
Best post I've seen from Twisted yet, which is a little sad, but I'll second it anyway.Twistedspoon wrote:
okayCtorj49 wrote: Also, I'm not a big typer. Being new to ms, I should let you know that off the bat. This is as long as my posts get.
seeing as this is your first post since your RVS vote, care to share some of your thoughts and reads with us?
what are the 3 scummiest things you've seen so far?
Bub Bidderskins wrote:Now the reasons behind Ludi's questions make sense, but I doubt that anything serious will come out from that. Still, his reasons weren't total crap and were noble in their objective, so I've going to say that Ludi is town.
You're totally missing the thrust of Calcifer's question though. Yeah, whoo-hoo, he's a newb. Yes, we all understand that. But your tell is newb centric - how are you moving it to a newb scum tell as opposed to a newb town tell?Zombeh-Pug wrote:I'd say leave the newbie defense in the road to rome. I still find him most suspicious right now.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I would like to replay for you a conversation that happened in this thread, names have been changed to protect the silly;Cecily wrote:@Thor. Respond to what? You voted for me with nothing more than an "lol" as explanation. All you've essentially been doing thus far is mocking my posting style and who I'm voting for. Cool. I understand that you may not agree but that doesn't make me want to change my vote right away. If you're looking for a response for having a single vote from you on me, you're not going to get one.
Handsome Bearded Town: Yo, C-Dawg, how come you're not voting?
C-Dawg: I like to make sure first. My vote is super accurate and awesome and cannot be risked until I hav emore information to vote with.
HBT: Lol, whut? No, seriously, c'mon, vote so you don't try to sideline your opinions.
C-Dawg: i must wait until I have perfect information, I won't be rushed!
HBT: This is silly, you're not doing anything but sort of drifting through and not giving reads, that's scummy.
C-Dawg: No it isn't, you're stupid for trying to rush me and are probably mean and not as handsome as your beard suggests. I need more info to make my case of win and cast a vote.
HBT: Whatevs, you are scummy and should probably be lynched.
Player X: I agree, that is scummy.
Player Y: Yeah, why is C-Dawg trying to sideline her vote?
C-Dawg: Vote: Lurking Player.
HBT: LOL, Vote: C-Dawg.
Do you see the scumtell now? Because I see a scumtell and a case on you. I also think LOL was a very concise and appropriate analysis of your decision to vote when and how you did. Don't dodge me because you want me to go away, you know I've got a better case on you than you'd like.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Do you have meta support for this?Cecily wrote:Scum pine hides from questions with indications that he'll be back later and yet never returns.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Meta case based off meta in this game only?
How is my case stupid again?
Okay, how about you address what made this the right time to vote - did it or did it not have anything to do with me and others noting that your lack of vote/opinion was scummy?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
How about instead of just grumping about some wagons you actually explain the Gollum read - that would be more helpful to me.
And your wrong Cecily wagon read could be Cecily herself so...
I agree about furc and Pine at the moment, Twisted too (moreso) and I don't understand the Nocmen read - all I'm getting there is newb, not newb town.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
For what it's worth I was pretty obviously talking about Caboose, not furc.Zdenek wrote:Thor on Furclow:
For what it is worth, I've seen Furc buddy a lot as town.Thor wrote: I'm a big boy and can defend myself, the scummiest thing I've seen you do thus far today is all the blatant buddying.
@Calcifer - Hate you, hate this play, like my last question, and not smart enough to see your angle or am too smart to fall for it, so...-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Probably a quote tag, I'd guess. Just smile and act polite about it or he modkills you-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
His ISO 5 looks town to me, and I said as much at the time. He had issues with Acro's actions but actually took the time to click a link rather than just scream how it was obvious scummy talk.Calcifer wrote:<<<It would be far easier to list the things which Gollum has done that are town, rather than the quite extensive list of things making them scum. Seriously, look at Gollum's posts, and tell me, with a straight face, that it's pro-town play. I DARE you to.>>>
I don't find the rest of his iso townish, but yet I don't find it scummy either. Worst (and best) I could say is that it's a lurker slot. Yeah, he sucks for that - but I don't see that as a runaway case that, paired with the Acro vote, makes him obv. scum with the whole scumteam setup before us on a neat platter.
Why are you being vague about these? If I thought I had information that solid I'd be screaming it from the rooftops and trying to throttle people with it.Calcifer wrote:More than that: Gollum is confirmed scum by VCA; a Gollum-scum lynch would also create someone else who's confirmed town by VCA. And if SOMEHOW Gollum is town, said person would instead by confirmed-scum.
Hmmm, I'm null on Gollum and townish on farside. Would you be as happy lynching Zdenek as Gollum? If we lynch Zdenek do we get explained the obvious connections?Calcifer wrote:So, I'd prefer not explaining my reasons in more detail, but I'm quite convinced that Gollum, Zdenek, and Farside contains 2-3 scum, and that lynching them will give us the rest of the scumteam, regardless of their flip.
I could certainly provide this to the level you're doing so If Cecily flips scum than the scumteam is Cecily, Bub, and that Magister dude. Also, there is someone who will be definitely cleared OoooooWHEEEEooooo ::waves hand in mystical incantations::.Calcifer wrote:you'd better make a DARN-good case to convince me otherwise. Not only do you have to convince me they're scum (preferably with one or two other people you explicitly believe they are scum with--I'm not talking about two separate people being individually scummy; I'm talking about two people being connected!), but you ALSO have to convince me that you'll know who the scumteam is if they're town.
I've yet to see a Day 1 scumteam prediction bear fruit (unless maybe it was by furc or something, and he accusses so many people of so many things he always has a reference to 'calling it right' by the end ). I can't even think of anyone else on site (including Nacho) who plays that way and am surprised you seem to take that as base 1 starting point of how to scumhunt - especially considering you're being vague in your points.
This I agree withCalcifer wrote:...See?
This is why I don't give reasons.
'Cause while perfectly sensible to me, the above might not make sense to you. (And I haven't even begun to explain why Gollum, Farside, and Zdenek are better; all I've done is show you why Bub and Cecily AREN'T.)
If you're right you're failing at one of the basics of playing town - part of it is being right, and the other part is convincing others you're right. COuld you at least tear down Cecily as a wagon more effectively to convince me to get off it? I can buy Bub as a sudden spurt growth wagon I suppose (though even you are agreeing he looks bad for it) but I don't see the vague "compromise" claims that should have me fleeing for my life from Cecily at all.
Mostly I sort of feel like you'd rather I was playing a Fate meta, but I'm more pedantic than that despite what some people think.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I can grok the information you are showing, but fail to translate it into actionable data.
I have been in games both currently and in the past where too many people have expressed suspicion and I was all "whoa, hey now, buckos!" and then somebody hammers and - boom, scumflip. Just because someone is suspected and talked about doesn't empirically prove much of anything as far as alignment goes (at least until a flip happens and you can look back). I will agree the slop over from Bud is telling, and is probably the reason I am slightly distrustful of that wagon insomuch as it feels like a growth spurt that was a recent event. But I note the Cecily growth in recent pages is, to my mind, a direct outgrowth of her posting and acting in a scummy manner recently and people reacting to that scumtell by either agreeing it's a scumtell or disagreeing - hence the indirects as people comment on the action.
In short, I suspect your method would tend to showcase lots of indirect defense and offense towards a player whenever they become the topic of discussion and people do the natural action of weighing in with thoughts (or being cajoled/demanded to do the same). Just because someone has indirect attention on them though doesn't clarify much alignment information to my mind - as regardless of alignment scum and town are likely to pile onto a wagon to some degree.
I expressed a potential willingness to help you lynch Zdenek (one of your scum trifecta) and get off Cecily (one of your towns in need of a white knight) Why no real excitement to make that happen?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Why ruin your perfect record now?Cecily wrote:I'm here. Long weekend and even longer day of homework today. I'll try and keep up and post something useful tomorrow.
@evilpacman - that's an awfully simplistic way to look at it, however, I'll agree that slot is no longer in the bottom half of my reads. Confirmed though? Lol - no.
@Caboose
@flinter
What's up with that Twisted wagon? I've got a town read there, what's the scum case?
@Gollum - why are you still on Acro?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Unvote: Cecily
Vote: Zdenek
I reserve the right to later go rushing back to Cecily, and also reserve the right that if she later flips scum to go 'nyaah-nyaah' in Calcifer's face. That slot is still terribad, but I want to play out this wagon.
@Calcifer - I like the Nocman=town case, though I think it's sloppy to suggest that all three of the scumteam were pushing on one player. There was probably at least one of the scumteam calling him town at that time, yeah? Neutral on the Bub=town case.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Nocmen - With the current activity levels I started to think I must be playing a 12 man game and hence expected a 3 man scumteam. (and to clarify - No.)
@Ion - welcome to Vigbait is you territory, enjoy the weather, forecasts call for sporadic lead showers. Ask Cecily where the best cover is, I'm sure she visits every game. Oh, and your vote is lolfail right now, you might want to fix that.
@Calcifer - cute enough analysis of Cecily - why did you ignore my reason for voting her considering how much you defend her initial play I personally think my reason for voting her should appear significantly stronger in your eyes.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Here's the explanation...he supported it *before* his vote too.Ion67 wrote:I don't care how much you defended your point after this post, I don't understand what would even make you THINK about posting this. It is basically saying that you will support a lynch, even if you don't believe it? Can you explain?
So your vote is... Because it shows you didn't read him before his vote, and that if you had read the discussion I had with him you'd certainly understand where he was coming from with this comment. So, welcome to obvious skimmer territory - also known as Vig territory, because I would like it if a Vig killed you dead.
Does my commentary make sense to you now?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Oh, and your vote is still lolfail - for reasons explained above.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Clacifer sez;
I see the scumteam of Gollum/farside/Zdenek
Vote: Gollum
Thor sez:
I donna see Gollum, howza bout we lynch Zdenek?
Calcifer sez:
Thor is super smart and probably more of a man than anyone here can imagine. i am certain his penis is huge.
Vote: Zdenek
...oh, and later go into more details.
Ion sez:
Lol, it's scummy that you voted Zdenek when you didn't think he was scummy.
How is this not lolfail? Because I'm looking at it, and it looks lolfail. I even put on some glasses and held my head at a quizzical slant in order to look smarter - it looked like slanted lolfail. So - please, explain your vote, probably I'm just being dumb and missing the obvious in how it's awesomewin. I await this revelation with baited breath and bosom a quiver.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Game is dying the death of boredom.
People who are on weak arse wagons should change their votes around to defeat boredom and add lulz. The awesomeness that is my beard can only ward off boredom so much on its own.
@Acro - get off Ctorj or start screaming about how we should lynch him - you're being muy muy useless there.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I submit that doesn't deserve death at all. How about you explain exactly why it does because clearly I (and all the people not voting Ctorj) don't understand why it's such an obvious scumtell.Acronach wrote:thor, i take that as "why are you lynching ctorj?"
well, to answer your question, this still deserves death, and i haven't seen anything thus far that struck me as more scummy than this.
Ctorj49 wrote:vote: Acronach
As good a Day 1 bandwagon as we'll get for now.
If you're on a wagon of one at this stage of the game it's intrinsic upon YOU to get more votes on that wagon, otherwise you are failing at voting. Do not fail at voting. So start selling or get off.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@evilpacman (and Acro too)
Voting one of the above would take you somewhere though - no scum reads on any of them?Tasky wrote:Zdenek (5/11): flinter, pappums rat, Calcifer, Thor665, Bunnylover
Cecily (4/11): Twistedspoon, Nocmen, Pine, Furcolow
Pine (2/11): Bub Bidderskins, Cecily
Nocmen (2/11): Zdenek, farside22-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I actually don't find that ironic at all, and an indirect defense through attacking (chainsaw at worst) isCalcifer wrote:
Ironic, considering that you (albeit indirectly) have twice defended Pine yourself.Thor wrote:Really not too found of Zombeh's deflection protection on pinemilesdifferent from a deflection defense.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Great, now I'm hating on the Zdenek wagon.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Furcolow wrote:In Wrestlemania I didn't have a string of posts more than 300-400 words. In this game I have had many huge walls that I simply do not generate as scum.
In Wrestlmania there was a universal post restriction preventing long posts though.
Oh, furc, never change.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I'd like to reaffirm that I'd be really happy with a Zdenek lynch.
Ion and TS look pretty sketchy for their last minute mumblings as they still squat on dead wagons that have been dead a long time. We're lynching Zdenek or Gollum today - didn't you guys get that memo like two days ago?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Hell, actually I'm slightly pro the Gollum lynch just for how he sidelined to Bub.
I'll be around and available to help with either lynch, but certain lackwits need to get their votes in play for something to happen here.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
^Still a more useful player than most of you due to location of vote.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Unvote: Zdenek
Vote: Gollum
Pine, why are you not onto this one?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Caboose - and for future record, just let your partner play his game. You actually didn't need to claim just then, only he did.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Calcifer - as long as you're hre; what were all the awesome reads we'd get if Zdenek flipped town? Because he just flipped town.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I don't lynch Vigs on Day 1. They're either verifiable or real Vigs kill them dead.
Unvote: Gollum
Vote: Cecily
Magister Ludi wrote:Thor, that was the best move for the zdenek considering the fact many times claims are simply disbelieved or speed hammered.
That predicates stupid town, and also *if* people didn't believe him than the partner could step in. I don't consider that optimal play.
Magister Ludi wrote:Since you seem opposed to Bub, how about the MrTrow slot?
papum/Trow = scum because papum voted Caboose (was Caboose looking obv. town at the time of the vote? It's not scummy to vote someone who is revealed to be town - unless the entire Zdenek wagon is scum).
Could you quote his Calcifer lynch/kidding thing? I don't recall that.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Magister Ludi wrote:So, Do you consider MrTrow/pappums a good lynch, or not?
Define good.
If it was up to me who was lynched right this second he wouldn't be first choice. Honestly he probably wouldn't be in my top five, but my top five is pretty pathetically full of lurkers right now. I do want you to explain that Calc thing though, as it's the only part of your case that really sounds like a scumtell to me.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Ugh, so Mastin is making a vow to be anti-town, nice
I will add, Calc old buddy, you still didn't get us any info on what we learned now that Zdenek flipped town - I am really not happy about that and we're certainly not sheeping you onto farside, so get over your bad self with that one. If, on the off chance you bother to generate the Zdenek one i wouldn't mind seeing what you'd think we'd learn with a Gollum scum/town flip too. There's a chance he doesn't see tomorrow, y'know.
@Gollum wagon - would you like to hazard a guess why all the experienced players are getting off the Gollum wagon and all the newbies are championing it? Do you think maybe we know something you don't? Let me break it down for you;
1. Gollum is not the Vig - he has to manage a secondary kill, somehow, and he'll have to claim responsibility for it tomorrow.
2. He runs the risk of a tracker watching him.
3. He runs the need to explain why scum didn't kill him.
4. He runs a risk there's a real Vig out there who'll be like "oh, *you're* the Vig, huh?" ::loads gun and grins::
So, there are a reasonable pile of situations which dick with him if he's not the Vig.
We discuss this situation tomorrow - not today. Gollum isn't being lynched today.
@farside - Bub case in a sentence or two? Also, you have a town read on Cecily? I'd like to lynch Ceceily - why are you harshing my mellow?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
flinter wrote:I don't get the positive side of lynching a claimed vig. Either we find out by the shots at night that something is wrong, or we have an extra town shot. For that reason I really dislike Pine and Cecily, but mostly pine who is really pushy about it. I would be up for a wagon on either. I could follow Calcifer on the Farside wagon, and if anyone is still up for a lynch on T-spoon (though I think not), I wouldn't mind that either.
"Hey guys, I'm literally open to lynching anybody! C'mon, somebody make a half decent case I can glomph on to!"
Also, this doesn't look much like a post that should have ended with a 'Vote: Farside'-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Zdenek wrote:I prefer Bub to Cecily because of the possibility that the Cecily wagon formed partly to protect Bub.
That's funny because I see it the other way around.
Considering the way Celcily reacted to Gollum's claim I'd love to see her dead before we go to night.
Calc is town even if Mastin is a bit too full of his own reads (and, for the record, I'm still horrified that he is apparently planning to do this 42 cases thing)
I'm neutral on Noc, he feels compromise-ish to me. I'd vote him, but I don't feel happy voting him, and as a result I don't think he should be voted for.
How do people feel about a Magister Ludi lynch? He's gut for me but I could be happy with that lynch - moreso than Bub or Noc, most assuredly. Also, the way he was interacting with me as regards pappum and then his sudden push for Bub as though he has actually been a Bub lynch supporter really feels off.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Unvote: Cecily
Vote: Magister Ludi
If nothing else - reactions to the EXTREME!-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Nocmen wrote:Vote: Bub. Way too wishy-washy and I dont like the way many of his posts seem to be either 1-2 lines, or him hopping on the zd/gollum wagon. Honestly, his posts and votes seem way too similar to Cecily. But some of these posts just don't seem in place, as opposed to cecily just lacking post content.
farside22 wrote:I don't think so. I get Cec's point more clearly then Bud's. At least i know why Cec's reason's.
Brings up past game experience is a plus and showing clearly what she(?) finds scummy is better then BW with no reason.
I want to look at these side by side. I'm pretty sure somebody is wrong.
How come more people aren't voting Ludi yet? Do I actually have to respond to his little wall rant to convince you? How about people look back at his "constant" pressure on Bub, how he initially responded to pressure from me, and than his most recent response to pressure from me. I really don't think I'm seeing things here.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Calcifer wrote:For the record, I'll be doing a viewpoint of Thor potentially being scum, just to be on the safe-side, even though I think he's town. It's still theoretically possible he's scum. (In fact, I have a "Wild Mass Guessing" about him and Cecily BOTH being scum in the Cecily-scum case.)
P.S. This is even more reason to have helped me lynch Cecily, ask Nacho about my bussing tendencies.
Considering how big these writeups are is it possible to maybe just put them up as Google docs or something? You're honestly intimidating the snot out of me at the sound of these things and they sound super unwieldy and not likely to be utilized by any but the most masochistic of town. I'd frankly rather get just a sentence or two for each case and a summation and then you can go into detail if people request it. Plus there'd be less of "everybody hold your breath till Mastin wallposts" like what we're getting here.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Caboose - Pine was nuzzling up to me earlier too, but I'll admit I tend to slightly ease back from the buddying call because it's been so consistent and blatant to multiple players. I think you're spotting newb decisions and automatically concluding they're newb scum, which though it might be correct, it's not as sure of a thing as I suspect you feel it is.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Caboose - Dude, that is awesome buddying - it made me love him for seeing how awesome I am.
But, really, people have been buddying me a fair amount this game - hell, I could call Calc out for buddying me, doesn't make him scum. Newb town get super excited and buddy up to players they feel are town and they can follow. Newb scum do it too in a desperate attempt to avoid lynching. How do you define the difference here? Because I don't see it.
Could you vote for Ludi? I'll buddy you if you do.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL