haycorn (1) - Shiidaji
syndromeofadown (1) - Workdawg
Tierce (1) - fathom42
Shiidaji (1) - Cav
Not Voting (5) - inte, haycorn, syndromeofadown, Sampson, Tierce
5 to lynch.
Deadline falls in (expired on 2011-12-10 14:00:00)
In post 54, Shiidaji wrote:Dat reaction. Why so tense over one more vote?
I never said, or even implied you were being anti-town, but I am rather happy, actually. My read on you has changed for the worse.
Why so tense over one more vote?
Keep in mind this is an RVS, not an attack.
In post 56, Shiidaji wrote:And since apparently you're still in your little RVS world, this implies you've yet to find anyone even remotely suspicious, correct?
If not, tell me what you have from the past three pages. Otherwise, I don't see why you're complaining that I'm voting you.
In post 58, Shiidaji wrote:Now then, regarding your reads, they say nothing that isn't either obvious or a pointless observation. I care more about who you feel is even slightly leaning scum. If you find yourself grasping at straws, thensay so.
In post 59, syndromeofadown wrote:That's exactly my point. Go back and read the previous pages. I've made my opinion very clear. I have no feelings one way or another about who is scum at this point.
In post 58, Shiidaji wrote:No really, I'd like to hear it, because you're obviously a master at this game, able to weed out scum without batting an eyelash.
In post 52, Shiidaji wrote:@ Everyone, please start voting, we'll get nowhere fast here.
I agree, let's hear it people. Pick a person you feel unsure about, tell us why, and lay down a vote. (Note, do NOT lynch anyone yet. If you're vote would lynch, then just say that and don't vote) We need to get everyone involved and voting is a good way to do so.Shii in 52 wrote:@ Everyone, please start voting, we'll get nowhere fast here.
In post 47, Shiidaji wrote:Theory discussion doesn't get town anywhere. There are other threads for such things, it generates a ton of 'fluff' that is irksome to sift through while all you get that is relevant to the game is... nil.
In post 62, Tierce wrote:I want to point out that we don't need to lynch anyone fast. If you're not talking about a lynch, what/where do we need to get fast? Discussion? That doesn't require Day 1 voting two days in. Seems to me you're hurrying a bit toward a lynch. Why? We want to lynch scum, and there's nothing wrong if we lynch them ten minutes before the deadline as long as we get it right.
In post 64, Workdawg wrote:Unfortunately, the rest of this conversation reverted back to junky theory discussion.
In post 65, Tierce wrote:In post 47, Shiidaji wrote:Theory discussion doesn't get town anywhere. There are other threads for such things, it generates a ton of 'fluff' that is irksome to sift through while all you get that is relevant to the game is... nil.
You post this, and then several hours later embark on a theory discussion? Not looking very townie there, Shii.
In post 66, Cav wrote:SOAD, I'm worried about a number of things with you. First, I disagree with your position on attacking and defending and scum tells on day 1, but others have gone into it so there's no need for me to rehash that.Second, your vote for Shii, whether or not you argue it as an attack, comes across as a thought out, planned move; not what I'd call RVS, and I believe you yourself give reasons for this in your post #55. You claim you have no opinions on who scum is... but you're still voting for Shii. Like it or not, you've taken a stance on who scum is.
I'm not sure whether it's intentional or not, but you're coming across as quite confrontational; stuff like questioning someone's grasp on the game and then playing the 'i'm just a poor newbie, why don't you tell me where I'm going wrong' thing is just odd. I'm presuming this is a playstyle issue, for now, but you can see why it looks scummy, yes?
In post 61, syndromeofadown wrote:No.
In post 64, Workdawg wrote:SOAD's vote for Shii smells of distancing. Notice how he votes, but then says it's not an attack? He wants to vote for Shii, but he doesn't want people to think he is scummy for doing it. This is scum mentality as they need to vote for someone, but if that person flips town, they will be scrutinized (everyone on the wagon will) and saying "I'm not attacking you" is a good one. (Really it's not, but for some reason people like to do that).
In post 73, inte wrote:im chillin' in the back and watching the game progress