Nai wrote:FOS: HackerHuck
for his post right there. FOSing me after I actually give evidence that Coron defended Jules with craplogic? Amazing.
OMGUS!
The only craplogic I've seen recently is this...
Nai wrote:I remember being told, several times, that you should never defend someone unless you are absolutely sure of their role. If they're scum, and you're town, you'll be lynched. If you're scum, you know they're town, and you'll probably be lynched. I can't see a reason you would defend him unless you know something we don't.
And this statement ...
Jules in post 68 wrote:FOS Nai - I can't remember the reasons for voting you before and I think it would be unfair to vote without any evidence, but I know you looked suspicious
followed by this...
Jules in post 74 wrote:vote Nai
It appears to me that your strong belief in Coron's scumminess is causing you to "force" things that really aren't there. Coron's defence of Jules was just Coron stating his opinion that it seems to be reasonable behaviour to FOS and then Vote without any new information. I don't agree with that opinion, but it certainly doesn't appear that he's trying to indicate that he's got some kind of inside knowledge.
Coron's behaviour is starting to wear thin. His defence of jules has been noted as has his claim to do a reread of Jules back on post 93.
It also looks more like Stewie is placing something in his rear-end, rather than pulling something out.