NY 190: Molla's Large Normal
-
-
FA_Q2
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 24, Aj The Epic wrote:Oh wait, you actually confirmed.
yup, try reading next time
Only dropped out one time (and by your post I guess that was a game you were in) from circumstances beyond my control.
Wont have an issue this game
VOTE: BananaCucho
That is a scummy GIF!-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 36, TheWorst wrote:In post 29, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 24, Aj The Epic wrote:Oh wait, you actually confirmed.
yup, try reading next time
Only dropped out one time (and by your post I guess that was a game you were in) from circumstances beyond my control.
Wont have an issue this game
VOTE: BananaCucho
That is a scummy GIF!
Hold up, if that's a scummy GIF, then shouldn't choof, who actually owns the gif as an avatar, be scummier?
I question your logic, good sir.
meh.
Choof is acting like town though.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
I have no idea why the quote above did that...
In post 87, Luna Fox wrote:Btw i also now have a townread on talah.
^this is what I meant to quote.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 111, choof wrote:In post 90, BananaCucho wrote:In post 64, choof wrote:In post 59, BananaCucho wrote:Why does the vote bother you so much?
it doesnt, you didnt give any reason for the vote aside from quoting a post
If my vote on you doesn't bother you and you're just asking why I didn't give any reason for my vote, can you then please explain to the members of the jury why you ignored posts 63, 66, 73, and 76, which were ALL votes without stated reasons for another person. This normally wouldn't bother me but given this post it calls my attention:
In post 48, choof wrote:In post 47, BananaCucho wrote:In post 44, choof wrote:In post 33, BananaCucho wrote:In post 31, Luna Fox wrote:I currently have slight townleans on both Banana and choof, more so Banana than choof.
Wat
What have I done that is alignment indicative at all lol
don't like this post
why bother pointing out that you havent done anything alignment indicative if someone has a townread on you?
I'm wondering how its possible to town read me based off of nothing alignment indicative. Scum know who is town and who is mafia. Cmon now.
tone and presence. I would have had a pretty decent town read on you because of the avatar post butyou seem to be pretty self conscious
on phone so I cant easily edit this
but those votes didnt bother me because they were not on me
That stinks to high heaven.
This tells me you are not bothering with scum hunting but rather only concerned with self preservation.
What does that sound like...-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 169, choof wrote:In post 166, FA_Q2 wrote:Somehow I missed moving my vote in my last post:
VOTE: choof
It is interesting that no one noted that as well.
don't give yourself too much credit, you haven't done much at all in this game so far. why do you think it's interesting that no one noted your lack of vote?
Because virtually every game I have played calling another player out like that and then not voting for them is called out.
It is odd to me that not one player noted that I still had my vote in RVS. I don't know what to make of that yet, if anything.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 223, talah wrote:Hello Vedith btw.
I'm guessing you're town on what could be completely incorrect game meta which is that the person you replaced did not pick up their role PM.
Ergo no full scumteam to chat pre-game, ergo unfair on the scumteam.
How do you feel about that?
?
this dies not make any sense.
Where did you even get this idea. How do you know that the scum team was able to chat pre-game? I thought that was something that is explicit in the rules or does not happen? Can anyone else speak to this site and the general rules as to scum being able to speak pre-game?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 257, TheWorst wrote:UNVOTE: I am Innocent for now, I was hoping to get something out of that RVS vote, but alas. I want you to talk!
VeeGeeandTalahboth seem confused from what little content that they contributed, which is usually never a good thing. However, while Talah actually asks decent probing questions to clear up her confusion and get a read, VeeGee adds unnecessary comments and doesn't appear to try to understand the situation. I could only see this coming from the perspective of a lazy town or a low-effort scum.
Either way, I'd like to hear him speak more. Soooo VOTE: Veegee Hi.
I still don't likecatboi's focus on me, when there's others who have lacked content on the whole. I don't see how my post 104 was so egregious, it's pretty clear I was trying to catch up to a game's speed I wasn't used to with some quick thoughts in a lax tone. And my point on IaI is clearly contentious, but I think I still had a point at the time. Choof in some ways agreed with me here: 129, and AJ kinda had the same idea.
Actually, reread and I liked what choof did with Banana that many interpret as an argument, reminds me of what Bacde did with me once.
Also of the TvT argument with Banana that ended bad.
I want to know if the gripes@Choofhad with Banana is legit or was it all a reaction test. If so the former, that makes me curious aboutKyubeywho went all in for real with the Banana case. I'd like to know from him if he still thinks Banana is scummy.
FAQ's last post does bug me a bit, not enough to vote though. I would expect him to know better though, rather than trying to get brownie points.
@BananaCare to explain the Luna vote?
@PerformerI'd like to know your reads now that all of your initial scumreads apparently dissipated.
@Luna FoxYou don't interact too much with some of your townreads, like Talah and Kyubey. Wouldn't that make you more sure if that's your playstyle? I understand some people can have town actions, but are they really that strong when it comes to those two?
Know better?
I have been scum one time on this site (and that was my very first game) and have seen it explicitly in the rules that scum do or do not have a pre-game chat. The other site I used to play at never had a pre-game chat for scum that I can remember. I would expect that there be more question without any explicit explanation as to weather or not scum actually had that capability.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
...
All this drama because I missed that in the OP.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 442, Luna Fox wrote:Unvote
Vote: Performer
I think im probably never going to find out about FAQ2 anyway.
#SheepingTownreads
Not true - the game will end at some point and then you will know everything-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 458, choof wrote:In post 456, FA_Q2 wrote:VOTE: performer
Why the fixation on your own survival? That is a decidedly ani-town mindset. It does not help town if players are simply trying to avoid conflict and getting lynched.
Your posts are also terrible to read. Not a reason for voting you just an observation.
iirc there are quite a few posts that relate to you so if you could not ignore them and respond with something original, that would be fan-freakin-tastic
Point them out-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 460, catboi wrote:yeah that vote is all sorts of terrible
Whatever.
It appears that anything that I fucking out there is going to be a problem for you so just vote to hang me and be done with it then.
I don't care for this asinine bullshit.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 786, zakk wrote:Eh that last post by performer sounds town I don't wanna lynch him
Why?
His post is entirely a FoS on people voting him because they are voting him. That is terrible reasoning.
In post 804, Titus wrote:AJ, I never read on replacing in.
I like Performer though but I can't say why. Dude looks noob town.
Based on?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 795, Aj The Epic wrote:
100% certain you have 1 scum in four people. THREE OF THEM are basically confirmed town.
Really?
AFAIK, no one is confirmed anything at this point.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
What leads you to believe this?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1147, talah wrote:Molla was logged on for at least a while earlier too, post-hammer.
*coughlurkingscumfuckmodcoughcough* what
Speaking of which, these folks should post their thoughts on the lynch, tomorrow etc.
Skybird Sep 24, 11:27am Sep 28, 12:49pm 2 days 4 hours 19
BananaCucho Sep 16, 12:49pm Sep 28, 12:04pm 2 days 5 hours 109
I Am Innocent Sep 16, 11:34am Sep 28, 07:59am 2 days 9 hours 45
FA_Q2 Sep 16, 12:52pm Sep 28, 04:07am 2 days 13 hours 21
Thoughts on the lynch? It was useless unless we managed to randomly hit scum - I don't see much of anything in the way of actual information we get from this. A policy lynch on day one is a bad idea.
Tomorrow is going to have to wait till we get the flip. There are a few people lining up lynches for tomorrow without the flip - that does not sit well with me. The way performers wagon fell apart at the 11th hour without a claim is also bogus - unless I missed something there.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1169, Aj The Epic wrote:There is the possibility that I got hit as well. However considering yesterday's events, I'm betting it was you that got shot at.
Sky, who'd you send to? Everyone's alive, no one can duck out.
Why?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1174, Aj The Epic wrote:Okay to be less cryptic, Worst is a friendly neighbor. This is almost exactly what choof/skybird have claimed. There's almost no way I expect there to be TWO in this game.
This is interesting. I have not been in a game with this particular role before so I don't know how rare it would be to have two in the same game. Sky claimed:
In post 995, Skybird wrote:
I have stuff to do today and will be afk quite a bit. I will send my message to one of these three players:FA_Q2, VeeGee, IamInnocent.As soon as the thread re-opens for D2, I will post who I sent it to. I ask that the player who receives the message confirm it in their first post on D2.
I received nothing. I guess we will see when veegee or innocent shows up.
pedit: Why do you think the target last night was you or luna?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1182, Aj The Epic wrote:@Faq2: I can spell it out for you: I'm a 2 shot bullet proof doctor.
@Luna because I'm not sure what exactly it means right now. Friendly neighbors aren't anything more than innocent children who need night phases to work.
Not sure what to take from that.
Why claim now? this does not make sense to me.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1274, ChannelDelibird wrote:In post 1268, talah wrote:I must be missing the obvious then. Do enlighten me.
As I said Yesterday, Performer's play was such a clear and deliberate deviation from his normal style of speaking, with all of the lyrics and so on, that there was no way that he was scum. I've played with him as scum recently - he was nervous and noncommittal. His posts in this game are clearly those of someone who is trying to put themselves out there and Do A Thing, and I fully believe that he would only do that if inspired by a town PM.
PEDIT: Didn't mean you, Sala
What do you think he was trying to do then?
I still do not see the performer is so town reasoning.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1260, Performer wrote:Good morning from Cali, everyone...
welcome, Salamence
I was hoping to post after the n1 ended (Friday night, since I had plenty of time yesterday) but BB had a show, it got late, I went to sleep, and now I'm reading some incredibly interesting updates...
Confession - my "awkward play" in d1, particularly the post toward Vee - done as a gambit attempt, to draw annk against me
This is why I wanted to draw so much attention on d1..
Obviously no one died, which makes me scratch my head....
I don't have enough time at the moment to follow-up on everything, as I have to head off to work in a bit
If I continue my playstyle this game, I see it'll most likely hinder town's chance of winning, so
I will quit my paranoid & musical playstyle for this game, as of d2
And I will just be myself , since the situation has grown complex
I will catch up when I get back home
Thank you everyone
I note that you failed to state why you were so bent on pulling the NK. I also don't understand how you thought your actions would actually draw the NK - you were clearly a lynch candidate and it would have been dumb for scum to have targeted you IMHO.
What are your reads from yesterday as well then now that you are going to be 'yourself.'-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1317, ChannelDelibird wrote:I think that he was trying to do exactly what he says that he was trying to do - try to make it look like he had a cool role to draw the nightkill. I'm not saying that he did it well but it's really obvious that something like that was happening.
Perhaps to you - not so much to me.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1207, ChannelDelibird wrote:In post 1206, Luna Fox wrote:I agree that such an OP role must have a scum counter (Strongman in this case)
That does make me wonder... if scum have a strongman, why did nobody die?
As I understand it, strongmen are usally X-shot.
That would make sense.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1218, Salamence20 wrote:Seriously someone here is a JK, and a BPBG.
Really?
And what amazing roles do you see scum having to counter this setup. That seems awfully powerful as well as the fact that we have 2 confirmed townies.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1285, Aj The Epic wrote:No, it's pretty obvious. What scum team WOULDN'T go straight for luna unless they suspected the doc protect.
More concerning is that you're not thinking that through.
Why would they go for luna is a better q.
I read talah as a much stronger town read than luna and we had at least one that was town-confirming.
In post 1290, Aj The Epic wrote:I mean, I know Luna's alignment. Anyone who's town knows her alignment.
Unless you are scum then you do not.
Such a statement is scummy as hell. You assume that you know where the scum NK went. Only scum know where it went.
AJ is still a bad vote for day 2 though. If he is scum we can deal with that day 3 but I highly doubt that scum does not have a strongman with this particular claim in play. It also bothers me that AJ didn't even seem to think about a RB to completely short circuit his role and essentially throws it away. I don't really see a town motivation for this action but we will find out tomorrow though.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1323, ChannelDelibird wrote:In post 1318, FA_Q2 wrote:I note that you failed to state why you were so bent on pulling the NK. I also don't understand how you thought your actions would actually draw the NK
The reason is implicit, duh. Somebody has to be targeted for kills at Night. Better somebody whodoesn'thave a cool role.
And it's obvious why Performer might think that his actions (in a perfect world in which he executed them properly) would draw a nightkill because people were literally speculating about him being a power role in the thread. So congratulations, you know exactly why he did what he did, just that he did it with not nearly enough subtlety. Given what I've seen of Performer so far on the site, I find it much easier to chalk that up to raw inexperience than a calculated effort to deliberately try to fake a townslip.
you were clearly a lynch candidate and it would have been dumb for scum to have targeted you IMHO.
Attacking the results rather than evaluating the original intention <<<<<<<
Fair enough.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1325, Salamence20 wrote:FA ignoring me other than bullshit setup spec to discredit me.
Man Im so fucking good at molla games.
I have nothing to say to your 2 massive lines of 'content' on me.
There is nothing to discredit. It is not 'bullshit' either.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1327, ChannelDelibird wrote:
As I understand it, strongmen are usually not X-shot. See? I can apply an insignificant sample size too!
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Strongman
Strongman is usually X-Shot. It is usually scum-aligned, but has been seen on Town Vigilantes as well (where the overall role is called Juggernaut).
It is not based off an 'insignificant sample size.' An unlimited strongman is certainly possible but it does not make any sense to me.
In post 1327, ChannelDelibird wrote:
The point I made earlier is that, in a world in which town has two multiple-night-self-confirming roles and a multiple-BP doc to protect them, telling scum that their strongman is limited-shot (thus increasing the chances that they do not make a strongman kill on Night 1) is highly likely to leave them massively on the back foot if that's their only counter to a town team that can spread confirmation all over the game and keep that confirmation protected. Like, assuming there's not a massclaim on Day 1, scum in that scenario are highly likely to be a long way behind the town. That's what I'm really struggling to reconcile here. Unless scum have some kind of ridiculous superpowers (which a Night without kills makes less likely, though far from impossible), the kind of town power being talked about here isbeyond ridiculous. So I think it's very likely that a scum strongman in this scenario would have to be unlimited, and the fact that we had no kill last night therefore tells me that either scum have something different to a strongman or, more likely, the scenario being proposed is bullshit.
If strongman were unlimited then roles like doc and bp are almost useless.
I guess I can see that as a possibility but considering the results we know that is likely not the case. Are you willing to put enough stock in that idea that you hang the BP Doc?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1330, Salamence20 wrote:Youre defending of Zakk was terrible not to mention he was your counterwagon.
Thats good enough to warrant a vote from me.
Almost Im 99% youre flipping scum now so wheeeeee
Sorry I pointed out the reality of the idiocy in Zakk's wagon.
You do not waste your day one lynch.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1342, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1339, Luna Fox wrote:In post 1338, Salamence20 wrote:I dont want sheep. I want results.
What kind of results? i already said everything i wanted about FAQ2 on D1, along with the fake towntell and stuff.
Then dont say youre sheeping.
"Sheeping" indicates that you dont give two shits about this wagon or you dont care about who dies. I for one do think he is going to flip mafia because he was the counterwagon to zakk and the way he treated his counterwagon. I dont like his D2 play so far and there are nitpicky stuff in his iso. I like this way better than AJ. The more I think about it, the more AJvTitus looks town (Titus isnt one to not pick fights after all).
I have not read D1 as a whole yet. I had some time during my radio show to skim some pages but never had time to do anything detailed other than skim wagons and see what I think.
Stating that I am scum because I was on the counter wagon of a town flip is beyond idiotic.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1345, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1342, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1339, Luna Fox wrote:In post 1338, Salamence20 wrote:I dont want sheep. I want results.
What kind of results? i already said everything i wanted about FAQ2 on D1, along with the fake towntell and stuff.
Then dont say youre sheeping.
"Sheeping" indicates that you dont give two shits about this wagon or you dont care about who dies. I for one do think he is going to flip mafia because he was the counterwagon to zakk and the way he treated his counterwagon. I dont like his D2 play so far and there are nitpicky stuff in his iso. I like this way better than AJ. The more I think about it, the more AJvTitus looks town (Titus isnt one to not pick fights after all).
I have not read D1 as a whole yet. I had some time during my radio show to skim some pages but never had time to do anything detailed other than skim wagons and see what I think.
Stating that I am scum because I was on the counter wagon of a town flip is beyond idiotic.
never mind. I was being idiotic. I read that totally wrong.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1341, Skybird wrote:I'm still thinking wtf? with Worst's claim of FN. I also don't like AJ outing himself as the doc if he really is that.
Technically, worst did not claim it - AJ did.
I don't really see a viable scum tactic of fake claiming FN.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1348, Titus wrote:In post 1347, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1341, Skybird wrote:I'm still thinking wtf? with Worst's claim of FN. I also don't like AJ outing himself as the doc if he really is that.
Technically, worst did not claim it - AJ did.
I don't really see a viable scum tactic of fake claiming FN.
InuYasha mafia.
Scum claimed FN when I got them wagoned D1.
Dead guy got the message twice.
Sent to scumbuddy.
In multi ball.
No one shot either one.
Most frustrating town game EVER for me.
What do you think of 2 FN claims then titus?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1321, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1218, Salamence20 wrote:Seriously someone here is a JK, and a BPBG.
Really?
And what amazing roles do you see scum having to counter this setup. That seems awfully powerful as well as the fact that we have 2 confirmed townies.
Still waiting for this or did I miss it.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1408, Titus wrote:In post 1405, Luna Fox wrote:The best solution i can think for this is to have both friendly neighbors target someone together, and have the doctor protect that person, unfortunately im not sure whether this would help.
If AJ's town that's setting him up for failure.
So far we have 2 different claims for what the PM states.
One state player name and town, other states player name, role and town :/-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1409, Titus wrote:In post 1407, Luna Fox wrote:I'm not sure i understand, but the mafiawiki says that FN is necessarily town (if the claim is true that is)
One isfake if the PMs are different.
Town-aligned Friendly Neighbor is considered Normal on mafiascum.net. Messages sent on behalf of a Friendly Neighbor must be identical.
From the wiki.
Sigh. The above post was supposed to go with this quote.
I meant to ask in the above - Why does that set him up for failure?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1411, Titus wrote:In post 1402, Aj The Epic wrote:Is he perhaps not a friendly neighbor? I explicitly got his role.
Mailman pops into mind as a role possibility, but mailman generally is clarified not to be written by the mod.
This sounds like Drug Dealer or Unscrupulous Messenger. Both roles in my Don't Trust Titus Setup.
Don't really care what is sounds like - they both explicitly claimed FN.
If one is a lie then it would not have come from town...-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1471, Salamence20 wrote:Vedith is scumtelling up the ass
Explain?
His interactions are bad - that is true but not really scummy. He certainly is not trying to win any popularity contests. I don't really like how willing he is to lynch a claimed PR out the gate but I an suspicious of AJ myself.
You are also CONTINUING to ignore my question. That is annoying.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
Care to share your thoughts then?
What are you not liking?-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1462, ChannelDelibird wrote:On lynching a claimed power role: Ordinarily I would let these things shake themselves out over another Night but the claimed array of power roles in this case isfrakking nonsensical. How is it not obvious that, if we had two people who could confirm themselves to the game at large over several Nights, and a role who could protect those roles for almost forever unless scum were to spend three Nights killing them (and that's assuming, from a design perspective, that the claim comes out on Day 1), that would be broken beyond belief?
I letplausibleclaims live to shake themselves out. This setup isn't plausible, and the quickest way that it becomes plausible again is if Aj is lying about his role. As also mentioned, I think that he's behaving like scum Today anyway.
It is if the scum team have comparable counter roles as well as the fact that AJ has the role that gives town the most utility if true. Out of the claimed FN, I like sky's claim less than Worst - sky claimed day one where worst was outed, if AJ is telling the truth then sky was not likely protected but survived anyway and a read through sky's iso reads like garbage (or better a blank slate). Vee is not any better. With an open claim of FN, would scum try and claim FN as well? I doubt it. Then the recent interactions with titus look baaad.
VOTE: skybird-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1702, Luna Fox wrote:I'm pretty sure Vedith just did something that made him jump to top scumread.
Which is also why i'm voting Vedith (This isn't a blind sheep)
You say this but do not point out what it is that makes him so scummy.
So far Vedith is being chaotic and rather dumb IMHO - that is not necessarily scummy. What about his actions help scum? All they seem to do is point out Vedith.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1714, Performer wrote:15301519 – FA - you don’t think scum could fake counterclaim the first FN claim?
Of course they could. I never said they could not. However, I find it less likely as I dont see real gains. What do they gain other than cusory suspicion on the first FN. What do they lose? They possibly out 2 scum members as there will be suspicion on them as well. Scum claiming FN in the beginning is much more likely IMHO when they have no idea that an actual FN exists. It is not as though it is the most common role around - I believe this is my first exposure to it.
It has been pointed out though that they can target again. I think that is a much simpler way to 'check' them. If one is scum then they are going to out themselves over the long run or scum is going to have to hand over their entire team with fake messages. Ergo, a vote for any of them is not intelligent.
UNVOTE:
@titus
I understand that you do not ignore scum however why is it more intelligent to pursue the FN's as you are (by targeting Vee specifically because of the message) than look for the remaining scum team? For them to continue the ruse they are going to pretty obvious if they are scum.
Also - are we going to mass claim then? Talah already has and I will go next if this is something that we are behind. This may cause even more setup spec though and that has already essentially cornered this game.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1736, Luna Fox wrote:In post 1735, FA_Q2 wrote:You say this but do not point out what it is that makes him so scummy.
If i could i would have done so
rather cryptic?
Is it against the rules to point it out? If yes I will not inquire further.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1801, VeeGee wrote:In post 1797, Titus wrote:FNs in my book are guiltyuntil proven innocent.
Second,Skybird cannot be guiltyunless VeeGee also is guilty.
That's quite a contradoction there.
Seriously?
It is FACT that if sky is scum (therefore not an FN) then you MUST be lying about the message and ergo are scum. If you are town then it is presumed that you are telling the truth and FN is confirmed town. IOW, you flipping/being confirmed town would prove his innocence. The only way Titus' remark that you point out would not make complete sense with a town VeeGee is if you were actively playing against your wincon by lying about the message.
pedit: ninja'd-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1800, Vedith wrote:So, what's the case IaI?
ditto.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1809, I Am Innocent wrote:FA I will have a follow up question for u once the other 3 have chimed in.
I assumed as much.
I will be in and out on here for most of the day so I should be able to respond rather quickly.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1814, VeeGee wrote:In post 1802, Vedith wrote:How? XD
You need to re read that I think, VeeGee.
Is Sky is guilty, then you are as well.
Same as if TheWorst is guilty, so is AJ...
It's simple.
No, she said that skybird CANNOT be guilty unless I am.
And that is true. If you don't understand then you really need to reexamine the situation.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1816, VeeGee wrote:In post 1803, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1801, VeeGee wrote:In post 1797, Titus wrote:FNs in my book are guiltyuntil proven innocent.
Second,Skybird cannot be guiltyunless VeeGee also is guilty.
That's quite a contradoction there.
Seriously?
It is FACT that if sky is scum (therefore not an FN) then you MUST be lying about the message and ergo are scum. If you are town then it is presumed that you are telling the truth and FN is confirmed town. IOW, you flipping/being confirmed town would prove his innocence. The only way Titus' remark that you point out would not make complete sense with a town VeeGee is if you were actively playing against your wincon by lying about the message.
pedit: ninja'd
So, tell me this.
What happens when I'm town, don't get it, and still playing to my wincon?
So you are trying to claim that you can play to your win-con as town by covering up a scum players lie?
Ummm, no.
That is enough trying to make you understand basic boolean logic though - it is no longer helping town. If you still do not understand then there is no point in continuing - it is willful.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1842, Titus wrote:In post 1840, talah wrote:In post 1828, Titus wrote:@Talah, You just went through great analysis on why to vote VeeGee while espousing a conclusion that cannot be true if VeeGee is town (namely AJ and the Worst are town).
This is afactually incorrect statement. Can you tell me what shadow-condition you're overlaying on top of actual facts to reach the conclusion that if VeeGee is town, AJ and Worst are scum?
Assuming Sky and The Worst are town, they'll have zero problem sending the message to someone other than themselves, AJ, TW, Talah, and Sam.
I'm not at all comfortable with you having any influence over who messages are sent to while you're presenting falsities as fact. This is what you did in Gundam - just slipping in bullshit statements here and there and not explaining them when challenged, but rather saying they were correct when they're obviously not. I'm not having that in this game so if you could kindly explain your position on the interdependencies between Skybird/VeeGee and AJ/Worst that would be appreciated.
Nope. If VeeGee is town, Worst and AJ are scum. The wiki requires FN messages to be the same. They claim different messages. So either they are in opposition, or there's a mod error.
Well I am not presenting falsaties as fact. So you can stop whining about the obvious.
We can't have the four send to each other in case of a circle jerk. Sal is scummy. You're too interested in control.
Thus my pool.
And they claimed that the PM was the same ergo your line of reasoning is blatantly incorrect. Considering it was veegee that had to clarify, there is no chance that a veegee town flip incriminates AJ and worst. This line of thought is so convoluted and is really stretching to force town PR's as a mislynch. Further, you are lining up your mislynches as well - veegee then onto AJ or Worst. This stinks to high heaven.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 1874, Titus wrote:Here I will prove it.
Mod: Are all friendly neighbor messages the same as required by the wiki.
That was never in question. What is in question is weather or not the claims were actually different. I got that they were precisely the same though veegee had to explain further after the paraphrase.-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-