Crub[4](Jex, ChaosOmega, Simenon, Sammich)
Simenon[2](Crub, Lemming1607)
Sir Tornado[1](Shanba)
Lemming1607[1](Per)
Not Voting[3](AlSleet, Samruc, Sir Tornado)
oh well. :[You see what you're trying to do is guide me into believing something. Whatever answer I give, allows you to properly respond to the situation. I'm not going to give you that chance. That's not how I roll yo.
Read the question. Now read your "case". I wouldn't ask this question if I didn't feel it was necessary.I see your game, and it's like you believe you're smarter than everyone else and need to lead us to find out "inner selves" through questions.
Have fun.I don't play that game. I'm going to keep my vote on you until you answer the question, instead of trying to figure out what answer will satisfy me and say that.
Why would you systematically bandwagon third vote everyone, assuming you're motivated about lynching scum?Simenon wrote:oh well. :[You see what you're trying to do is guide me into believing something. Whatever answer I give, allows you to properly respond to the situation. I'm not going to give you that chance. That's not how I roll yo.
Read the question. Now read your "case". I wouldn't ask this question if I didn't feel it was necessary.I see your game, and it's like you believe you're smarter than everyone else and need to lead us to find out "inner selves" through questions.
If you read my posts, I'm obviously acting the exact same way (every two votes gets a bandwagon vote from me). I'm asking you if that is a coincidence or not. If you aren't going to answer that, then I think it's of no use to me to answer your case.Have fun.I don't play that game. I'm going to keep my vote on you until you answer the question, instead of trying to figure out what answer will satisfy me and say that.
Why would you systematically bandwagon third vote everyone, assuming you're motivated about lynching scum?
Not very convincing. This is from the guy who said "I'm not a big fan of bandwagoning". Could be that he knows Crub will turn up town, and prepares to go after other players on the wagon?Sammich wrote:Unvote; Vote Crub
I don't think you're really town, and I didn't really like how you claimed you were town and we could all "Lynch Simenon the next day".
If you turn up town then we can all assure that someone on this bandwagon is scum.
Why point this out if you don't react to it? This looks like you either want a hammer but didn't dare say it, or wants him put off L-1(which would have been easy to do when he had voted Sir T himself).Sammich wrote:I think Sir T is in a -1 lynch situation.
I voted for Simenon with I believe correct reasoning. I believe to have found a scumtell. Crub jumped on presumably to save himself. If you can call that a bandwagon sure.Shanba wrote:Crub, you are like a broken record. Do you actually have anything on Sim or are you voting him for the heck of it? Or maybe it's just OMGUS?
I personally don't think Simenon is deserving of the wagon on him. He's not a bad vote, but I'd put him at least 4th or 5th on my list.
Sammich has been slipping a little bit under the radar, but I don't find his behavior all too distressing. I do agree, though, that it would be beneficial to take a closer look at him.Samruc wrote:ChaosOmega: I'm reluctant to put Crub at L-1. Apparently he isn't affected by pressure, rather keeps the same style throughout his posts: "Lynch me, you will find out that you are wrong". I don't like this defence, as I said before, but I don't find it enough to risk a lynch for.
I'm thinking that there actually might be "opportunistic scum" on the wagon. Consider this:Not very convincing. This is from the guy who said "I'm not a big fan of bandwagoning". Could be that he knows Crub will turn up town, and prepares to go after other players on the wagon?Sammich wrote:Unvote; Vote Crub
I don't think you're really town, and I didn't really like how you claimed you were town and we could all "Lynch Simenon the next day".
If you turn up town then we can all assure that someone on this bandwagon is scum.
Another thing about Sammich:Why point this out if you don't react to it? This looks like you either want a hammer but didn't dare say it, or wants him put off L-1(which would have been easy to do when he had voted Sir T himself).Sammich wrote:I think Sir T is in a -1 lynch situation.
I think this guy deserves a closer look.Vote: Sammich
Late edit: The last post from Sammich isn't very impressive either.
So if this is his defense, how do I turn up as oppurtunistic scum?Samruc wrote:ChaosOmega: I'm reluctant to put Crub at L-1. Apparently he isn't affected by pressure, rather keeps the same style throughout his posts: "Lynch me, you will find out that you are wrong". I don't like this defence, as I said before, but I don't find it enough to risk a lynch for.
Far from it.Samruc wrote:I'm thinking that there actually might be "opportunistic scum" on the wagon. Consider this:Not very convincing. This is from the guy who said "I'm not a big fan of bandwagoning". Could be that he knows Crub will turn up town, and prepares to go after other players on the wagon?Sammich wrote:Unvote; Vote Crub
I don't think you're really town, and I didn't really like how you claimed you were town and we could all "Lynch Simenon the next day".
If you turn up town then we can all assure that someone on this bandwagon is scum.
It doesn't look like that at all.Samruc wrote: Another thing about Sammich:Why point this out if you don't react to it? This looks like you either want a hammer but didn't dare say it, or wants him put off L-1(which would have been easy to do when he had voted Sir T himself).Sammich wrote:I think Sir T is in a -1 lynch situation.
ChaosOmega pointed out you were always seemingly on the bandwagon. Could it be that you're now focusing on a player that's not being BWed at the moment?ChaosOmega wrote:In the re-read, something seemed off with you in the beginning. Later on, you always seemed to be on the popular bandwagon at the time. But the thing is, you're not voting. It seems like you want to be part of the lynchers, but if they turn up town, you can go "I wasn't voting for him". You're suspicous of Crub, why aren't you voting for him?
And who's fault is it for being myopic and failing to consider the state of play if I'm town?Sammich wrote:If Crub does turn up town, it's his fault for acting so scummy.
Because his defense is the obvious candidate to push against if you are trying to not look scummy while lynching.Sammich wrote:I don't OMGUS.So if this is his defense, how do I turn up as oppurtunistic scum?Samruc wrote:ChaosOmega: I'm reluctant to put Crub at L-1. Apparently he isn't affected by pressure, rather keeps the same style throughout his posts: "Lynch me, you will find out that you are wrong". I don't like this defence, as I said before, but I don't find it enough to risk a lynch for.
And everyone else's fault for making the wrong assessment of his scumminess...Sammich wrote:Far from it.Samruc wrote:I'm thinking that there actually might be "opportunistic scum" on the wagon. Consider this:Not very convincing. This is from the guy who said "I'm not a big fan of bandwagoning". Could be that he knows Crub will turn up town, and prepares to go after other players on the wagon?Sammich wrote:Unvote; Vote Crub
I don't think you're really town, and I didn't really like how you claimed you were town and we could all "Lynch Simenon the next day".
If you turn up town then we can all assure that someone on this bandwagon is scum.
If Crub does turn up town, it's his fault for acting so scummy.
Completely Wifom.Sammich wrote:It doesn't look like that at all. If I wanted a Sir T hammer, I would have been way more pressed onto his case.
Yes. After Omega's post I tried to explain to myself why I hadn't voted Crub, and decided I was not completely agreeing with having him at L-2, even less so at L-1. It was only natural then to take a look at his bandwagonners.Sammich wrote:ChaosOmega pointed out you were always seemingly on the bandwagon. Could it be that you're now focusing on a player that's not being BWed at the moment?
=\Shanba wrote:Sammich's logic is unimpressive. Samruc's is better. Don't think either are great lynches right now, though I'd favour Sammich over Samruc. especilly don't like him saying he doesn't OMGUS and then FoSsing Samruc in what amounts to OMGUS. Actually, I just convinced myself. Unvote vote: Sammich
Then look at Jex and Simenon and I if you're going to do that.Samruc wrote:Yes. After Omega's post I tried to explain to myself why I hadn't voted Crub, and decided I was not completely agreeing with having him at L-2, even less so at L-1. It was only natural then to take a look at his bandwagonners.
Why not?Shanba wrote:Please don't speculate on who's a mason, that'SJust common sense
Suddenly you agree with Samruc.Shanba wrote:Sammich's logic is unimpressive. Samruc's is better. Don't think either are great lynches right now, though I'd favour Sammich over Samruc. especilly don't like him saying he doesn't OMGUS and then FoSsing Samruc in what amounts to OMGUS. Actually, I just convinced myself. Unvote vote: Sammich
Suddenly you feel the need to vote me only after Samruc's post? What's up with that?Shanba wrote:Anyway. My vote was mostly unsubstantiated. Putting pressure on a player I'm not sure on is not a bad move.Not all votes have the intent of lynching, as I said before.Yet SirT's clearly did. Which I felt was odd, given the strength of the case.
Shanba wrote:Putting pressure on a player I'm not sure on is not a bad move.
That makes that post absolutely bullcrap. How can you be unhappy with an unsure BW on YogurtBandit and then say voting while unsure is fine?Shanba wrote:Unvote
The case there was on YB was weak. I voted for him and I admit that. Why, therefore, is this wagon growing this quickly and is this big? Unhappy bout that. unvote vote lemming