CKD wrote: Thats a combination of posts 298-300. Also at the tail end of your post before this it starts as well. And the fact it was a triple post implies the posts were extremely hasty, implying an extremely aggressive reaction.
Over reaction is scummy as it implies you have a lot more on the line with the lynch, which a scum would (especially in a nightless game, losing 1 of 2 or 3 members is a much bigger blow than losing one of 7 or 8). It also implies that you are being a lot more wary of single votes on you, which is scummy for the same reasons.
OBJECTION!
I love the syllogistic thinking
Triple posting is aggressive over-reaction
Aggressive over-reaction is scummy
Triple posting is scummy
I dispute the first line entirely, and I dispute the reliability of the second line. The third line, then, is just ridiculous.
armlx wrote:
There's one other reason I can think of for overreactions, and it's that you are a completely incompetent newbie. You offered to do a PbP, so that is blown out of the water.
Have you meta'd CKD? Is he normally calm, cool and collected?
armlx wrote: Also, it's not even just the triple posts. Did you read what you said in those? It doesn't even make sense, you use the word bull shit actual infi times.
It makes sense to me. Sure, it isn't exactly eloquent, but it is still intelligible.
I also fail to see why the use of "bull shit" is relevant. Mentally change it to "falderal" or "rot" if you must, but it doesn't mean anything/
armlx wrote: You claim that voting on a hunch isn't scummy b/c you told use you were doing it. Because honesty makes everything better.
I agree with you here; hunch voting is bad. Admitting it makes no difference, because the problem in hunch play is that it makes an unchallengeable statement.
armlx wrote: Dear god, if that wasn't an over reaction I would love to see what is.
armlx wrote:te on why CKD's #360 was an over-reaction?
armlx wrote: Double posting on its own isn't over reacting, however in that situation it clearly was.
"Clearly was"? Prove it.
FoS: armlx