mmkay. But it's pretty standard practice to mention such occurances. You can say so and so was active on site without siting the game.Adel wrote:I knew he was active from other games we are in.shaft.ed wrote:Adel why did you try to push that off to an ongoing game? Seems rather trivial to lie about.
Mini 546: House Mafia - Game Over
-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
-
-
Adel Crystalline Logick
- Crystalline Logick
- Crystalline Logick
- Posts: 6743
- Joined: May 23, 2007
- Location: Central Oregon / High Desert
And it is pretty standard to dodge a question by saying that you aren't going to cite ongoing games.-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Finally sitting down and reading the posts from the beginning! I am jotting down things that I find interesting. I am using the + and - notations to indicate whether the cited post makes a player more or less likely to be a scum. For example CKD+ means that in my opinion CKD is more likely to be a scum as result of the post
Post 119. Armlx says that he's 80% sure on Adel and Shaft and only 40% sure on CKD, but still votes CKD, says he's smacking Pooky too hard for wrong reasons. (CKD+)
Post 124: CKD says he understands Shaft's reasoning for voting him (CKD+) But his accusations on Adel (rather than defending himself) sounds pretty geniune (CKD-)
Post 170: armlx says "One scum wont vote for the other even when he's digging his own grave, but tries to look suspicious of him to distance himself. How cute. " then votes for shaft.ed (shafted+++)
post 183: shafted's famous post that removed suspicions from all that suspected him EXCEPT armlx. Why didn't armlx go with the "bandwagon" and give shafted a pardon? It was a very convincing post, indeed. Stubborn distancing that, in armlx's mind, its benefits outweighed the suspicions that might be directed to him for not being convinced by a convincing post. (shafted++)
I also want to make another note, shafted post in 183 was smart in both cases 1)if he was a scum 2) if he's a townie. if he was a townie, he probably meant it and planned the whole thing from the beginning. 2) if he was a scum, he probably came up with reasons behind his actions AFTER THE FACT. I am hesitant to believe that there are more than handful of people smart enough to actually plan this (i.e when he was accusing Adel). therefore, in my mind, 2) is more likely. (shafted+)
Post 246: TG goes against the crowd and says armlx is neutral and difficult to read. He says this even though armlx is on the same team as him and therefore TG cannot vote against armlx. A scum could have found this as a convenient way to suspect his partner (a scum) without actually contributing to vote against him (TG--)
Post 252: armlx (who's at L-1) says: "With Adele jumping in early on such a low threshold as well as following all my votes and the TG votes early is really suspicious" A scum before death trying to incriminate a innocent? (Adele-, TG-)
Post 314: TG says: " I am completely swooning over Pooky and Adel. There's a reason why Adel is crystalline logic and Pooky just came through with the resolution of an after-school special. I am held under their sway not because of charisma, but by the involiable stuff of credibility. They make complete and perfect sense and are actually playing the game. " (TG++) Hard to explain this one. Even though it sounds like TG is trying to buddy up with Pooky and Adel, but it's so full of scummy flavor, I was somewhat hesitant to count this.
Post 328: All Pooky says is: "Armlx=total scum. "
Six minutes later. Post 329: TG says: "For once I tend to agree with Pooky. His post feels a little barnacle-y, in addition he was barnacle-y to Adel's playstyle. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't two barnacles make a scum?" (TG++++)
First of all, all Pooky says is one sentence, without any explanation. Yet TG jumps on the bandwagon against Armlx, who he considered "neutral and difficult to read" prior to this. "little barnacle-y"? "two barnacles make a scum"?
I can't suppress my mind from screaming "just lynch TG"
Post 350: Votes against Jive Machine by accusing him of "It's been more than 72 hours since you've promised content." [TG+]
WOW AND FINALLY 351, 353, 354SEALS ITfor me.
In 351 he calls armlx "acting as scummy as possible". And then, unfos-es armlx because he "agrees with armlx's assessment on CKD"?!! What? [TG++]-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
I am re-reading my post.. to see if it makes sense.
breathe in...
breathe out...
Vote: TGShowGuys!! If RBD isn't scum, I'll video-record me eating my shoe and post it here!
Like, for REAL
Actually, I will hammer my cock.
That should be more fun.
I'll HAMMER my COCK and POST IT HERE.
RBD IS SCUM.
Lynch him and uncover the truth about RachMarie.
I'LL HAMMER MY COCK, MY BALLS, MY EVERYTHING.
RBD SCUM. ALL IN!!!!!!-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
A bit surprised you dropped a vote after that analysis Near. Your scoring put me tied with TG yet he was the obvscum after it was all said and done.
So I guess you're not running with that CKD is scum idea anymore?Near wrote:In 351 he calls armlx "acting as scummy as possible". And then, unfos-es armlx because he "agrees with armlx's assessment on CKD"?!! What? [TG++]-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Yes, I realize I'd look pretty suspicious whether or not TG turns out scum. But in my defense (sort of) I got pretty worked up and emotional.shaft.ed wrote:A bit surprised you dropped a vote after that analysis Near. Your scoring put me tied with TG yet he was the obvscum after it was all said and done.
So I guess you're not running with that CKD is scum idea anymore?Near wrote:In 351 he calls armlx "acting as scummy as possible". And then, unfos-es armlx because he "agrees with armlx's assessment on CKD"?!! What? [TG++]
Oh well, I know saying this could make me more suspicious, but: I wish I can take back my vote.-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
As for CKD, yes, I changed my mind. What was a hunch before, I don't think it's him.
Also, I didn't even realize that you had same number of +'s as TG, I didn't actually count. I didn't even finish reading all the posts. I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.ShowGuys!! If RBD isn't scum, I'll video-record me eating my shoe and post it here!
Like, for REAL
Actually, I will hammer my cock.
That should be more fun.
I'll HAMMER my COCK and POST IT HERE.
RBD IS SCUM.
Lynch him and uncover the truth about RachMarie.
I'LL HAMMER MY COCK, MY BALLS, MY EVERYTHING.
RBD SCUM. ALL IN!!!!!!-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
Near wrote: Oh well, I know saying this could make me more suspicious, but: I wish I can take back my vote.
How are these two posts cogent with each other? You were certain, but now you aren't?Near wrote: I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.
As CKD said: What changed?-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
I don't know the answer to either question.vollkan wrote:
About what, and why?Near wrote: But in my defense (sort of) I got pretty worked up and emotional.
But, I just do. And it happens pretty frequently to me in real life and it already happened once in the newbie game. When I start to think I have a pretty good idea on who the mafia is, I seem to go into this "emotional mode" where I get scared. Does it ever happen to you guys?-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
Reference me to you losing control in a Newbie game.Near wrote:
I don't know the answer to either question.vollkan wrote:
About what, and why?Near wrote: But in my defense (sort of) I got pretty worked up and emotional.
But, I just do. And it happens pretty frequently to me in real life and it already happened once in the newbie game. When I start to think I have a pretty good idea on who the mafia is, I seem to go into this "emotional mode" where I get scared. Does it ever happen to you guys?
I don't like this. It's just giving yourself an out for irrationality. I might get a bit tunnel-visioned when an interogatee begins to implode, but I certainly don't get into a "scared" (wtf are you scared about?) emotional state.-
-
vollkan The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- The Interrogator
- Posts: 5373
- Joined: March 29, 2007
- Location: Australia
-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
Near wrote:I am re-reading my post.. to see if it makes sense.
So methinks TG's turning up town, right Near? Care to save us the time for Claus to log in?Near wrote:Also, I didn't even realize that you had same number of +'s as TG, I didn't actually count. I didn't even finish reading all the posts. I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
I was thinking this even when I was analyzing TG toward the end, that if TG turns scum, I'd look suspicious BECAUSE it would be look like I am bussing TG. I was not at all convinced it was TG just a few posts ago, all of the sudden, I think it's TG who is sitting at L-1 RIGHT AFTER vollkan expresses his opinion that he's willing to vote against him. That's what concerned me.curiouskarmadog wrote:why would you look suspicious if TG turns out to be scum?
wait what? you want to take your vote back?..why? What has changed in between voting and now?
Yes, I wanted to take my vote back. I don't knwo! I wasn't sure anymore.-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
They are related to each other because 1) I thought people would be suspicious BECAUSE I reacted all suddenly SO 2) I explained my unusual circumstances for it.vollkan wrote:Near wrote: Oh well, I know saying this could make me more suspicious, but: I wish I can take back my vote.
How are these two posts cogent with each other? You were certain, but now you aren't?Near wrote: I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.
As CKD said: What changed?
Yes, I was certain at the time. THat's why I voted.
And yes, almost immediately after I submitted vote, I wasn't sure anymore. I kept hitting refresh wanting to hear Adel's or CKD's approval.-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
Is what I did that suspicious? Really?shaft.ed wrote:Near wrote:I am re-reading my post.. to see if it makes sense.
So methinks TG's turning up town, right Near? Care to save us the time for Claus to log in?Near wrote:Also, I didn't even realize that you had same number of +'s as TG, I didn't actually count. I didn't even finish reading all the posts. I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
Well usually scum will wait to express regret for their vote until after their mislynch turns up town. It really really feels like you are setting up for explaining your way out of a mislynch. I guess time will tell.Near wrote:
Is what I did that suspicious? Really?shaft.ed wrote:Near wrote:I am re-reading my post.. to see if it makes sense.
So methinks TG's turning up town, right Near? Care to save us the time for Claus to log in?Near wrote:Also, I didn't even realize that you had same number of +'s as TG, I didn't actually count. I didn't even finish reading all the posts. I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.-
-
Claus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: June 1, 2007
- Location: Tsukuba
Wow, you guys sure get chatty after a good firing. Let's get rid of TG!
* Kick *
And his folder reads... Ah!Good Doctor! That was a mislynch, sorry. It is now Free Time assignment number three. Let me check doctor House's instructions.
...
Really? How strange.
Well, anyway, House said so, so here is your task for the FTA: you have to discuss among yourselves, and attribute an AGE in YEARS for each player in the game, based on their playstyle. No two players can have the same age.
I'll let you discuss for a while how to decide this.
Also, since it is the FTA, the bad doctors can talk between themselves.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
-
-
Near Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: January 31, 2008
shaft.ed wrote:Near wrote:I am re-reading my post.. to see if it makes sense.
So methinks TG's turning up town, right Near? Care to save us the time for Claus to log in?Near wrote:Also, I didn't even realize that you had same number of +'s as TG, I didn't actually count. I didn't even finish reading all the posts. I just reached a stage where I was certain it was TG... and I acted on it.FOS = Shaftedfor being the first to "know" TG will turn town and trying to blame me for it.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.