Do not worry -- he will swoop in on the 10th, an entire day early, and with his magical numerals have this whole mess solved.Acosmist wrote:Um...when?Ellibereth wrote:Hell week of test ends next week. Will be back then.The deadline is Tuesday, May 11.
Furry wrote:Is there any way we can get a slight deadline extension due to finals? I have one this thursday, two one the day of deadline, and one the day following it.
I just know im not putting a whole lot of effort into this since school is eating up all my time right now, and really want to make a run at this game.
Acosmist wrote:Seriously, deadline extend get
plz
Ummmmm I looked over the history and never saw the wagon gain any steam or create any danger of lynching Nacho. If I'm wrong go ahead and point out what I missed.Furry wrote:Remember Eli laying into nacho yesterday? That makes no sense if they are partners since its going to quickly bring WIFOM to Eli before endgame, there was an easy town lynch to push through first, he wasnt stuck on the wagon... there is no good reason for someone as good as Eli is to bus a partner like that. I see it as actually the least likely existing pairing out there right now.Elementary Fermion wrote:How is that pair not possible? (Is one of them a pair with you?)Furry wrote:Well given that it seems that there is zero way you dont vote one of nach/elli which is almost an impossible pairing... yeah you are tunneling.
Where did you get "reaction hunting" from BaB's vote at all? I also don't remember you having the latter philosophy.Nacho Iso 0 wrote: I didn't like Balloon's original vote on Panacea; I'm not a firm believer in reaction hunting that early in the game.
Sup lurking scum, how are you this evening?Nachomamma8 wrote:In a newbie game, I tend to have a waaay different philosophy than I would in a normal game. For example, reaction hunting by voting without an explanation tagged on with it is generally a bad idea when you're the only person who knows wtf is happening.
Also, why woulld you request a deadline extension? There are two scums to get, you know. So why don't you, you know, actually do some scumhunting and make a case on me that doesn't, you know, suck? After I shoot that down, maybe we can get somethin productive done! ^.^
ive tried making these before, and I just kept updating it as I went through the game. I do use a similar thing to keep track of votes when I mod, so im not sure "spent most of his time working on a spreadsheet" quite qualifies as a tell. Those things are amazingly usefull by the by.Ellibereth is my second suspect at the moment, again for the reasons I outlined above as ancillary to explaining to havingfitz the difference between taunting stupid people and actual ad hominem attacks. He shows up, claims he cannot bother to read the things that have been written in this game, but finds the time to go through and make up some elaborate spreadsheet of every vote cast.
It may just be lack of sleep but...He then claims that his numbers tell him exactly who is who in this game, except (a) he would not open his methods up to peer review or even describe them at all, (b) he incorrectly maintained an existential instantiation of a universal generalization based on existential instantiations when such premises were debunked, (c) he very quickly flipped his claimed results from his "numbers research" with no explanation, and has been reduced to posting at my frequency (which has been criticized as of late), and (d) has dropped his "numbers research" altogether without answering any of the questions put to him about it. To me, this seems like scum that replaced in and tried to throw a load of feces in our faces.
Are you serious? Such bald assertions cannot even be called “results” without providing some sort of methodology. I thought you seemed bright enough to realize that. Also, as he does not even stick to his own “results” I would imagine that should throw a little more doubt on such “results.”Furry wrote:a) Arent the results all that matters
Eventually yes, but early on in a phase, its not always necesary, as you eventually can back up the assertion im fine with doing that. Makes people react somewhat differently when they are not sure if you have a case, cop guilty, etc.Elementary Fermion wrote:Are you serious? Such bald assertions cannot even be called “results” without providing some sort of methodology. I thought you seemed bright enough to realize that. Also, as he does not even stick to his own “results” I would imagine that should throw a little more doubt on such “results.”Furry wrote:a) Arent the results all that matters
It's almost likeFurry wrote:Eventually yes, but early on in a phase, its not always necesary, as you eventually can back up the assertion im fine with doing that. . . .Elementary Fermion wrote:Are you serious? Such bald assertions cannot even be called “results” without providing some sort of methodology. I thought you seemed bright enough to realize that. Also, as he does not even stick to his own “results” I would imagine that should throw a little more doubt on such “results.”Furry wrote:a) Arent the results all that matters
That's stupid. It would work even better since they have no idea what you're doing. Also, you're ignoring the point, where in Bab's vote did you see pressure/reaction vote?Nachomamma8 wrote:In a newbie game, I tend to have a waaay different philosophy than I would in a normal game. For example, reaction hunting by voting without an explanation tagged on with it is generally a bad idea when you're the only person who knows wtf is happening.
I have no desire to be Day 1 lynched by a bunch of confused noobtowns.Ellibereth wrote: That's stupid. It would work even better since they have no idea what you're doing.
The whole not tagging on an explanation for the vote in the vote post...? I said that already, babe.Ellibereth wrote: Also, you're ignoring the point, where in Bab's vote did you see pressure/reaction vote?
^^^You call that a pressure vote?BridgesAndBaloons wrote:Some questions to get us started:
1) Have you played with anyone on this list before?
2) What is your prior mafia game experience?
3) What is your favorite fruit?
4) Self-identify an aspect of your personality or mafia-playstyle.
1)nope.
2) I've played somewhere around ~10 games, all on this website.
3) Strawberries.
4) I tend to fan out and spread suspicion on multiple players, than ultimately pick one that seems scummiest and focus on them. My problem is that sometimes I'm unable to stop focusing on that one person, even if they start to appear to be pro-town. I'm working on it. I don't always follow this pattern.
vote: Panacea
