OPEN 310 - Medical Mafia - TOWN WIN

[Hoppster]

a. Hypo-doc, do we do it or not (Y/N)? Briefly explained in my post here.

If you still don't understand it, then say N.

can't we have a normal RVS?

Yeah, thought about it, and, eh. Feel free to make a 'tee-hee' RVS vote. I thought about it, and I decided there's no paticular point in making you unvote after it as well, so... yeah. I'm relaxing the 'rules' on C slightly.


Remember, minimal discussion would be cool, folks.


We need to hear from the two people with dates in their names (1990 and 1991) and chk, and then I'll stop being such a spoil-sport.

[AntB]

VOTE COUNT - 9 alive, 5 to Lynch

DeityKabuto

L-2 <- Hoppster - Quilford - Amrun

Hopster

<- HellloooNewman

Not Voting

<- tim_hill1990, DeityKabuto, chkflip, jilynne1991, Moratoriumm

DEADLINE

THURSDAY 23 JUNE 2011 23:59:59 UTC
Countdown Timer

E is borderline Rule 5. Its related to the game but before the start. I will allow it as its not a direct violation.

I have extended rule 5, I realised it was a bit too strict and may have been interpreted as literally nothing outside the start and end of the game.

Modification to Rule 5: Meta gaming is allowed, pre-game is still game.

[Hoppster]

Huzzah!

Ah, got another instruction for y'all.

e. Y/N - Do you agree that Quilford's pre-game shenanigans suggest he is likely town?

(Again, no discussion plzkthx.)

If you'd all be so kind as to answer this now, then.

[Moratorium]

e. N (assuming we're thinking along the same lines)

[Amrun]

N. It's null.

[HellloooNewman]

I really, REALLY don't like being led by a overly domineering player. Why are you acting like you are in charge anyway.

Upon reflection, I wish I hadn't obliged you by answering your

demands

questions.

[HellloooNewman]

Unvote/Vote: DeityKabuto

Please reference my post 534 in the Square Enix VI game for my reasoning.

http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p3096858

[Hoppster]

Umm.

Ongoing games?

[Amrun]

Unvote

[HellloooNewman]

I don't think I broke any rules. If I did, my apologies.

[jilynne1991]

1) Y
2) Y
3) no vote for the moment
4) done
5) N, null

[tim_hill1990]

VOTE: Hoppster

1) Y
2)y
3)Done
4)nothing

[AntB]

Discussion of on-going games is forbidden no matter where you are and is a site-wide rule violation.

A minor violation such as that may not warrant a modkill, however I am seeking further advice on the matter. Please continue as normal for now.

[HellloooNewman]

Again, my apologies. I accept whatever punishment that comes my way.

[chkflip]

Sup bros? I've been V/LA. I'll catch up to this when I get a chance.

[AntB]

I will not be modkilling HellloooNewman at this time. This is a warning however. If it does happen again I will modkill.

[chkflip]

Read this as it's relevant. Same type of game. We straight out claimed our results and another townie did some weird math thing that pinpointed scum to a Tee. We just didn't follow it like we should've. And subsequently lost. Though it's not on my tally because I was replaced due to RL shenanigans.

In other news, I think DK at L-1 on P2 is retarded regardless of what has taken place. I don't care if he's a VI or whatever -- we need discussion before we need a lynch. Period. I think at

least

one opportunistic scum jumped onto that wagon.

Townie points to Amrun for the unvote six minutes after.

[Hoppster]

Hey, chk. Weird how everybody else is keeping discussion to a minimum, amirite? >>

[Hoppster]

EBWOP: We're NOT lynching yet, we're just satisfying my weird urges.

[chkflip]

Yeah and I'm definitely not playing along, so if you could tell the class what it was you were getting at with that? It'd help progress the discussion you incessantly halted with that.

Thanks.

[DeityKabuto]

I am not playing with hellonewman, he is dead to me, kthx, moving on...

[Hoppster]

Yeah and I'm definitely not playing along

Why? Give me any pro-town reason.

[chkflip]

1) You're stifling discussion by demanding we play to your questionaire.
2) You're ending a legit part of the game that has legit reasons for existance just to push to RQS just to push your own agenda.
3) You want a "confirmed townie" when, here's a thought, mafia would more than likely shoot them N1.
4) You're introduing waaaay too much WIFOM with this hypo-doc nonsense. Either we claim our targets outright or we simply play mafia.

Would you like me to continue? I see no reason Hopptown would feel this strongly this fast, nor do I think he'd have something so ridiculous planned out right off the bat.

[Hoppster]

1) We'll have plenty to discuss after.
2) This is NOT RQS. These questions are

completely

and wholly relevant to the game.
3) What? That's part of the questions. That's what I want everybody to give their opinion on. If you disagree, then you just say No to question B or whatever it was. Then we discuss it after.
4) No, claiming outright gives mafia far too much wriggle room. This locks them into what they have to play along with.

[chkflip]

I think it worked out pretty well in the previous game of this fashion that I was in (see link), but you're entitled to your opinion. I also understand where you're coming from with the whole "let's PL the VI," but we don't have a big enough playerlist for all that.

So, care to share why you opened with that?