~ The sample townie role PM is as follows;
You are a
Living
2. Prox
3. magnus_orion
4. RobCapone
5. Oso
7. Mute
10. ConSpiracy
12. Javert
13. Jerbs
Dead
I hate subzero honestly. He's UberH@x with his FREEZE YOU TO DEATH!! powers.Prox wrote:No. It's decided that you are Subzero. I get to be Scorpion.
It wasn'tICENinja (From the Signup thread) wrote:/in as well. Last mini was a disaster, this should be better!/
I'm cold and calculating, and will catch scum with ninja precision. I am not an assassin, thank you very much.Mute wrote: How much scummier can you be than a cold heartless assassin?
If I must.ICEninja wrote:1) What is everybody's timezone? This can be important if you live overseas and we're expecting a post from you, and it wont come until the wee hours of the morning.
2) What is your mafia experience here and elsewhere? It helps my reads to know who are the pros and who are still learning.
3) About how often can we expect you to post? Is this consistent with your meta?
1) EST. Iuno what GMT -# that is.ICEninja wrote:Anyways, I like to open up games with a few questions.
1) What is everybody's timezone? This can be important if you live overseas and we're expecting a post from you, and it wont come until the wee hours of the morning.
2) What is your mafia experience here and elsewhere? It helps my reads to know who are the pros and who are still learning.
3) About how often can we expect you to post? Is this consistent with your meta?
How don't they? Voting to get people involved, get discussions going, acquire info, find people whom are felt to be scum, etc etc etc. I prefer to vote for random reasons until a point where serious discussion is reached, and the RVS ends and the game proper begins. Then my votes get based on solid reasoning.ICEninja wrote:I feel like the beginnings of this game haven't been particularly productive. They usually aren't great, but as David pointed out, this stage has been even more random than is normal. Mute, why do you feel the need to make two random votes that don't actually advance the game?
...I had not noticed that. Thank you for pointing that out. o-oJavert wrote:I will take this opportunity to emphasize two facets of our ruleset:
1.)We are on a 14-day deadline on Day One, and a 10-day deadline for every other Day; and
2.)There is no reduced majority rule, which means we must reach a majority in order to achieve a lynch each Day.
With that in mind, I do not think we should take kindly to lurking. We cannot afford to dawdle.
Vote: magnus_orion. One scum down.
I'm going to go out on a limb and call that a non-RVS vote based on a player lurking.Javert wrote:[snip]
..
With that in mind,I do not think we should take kindly to lurking.We cannot afford to dawdle.
Vote: magnus_orion.One scum down.
You voted people based on their name. That doesn't do anything to get discussion going. There are some things people do to get discussion going, such as bandwagoning, voting people supporting bandwagons, asking questions, reaction hunting, etc. However, simply making random votes for random reasons do nothing of what you said.Mute wrote: How don't they? Voting to get people involved, get discussions going, acquire info, find people whom are felt to be scum, etc etc etc.
Problem is, if he is scum, why would he be ousting his partner now?ICEninja wrote:Also, the only way Javert could overtly know that magnus is scum is if he is his scum buddy. I too, as indicated by a comment made earlier in this post (that is now obsolete but I don't feel like deleting for transparency reasons), believed he voted a player for reasons of not posting yet. Simply declaring a player scum without "if" is one of the most solid scum tells in the game, I'd say. I don't usually make serious votes like this so early, but...
Vote Javert.
That would be going against his wincon if he were scum...jimfinn wrote:3.4 Play to win. Don't do anything obviously detrimental to your faction on purpose.
Nowhere in the rules does it specify that when deadline comes, the player with most votes won't get lynched. But it doesn't state otherwise, either.Javert wrote:I will take this opportunity to emphasize two facets of our ruleset:
2.)There is no reduced majority rule, which means we must reach a majority in order to achieve a lynch each Day.
Add to that a couple of games you're welcome to research in my profile.My experience in MS is 1 & 1/2 games by myself. The 1/2 game is because we broke the setup and the mod stopped it . A friend of mine introduced me to mafia and allowed me to contribute in his games. I've read like 13-15 gamse. I know the wiki. I've played some lame games on other sites too. I've played some basic mafia IRL too. That's about it. Without being arrogant, I'd like to consider myself a decent player. But I still have trouble sometimes separating bad logic from scum logic. Town can make mistakes too. I try to get reads on everyone before moving on. I don't want d1 to end fast without expressing who I think is scum with a decent degree of certainty.
Time to end RVS for you, buddy. If you are joking about magnus_orion, then state so clearly. If you really think magnus_orion is scum, then state why, if it doesn't relate to your "lurker awareness policy", to give it a name.Javert wrote:My vote was not a lurker vote. But magnus_orion is scum.