OMGUS!
VOTE: Naerys
Sidenote, I didn't even pay attention to the playerlist when I /inned, but really like it
OMGUS!
I guess I'm reading this differently than you two, but Black never even alludes to gob being town. 36 reads to me more like she's accusing gob of being spiteful and pushing for a lim rather than actually pegging her as scum this game.In post 56, Snow2697 wrote:agreeIn post 45, Naerys wrote:good point, Aristeia feels towny thanks to this postIn post 44, Aristeia wrote: I'm asking you why you're assuming he's town who wants to kill you for being good at mafia rather than mafia trying to push you for an excuse
Spite means "You beat me last time so I want to lim you here regardless of my alignment or yours". At this point I think it's probably NAI, but if forced to choose a flavor I'd probably say scum. Why? Because scum are looking to get everyone else eliminated, and until closer to endgame even if they 1v1 have more to gain from a mislim.In post 89, Aristeia wrote:In post 80, shaddowez wrote:I guess I'm reading this differently than you two, but Black never even alludes to gob being town. 36 reads to me more like she's accusing gob of being spiteful and pushing for a lim rather than actually pegging her as scum this game.In post 56, Snow2697 wrote:agreeIn post 45, Naerys wrote:good point, Aristeia feels towny thanks to this postIn post 44, Aristeia wrote: I'm asking you why you're assuming he's town who wants to kill you for being good at mafia rather than mafia trying to push you for an excuse
assuming spite is someone's motive also assumes they're town imo
but explain why it doesn't
It depends on the mod, but I for one hope that we get some carrion bird facts at leastIn post 110, Snow2697 wrote: Will we have a morning newspaper/description with night events or smth like that? Or just "X is dead".
Is this just a way of saying you don't like RVS?
What do you find weird about the cakes vote? Do you still think that in context of their interactions?In post 105, Hu Tao wrote: I think cakes vote seemed weird though. And nurses post seemed forced that I quoted. I'm fine with either of them being the elimination so far
I know this is super old at this point, but came back on it during my reread and felt it needed to be addressed. The reason for voting cakez is as weak as the reason you're using for the vote itself. People sheep all the time for worse reasons. The fact that it was post 59 and therefore still RVS makes this look like a reason to vote, not a reason to scumread.In post 115, Hu Tao wrote:Just that he says he's sheeping gob, but gobs vote really was just based off past experiences not this gameIn post 113, shaddowez wrote:What do you find weird about the cakes vote? Do you still think that in context of their interactions?In post 105, Hu Tao wrote: I think cakes vote seemed weird though. And nurses post seemed forced that I quoted. I'm fine with either of them being the elimination so far
Just to clarify, this is based strictly off of the fact that you thought one of his posts was forced?In post 207, Hu Tao wrote: Either way, I think nurse is still the best vote right now based off what I said earlier
Can you link these? Not sure what you call 3p, but you didn't say a word about Black on D1 in 901, and you weren't in the game where her and T3 were scum. Interested in seeing your interactions with her in the games you're referencing.In post 367, Hu Tao wrote: But both games I've played where she was scum I called her scum day 1.
I'm trying to make sense of this - you don't like gob's push (fine), but unless you know that Black is town I'm not sure why manipulation is the argument you'd go with for gob's arguments.In post 218, Naerys wrote: Kinda starting to feel better about gob, he doesnt feel manipulative at all, i can understand fear of Black even if i dont really agree with his push.
Hu Tao didn't say anything outside of "being good with it", and while I don't disagree at all that his ISO is bad people just mimicing that and voting based on it don't seem like they're putting any more effort in than if they just said "I'm sheeping <X>" (and for transparency, I specifically mean Naerys' jump onto the wagon).In post 536, SirCakez wrote:Who joined without reason? I think there's a consensus that the ISO is badIn post 520, shaddowez wrote: T3s ISO is pretty bad, but me voting based purely on that would be a very pot/kettle situation. I really don't like how fast people piled on, several without any reason.
That's the biggest problem I have with the wagon. Nobody's said anything but "His ISO is really bad", and people are just repeating that and voting him.In post 541, Naerys wrote: i hate repeating stuff people already said
Up until his recent posts, this is where I was at too. The "bad ISO" was really just low content with a weak push (?) on Black. However:In post 547, Aristeia wrote: I don't really have a read on T3.
I guess I'm fine with him being limmed if that's what we're settling on.
In post 539, SirCakez wrote: why is it scummy? You can't just quote a wall of posts and call it scummy, that doesn't mean anything
These I absolutely agree with. He came back into the thread, didn't even acknowledge his wagon, and tried to...make a case...maybe?.....on Cakez without saying much. The reads lists is weak, and he claims that Black made a towny post while still voting Black. Now, I'm willing to do this.In post 543, Black wrote:I think the wagon served a purpose of making T3 do stuff. I don't think the stuff he is doing is all that compellingIn post 542, shaddowez wrote:That's the biggest problem I have with the wagon. Nobody's said anything but "His ISO is really bad", and people are just repeating that and voting him.In post 541, Naerys wrote: i hate repeating stuff people already said
In post 553, T3 wrote:How am I supposed to acknowledge my wagon, exactly???In post 552, shaddowez wrote: didn't even acknowledge his wagon
On one hand, fair. On the other hand, you could have attempted to engage with any of the 5 people on your wagon in a way that could try and convince the rest of us you're town. Instead you just basically threw shade at Cakez and disappeared again.In post 554, T3 wrote: The reasons people had voted me was "my ISO is bad"
Wtf do you want me to respond??? istg I get this in literally EVERY game
StD did something similar to this in my last game where he was scum (came in and just agreed with the reason he was being voted), but I'm getting a slightly different vibe here. I'm not against a T3 lim yet, but don't want someone to come in and derphammer.In post 560, T3 wrote: True. On the other hand, my ISO really did suck.
Let's be fair, youIn post 562, T3 wrote: I guess I was trying to demonstrate my towniness by, like, making content. In the past that hasn't really worked, because I'm limmed in virtually every town game I play.
Largely PoE, based on knowns and weak town reads. While not impossibly, it's highly unlikely that all 3 scum are on T3, but based on the fact that there were no votes on scum it's reasonable to assume that all 3 scum were voting. Since T3 was the wagon that went through, my guess is that 2 of the scum were on that wagon. I was SRing Naerys yesterDay (and voting there until deadline), and this hasn't changed. Her position on the wagon is also suspect. So, who's the second? It's not me, Cakez, or Ari, which leaves Black, RN, and Smiley. I'm TRing Smiley, and between the other two since I'm already SRing Naerys the below points me to RN:In post 746, Hu Tao wrote:But why
As for StD, the only other person I'm not TRing much at all is NaS, but I think it's more likely scum was on a wagon than not.In post 155, Naerys wrote:This doesnt sit well with me, feels like posturing.In post 143, Random Nurse wrote: Don't worry Naerys: I'm Town again this time.
Everyone you've listed was on the wagon, so who do you think it could be that was off the wagon?In post 760, gob wrote: given that Ari was killed whilst voting T3, i think its likely that there is scum not on the T4 wagon as well
While I'm not quite sure what you mean, I'm not completely against it. That is, provided you have rings for me.In post 784, gob wrote: Shaddowez the hedgehog
In post 787, Snow2697 wrote: It could be that 2 scums were in Cakez wagon (to distance themselves from a mislim) and thus they did not kill Cakez (to play against him) and killed a townie on the T3 train (to compromise other members of the T3 train). I am more inclined to look closer at Cakez wagon for scum search.
Unless you don't believe gob's claim, you're saying that both StD and Hu are scum, there's no "searching".In post 730, Hu Tao wrote: SirCakez (4) - Save the Dragons, T3, Hu Tao, gob
Snow never claimed 1-shotIn post 1050, Black wrote:Snow claimed 1-shotIn post 1047, Random Nurse wrote:In post 1042, Black wrote:If he's scum then he wanted to out the Vig. He started pushing me when he realized the Vig was one-shotIn post 1039, Hu Tao wrote: Also what was the benefit of gob claiming right now. Did he think his partner would get heat today or something?
Which post made him realize the Vig was one-shot?
Why StD in the sus pool?In post 1057, Naerys wrote: sus people:
gob
NotAScum
RN
StD
Town:
Smiley
Snow
Hu,Black,shaddowez are null
Not particularly, but I also don't TR Naerys. And since she hadn't mentioned him in any post up until then, curious as to what the reason for her read is.In post 1080, Black wrote:Do you townread StD?In post 1078, shaddowez wrote:Why StD in the sus pool?In post 1057, Naerys wrote: sus people:
gob
NotAScum
RN
StD
Town:
Smiley
Snow
Hu,Black,shaddowez are null
I considered not, but also thought that the reactions could be informative.In post 1082, SmileyDude1 wrote:I noticed this but didn't want to say anything about it. Kind of wished you didn't bring that upIn post 1074, shaddowez wrote:Snow never claimed 1-shotIn post 1050, Black wrote:Snow claimed 1-shotIn post 1047, Random Nurse wrote:In post 1042, Black wrote:If he's scum then he wanted to out the Vig. He started pushing me when he realized the Vig was one-shotIn post 1039, Hu Tao wrote: Also what was the benefit of gob claiming right now. Did he think his partner would get heat today or something?
Which post made him realize the Vig was one-shot?
Working under the assumption that one is a vig, Snow has a much higher likelihood of being town. He wasn't in any danger of being limmed, so the only thing a cc does is put a target on him if gob ends up limmed and flips green.In post 1087, SmileyDude1 wrote: Do you have a take on the Gob/Snow situation?
Do you SR Black independently, or only via partner equity?In post 1135, NotAScum wrote: Black needs to go. Her attempt at distancing was poor and awkward. It never felt a genuine interaction between gob and Black, her response was over the top and showy. Just go and read her iso and tell me it's a genuine attempt to find a scum, she seemed to have made her mind throughout the conversation with gob. It wasn't genuine at all.
VOTE: Black
What did you like about her push on gob D1?In post 1161, Hu Tao wrote: I agree with NAS being scum. I think the last is Dragons. I liked Naerys push on gob day 1. I liked shadows overall play. And I don't think random and NAS are a team. I think black is town and I think smiley is town.
Naerys does a similar thing in reverse, first with a SR on gob on D1 switching to a TR somewhat randomly and without explanation in 218. There's some nonsensical back and forth between them, and then her posts on D2 feel forced. 839 and 842 don't make sense for all of a sudden believing he's lying about the vig kill in 852.In post 1128, SmileyDude1 wrote:For me, I think intuitively it feels less likely scum would consistently hold their partner in that position without there being a softening in opinion at some point. Like there's never really a moment where Gob "feels better about Naerys" like I might expect if partnered. Stuff like 666 where it seems like Gob is less trying to shade Naerys to distance and more like he's trying to make a Naerys lim happen. It feels closer to scum trying to push on town than scum trying to distance from a partner to me.In post 1125, Black wrote:Why does this behavior make them feel less partnery?In post 1124, SmileyDude1 wrote: I think in general I feel pretty good about her atm. I'm currently combing through Gob at the moment though, so that maybe could change things.
Speaking of which, feels like Gob was consistently transitioning between feeling neutral on Naerys and shading/scumreading her. Would say it feels less partnery to me right now
Looking at it from Naery's end, I also find myself vibing with her Gob push during day 2 as well(it feels like it came at a point where Gob was still up in the air in terms of whether they'd be limmed). I think I lean town on Naerys atm, they're not in the group of people that i'm near 100% sure on being town, but they're also not in the group of people i'd want to look at limming today either right now
It wouldn't be a game with both of us and you not an SK for me to not end up in your PoE.In post 1186, Black wrote: I keep forgetting shaddow exists in this game. I suppose he should go into my PoE as well
That's what I meant. What are your thoughts on the third?In post 1150, NotAScum wrote: Not sure what you mean by partner equity, but mt SR on Black is pure on her back and forth with gob.
What about NAS' play yesterday makes you think this?In post 1373, Hu Tao wrote: Because I think one of RN or NAS is scum based on how yesterday went. I think it's NAS
Because you already said you were going to look more into me, and I care more about trying to find actual scum than waste time asking about people's reads on me.In post 1375, Hu Tao wrote:How come you don't question my read on you?In post 1371, shaddowez wrote: I'm back and catching up, but based on what I've read so far I'm comfortable with HT. Her defense on Naerys, regardless of Naerys' alignment, feels like it's forced and not a real town read. Some of the assumptions/reasonings there don't come off as legit.
VOTE: Hu Tao
That literally didn't happen. They voted gob and didn't vote Black until toDay.In post 1379, Hu Tao wrote:The way that they went for black and wanted black over gob. Seems like something a new scum would do. RN I think was just paranoid because I've been literally pretty much confirmed town and he still wanted be eliminated beforeIn post 1376, shaddowez wrote:What about NAS' play yesterday makes you think this?In post 1373, Hu Tao wrote: Because I think one of RN or NAS is scum based on how yesterday went. I think it's NAS
1. Not just because of thisIn post 1382, Hu Tao wrote:So you think I'm scum because of my Naerys read but smiley had a similar read to me, which I stated before himIn post 1378, shaddowez wrote:Because you already said you were going to look more into me, and I care more about trying to find actual scum than waste time asking about people's reads on me.In post 1375, Hu Tao wrote:How come you don't question my read on you?In post 1371, shaddowez wrote: I'm back and catching up, but based on what I've read so far I'm comfortable with HT. Her defense on Naerys, regardless of Naerys' alignment, feels like it's forced and not a real town read. Some of the assumptions/reasonings there don't come off as legit.
VOTE: Hu Tao
Even though I'm the only one that's only voted you?In post 1395, Hu Tao wrote: Yes, I'm trying to convince smiley that it's sus that everyone is seemingly fine with me being eliminated but the other votes have trouble going through. I don't think everyone willing to vote me is sus clearly it's just that it seems to be the easy vote.
I had been in the office that day, so was catching up when I got back to my hotel that evening between dinner and everything else. Timing just happened to work out that way.In post 1390, Black wrote: shaddow why did you not comment on the gob/Snow situation until you were asked about it?
I had 5 posts in about a 2 hour period, including the one where I answered. My other comments were all responses to a single comment, not the situation as a whole. I was responding to the situation, it just happened that Smiley directly asked me about it before I got to post it.In post 1400, Black wrote:When you were catching up you didn't say anything about the gob/Snow stuff though. You pointed out that Snow wasn't 1-shot and you asked Naerys about her StD read. Why did you wait until Smiley asked you about the situation before sharing your thoughts about it?In post 1397, shaddowez wrote:I had been in the office that day, so was catching up when I got back to my hotel that evening between dinner and everything else. Timing just happened to work out that way.In post 1390, Black wrote: shaddow why did you not comment on the gob/Snow situation until you were asked about it?
Well, now I'm curious. You said you were going to look back into me, asked why I didn't ask about my read on you, and now all of a sudden after I voted you I'm in your top two. What reasons do you have for your read on me?In post 1421, Hu Tao wrote: 1. NAS and Shadow is who I'm thinking at the moment. I agree that Black is likely town. Unless there is another PR out there hiding.
So you don't have any explicit scum reads based on activity, just PoE based on people you're townreading?In post 1441, Hu Tao wrote:Well. I think I explained this already. I think nas/rn has one scum only. I think naerys is town. Dragons is conf town. Only leaves you leftIn post 1439, shaddowez wrote:Well, now I'm curious. You said you were going to look back into me, asked why I didn't ask about my read on you, and now all of a sudden after I voted you I'm in your top two. What reasons do you have for your read on me?In post 1421, Hu Tao wrote: 1. NAS and Shadow is who I'm thinking at the moment. I agree that Black is likely town. Unless there is another PR out there hiding.
It could be me, but this sounds like TMIIn post 1440, Hu Tao wrote:Unfortunately I don't think black will vote Nas today which limits us voting actual scumIn post 1436, Save The Dragons wrote:this post indeed feels very forcedIn post 1402, NotAScum wrote:You're getting quite nervous HT, do you feel everyone else is conspiring against you?In post 1395, Hu Tao wrote: everyone is seemingly fine with me being eliminated but the other votes have trouble going through.
Are you referring to NAS or HT here?In post 1436, Save The Dragons wrote:this post indeed feels very forcedIn post 1402, NotAScum wrote:You're getting quite nervous HT, do you feel everyone else is conspiring against you?In post 1395, Hu Tao wrote: everyone is seemingly fine with me being eliminated but the other votes have trouble going through.
I also hope you're feeling better. How's the reading coming along?In post 1435, Black wrote:YayIn post 1434, Naerys wrote: rereading time
I hope you're feeling better
The bolded above makes it sound like you know whether or not NAS is scum.In post 1449, Hu Tao wrote:Now you're just scum posting. How is this TMI? Unless you're saying that Nas and I are partners?In post 1445, shaddowez wrote:It could be me, but this sounds like TMIIn post 1440, Hu Tao wrote:Unfortunately I don't think black will vote Nas today whichIn post 1436, Save The Dragons wrote:this post indeed feels very forcedIn post 1402, NotAScum wrote:You're getting quite nervous HT, do you feel everyone else is conspiring against you?In post 1395, Hu Tao wrote: everyone is seemingly fine with me being eliminated but the other votes have trouble going through.limits us voting actual scum
That's an interesting game to link. I realize it's only one comparison, but your play seems different than that game, and Naerys' feels very similar.In post 1455, Hu Tao wrote:viewtopic.php?t=92020In post 1454, Black wrote: Well Vigs are strong but they tend to hit town more often than not which greatly benefits scum. Neo's are weaker than actual cops because they can't distinguish between a town PR and scum
This is the game I'm comparing to. Scum had a 1 shot. Town had 3 pr. I don't really consider BP a pr but yeah
Smaller sample size means less room for error, obviously!In post 1459, Black wrote: I'm also not sure why you would compare this game to just one game and be satisfied with your conclusion
About to head off for the night, but putting this in my ISO to come back to tomorrow.In post 1488, Black wrote: Shaddow what is your current readslist