Vote: Xtoxm for lynch
Softclaiming this early? Really? Plus, Xtoxm is on my standard list of good D1 lynches.
Agreed!Battle Mage wrote:lol, how does that make you a good mayor? surely that makes you the exact kind of mayor we DONT want i.e. the kind who cannot be held accountable to the town.Xtoxm wrote:I'm unlynchable.
BM
DI next.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:Well, I've never played a game with this mechanic, so I'll take your word for it. Personally, I prefer to keep my vote on me for as long as possible, since I'd rather like to use it well. Of course, you could all make it easy and vote me for mayor. :pBattle Mage wrote:This is a respectable stance, but not very realistic. You are unlikely to get that kind of assurity on day 1. Our best bet is to pick someone today, and make sure they are held accountable as much as possible. Odds on, unless we get consequtive scum lynches, the Mayor will probably change on a daily basis. Such is the way with Kingmaker style games.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:unvote, Vote to Lynch: Xtoxm
I do not like that kind of play one bit.
I'm not shifting my mayor vote off myself unless I'm absolutely sure the person I'd be giving it to is Pro-Town.
BM
This makes me lol.dingoatemybaby wrote:How about this. Why don't we all list our top four methods for deciding how to vote for mayor and our top four method for deciding how to vote for a lynch. The top three from each will then go into a round robin style voting contest, where the winner of each round will be determined by a method to be determined through an three day elimination challenge. The winner of the round robin contest will be validated by two thirds of the most experienced players and a simple majority of less experienced players. If validated, people can then use these methods to decide who and how they are going to vote for. I propose we vote on my proposal.
Or, just for kicks, we could justVote for Mayorfor whoever we want to be mayor andVote:for whoever we want to lynch.
Why the hell not?Shadow Knight wrote:Grrrrr. If he *is* a role that wants us to lynch him, I say we don't give him what he wants.
I concur. In fact, it's one of my most trusted scumtells.Juls wrote:Well, I haven't caught up but I have always heard the person who speaks up in this manner (congratulating town) is usually scum. Who did you replace? OP is not up-to-dateKaiveran wrote:Well, at least we got a werewolf. Finally.
Still thinking about testing Mufasa's claim. I think we should hear the females out, see if they're aware of any role that might help them.(@mod: read previous sentence)
Is this where the playhouse suddenly animates with the alarm blaring?zwetschenwasser wrote:I would say your case is crapwifom, but you already admitted it.
I am, it was.Jahudo wrote:Are you still talking about a player that reacts to the outcome of a lynch or night (ie: cheering at a dead scum or feeling remorse over a dead town)? Was Random Mafia 3 a night start, because otherwise how would someone commit that tell?Gorrad wrote:Absolutely! UROE in Random Mafia 3, I led an attack on him, lynching D1 based on this tell. It also caught my scumpartner, Seraphim in Bleach Mafia when I brought it up there (though I brought it up on a townie, to be fair).
The basic premise behind it is that it gains nothing for town by being said, and has a chance of outting power roles.
I call BS. You're really stretching it here, NabNab.NabakovNabakov wrote:Is BM really the scummiest person in this situation? I would think that given all the talk D1 of two votes possibly placing greater scrutiny on scum, wouldn't it follow that a player with no vote will experience less scrutiny?zwetschenwasser wrote:WAAAAA I lost my vote... You are scum, BM.
Therefore, any player who deprives themselves of their own vote, regardless of whether or not it looks like an accident, is looking pretty scummy to me. It just seems like an excuse to lurk and shirk (hey, that's kind of catchy) responsibility for a day.
Aye, what he said.Yosarian2 wrote:Actually, I arranged it so the scum wouldn't be able to kill anyone at all, and especally not me, without giving themselves away. And, espeally, I made sure Gorrad, who was a jailkeeper and who I I suspected, wouldn't be able to do anything at all except jailkeep me, since I had announced in thread I would attempt to vig kill him every night. Breaking smalltown games is fun.Battle Mage wrote:so you're saying you effectively could only make 1 NK before you were the last man in your scumteam, and were unable to make your top choice NK?Gorrad wrote:Yos wasn't killed because we wanted to kill danchao more than him, and after that I was stuck in a situation where I pretty much could not NK without outting myself.
BM
Link games that show as such?zwetschenwasser wrote:people who refer to themselves in third person during a case on somebody else are more likely scum in my experience.
President is another story.Haschel Cedricson wrote:No self-respecting community would elect a village idiot to the post of Mayor!Yosarian2 wrote:Mod: Could Millar become mayor now?
Well, maybe Medford.
Yay! NN is smart.NabakovNabakov wrote:Wow, false sympathy and rolefishing. You rarely get a twofer like that.dramonic wrote:yikes... At least she wasn't a power role ><
what power roles are there left anyways?
Vote: Dramonic
...Hold on, just gotta check this. You, Zwetschenwasser, are upset at another player for doing stupid, potentially game-ruining play?zwetschenwasser wrote:And thanks to him we have NO leads besides whoever wanted to get Yos killed. THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING DAMMIT
Bump for Dramonic to answer.Gorrad wrote:Dramonic, one question: How could asking what power roles are left help the town in any way, shape, or form?
You want to direct power roles with this many alive oO?dramonic wrote:Because knowing what is left is good for optimal use of said roles.
In the RL game anyway <<
I fail to see how the quote relates to the body.Battle Mage wrote:dramonic wrote:Because knowing what is left is good for optimal use of said roles.
In the RL game anyway <<Unvote, vote: Zwet
no sense in allowing him to cruise. I thought we'd dealt with this a while back, tbh?
BM
It's posts like this that make me love being in every game with Zwet's awe-inspiring scumhunting. How could ANYONE go against this maelstrom of logic?zwetschenwasser wrote:It's quite clear that Yos is probably one of the most pro-town people in this game.
If you don't want sarcasm, back up your posts with cases.zwetschenwasser wrote:Gorrad wrote:It's posts like this that make me love being in every game with Zwet's awe-inspiring scumhunting. How could ANYONE go against this maelstrom of logic?zwetschenwasser wrote:It's quite clear that Yos is probably one of the most pro-town people in this game.
Hey Dramonic, could you conceivably choose an easier lynch target?dramonic wrote:on-topic: Who do you propose?
Vote: Zwet
in case it wasn't already clear.
Simple. Zwet is, by definition, an easy lynch. He could be playing like a pro and have nailed three scum in a row and STILL be lynched for virtue of being himself.dramonic wrote:Care to explain what you mean by that Gorrad?
I'm all for lynching YOU. He's acceptable.dramonic wrote:Last time I checked, you were also all for lynching him and if you look I've been voting him since july 2nd, it's not like it's anything new.
His playstyle is a nuisance at best.