Mini 986: Beatles Mafia (Game Over)

[Karma]

vote: Scott Brosius

because I hate the Yankees with a fiery passion.

[Karma]

Why not hop aboard the SB bandwagon then, Zang?

[Karma]

There is a 0% chance I am scum. Usually there are 3-4 threats to the town in a 12 person game. So the chance you are scum is 3 or 4 out of 11.

So first you say you got a 0% chance then you say there's a 3/11 possibility
Numbers dont add up

He's insinuating he's town.

[Karma]

I would hand a live grenade to inHimshallIbe for not explaining his username and OMGUS voting me.

It was an RV, no? Why do you consider it OMGUS?

[Karma]

unvote, vote: danakillsu

[Karma]

He obviously voted for me simply because I was voting for him, and didn't even bother giving a fake reason for it. Just because it's "RVS" doesn't mean OMGUS is impossible.

^^^scummy

also, anon, why vote me for the emoticons and not muh, who two posts above me wrote this:

wow i didnt even know that the topic started.

Vote karma

I FREAKIN LOVE THE YANKEES!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Karma]

Except he's not scumhunting.

Way to say something negative about me with no basis. It's the second page, I have revealed one person as acting scummily, and you are already accusing me of not scumhunting. Who made you king of MafiaScum? I missed the coronation.
My case on inHimshallIbe is a better one than most people have, especially you.

Moar votes plz

[Karma]

Calling for a wagon on an extremely scummy player is scummy? It probably won't lead to a lynch, but if dana is scum, he'll slip. Scum always slip. A wagon is a way to find those slips.

[Karma]

He's exceptionally defensive in RVS and freaks out when inhim "OMGUS" votes him. Nervous scum.

[Karma]

How is the whole case flawed? He gets insanely defensive over some good ol' fashioned RVS OMGUSing and then freaks out when Monkey says he's not scumhunting. Those are scummy actions. I want dana lynched.

[Karma]

How have these accusations been answered?

[Karma]

I resent being called a VI. Nervousness in the RVS is a scumtell.

[Karma]

Way to say something negative about me with no basis. It's the second page, I have revealed one person as acting scummily, and you are already accusing me of not scumhunting. Who made you king of MafiaScum? I missed the coronation.
My case on inHimshallIbe is a better one than most people have, especially you.

This = nervousness. And what's your case on me? Purely OMGUS?

[Karma]

@ The Skeward
I think you're right, and for that reason I like the MonkeyMan wagon as well, but I still prefer inHim, because he just voted AGAIN with no reasoning.
Right now I would lynch:
inHim
MonkeyMan
Karma (maybe)

In that order. And ekIM, just try putting yourself in my shoes. Most people on this forum would probably resort to foul language if they recieved three votes in two pages with little to no reasoning.

I would join the Karma wagon, but at least Karma's trying. InHimshallIbe hasn't done anything except vote for me.

This is suspecting me, even if it is slightly. You have no reason for it other than OMGUSing.

Well it has been explained at least three times already that he shouldntve been expected to scumhunt on the second page.

That's not the accusation - the accusation is nervousness and over-defensiveness in the RVS.

the player who believes others are trying to lynch him who aren't?

I have 4 votes. That means players are trying to lynch me - for what, I don't know. I made a case on dana and I stand by it.

[Karma]

@Dana: How am I misunderstanding this quote:

the player who believes others are trying to lynch him who aren't?

It's in reference to me, no? That makes it seem I think people are trying to lynch me when they aren't. But, people are trying to lynch me. So, what am I missing?

You essentially said I want to lynch you, and that is somewhat paranoid/nervous, at least more so than me.

Where did I say that? I said that you suspected me. Which you admitted that you did. Now you're just contradicting yourself.

Your case appears to boil down to nervousness, which isn't much of a case, and can't be proven.

It started as nervousness, which is a good starting point for a case, but now it includes contradictions and outright lies.

@VasudeVa: I think you meant to vote dana. It's okay, just use preview next time.

[Karma]

Dana's responded well to my pushing. Gah.

UNVOTE:

[Karma]

I'm an alt. Why the fuck are you playing the newb card for me.

[Karma]

I like Monkey better.

VOTE: MonkeyMan576

[Karma]

Alright. I've determined that me vs. dana is town vs. town.

Let's move on.

MonkeyMan, this is hypocritical:

Except he's not scumhunting.

Give me some scumhunting of your own.

[Karma]

Dana's having problems with alts, lol

[Karma]

Scum can usually figure out the towniest players anyway. I always thought that argument was wrong but hey that's just me.

[Karma]

I should clarify - by "that" argument I meant skeward's.

[Karma]

I disagree but this is a post for MD, not here.

Let's talk real scum. MonkeyMan disappears under pressure...hm.

[Karma]

Muh, that's the best you got?

[Karma]

UNVOTE: Monkey
VOTE: muh316

This is the better option here. Continually promising posts, and then delivering us that last post? No scumhunting, just four names of people whose behavior is scummy. Nice try. Monkey deserves a vig shot though, for scumminess and general uselessness.

Wagon go!

[Karma]

Hm. I suppose you have a point about inhim. But still, muh is more "active lurky" if you kind of understand.

[Karma]

still waiting on muh's reasoning for zang

[Karma]

Oh you're right. Sorry.

[Karma]

I don't prefer inhim over star.

unvote, vote: Starbuck

since I guess muh isn't going anywhere.

[Karma]

Why does starbuck deserve a chance, muh?

[Karma]

He has had plenty of time to do a read-through.

[Karma]

VOTE: muh316

I can dig it

[Karma]

Um...what?