But, speaking of good points:
Hmmmm. I'm torn.Friend wrote: Especially because he unvotes Tasky and then, in his next post, calls Tasky scum. Doesn't match up.
Hmmmm. I'm torn.Friend wrote: Especially because he unvotes Tasky and then, in his next post, calls Tasky scum. Doesn't match up.
EBWOP: Why didn't I notice this before?<_< One post you agree with Oso's reasons to unvote Tasky blindly, and then the next you ask Friend if he's scumbuddies with Tasky? Funny.vezokpiraka wrote:So you're giving tasky the noob pass but you're voting for me because of sheepping?
You sure you're not scum with Tasky?
As I said, I don't think anyone could find PRs through those questions. But Tasky suggested that he thought we would be able to do so later in the game based on answers to those questions. My point was that it wouldn't work. And if by some miracle you could gain knowledge from that, it would be a double-edged sword since scum could use that too. Never mind that I said anything though... if that's the method Tasky wants to use and the rest don't have a problem with it (besides not wanting to answer), I don't have a problem either. I just didn't think it was an efficient use of our time and his brainpower.Friend wrote:Guys, take a look at Tasky's join date, posting style, etc. Now tell me, do you really think he's good enough to subtly rolefish like that as scum? Cause I really don't.
@KageLord: how would scum find out a cop/doc through Tasky's questions?
I am currently in 4 online-mafia games, haven't completed one though...diddin wrote:Tasky: How many games have you played? I want to know a little more about your experience level.
talking about contradictions... first you say my RQS questions are good (save 2/3) and then you say voting for not answering them is poor reason... since we were in RVS and any reason, no matter how poor is better than no reason, this means it was no reason...
this is a good point... especially since if you are posting and someone posts something in the meanwhile, you get notified by the forum mechanics... so, at the time he posted he already knew about SSBF's post...KageLord wrote:And I have to say, it looks pretty bad for vezo. I was going to say something to vezo after the post following SSBF's ISOs of Friend since it basically tries to call Friend out on the same thing that SSBF said, but vezo claims it was a ninja (or a "nath"?) by SSBF. I'm not sure if I buy that though since the posts were 6 minutes apart. Just after being called out on sheeping Oso, vezo seems to sheep SSBF.
Testing this statement by subscribing to topic and seeing if it ends up as a board notification or in my personal email box. Of course, me being the poster might hose it for me. So could the first person who see this post?Tasky wrote:especially since if you are posting and someone posts something in the meanwhile, you get notified by the forum mechanics...
no, didn't mean it that way...Oso wrote:Testing this statement by subscribing to topic and seeing if it ends up as a board notification or in my personal email box. Of course, me being the poster might hose it for me. So could the first person who see this post?Tasky wrote:especially since if you are posting and someone posts something in the meanwhile, you get notified by the forum mechanics...
Far from subtle, hm?Tasky wrote:now... since I'd actually like to get out of the RVS fast, I'll ask some questions for you to answer...
Friend wrote:P.S. (lol triplepost)
I don't find Tasky's questions to be rolefishing. Answers to the "what role do you like" question are too WIFOMy to analyze anyways.
Friend wrote:I don't understand Oso's contradiction. I don't want to defend Tasky here because I think he's pretty scummy anyways, but I still don't get it.
UNVOTE: SSBF
VOTE: Diddin
Jumping all over that came off as quite opportunistic.
Friend wrote:SSBF: Tell me what the case on Tasky is, in your own words.
Friend wrote:Guys, take a look at Tasky's join date, posting style, etc. Now tell me, do you really think he's good enough to subtly rolefish like that as scum? Cause I really don't.
@KageLord: how would scum find out a cop/doc through Tasky's questions?
No matter how you defended a person, the point is that you defended a person and that will not change. Even if it was defending Tasky's rolefishing accustions, a defense on a person is a defense on a person.Friend wrote:SSBF. Think about it, now. I'm not defending Tasky on anything else except the rolefishing accusations, because I do NOT think Taskyscum is capable of thinking "hm I'll try and out some PRs with these RQs" in a million years.
People can choose to participate in either RVS, RQS, or both. Most of your RQS questions are good, but it should be a matter of personal prefrence to answer RQS question, not an obligation.Tasky wrote:talking about contradictions... first you say my RQS questions are good (save 2/3) and then you say voting for not answering them is poor reason... since we were in RVS and any reason, no matter how poor is better than no reason, this means it was no reason...
so you are saying that not answering good RQS questions is less a reason than RVS voting... that seems wrong
could you please explain why in a calm manner instead of yelling at us... I don't know which authority you think to have, you don't have it...jayfl383 wrote:FIRST AND FOREMOST THAT WAGON ON VEZO HAS SCUM WRITTEN ALL OVER IT....next...
wait a moment... if someone votes in an opportunistic manner it's quite irrelevant who that vote targets, no?jayfl383 wrote: Here again Friend now votes for Diddin because Diddin voted for....TASKY.....Friend votes Diddin because he felt Diddin's vote was opportunistic. But Friend, don't you think you're vote was opportunistic as well, just because another vote was placed on Tasky you felt the need to vote Diddin.
you really think that wagon on me would have gone on to a lynch? I see that as wishful thinking of a scumbag who'd really like to quicklynch...jayfl383 wrote: Or was it that you were trying to distract town from going on with the lynch??
why would that matter?vezokpiraka wrote:I know the post before you appearsbut it doesn't show the avatar.