Execution Mafia GAMEOVER!

Tragedy · Post Post #12 (isolation #0) » Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:24 pm

Sigh~
Hai Exe!

Vote: Exe

for Epic Randomness.

[Playing LoL has killed my fun.]

Tragedy · Post Post #57 (isolation #1) » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:12 am

Yes, it's League Of Legends.

Also, Ant has a reasonable reason of 'phishing roles' question.

Meanwhile, there's only WITCHES, as some would obviously read and notice from their Role PM as well, amIRight?

Tragedy · Post Post #62 (isolation #2) » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:04 am

Umbrage wrote:I don't like agreeing to no-lynch. We're just guessing as to the number of scum. If it turns out there are five, we just wasted a lynch. It's a gamble, and I don't like it upon first impression. Also, FF's certainty as to the number of scum troubles me.

Maybe it is the best plan, maybe I'm just tired right now, but this is likely the very first thing the mod or whoever thought of when designing the setup. I doubt it'll work.

Umbrage wrote:I agree with having a different executioner for day and night. Otherwise we're putting all our eggs in one basket.

I don't want to bank on any investigative roles. Great if we have them, but don't count on it.

FF strikes me as town. Exe is probably town. Ant could go either way.

You mentioned about 5 scums and wasting a lynch. I'd gamble, but you're such a parter pooper.

The best plan? What do you have on your mind?
Obviously, anyone wants a different executioner for day/night. What if we ended up voting for a

Witch

during the next few pre-execution debates? As some other person mentioned, choose the most trustful Townsperson as the Executioner.
Meep Meep.

@Exe: I lost interesting playing LoL on my first try.

Tragedy · Post Post #75 (isolation #3) » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:15 pm

The game just started yesterday.
lolol.

Tragedy · Post Post #143 (isolation #4) » Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:26 am

@Umbrage: I just came back from school just now and gotta pick up my bros.
More content later, but YOU.
You're just trying to distance yourself away since I have no content yet..

BRB.

Tragedy · Post Post #152 (isolation #5) » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:18 am

@Amrun: Why do you think it's not a good idea from choosing an executioner although having a town motivation from different ideals from others? Why do you have a solid townread on FF? Why FF instead of Exe?

@Ant_To_The_Max: If you're not voting Exe, who would be your most favorable executioner [Other than yourself] to vote of?

@Charter: Explain how haschel / SV looks town... Why do you think Ant should be killed?

@CooLDoG: Why do you think rolefishing is suspicious?

How does vezo have a null-read? About the scumhunter, who do you think will be the most valuable one? If he's dead, who would be your next pick?

@Exe: Why do you ask Haschel of who shold die?

How is trying to please many people scummy? Why should we make SV scummy along with TS, trying to take them both down during the whole Day/Night? Why so persistent over having more vote-coutns?

@FF: How do you have a town-read on TS when everyone sees that s/he's rolefishing as well? What do you think that you'll gain from killing TS instead of vezok?

@Haschel: Why did you vote for Charter, then switched it to Exe? What are your town-reads on Exe? Why so persistent on voting Exe? If Exe was executed, who would be your next executioner-of-your-epic-choice?

@SV: Why did you vote for StrungOut, Then Exe, but lastly unvoted? Does it always matter for a smart (scum) person to be the executioner? How does TS 'blatantly buddy' somebody?

@SO: What do you mean by "Exe" is legit? How would not executing anyone help at all? Who do you think is scum?

@TS: Would YOU be hungry for the execution power? Do you think

"possible investigative role recieves an innocent verdict"

is rolefishing?

@UMBRAGE: How do you not see anything scummy with TS? Why are you targeting me but not StrungOver? What are the important aspects for you? Why hesitate to call vezok a scum while s/he blatantly sheeps and buddies with Exe and call it a noob town-thing to do?

@VEZO: Why do you think Exe is a good executioner choice? Why do you not like FF/ANT at all? How is your list resemble towards Exe's list?

@ALL: How would you react if you were given an execution choice? WHO would you execute?

Tragedy · Post Post #155 (isolation #6) » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:22 am

I forgot to put a post.

Unvote

.

Time for another long re-read... Might not finish posting since I've got plans as well.

Tragedy · Post Post #248 (isolation #7) » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:11 am

I propose a new majorly suspicious person:

StrungOver

.
S/he's been mostly avoiding

prods

and not helping us out here.

--

Is it just me or vezok's rising the scum-dar but somehow town too?

Tragedy · Post Post #255 (isolation #8) » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:42 pm

@Amrun: I see, I see you no longer have

faith

in Exe, huh? You mentioned about his

solid townie plans

, but does it involve actual

scum-hunting

? That's what I'm actually looking for too.

@Ant: Answer my damn questions. [Scum-dar is rising..]

@Charter: How could he have actually 'faked' scumhunting? OH right, accusations?

@CoolDog: ... Your response towards my question(s) was seriously odd and misunderstood... +Scum-rise for his #2 post too.

@Exe: God damn. Your

don't think even I would be crazy enough to go as far as killing a scumbuddy with a daykill

makes it sound suspicious now.

@FF: I see, I see. It feels like everyone is just agreeing and following FF's ideals and shooting vezok's ass with lasers now.

@Haschel: Isn't it strange you wouldn't really care of whom should be the Executor? It feels like you want Exe to execute a townie, then everyone votes for a certain Witch-mate [by chance] while you feel satisfied. How does TS flipping scum makes all of us vote Exe and execute Umbrage? It's like the same thing with your point of "Hitting scum makes Exe townie town". +Strange-neutral-to-scum stuff.

@SV: Neutral 'nuff.

@TS: I see, I see. You're sexiness has now risen by 2%.

@Umbrage: No wonder why you really want me to go hunt you for the fun of it (No really, I'm going to see how scummy you are since I won't have my eyes on you.

) Do remember to not blindly or simply agree what a certain person says, but I really know you're against Exe so you're following Amrun, right? You were thinking vezok's neutral since you were blind enough to not see his scuminess, and now you see it, bravo!

@VEZOK: Goddamn it, I'm not leaving you alive if you ain't going to answer questions and showing your epic scumminess. Never, ever demand to live for the day to do something tonight, no. +Scum.

Tragedy · Post Post #257 (isolation #9) » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:01 pm

I see, I see.

Damn me for not reading things carefully.

Tragedy · Post Post #316 (isolation #10) » Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:32 am

Vezok: Really scum, for the demand to live while not doing the scum-hunts.

Umbrage: Worse = Could possibly mean bad townie. If you were reading Simpsons Mafia on how

I was

playing badly, you wouldn't completely consider as a noob townie that's worst. I wouldn't really trust you as an Executioner, but I don't even know what

you're doing anymore

. Null-to-scum.

TS: Null. Not really much to scum-hunting, mostly on defense.

SO: Flying under the radar,

scum

.

SV: I don't like him and his observations. Null read.

HASH: I do analyze the answers, but I prefer not revealing any thoughts about it at the moment. Anyone would ask questions and not talk of his/her conclusions towards the questions not right away, though. Not much to really read on you at the moment. Null.

Tragedy · Post Post #325 (isolation #11) » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:37 pm

Not yet, Exe. Not yet.

The only town-read I've thought of was Amrun, but something else doesn't seem right in this game at the moment.

Tragedy · Post Post #437 (isolation #12) » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:51 am

Vote: Exe

Can't seem to post last night while on the phone (Except a mishmash game, but whatever).

Tragedy · Post Post #446 (isolation #13) » Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:24 pm

@Umbrage: Isn't it somehow

obvious

?...

Unless you think Vezok ain't scummier than Exe to you, hum.

Tragedy · Post Post #461 (isolation #14) » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:43 pm

As kill choices or Execution choices?

We each have our own decisive ones, we all know.

Either vote for the most towniest or neutral-ish person would get you somewhere, but I don't think that'll work.

[Oh wait, Amrun is elected.]

Tragedy · Post Post #510 (isolation #15) » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:34 am

I would call Vezok's posts towards SO somehow an OMGUS to avoid his death to live tonight.
Something fishy is gonna be fished soon.

Tragedy · Post Post #515 (isolation #16) » Sun Feb 20, 2011 7:21 am

@Mod: If you don't decide to use your night-kill executioner abilities, do you still keep it for the next night or is it just given to someone else?

Tragedy · Post Post #528 (isolation #17) » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:20 pm

@FF: Allow me to correct the statement. He was distancing from town while being more concerned of myself ever since this game started, attacking/luring me out to obviously be executed. Sorry.

Tragedy · Post Post #535 (isolation #18) » Sun Feb 20, 2011 3:01 pm

I can really see Umbrage's gut says SO is scum, then he finds him town.

I can only think of a sole reason; He hasn't even been accused by SO.

I bet Umbrage goes nuts on every single person who votes against him.

Tragedy · Post Post #563 (isolation #19) » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:36 am

Umbrage wrote:
Tragedy wrote:I can really see Umbrage's gut says SO is scum, then he finds him town.

I can only think of a sole reason; He hasn't even been accused by SO.

I bet Umbrage goes nuts on every single person who votes against him.
Really? Prove it. Until you do, you're just wasting everyone's time with pointless speculation and slander. Oh wait, you've been doing that all game.

Pointless raging from you is definitely going out of the rage level. SO has only mentioned

Umbrage

once in his post, where he tells him something I don't really care of.

You

"If you're going to go after people for activity, go after Tragedy. She's done nothing."
"The three players with the worst activity and content rates are charter, Tragedy, and StrungOver. Of these three, charter still strikes me as the scummiest. I see no reason to kill the others I mentioned until they start posting more often."
"And StrungOver is on V/LA. I do NOT like killing players that are absent."
"I have a gut read of SO as scum and CD as town. But that's just gut. I'm not willing to decide a kill on it. Going for one of them is a cop-out. A lottery. Maybe scum, maybe lurky town. Who knows?"
"@ Final Fires and somewhat to Amrun: I can't help but notice you're picking on players who are absent or haven't made much content. Going after weak players like that strikes me as scummy."
"charter's beginning to look a little better, but I still think he's the best kill for today."
"Vezok saying SO is a good kill proves my point, a wagon on an absent player will draw out the scum."
"Charter actually gets townie points. He ignored the SO wagon, and pretty much admitted to tunneling, something I don't see scum doing"
"I read SO as town who thinks he's always right."
"SO doesn't concern me right now"
"I did not say I found Tragedy town. I said I did not want her killed until she could provide more content."
"I knew he was an easy target. Scum or town, he is an easy target. And going after easy targets is anti-town."
"My read on SO, when I was pushed to give one, was based on a gut feeling from a few posts of his. But even if I was absolutely sure he was scum, I would not want him killed until he made some content. Understand? It is anti-town to go after easy targets and lurking players. Scum want those easy targets to be lynched, so they will flock to the wagon. I stand by that logic, logic which shows you are possible scum. Now you are either not reading my posts, or deliberately misinterpreting them."

My Interpretation

So you find charter very scummy, but when he starts to improve his logic, you thought it was a good idea to kill him today. Yet, you mention he gets townie points for 'ignoring' the SO wagon.
Although your gut screams out that SO is scum, you're mentioning that he doesn't concern you much as you think he's town. There's your damn contradiction towards the situation itself, as you're just going to ignore the situation of SO. SO is no longer absent for the moment, yet you're not really observing the situation of SO and trying to get Exe killed. [Who knew?]
I haven't posted much content towards the damn whole day of the shit, and yet, you dislike trying to get inactive people killed. Guess what? You're trying to point everybody

at me

so I could actually post good content while somehow feeling threatened. That's basically trying to make everyone more scummier than you think they could be, by making me the easier target, that's not something a good town would do.

You're completely contradicting yourself in a bad way. I suggest you to give

yourself

a big slap in the face and stop trying to change the scum directions to everyone else without being stupid. You're just digging your grave, silly rabbit. Tricks are for silly rabbits.

Tragedy · Post Post #625 (isolation #20) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:49 am

Haschel Cedricson wrote:
Tragedy wrote:I haven't posted much content towards the damn whole day of the shit, and yet, you dislike trying to get inactive people killed. Guess what? You're trying to point everybody at me so I could actually post good content while somehow feeling threatened. That's basically trying to make everyone more scummier than you think they could be, by making me the easier target, that's not something a good town would do.
http://mafiascum.net/forum/posting.php? ... &p=2811507#
It's hard to parse this rambling mess of a paragraph, but if I've done so correctly, Tragedy is saying that good town players would not put pressure on another player. This is patently false.

I vote to daykill Umbrage or Tragedy and nightkill the other.

Incorrect.
-Umbrage wanted to get inactive people killed + I'm Inactive to him = He's trying to point out to everybody towards me to be lynched.
-Umbrage earlier mentions that he doesn't like going to hunt easier targets + I'm an easier target for everyone else = He's trying to point out to everybody against me as a lynch target. Not a good town view of Umbrage at all

Tragedy · Post Post #628 (isolation #21) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:46 am

Reminder to SV:
You earlier mentioned you forgot where you mentioned 'blatant buddying'. Now you're forgetting to ISO vezok? All you mentioned that he's less scummier than Umbrage.

Tragedy · Post Post #638 (isolation #22) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:20 pm

A good taste of the dead Umbrage would calm my head for the next few days.

Tragedy · Post Post #660 (isolation #23) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:58 am

Uh huh.
I wonder why Ant's voting for me.
I wonder why does it feel like Vezok is celebrating his luckiness (with his possible scumbuddies)?

Tragedy · Post Post #670 (isolation #24) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:20 pm

@Mod: Is it possible that we could choose to not have an Executioner?

Tragedy · Post Post #676 (isolation #25) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:39 pm

I ain't suggesting, I'm just checking if it's

even

possible to do so.

Tragedy · Post Post #729 (isolation #26) » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:09 am

Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I need to iso vezo; but that will have to wait; dinner's about ready.

When will this ever happen.

Tragedy · Post Post #733 (isolation #27) » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:33 am

Unvote

If Umbrage can make a better argument that ain't just pointing fingers at random people without decent evidence, I'm going to smack him/her/it.

Tragedy · Post Post #743 (isolation #28) » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:35 pm

@ANT

I'm quite worried of obviously confused people who doesn't know whom to vote for right away.

Suggesting it ain't a good idea anyways (During the night), since Witch/Mafia? (Mallow's kept mentioning it..

) have better voting powers than we do.

Even I'm not that confident who'll be the Executioner since Amrun became Elected.

Tragedy · Post Post #745 (isolation #29) » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:46 pm

Shattered Viewpoint wrote: 15/2/11: I need to iso vezo; but that will have to wait; dinner's about ready.
22/2/11: Note to self: look at cooldog toMorrow.

If none of these ever happen, I'm really, really going to bitch slap the hell out of SV.
Might have to keep up with Shattered Viewpoint even more.

Tragedy · Post Post #755 (isolation #30) » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:09 pm

StrungOver wrote:A 31 day page is WAY to long... please kill vezo

I'd hate to see 31 pages in Day 1 [Ridiculous, let's hit the record towards 50 pages in Day 1 to commemorate this luls!]

So you're just going straight into killing Vezok without any after-thoughts?

Cool story.

Tragedy · Post Post #796 (isolation #31) » Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:00 pm

Setael wrote:Shattered Viewpoint: 6 (Amrun, Seteal, Twistedspoon, Umbrage, SO, Tragedy)
Umbrage: 6 (FF, Exe, Charter, Vezok, Haschel, SV)

Tragedy · Post Post #800 (isolation #32) » Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:13 pm

I'm pretty pissed at SV for simply skipping his own words.
But if he turns out town, I'm really going to call him an idiot every game.
/Tips Hat.

Tragedy · Post Post #802 (isolation #33) » Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:15 pm

Lol-wut?
Either way, if SV flips scum, one of us is scum in your perspective?

The best to distance from him? How's that damn possible?
No point into completely posting a whole case on you again unless your testimony is really going to suck tomorrow. Obviously, scum would makes you a damn bait for tomorrow's lynch if you're going to continue on being Ridiculous.
SV > UMBRAGE > VEZOK/SO > SO/VEZOK

Idealistic?

Tragedy · Post Post #806 (isolation #34) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:22 am

No, SV.
You called yourself an idiot and decided not to actually ISO vezok and the other guy.
Maybe not scumhunt like myself, but...

Tragedy · Post Post #822 (isolation #35) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:19 pm

Ya know I ain't really doing that, so yeah.
Sadly.

Tragedy · Post Post #825 (isolation #36) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:35 pm

Allow me to Steal a Quote and Post it here which was directed at Me.

Jahudo wrote:So your lack of any reads day one actually made me think you weren't scum trying to slip under the radar but town having trouble scumhunting.

Tragedy · Post Post #840 (isolation #37) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 4:15 pm

Dun rush it.

Tragedy · Post Post #850 (isolation #38) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:32 am

Umbrage wrote:@ Exe: Say we go through with your plan, but someone still dies. Amrun claims she was not elected killer. Would you want to kill Amrun?

Instead of killing

Amrun

right away, we musn't actually

Elect

her at all for betraying us. If it was a severe case when she's a mafia, then yes, she'd be executed the next day.

Tragedy · Post Post #893 (isolation #39) » Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:15 am

charter wrote:I honestly voted Haschel.

Tragedy · Post Post #896 (isolation #40) » Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:44 am

Vezok did have some scummy reads on myself.
He mentioned he wanted to live through the night as well...

Tragedy · Post Post #933 (isolation #41) » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:07 pm

Amrun wrote:
And for the record, had I thought vezok would actually claim, I would have let her. It seemed to me like she wasn't going to claim no matter what.

You did read the post from vezok of letting him live through the night, right?... Must be that scummy enough for you to notice as well.

@TS:

"...I was dissapointed Vezok wasn't given a chance to claim, and didn't want us to lose a potential PR."

How did you end up coming with this outcome of thinking/knowing vezok was a Power Role?

@FF: Although you hadn't completely agreed of executing vezok, you still had the urge of doing it in the beginning. You found him quite scummy, too. Just wanted to point that out.

Tragedy · Post Post #947 (isolation #42) » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:29 pm

Amrun (1): Umbrage,
Final Fires (4): Setael, Amrun, Ant_to_the_max, Twistedspoon
Haschel (2): charter, Tragedy
Charter (1): Haschel

...Then how did it come to Amrun like this?

This chart does not make any logical sense.

Tragedy · Post Post #984 (isolation #43) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:20 am

@Haschel: Picking the Night Executioner was quite difficult, for it being it

was

possible that Amrun would suddenly pull off a different move instead of actually Not Killing somebody. (Dum-Dum-dee-doodle-lee-dooo..) Besides, you're quite an interesting pirate-wanna-be but yet, you seem focused in a good way... (I do sort of mind some disappearances, but..)

Tragedy · Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:25 pm

@Now Stating the Obvious to Ant:
"

Some villagers, some witches. Then, however, a leader by the name of Andrew Smith decided to do something about it. He declared that the villagers should fight back!

And so thus begins there story..."

If you could

read

your Role PM, you win when

All the Witches

are dead. DEAD I SAY.
WITCHES SHOULD BE BEHEADED.

Tragedy · Post Post #1016 (isolation #45) » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:20 pm

Lol Pilgrims?...
I thought we were just regular Townspeople.

Tragedy · Post Post #1050 (isolation #46) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:38 am

@FF: ...I do kindly like to see you make me look really town but...
What Umbrage kind of said was a good point. Me does not like blatant buddies out of nowhere, no arguments there.

@Umbrage: Just to wonder... Why would

scum

actually have Fake Role PMs if there's just plain old witches and pilgrims/townspeople/Townies/WHATEVER?
I don't see a good reason why would they really need a fucking fake Role PM when there's just villagers and witches without power roles.

Tragedy · Post Post #1051 (isolation #47) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:39 am

^Well, nvm about the power roles part.

Tragedy · Post Post #1074 (isolation #48) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:07 pm

So basically... It's from Umbrage, TS, Exe, SO, SV, Amrun then back to Umbrage.
Apparently, I guess these changes were caused by TS, SO and somehow Umbrage. I just had recently noticed, but I thought Amrun wanted to execute SO...

Tragedy · Post Post #1078 (isolation #49) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:15 pm

Original Executionees. People who were about to be executed and chosen to were on the big list.

Apparently, three people in the smaller list had somehow gotten those wagons derailed. And I don't get why.

Tragedy · Post Post #1095 (isolation #50) » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:17 pm

A scum-faced one, obviously.
Or a politician, who knows.

The culprit would be

Umbrage

, by the way...

Tragedy · Post Post #1098 (isolation #51) » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:16 pm

Do you not remember how Politician's ability works, I wonder..?

Tragedy · Post Post #1103 (isolation #52) » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:44 pm

Pretty much sucks for the guy whose being Executed by Exe.
I'm not even sure anymore if Amrun flipping town upon death would reveal something else about Setael and Haschel/charter..

Tragedy · Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:15 am

Om nom nom.
Should we vote whom should die tomorrow?

Tragedy · Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:20 am

Game Tomorrow, silly.

I don't really have a suggestion on whom to vote now...

Tragedy · Post Post #1127 (isolation #55) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:42 am

It includes you, Umbrage.

Anyways..

If Amrun = Town -> SO must Die.
If Amrun = Scum -> Uhh.

Tragedy · Post Post #1130 (isolation #56) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:47 am

StrungOver wrote:I voted Umbrage
also the following need to die
Amrun
Exe
Final Fires

For a long time, it DOES matter.
I don't see SO pushing the wagon, but complaining against 'em.

Tragedy · Sat Mar 12, 2011 12:57 pm

Nobody can obviously vote for themselves at night, right..?

Tragedy · Post Post #1141 (isolation #58) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:44 pm

If Amrun = Town -> SO must Die.
If Amrun = Scum -> TS must Die.

Period of Correction.

Tragedy · Post Post #1152 (isolation #59) » Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:03 am

Then it's still preferable that our opinions come by, 'ya know..
I keep in silence of my town power.

Tragedy · Post Post #1157 (isolation #60) » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:03 am

VOTE-TO-KILL

: SO.

Tragedy · Post Post #1180 (isolation #61) » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:57 am

Twistedspoon wrote:it's simple. SO's play has been nothing like how a townie plays.
Townie's don't play as SO did. Therefore he must be scum.

anyways, stop defending SO. I agree that Amrun is very suspicious and I can see why you guys voted for her but in my opinion SO is scum
I hope you respect my opinion and vote

You have no right to insult how a person plays Mafia.

In any case, everyone plays Town however they want to.

Tragedy · Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:04 am

SO (3) - Twistedspoon, Tragedy, Final Fires
Amrun (3) - Umbrage, Set, SO
Umbrage (1) - Charter

Roger~

Tragedy · Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:32 am

SO (3) - Twistedspoon, Tragedy, Final Fires
Amrun (3) - Umbrage, Setael, SO
Umbrage (1) - Charter

Dun dun dun.

Tragedy · Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:55 pm

charter wrote:Exe, if you just killed Umbrage, that would be most excellent. You have the power...

->

Why so convinced? (...)

Tragedy · Post Post #1212 (isolation #65) » Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:09 pm

SO (5) - Twistedspoon, Tragedy, Final Fires, Ant, Amrun
Amrun (3) - Umbrage, Setael, SO
Umbrage (1) - Charter

._.

Tragedy · Post Post #1227 (isolation #66) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:05 am

It was already proven that scum votes for certain people.
I'm fine with executing Umbrage, but I'd do that more later, since SO is more scummy than he is...

Tragedy · Post Post #1229 (isolation #67) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:19 am

Not proven, I mean. It's obvious.

Tragedy · Post Post #1233 (isolation #68) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:35 am

Haschel went V/LA.

Tragedy · Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:37 am

It was just an example.

Tragedy · Post Post #1273 (isolation #70) » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:14 am

"SETAEL KNEW SV WOULD FLIP TOWN"

A suspicious fact is suspicious.

I'm still fine enough for me being NK Executioner, but most people would obviously disagree.

Tragedy · Post Post #1285 (isolation #71) » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:37 pm

Only thing I could understand from Umbrage:

HE IS SURE AMRUN WILL FLIP SCUM BECAUSE SCUM BE MORE CAUTIOUS, AND DO WHAT THE TOWN WANTS

Tragedy · Post Post #1292 (isolation #72) » Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:00 pm

It means before.
Before SO posted content.

Tragedy · Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:38 pm

I voted for

TS

.

Tragedy · Post Post #1302 (isolation #74) » Thu Mar 24, 2011 1:28 pm

Well, shit.
Where's Haschel when we need him.

Tragedy · Post Post #1326 (isolation #75) » Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:36 am

Wait, if Ant is doublevoter, shouldn't the Witch be killing him instead? I find this disturbing, to the fact that he's still alive today after 2 Nights.

Also, TS. Out of all honesty, I find TS a bit more trustworthy than anybody else (FF comes second).
Though, I just like to randomly vote people who I would expect to not really get much votes during the night anyways.. >_>

Tragedy · Post Post #1329 (isolation #76) » Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:03 am

If Ant is basically confirmed town, then he's a goody-two-shoes puppet for the scums.
And now I shouldn't have forgotten we have an Executioner already..

Tragedy · Post Post #1333 (isolation #77) » Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:40 am

It's hard to know whom to trust. Obviously, in my perspective.

Tragedy · Fri Mar 25, 2011 10:28 am

So why Exe out of all people?
Most people have trusted FF, but...

Tragedy · Post Post #1343 (isolation #79) » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:58 pm

Setael wrote:TS, Tragedy and charter is the scum team.

Since when did you get a conclusion of 3 scums in a 13 player game? >_>

Tragedy · Post Post #1350 (isolation #80) » Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:59 am

Who did charter vote last night?
Either Exe or FF, if I was reading his posts.

Tragedy · Post Post #1359 (isolation #81) » Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:05 am

Exe wrote:
Hey, hey. Daykill nmber 2 wasn't fake. I was legitimately trying to use my daykill. However, it failed as you had already been elected Executioner.

This was for Day 1 or 2?
If it was Day 2, then you're out of your mind.

Tragedy · Post Post #1361 (isolation #82) » Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:47 am

Tragedy wrote:SO (5) -
Twistedspoon, Final Fires
, Ant, Tragedy, Amrun
Amrun (3) -
Umbrage, SO,
Setael
Umbrage (1) - Charter

._.

Was this the whole list of whom chose to execute SO yesterday?
Or did I miss some people.

Anyways. Just to place this here.

Tragedy · Post Post #1368 (isolation #83) » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:36 am

When did I sheep?
But still. . .

Tragedy · Post Post #1370 (isolation #84) » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:53 am

Kind of awkward that Amrun did survive yesterday, durr....

Tragedy · Post Post #1387 (isolation #85) » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:29 am

And I'm pretty sure I'm not. . . >_>

Tragedy · Post Post #1389 (isolation #86) » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:33 am

Amrun wrote:Just pretty sure? Haha.

At least somebody has a sense of humor.
Anyways, I still thought Amrun was the actual execution of a damn fucking long time ago, and now it's hopping everywhere again.
-Sort-of-blame-Exe-&-Amrun-

Tragedy · Post Post #1391 (isolation #87) » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:38 am

I did not wanted you to be executed before Exe. I mentioned that you were almost everyone's preferred execution way a long time ago.

Tragedy · Post Post #1393 (isolation #88) » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:53 am

I thought.

Tragedy · Post Post #1395 (isolation #89) » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:59 am

I thought the Amrun wagon was still alive.
I'm just mentioning it because of different reactions.
Except I can't see any.

Tragedy · Post Post #1397 (isolation #90) » Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:52 am

I still thought the Amrun wagon existed. . .

Tragedy · Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:19 am

Amrun wrote:Well, it seems that people have analyzed night 1 votes and figured it's unlikely that I was scum, with the votes. That's also a reason you are coming under suspicion, but not the only one.

I wish I had thought of that defense yesterday.

ic.
I wonder who had still voted Amrun last night, if i'm ever amazed >_>

Tragedy · Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:24 am

I still don't lie about voting Haschel and TS, though.
Yet, I'm quite confuzzled, hehe.

Why did charter just suddenly come back and voted Ant?.

Tragedy · Post Post #1407 (isolation #93) » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:08 am

@Ant: Does your doublevoting power is also usable during the Night as well?

Also, we need a list of whom voted for who last night.
I still voted for TS.

Tragedy · Post Post #1409 (isolation #94) » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:13 am

Exe (1) - TS
TS (1) - Tragedy

Tragedy · Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:35 am

I'm still waiting of whoever you voted last night.
Unless it was FF, of course.

Tragedy · Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:35 am

You cannot choose to Not Vote.
Don't lie.

Tragedy · Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:29 pm

^Oh

But does your doublevoting power is used during the night too?

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:49 am

...
Although the Amrun argument was pretty long, and weak, suddenly, the SO wagon is already formed. Although I may not be scum, and trying to gamble my life here, but it's quite obvious that most of the scum where outside of the Amrun wagon, yes, yes? That would make a possibility of myself, TS, Ant, Amrun, Haschel and Charter out of the wagon. However, what if it's possible that there was a scum member actually voting Amrun? I see this quite often, for some silly reason. If Setael was actually scum, that would leave TS, Charter, Ant, Amrun and myself. But although I know I'm damn town from role PMs (Anyways), you could assume that scum would really get rid of the idiots first [TS, Myself, Cough.] I still don't like how the Amrun wagon was left in silence, when it's more possible that she is scum.

Ant mentioned he was a doublevoter, yes, YES? His doublevoting power can either be scum or town [But I don't think mallow is a troll to make Ant a doublevoter.. Or IS HE..], anyways. We shouldn't forget that Mafia had night-doublevoting powers, too.

What, if in another scenario, wasn't Amrun actually NK'ing, but his scum buddy? Of course, he would think wisely enough. But you did mention of going offensive towards him, and then say "Oh no, he's an important town PR!" way earlier, then actually ignored that damn fact and executed him last night. I don't think it's possible for Amrun to be executing last night, for he has made a silly point of him possibly being an important town PR, but his POSSIBLE SCUMBUDDY (or himself), could have done so.

Uhhh..

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:40 pm

Amrun wrote:Wait, wait, who's a town PR?

Vezok.

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:41 pm

Ant_to_the_max wrote:Tragedy is going to be the quick answer right now and I will leave the other two for tonight.

Now, I know this is a weakish argument but hear me out. Why was Final Fires killed before me? I think it was because he was running around confirming people with the win-con. The scum didn't know (as far as I know) about a doc, or they just didn't think I was worth it. If it was because he was town by confirming people, then Tragedy would likely be town. I was going to go and meta her, but she obviously has played a lot of games here so she can't be a noob town, but she can still be an ignorant town. That is what I am thinking on her.

Oh and I said I voted for Exe if we really wanna get all the vote.

It's possible that FF truly outwitted you, there. But there's still a possible fact that you can still be scum, uh hum.

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:50 pm

Outwitted you as in like outsmarted you in awesome speculahs.
=/

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:51 pm

If I had to gamble onto whose scum, it'd possibly be Amrun/Exe/Haschel.

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:59 pm

Ant_to_the_max wrote:So you just admitted that FF tried to clear you as town, but "outwitted" me because you are really scum?
And I think I am 100% town now to everyone =/

And if you were seriously 100% town, you should be looking back at the Amrun shit wagon and look again.

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:59 pm

Exe (3+1) - TS, Amrun, Ant
TS (1) - Tragedy

Tragedy · Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:02 pm

Setael wrote:Ditto that.

Tragedy wrote:Ant mentioned he was a doublevoter, yes, YES? His doublevoting power can either be scum or town [But I don't think mallow is a troll to make Ant a doublevoter.. Or IS HE..], anyways. We shouldn't forget that Mafia had night-doublevoting powers, too.
Are you trying to say that ant may actually be scum? If that were the case the game would be over.

Tragedy's sudden attempt to try to appear to be scum hunting just looks suspicious. She's scum.

Why are so many players lurking? I've been V/LA - anyone else have an excuse?

It may be possible, but there's still a bigger chance he could possibly be town, but it's still possible he could be scum.
And no, I was looking not-so-deep under how the Amrun wagon got disbanded here.
And we've got lives..

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:10 am

When he meant the "Girls First" part, it was for random execution voting moment, wasn't it?

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:18 am

Setael wrote:Wow, that was scummy tragedy. It's clear that you really don't want to be linked to ant. That's really the only comment you have?

I'm calling a TS-Tragedy-Ant scum team.

After that post, I'd be just as happy requiring Ant to day kill tragedy.

It's clear you didn't notice we started random voting people for executioners. In the BEGINNING. That was in the first page, Post #24.
If you're widely stupid enough, it was when we started our plans, but he never got to vote me anyways. Noobface.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:38 am

@TS: I prefer to expect you to become Night Executioner since I know you'd be trusting FF to the max [Or amIwrong], and wouldn't execute him.

Looks like we gave the Executioner to scum again...

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:49 am

1) Not to the max, but keep it good enough to avoid getting executed first. I would have been executing Charter by now.
2) In fact, TS was your major town read, no?
3) When Exe shout out that he didn't vote last night, still didn't count him out to be possible Night Executioner. Of course, if it was him, then it's pretty reasonable why FF would be dead today.
4) Biggest Scum-teh-reads ever.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:36 am

Don't worry, Setael.

Some scum-senses is crying out loud

When did I say "YOU'RE CRAZY, YOU NOOB"..
Oh right, you must have read it wrong, you should have knew that the only one who actually voted me was Exe, until we ended up having Amrun as Day 1 Executor.
You still misread.

And I didn't say if Ant was totally scum. I just ended up typing up a scenario, ff.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:43 am

Then I keep my proposal of executing Exe at hand.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:39 am

Ohhh.
But then there's a possibility of 2 scums, too.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:33 am

Amrun wrote:I still want Exe dead, but Tragedy is an acceptable compromise, especially since Tragedy herself pointed out that he voted for her in RVS.

I pointed out that he didn't voted for me in RVS.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:13 pm

-ROLE CLAIM : Vanilla Townie-

...I'm pretty sure I accidentaly deleted my role PM again.. -___-...
But I'm pretty sure remember that I am a Vanilla Townie, Town Faction, pretty much it..
Also, isn't the Executioner (Exe's Case) normally anti-town..?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:34 pm

What, I'm not allowed to claim?
Besides, it's pretty obvious I have to be claiming as the most popular wagon.
I still see you're not reading as well.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:52 pm

It IS necessary.
Everyone's still thinking I'm scum, after all.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 02, 2011 4:51 pm

I'm keeping the honesty, no lies here. -_-
Claiming a Power Role is more dangerous than a Vanilla Townie, too.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:20 pm

So why didn't you add Exe or HS?
I detected something wrong in the above post.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:57 pm

So what were you even right of...?

Tragedy · Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:34 am

Amrun wrote:Well, then, I'll be voting for HC at night, I think, unless something drastically changes today.

Maybe scum knew that TS and I were scapegoats.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:40 am

I'm not cool with the automatic haschel night-voting plan, though.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:36 pm

I'm pretty sure having a doctor's obvious. I doubt mallowgeno is a bastard moderator, since we have a confirmed-dead Nurse.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:49 pm

Having a doctor claim after more than half of the town dead?
Pretty knowledgable that a doctor claiming right now is pretty screwed tonight.
A slight change or thought, but did Amrun or Haschel claim anything?

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 8:39 am

Say, is it possible that docs could protect from night executions..?
Hm.
Regardless, really?
That's two town VIs off the game.
If I were to live tonight and choose the night execution, bye bye charter.

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:01 am

By what you mentioned of Scum Night Extra Killer of Night 1, I find it a bit ridiculous but possibly reasonable.
1 Night Executioner and an extra scum killer, but it's risky to choose an executioner because of it.
If both Night Execution was given to scum killer, then 2 kills for scum unless something else happens.
Is it even possible for Docs to protect from executions? I probably doubt it, but possibly.

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:28 am

Most likely to defend from scum kills, not executions.
I'm quite sure Executions are quite inevitable to die without any fail, obviously.

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:30 am

Twistedspoon wrote:
Tragedy wrote:Most likely to defend from scum kills, not executions.
scum kills?
when have we had a scum kill? I didn't even think they were in the rules :/

Based on Ant's simple theory from earlier.

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:47 am

Amrun wrote:This theory is terrible. Anyone with a basic concept of balance knows this isn't true that scum gets NK AND double execution votes.

Lol. I'm quite sure town has certain advantage during the morning, so yeah.

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:34 pm

REQUEST TO PROD EXE AFTER AFKING IN THREE DAYS. Please.

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:59 pm

How come you left out Setael, other than thinking he's your town read?

Tragedy · Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:35 pm

Well, Ant.
If I'm the vig kill for tomorrow, Set would already be murdering me by then. I prefer a charter execution and whoever you want to die tonight.
I still don't get the HC being town thingy,
But yeah, I'll be keeping my mind on that later and prefer to be voted as Night Executioner and decide on something.
But if by a miracle, that does happen, cool story.

I'm still keeping Amrun as scum here.

Tragedy · Thu Apr 07, 2011 12:45 am

I keep forgetting, are you just calling me scum here or are you backing up A reason?
Why would you think I would most likel hit scum than TS/charter/HS?

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:20 am

Amrun wrote:I would sooo rather we switch that plan, Ant.

My scumread on TS is relative to my scumread on Exe, so seeing if Exe will execute TS will be really helpful in me determining Exe's alignment.

Tragedy today, TS tomorrow sounds like a good plan to me.

I don't understand how TS = Scumread on Exe
This is confusing, why would you go for another person instead of your 'scumread' thoughts? Fishy Fishy.
You're fine with choosing anyone since you're too focused to Exe & TS?

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:04 am

Haschel Cedricson wrote:I'm okay giving the NK to Setael.

I don't think charter is scum, though. My preference order is Exe, Tragedy, and TS.

But yeah, I understand the plan and will be voting for Setael.

Why not charter? Do YOU have any proof, other than he pops up sometimes or such?
...What was the plan after voting Setael again..? Oh right, he's going to execute one of us..
Uhh.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:58 am

I'm pretty sure you had the chance to execute Exe.
Instead you went for VEZOK who was more 'scummier'. Cool.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:23 pm

Amrun wrote:Tragedy is getting executed today, right, ant?

So, if you're pretty concerned of TS, why not execute him first? >_>
You're being pretty stupid here and you're going to screw town over.
A request to execute Amrun, please.

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:27 pm

VOTE: Amrun

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:34 pm

Amrun wrote:Why does Exe need to live?

His vigkill wasn't even real.

Your argument seems to be that it didn't prove he was scum, so he should live.

Proving people are scum is pretty damn difficult. If that vigkill had been real and TS flipped town, I would have gone after Exe next, no questions.

No townie really ends the day that early on a whim in this set up.

Amrun wrote:Twisted: Newb town. I liked his reaction to the vigkill gambit and the major point against him is the supposed rolefishing and I 100% disagree. I don't see it as rolefishing at all. Has said some fishy things, so is closer to null, I guess. Right now I'm attributing it to newb-ness but IGMEOY.

Amrun wrote:@the rest of this mess: I smell monkey business. I'll need to see a flip out of the Exe/charter/Umbrage group to really figure it out, though.

Uh huh.. Explanations how TS -> Newb Town -> Scum again?

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:57 pm

charter wrote:I'm not claiming now. I can live with voting Seteal tonight...

...

Tragedy · Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:22 pm

So, how's your read on Amrun?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:45 am

Lol, you're being stupid!

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:45 am

Setael wrote:Obviously, don't execute until TS has a chance to claim.

This is just letting scum get away, obviously.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:02 am

Twistedspoon wrote:
Tragedy wrote:
Setael wrote:Obviously, don't execute until TS has a chance to claim.
This is just letting scum get away, obviously.
no, it's making sure we don't execute a townie :/

So you're a townie? Cool story. I'm a townie too, got a problem?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:12 am

It's pretty not-so-obvious.
Either Ant believes Exe's actually town, and actually satisfying some scums out there.
Or, Ant is scumbuddies with Exe, which I would clearly doubt here.
Amrun as scum, is pretty probable.
But Setael just shown his small buddying with TS. Looks scummy.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:15 am

Dependence. I'd bet Exe expected Ant to execute one of us..
And Setael, why would you bother leaving TS alive to claim but you ignore of charter?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:30 am

Setael wrote:I thought it was pretty clear that I want TS to claim because I want to kill him tonight when you flip scum.

And I'm still going to flip as a Regular Townie.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:41 am

TS, I'm pretty sure you already claimed.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:43 am

Twistedspoon wrote:
Tragedy wrote:
Setael wrote:Obviously, don't execute until TS has a chance to claim.
This is just letting scum get away, obviously.

no, it's making sure we don't execute a townie
:/

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:45 am

Setael wrote:Tragedy's sudden attempt to try to appear to be scum hunting just looks suspicious. She's scum.

When I read this post, the bad vibes suddenly popped up- He's now going against me in many ways.
A day before LyLo is pretty important, right? So we don't kill a goddamned townie like yesterday.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:51 am

Uh huh.. Then there would be a total of 2 Vanilla Townies in-game, that have claimed, so far?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:14 pm

Exe wrote:I still think we should have massclaimed. Just saying.

So tragedy will be dying? K.

I don't really know what exactly we need to discuss.

I really don't know out of blue you chose me.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:23 pm

Amrun wrote:Idk though. Not exactly sold, but we did have a nurse so a deputy isn't too far out of the question.

So if there's a Deputy then..

Vezok [Cop] - TS [Deputy]
FF [Nurse] - Amrun/Setael/Charter/Haschel [Doctor?]
Ant [Doublevoter] - Exe [Executioner?]
Tragedy [VT] - Umbrage [VT]
Amrun [??] - Setael [??]
Charter [??] - Haschel [??]

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:24 pm

I forgot to put SV's a VT too. Ops.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:42 pm

Based on Nurse/Deputy Claims/FF Flip, there's linked roles in this game.
If, by chance, Mafia has Double Votes, then a Town member would possibly have Double votes as well.
Executioner would be an alternative Executor.. Hmm...

Scumbuddies?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:10 pm

Amrun wrote:Not seeing this.

Seeing what? Linked Roles?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:55 pm

Well, other than the 'town doublevoter' and 'town executioner', no?

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:01 pm

The 'town doublevoter' would be linked to the SCUMS, who have DOUBLEVOTING Powers in the NIGHT.
The 'town executioner', would most likely be the issue with the Night Executioner, whom actually is full of bullshit and can possibly mostly be scum because of their doublevoting-night powers, to work in the day to automatically kill somebody in the Day before an actual executinoer is picked-zors.

So, I get the vibes that Ant and Exe aren't LYING here.
It's three of you four people, Haschel, Amrun, charter and Setael, that are SCUM.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:03 pm

Ant, please, if you hate my shitty game analysis speculahs, at least execute either Haschel, Amrun, charter or Setael, and we'll be getting SOME results here.

Tragedy · Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:06 pm

Well, Exe.
What made you change your wanting to lynch Amrun, other than me being the reason?

Tragedy · Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:46 am

I'm still down for an Amrun kill. TS, don't go scummy on us now.

Tragedy · Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:01 am

No. Town technically agreed to vote for you, Amrun, since we wanted to have 'no-kill', but you thought vezok was pretty scummy and executed him. Don't lie here.

Tragedy · Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:07 am

You, Exe, TS, Haschel, Umbrage supported the plan.
Unless I'm wrong and thought Umbrage didn't want no-kill when SV flipped Town. Yeah..

Tragedy · Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:57 am

Setael wrote:
Tragedy wrote:No. Town technically agreed to vote for you, Amrun, since we wanted to have 'no-kill', but you thought vezok was pretty scummy and executed him. Don't lie here.
Don't you supposedly have a scum read on amrun? This post of yours is 100% from the perspective that amrun is definitely town. Not even a hint of you thinking she made that move because she's scum.

Did you forget you're supposed to have a scum read on amrun?

Was correcting her.

Most of the town, other than myself and whoever it was.

Tragedy · Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:09 am

Amrun wrote:Okay, we want the kill NOW?

I'm going to vote for Final Fires at night. Just saying it now.

If I get the night kill, I'm killing vezokpiraka. If you don't want me to do that, vote for someone else. I would have done what we all elected to do at night, but I am entirely unclear on what that is, so this is my announcement of what I will do should I be elected as night killer.

Amrun wrote:So, Final Fires, you voted for me even though you didn't want me to kill vezok? And now you want to kill me for doing exactly what I professed to do?

So if you're trying to tell me that Amrun is town, then I give up on it. The posts above changes the idea differently after a skip of pages. But it still doesn't mean Amrun can't be scum, I'm just confused..

Tragedy · Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:28 am

But Setael, why are you protecting Amrun? Because she's your town read or something?

Tragedy · Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:46 am

And the Haschel claim?

Tragedy · Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:06 pm

Although Haschel is mostly a town read, any good reasons why he IS? Any good reason why Haschel should NOT claim?
All players deserve the right to claim, and you're confident enough to let town dead.

Tragedy · Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:11 pm

So ant, you're not going to object that they should claim now?

Tragedy · Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:44 pm

I thought TS would be your NK if I die today, what changed your mind?
If I was town, you'd still kill him or make him already 'innocent'?
Scum is just leaving me to jump down the to the pole.

Tragedy · Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:05 pm

End this madness. Whatever, Amrun~

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:17 am

No Bah posts allowed...

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:18 am

Tragedy has been converted into a neutral survivor...

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:57 pm

Sorry mallow.

Seriously, it was pathetic of us. 3:

I'm still right of Amrun.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:00 pm

FFFFFFFF............ I forgive you, Ant.
I still think you're scum.,

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:03 pm

Also, isn't 4/13 a bit too high for scum alliance?

Although we had a Leader, A Cop, An Executioner, and a Nurse [whose been trolled], and yeah..
Scum really did have major opportunity to win this game based on the setup, btw.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:03 pm

Exe wrote:OMFG I CALLED IT.

WHAT DID I SAY WHEN AMRUN REPLACED IN!? TS AND AMRUN.

TS AND FUCKING AMRUN.

YOU ALL OWE ME YOUR SOULS. ALL OF YOU.

Me...? I said I was convinced of AMRUN being scum.
..You did agree to kill me too...
...

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:09 pm

Exe wrote:
Tragedy wrote:
Exe wrote:OMFG I CALLED IT.

WHAT DID I SAY WHEN AMRUN REPLACED IN!? TS AND AMRUN.

TS AND FUCKING AMRUN.

YOU ALL OWE ME YOUR SOULS. ALL OF YOU.
Me...? I said I was convinced of AMRUN being scum.
..You did agree to kill me too...
...
4 for 5 isn't a bad ratio. Just got unlucky

Pretty much easily that scum could stack up votes towards one of their members = They get automatic NK.
4 x 2 = 8
Town has 9 people.. I mean 8, since somebody would be executed in the morning. Anyways, I doubt it would be even possible for all town to vote for one guy, pretty tricky to do all that. Looked more scum-favored, TBH.

My non-informational role analysis did work out-ish.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:15 pm

Exe wrote:Oh also, I accidentally didn't vote Night 1, but it didn't matter because it wouldn't have changed anything >.>

Why did Amrun get away with it, WHY!?

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:18 pm

At least TS sort of played good scum for that small bit.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:21 pm

Yeah, really. You go for the OBVIOUS-SCUM-STICKING-OUT instead of the silent ones. But meh. >,<
I'm not amused to see HC as scum, but I don't get how he's town either.
The most Pro-Town thing that Exe did in game was voting me out of love <3.

Tragedy · Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:23 pm

But Traitor has x2 votes, right?..

Tragedy · Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:58 am

LIST OF WHOM TO KILL IN ORDER...
AMRUN > TS > HS > OR = CHARTER > VEZOK > UMBRAGE > SET > SV > EXE > FF > ME.

Tragedy · Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:31 am

Twistedspoon wrote:FF
If I was ever on a scumteam with him, we'd win for sure
I tip my hat to final fires

Then I wouldn't be dead here and it'd make him look pretty suspicious.

Tragedy · Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:18 am

Umbrage wrote:
Umbrage wrote:
IF WE END UP LOSING THIS GAME TO AMRUN-SCUM I AM CREATING A PETITION TO RESTRICT EVERYONE BUT SETAEL TO NEWBIE GAMES FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.
OH WOW LOOKIE HERE

OH WOW I'M BLAMED FOR NOT PUSHING AMRUN?

Tragedy · Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:15 am

<('__'<)
Oh noes, not FF D: