1. What, if any, experience do you have at mafia?
2. What is your timezone?
3. How often can we expect you to be posting?
Yay for RVS.
CaptainCuddles wrote:I know. The thought process fell apart when I reread the mod's original post. 25% for a cop and 25% for a doctor no dupe already makes this combo very rare. My bad guys.
CaptainCuddles wrote:I think it could be noob town because if I were scum, I would've totally jumped on my noobiness and bandwagoned when people started to change their votes to me. I'm keeping my vote on Frostbite because he's the only one I see suspicious atm.
CaptainCuddles wrote:
I like that vote on TS you got there....
Twistedspoon wrote:so what info were you hoping for?
CaptainCuddles wrote:I see people voting as TS was asking people why they were being so conservative with their votes. Early on I screwed up because of some misunderstandings about how the games were played on MS.
@forest_air: Could you explain what you find suspicious about my voting habits? My current vote on Frost, I think, is justifiable. Others were random (TS) or OMGUS votes (which brought gb to L-1 >.> but then I really thought the entire game was going to end by June 3 and I didn't understand why people were being so slow).
The fluff posts was a result of, again, not understanding what the hell I am doing or the consequences of such posts. VI
gbevilchaos wrote:Same. My top 2 scum candidates are Graves and CC at the moment, but Graves isn't getting any attention.
Can everyone post their opinions on Graves? We need to start discussing him. CC has been discussed already, and nothing new has really popped up. Let's wait for him to do something else wrong before we all default back to the guy who was the easiest target during his first few days of play.
noragar wrote:
If you're getting a town-tell from me, why are you so quick to jump on the bandwagonjust because TwistedSpoon asked you to?
Otolia wrote:Out of the 3 banwagonned, none really stands out as very scummy. Frostbite should post more. CptCuddles has make up his mind about what he want to do today. So in the end, the only one who seems to have a plan is noragar. It isn't always scummy not it is townish.
VOTE: noragar. Let's see what you do when under pressure.
Otolia wrote:You know what time it is for me little punk ? It's 1AM, I have to get up as early as 5AM tomorrow. I'm still waiting on a green light by NS to post what I had to say. I'm not a flaker. I promised a post and I will deliver it. I am not excusing myself for taking time to speak with my girlfriend and my best friend. My post will come, if you are not capable of waiting then [censored]
THIS. KIND. OF. ATTITUDE. REALLY. PISSES. ME. OFF.
chkflip wrote:His 282doesn't seem scum motivated, brings up interesting points on Spoon; meanwhile, Espe is 12 hours lurked, has little to no actual content, and has fluffed a good bit.
I've played with Espe - it doesn't mean I can read him any better or worse than anyone else, but he lurked as scum in that one, too.
Otolia wrote:I'll break the deal for you : I'm scum.
Go partner, you can win this.
PS : I'll have A LOT to say about TS focus after game. See you there.
even though chkflip did say he had suspected noragar earlier on in 185.noragar wrote:
If you're getting a town-tell from me, why are you so quick to jump on the bandwagon just because TwistedSpoon asked you to?
Otolia wrote:It is to be expected that anyone who is being bandwagonned start to post more. I am not sure I like the way you are justifying your vote.
noragar wrote:
The reasons I've seen for the votes against me are:
1. Answering an easy question to try to appear more town
2. Scum skimming because I skimmed over a post that hadn't been made yet when I answered that question.
3. Trying to blend in and not appear scummy. Isn't it good strategy to try to not appear scummy whether you're scum or town?
4. Not posting very much even though I've posted more than half the other people in the game.
5. Copying a vote without reason, even though I stated my reasons before the vote I "copied" was made.
I guess if I'm going out, I may as well have my vote on the person who tried hardest to orchestrate it.
Unvote
Vote: Chkflip
My initial read on the spot when there was nothing else to go on was that of Vanilla townie since I thought that when the original person disappeared immediately, I though it was more likely that someone would just walk away after getting dealt a VT role than either a scum or a power role. But since then, Chkflip's actions make no sense to me. First he tries to fabricate a very weak case against me. Then after that fails, he admits that my responses seem town, then immediately votes for me because someone asked him to. I tried to get more information about his justifications, but it looks like I may not have time to do that.
noragar wrote:Oh - and a shout out to gbevil. Thanks for the support.
You're either the one townie that has a clue, or doing a good job at distancing yourself from chkflip to help your scum partnership with him - either way, something my fellow townies should keep in mind further down the road.
chkflip wrote:I also think your "self preservation motivated" theory seems even more fitting here. Scum wants to live.
Otolia wrote:You are really spouting out random affirmations without thinking about it, just like TS. This question is a true dilemma for every side (except Third Party maybe), and here is why.
Scum-side: A mafia player don't name his partner at first because it too dangerous. But naming a townie will drew further suspicions on the people you didn't name including your partner. It becomes a game of WIFOM
Town-side: Being a townie means you don't lie. Why would you cast suspicions on someone particularly when upon reveal, your fellow townies will take another look at your reads upon death ? Naming someone is creating WIFOM and townies don't want that.
VOTE: Chkflip I would like you to stop acting as if I were mentally challenged.
Otolia wrote:I'll break the deal for you : I'm scum.
Go partner, you can win this.
PS : I'll have A LOT to say about TS focus after game. See you there.
noragar wrote:Curious as to why you think everybody who voted for Otolia is not scum (with that vote being the main or only reason provided), with one exception. I can see the reasoning behind saying that about TS starting the wagon, and to a lesser extent gbevil and forest for finishing the wagon. But it seems to me that chkflip and I were in basically equivalent positions on the wagon. Why do you say Chkflip would have jumped off the wagon if he were scum, but I wouldn't have?
noragar wrote:Yes, townies worry about finding scum. But how is it productive to look for scum in such a way that you appear to be scummier than the true scum are looking. What benefit is it to mislead the rest of the town into thinking you might be scum?
noragar wrote:forest_air wrote:
But now my vote on noragar is serious because I have what I need to prove that noragar is scum and chkflip is town. I'll make a post on that next.
Is this part still to come? If the proof that noragar is scum and chkflip is town is in that last post somewhere, please highlight it because I must have missed it.
Chkflip may be town, but I'm becoming more convinced that the second scum needs to be one of {chkflip, forest, or CC}.
Twistedspoon wrote:i don't think scum would lurk d1.
his d2 play looks town despite being brief
gbevilchaos wrote:forest_air wrote:Some people as scum may post a lot to arouse suspicion and chaos, and others may choose to post less often to avoid getting noticed.
lolwut? I have the second highest post count!
Espeonage wrote:
I've been onsite, just not in this tread. No kill argument invalid.
Had to catch up in this game. Waited until the new day to do so.
We probably have a doc.
Espeonage wrote:I've been onsite, just not in this tread. No kill argument invalid.
Had to catch up in this game. Waited until the new day to do so.
Espeonage wrote:That was a point at the no kill argument. I have been active onsite.
Twistedspoon wrote:this is like Muffin's Christmas analogy but the presents are kept hidden until his Birthday in July