What? Play normally?? Dang, girl! Youneongrey wrote:I've got a really wacky idea.
How about we discuss amongst ourselves who's acting scummy until we reach a general consensus, and then lynch them?
Crazy, I know.
I do, as stated before, think we're much better off just playing normally than trying to mind-read people who we don't know who they are.
Ehh? You find Cesspit' to be "playing it safe" and then unvote him? Where's the logic in that? Also, what's magic about page 5 for lynching DG? We have until late April, if it comes to that...tidus_of_zanarkand wrote:Also TheCessPit seems very on the fence and making safe statements all the time. I willunvote TheCessPitbecause my original vote was very weak to begin with.
Few reasons:Mr. Flay wrote:I'm also curious why HezLucky thinks it's only good to talk about the recruit on D1?
Yet your vote lays steadfast on me for the reason that, as stated, I'd be a likely recruit.HezLucky wrote:Few reasons:Mr. Flay wrote:I'm also curious why HezLucky thinks it's only good to talk about the recruit on D1?
a) Only one player is recruited; and we never know who this player is so who's to really say when speculation is to stop? I say it stops after today and we play the game normally. Or else we could be lynching someone on day four based on the fact that we think tehy are the recruit even though the recruit could already have died.
b) I don't want to lynch all the good players; if they are all pro-town we are cooked. Let the good players on the town's side catch the good scum.
c) After day one, talking about the recruit is pointless due to the fact that people might have information for us and/or we can use information from previous days. It's pointless to vote someone later in the game because they could've been the recruit, especially with all the information out there, so I am trying to remove that line of thinking so that people won't play the game with half a butt when it comes down to later by lynching a good player simply because he's alive
Remember guys, good players can help us catch scum. We may or may not have nothing better to go on today but after that we should be lynching SCUMMY players, not good ones. Hence, let's not talk about the recruit because that will encourage the lynching of good players, yes?
Either they're ganging up and manufacturing this wagon, or they're sitting back and laughing.TheCesspit wrote:Also, for what it's worth, I don't agree that the bandwagon on you is either all Mafia or all non-Mafia. Why do you theorise such? How would you know?
There usually are, but that's not going to have too much relevance yet, until we have fewer than six people like that to deal with.TheCesspit wrote:I've noted tat I think there's at least one Mafia among the 6 voters and DrippingGoofball herself.
Pressure-votes, but they're trying to avoid a speedlynch, I expect.I've also queried that some people are 'voting but will remove if the bandwagon grows'. Which I just don't understand, and still don't. JamesSparrow was one of those stating that.
Which I can understand in role-based game. But not here. I'm not sure what pressure you can apply usefully. It looks slightly scummy and not very helpful to me.neongrey wrote:Pressure-votes, but they're trying to avoid a speedlynch, I expect.I've also queried that some people are 'voting but will remove if the bandwagon grows'. Which I just don't understand, and still don't. JamesSparrow was one of those stating that.
This is MoS's only contribution.Mastermind of Sin wrote:*under the radar*
)) 
I assume now it's stalled your happy to keep your stance that way?JamesSparrow wrote:That is accurate, I wanted to show my stance, but make it clear that I wasn't going to be supporting a rash, speedy lynch. I saw that the bandwagon was already growing fast.neongrey wrote: Pressure-votes, but they're trying to avoid a speedlynch, I expect.
I was scum and won the second of the two minis this is based on, More Mountainous Mafia. On the other hand, between the two of us, LML and I ruined Day Two of the Five Year Invitational for town, with consequences through the rest of the game. The main difference between the two was that the Five Year, unlike this setup, wasn't an open setup. Things would have gone much differently in that game if we'dbroomhead wrote:well out of pure curiosity, has anyone played or know of a game with no power roles like this one? i'd like to read it, or hear about experience.