hmmm, who is "we" and why do you already have a name?PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:if you want to win
join my team
we have super cool team name:
L-UNIT
I am with vollkan, I want no part of the L-Unit.
yeah..it is gut...I didnt like the use of "we" and there was nothing else to go on in the random stage....nothing has popped up yet that I deem scummier, so my vote stays.TrustGossip wrote: Could you explain your issue with it? Or is it one of those nitty little feelings you get in the bottom of your gut?
Adel wrote:I like those reason -- much better than my current ones.armlx wrote:Actually, Trust, I'm fairly sure non-commitment is the most scummy thing you can do.
However, my sick reads tell me you aren't scum. Neither is Ergo.
Unvote
Guess I'll do this
Vote curiouskarmadog
Smacking Pooky too hard for the wrong reasons. Could be double scum tell (makes valid arguement vs other scum that isn't enough to get him lynched, good set up for both), rather lynch him and find out.
unvote, vote:curiouskarmadog
doesnt that seem a little hypocritical to you? Now why would Adel jump on a bandwagon given that reason, when she did the same thing? I know Adel can think for herself....guess we have found something scummier than the "we"Adel wrote:qftcuriouskarmadog wrote:non random vote: pooky, I think it was a slip up
non random vote: pooky
well I assume that was a vote for shafted..which is the third time you and arm have voted together...think it is too obvious though..ughAdel wrote:it is all an illusion in your mind.curiouskarmadog wrote:armix and Adel voting partnership noted.
unvote, vote: shaft.ed[/b[
What are you really asking me? ..actually, what are you trying to imply at this point in the game?TheJiveMachine wrote:So you want to lynch someone on a hunch, despite the fact that myself, shafted, and (depending on who you ask) Pooky are acting identifiably scummy?curiouskarmadog wrote:I think he is scum...on a hunch.
I want to lynch scum...so yes.
so I am scummy because I INFORMED YOU that my vote was based on a hunch? or am I scummy because at the moment I HAVE NOT jumped on the current leaders (or BWs) of those "acting scummy"? well I think that is about to change.TheJiveMachine wrote:curiouskarmadog wrote:What are you really asking me? ..actually, what are you trying to imply at this point in the game?TheJiveMachine wrote:So you want to lynch someone on a hunch, despite the fact that myself, shafted, and (depending on who you ask) Pooky are acting identifiably scummy?curiouskarmadog wrote:I think he is scum...on a hunch.
I want to lynch scum...so yes.
At this point in the game, I'm implying that I found your post scummy, because you are fully supportive ofa lynch that your only reasoning for is a hunch? I think?
TheJiveMachine wrote:Whatever, what's done is done, I basically accept that I'm going to be lynched, and I pretty much know why, so I've learned something, right? Not a total loss.
well it was pretty easy having "hunches" when you were the cop.Adel wrote:mini 518 demonstrated how astute ckd cn be as town, and I figure that if he is scum than his hunch may just be a scum-distancing technique.shaft.ed wrote:Adel I must admit I'm intrigued. I haven't seen you mention armlx outside of a mild back and forth with CKD.
I didnt say it wasTrustGossip wrote:Mini 518 is irrelevant.curiouskarmadog wrote:well it was pretty easy having "hunches" when you were the cop.Adel wrote:mini 518 demonstrated how astute ckd cn be as town, and I figure that if he is scum than his hunch may just be a scum-distancing technique.shaft.ed wrote:Adel I must admit I'm intrigued. I haven't seen you mention armlx outside of a mild back and forth with CKD.
please quote where I put words in anyone's mouth.TrustGossip wrote:Faking the forgetting of a changed game mechanic is a little too high level of a gambit for me personally.
To Pooky: By nightless you mean the scum have no nightkill, correct? Also, I can see your reasonings for vollkan as I've also noticed a significant departure from his usual play, but I have many more issues with Jive and curious at the moment.
Speaking of which,
Vote: curiouskarmadog
I would like you to tell me how you play based on hunches, and also why you felt the need to put words in Jive's mouth before putting him at L-2 prior to the final diagnostic.
Same with armix. Why did you feel the need to put Jive at L-1?
that is a stretch..he said I was scummy for voting on a hunch...I wanted to know why...both were in the form of a question, because I was wanted information from him which is how we form a request (in a question)...noting your bull shit here.TrustGossip wrote:You state the previous not as questions to Jive, but not as any kind of provable statement on Jive's intentions. So what are they?curiouskarmadog wrote:so I am scummy because I INFORMED YOU that my vote was based on a hunch? or am I scummy because at the moment I HAVE NOT jumped on the current leaders (or BWs) of those "acting scummy"?
I think they are words that are put in other people's mouths.
Otherwise there's no real reason to say such things when the person in question is slowly dying down and losing interest and becomes admissive of his own fate and blah blah blah.
sorry for the triple post, but bull shit tends to piss me off.TrustGossip wrote:
Your only vote of any merit was the one on Jive Machine, and that was only after three other people had already leveled good arguments and voted him already. You cannot escape inquisition by dismissing everything I say as bullshit.
<3
ah, so you want to lynch someone who you claim posts more versus someone who as you say is skating by and not posting...so you are condemning we for not providing content, but at the same time want to lynch someone who is..I am confused.PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
So basically you are just making offhanded remarks here while skating by on the down-low.
I might consider lynching you but I haven't ever lynched Volky and he seems to be a lot more fun to tangle with because he responds in such wonderful prose when attacked.
you havent, this game is in line to do a PbP, however, there are two games in front of this one that I either promised a read (because I replaced in) or a reread..I will get to it when I can...armlx wrote:Just what makes you so sure? I'm actually 90% sure you have posted no more reason than your "hunch", unless I missed it.
armlx wrote:Thats a combination of posts 298-300. Also at the tail end of your post before this it starts as well. And the fact it was a triple post implies the posts were extremely hasty, implying an extremely aggressive reaction.curiouskarmadog wrote:so then by saying I put words in Jive's mouth was bull shit? And you already think I am scummy because you have your vote on me, so no reason imply that you think I am scummy....
Why am a scummy exactly? Because I voted on a hunch? How do you know I voted on a hunch, oh yeah, I told you. Scummy indeed.
hey vollkan, does TG's bullshit change his % in your eyes?
sorry for the triple post, but bull shit tends to piss me off.
another question TG, are you saying that my vote on Jive was a BW? So then what is(was) my vote on armix?
Over reaction is scummy as it implies you have a lot more on the line with the lynch, which a scum would (especially in a nightless game, losing 1 of 2 or 3 members is a much bigger blow than losing one of 7 or 8). It also implies that you are being a lot more wary of single votes on you, which is scummy for the same reasons.
that is all you gathered from our conversation....try taking a stance...is overreacting scummy? was I overreacting? am I scummy?TrustGossip wrote:Maybe it would help if you didn't play into their hands with your histrionics. In addition, said behavior hinders town because it's out of the ordinary and would detract from finding scum.curiouskarmadog wrote:I have been lynched so many times on silly scum driven accusations of overreacting it is not even funny.
that was the embarassing game that I got so pissed I self hammer at lylo as a townie, because there was no way I could have convince the remaining newbie that the scum was indeed scum...that armix, is an overreaction and that IS a bad town play.Erg0 wrote:Post 2, the forgotten point: my hazy memory of ckd from a newbie game I modded has him being a little emotional at times. This goes back to the question of whether anger/overreaction is actually a scumtell, and in his case I'd say "not necessarily". Certainly not enough to use this tell reliably.
Actively scum hunting does count a lot for me, if I agree with the drawn conclusion and if the actions reflex the conclusions drawn.Erg0 wrote:General question: how much does scum hunting count for if you don't agree with the reasoning and/or the conclusions?curiouskarmadog wrote:Shafted, good poster, good content. Appears to be scum hunting. Good vibes all around here.
I agree that shaft.ed has been actively poking, but there are a few posts where he's given cases that I've thought are somewhat weak (e.g. the one I mentioned above). Barring the blip where he got a little worked up over Pooky's pressure on him, I'm finding it a little difficult to get a handle on him right now.
nothing short of a confirmed claim is solid proof of innocence. I would also add asking relevant informed questions to the definition of scum hunting.Erg0 wrote:I guess I'd define it as stating suspicion of and/or actively pursuing individuals who you appear to genuinely believe are scum. By my definition, it basically amounts to "not lurking and not obviously faking it", which is why it's a point in a player's favour but not solid proof of innocence.
which games did you look at? I am sure you have some sort of meta to back this up or are you pulling crap out of the air again?armlx wrote:I'm fairly sure at least 1 scum was on my wagon. I'm gonna stick where my heart is, especially as I haven't seen any similar action from CKD in other games that I've looked at. Guess it's about time to push the chips in the pot.
As for Beep messing up game mechs, I'm fairly sure thats a true thing especially as he didn't get why Pooky didn't vote me (on same team and what not).
Vote CKD
??? what does that stand for?TrustGossip wrote:T_Tcuriouskarmadog wrote:I nominate myself to be the leader...think I have a good hold on this game.
so are you still supporting armix's theory of overreaction is scummy...TrustGossip wrote:Unfos: Armix
Thank you. I also agree with your assessment of CKD. It was the first time in the game I've used my vote as a weapon in scumhunting and I believe I fished out a satisfactory result.
...because it didnt really hinder us lynching scum did it?TrustGossip wrote:Maybe it would help if you didn't play into their hands with your histrionics. In addition, said behavior hinders town because it's out of the ordinary and would detract from finding scum.curiouskarmadog wrote:I have been lynched so many times on silly scum driven accusations of overreacting it is not even funny.
you didnt really answer the question...do you still think overreacting is scummy?TrustGossip wrote:curious.
I'm not about to do a 180 just because armix was unveiled as scum. His machinations against you could very well be an elaborate distancing attempt as the town began to sniff him out.
I have major problems with how eager you piped up to be the leader upon your "successful" lynch of armix.
Town doesn't get that heady and powerhungry. It seems more like you thought your bus was successful.
I assume this is to me and you are not just being "curious". I want to see who continues to push crappy logic...that is why I felt that armix was scum, because it was just silly. Today you said you still feel I am scum given the same reasons...I am asking you (and you STILL HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER)...are you still sticking with overreacting is scummy? I am curious if given that was armix's main point against me that you agreed with, are you willingly to stand by his obviously stretched case agianst me given by scum?TrustGossip wrote: Also curious, why have you been asking that EXACT SAME QUESTION for over half the game?