Mini 589: SSBB Smalltown Mafia (Game Over!)

Gorrad · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:13 am

What does Mario's Super Mushroom do?

Gorrad · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:28 pm

Lucas

Gorrad · Post Post #14 (isolation #2) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:50 pm

Available roles:

* Link – Bodyguard
* Pikachu – Hider
* Fox – One-Shot Mirror
* Donkey Kong – Hunter
* Pit – Archangel
* Ike – Super Saint

Gorrad · Post Post #31 (isolation #3) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:45 am

A reminder- DK and Link are left

Gorrad · Post Post #44 (isolation #4) » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:01 am

Gasp!

Vote: andersonw

for not having the game yet.

Also,

FoS: PEG

. This FoS should be implied throughout the game.

Gorrad · Post Post #52 (isolation #5) » Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:32 pm

I'd like to throw out that my choice was 100% keeping that in mind. I've always been a fan of the role.

Gorrad · Post Post #75 (isolation #6) » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:06 pm

*Sigh* Flameaxe, stop being so typical you for a second and explain your thoughts here. I don't get it either.

Gorrad · Post Post #81 (isolation #7) » Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:55 am

It would be more useful if it didn't only list ONE role that would be bad for mafia, and that role is useless for pretty much everyone.

Unvote, Vote: Lawrencelot

No role-based killing plskthxbai.

Gorrad · Post Post #84 (isolation #8) » Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:29 am

Lawrencelot wrote:
Gorrad wrote:It would be more useful if it didn't only list ONE role that would be bad for mafia, and that role is useless for pretty much everyone.

Unvote, Vote: Lawrencelot

No role-based killing plskthxbai.
Sorry but I don't think I understand your first sentence.

Why no role-based killing? If we had no clues who the scum were, we could just lynch Ice Climbers. Point is, we can just play normal mafia to find out who's scum, I only plan to use this if we have nothing better to use. And I posted it to get some discussion going.

My mistake. It listed TWO roles that weren't good for mafia.

And your last paragraph makes me feel significantly better.

Unvote

.

Flameaxe, if we lynch AK and he comes up town, will you explain your reasoning after lynch?

Gorrad · Post Post #90 (isolation #9) » Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:51 pm

Xdaamno wrote:
SmalltownSmalltown is a mafia variation in which all roles are usually unique, and all roles, and which players have each role is public; but alignments and randomized, and are not public. Completed examples of smalltown games include Scrubs and Heroes mafia.

Allignments are RANDOMISED.

Gorrad · Post Post #92 (isolation #10) » Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:57 pm

goborage wrote:I don't know if this is the case - I couldn't see anything regarding random selection on the rule page. For balance purposes the mod may have preselected who'd be what. But I agree that lynching just because of a role is not a good idea.

Gorrad · Post Post #109 (isolation #11) » Thu May 01, 2008 11:45 am

Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.

Dang, I like your style.

Gorrad · Post Post #113 (isolation #12) » Thu May 01, 2008 12:33 pm

Did I say I agree with him? I don't. I just like his style. He's not standing for the BS that some players continually put out, yourself notably among them, PEG.

AK, please read the Wiki article on Team Asshat.

Gorrad · Post Post #120 (isolation #13) » Thu May 01, 2008 2:31 pm

He's got the right idea. It just isn't aplicable with Asshat around.

Gorrad · Post Post #167 (isolation #14) » Sun May 04, 2008 4:58 pm

Fine with claiming night action here.

Gorrad · Post Post #169 (isolation #15) » Sun May 04, 2008 5:06 pm

Pst, AK, we're claiming AFTER we perform the night actions.

Gorrad · Post Post #221 (isolation #16) » Thu May 08, 2008 1:12 pm

This entire conversation is confusing the HELL out of me. Can someone other than AK and PEG tell me what the heck people are even talking about?

Gorrad · Post Post #227 (isolation #17) » Fri May 09, 2008 9:00 am

Hold on- Couple of WEEKS?!?!? That's rather harsh for requesting no replacement. Days I can see. A week maybe. But a couple of weeks with no replacement just isn't fair to the rest of us players.

Gorrad · Post Post #254 (isolation #18) » Mon May 12, 2008 12:55 am

Lawrencelot, that was a good case. I dig it. Erm, how many votes is that on SSK now? I don't want to L-1 yet.

Mod:

VC please.

Gorrad · Post Post #263 (isolation #19) » Mon May 12, 2008 11:57 am

I think Lawrencelot's power should be used when he chooses, not when we do. Too much to lose, not enough to gain.

Gorrad · Post Post #264 (isolation #20) » Mon May 12, 2008 11:58 am

Oh, and

Vote: MafiaSSK

L-2.

Gorrad · Post Post #282 (isolation #21) » Wed May 14, 2008 8:15 am

Gorrad wrote:I think Lawrencelot's power should be used when he chooses, not when we do. Too much to lose, not enough to gain.

Repeated for emphasis.

Gorrad · Post Post #284 (isolation #22) » Wed May 14, 2008 8:29 am

He might use it like a crutch, yes. He might never use his power. But think- if we direct him, what will we gain? Basically, a one-shot bulletproof townie who, when they're targetted, kills Lawrencelot. I'm not willing to risk a player's life on that.

We cannot force him to use his power. At all. So let him choose.

Gorrad · Post Post #287 (isolation #23) » Wed May 14, 2008 8:49 am

Right. Again, what do we get from directing him? It's like directing a doc here, bad idea!

Gorrad · Post Post #289 (isolation #24) » Wed May 14, 2008 8:56 am

Hmmm....I misunderstood. Ok, I can see a case for that. Lawrence, why is it a bad idea for you to use your power on someone you choose every night?

Gorrad · Post Post #293 (isolation #25) » Wed May 14, 2008 11:14 am

Hey, Fonz, see my post RIGHT AFTER THAT. I misunderstood the argument.

Lawrencelot, the only bad thing that might happen is that you protect from a crosskill. The odds of that happening are small compared to the odds of anything else.

Gorrad · Post Post #326 (isolation #26) » Sat May 17, 2008 3:41 pm

Not I

Gorrad · Post Post #343 (isolation #27) » Fri May 23, 2008 1:04 am

Mod:

If Pikachu is mafia and targets a mafia, does he still die?

Gorrad · Post Post #353 (isolation #28) » Fri May 23, 2008 8:15 am

Protected Andersonw.

Gorrad · Post Post #355 (isolation #29) » Fri May 23, 2008 4:26 pm

I thought the mafia/SK would go for a 1-shot vig first.

Gorrad · Post Post #357 (isolation #30) » Sat May 24, 2008 5:53 am

Vote: AK

Gorrad · Post Post #359 (isolation #31) » Sat May 24, 2008 6:28 am

No. 1-shot vigs are a VERY likely N-1 kill in my experience, as scum want to off them before they use their ability. That you don't think that AND the scum don't think that...

Coincidence? I think NOT!

Gorrad · Post Post #364 (isolation #32) » Sat May 24, 2008 8:03 am

Sorry, let me rephrase. If someone claims one-shot vig, it's usually a safe bet they die the next day over almost any other claimed roles.

Gorrad · Post Post #376 (isolation #33) » Mon May 26, 2008 8:30 am

Not OMGUS.

Gorrad · Post Post #387 (isolation #34) » Wed May 28, 2008 8:05 am

Care to point out said votes without explanation?

Gorrad · Post Post #397 (isolation #35) » Thu May 29, 2008 6:11 pm

V/LA Board wrote:Gone to A-Kon until late Sunday/mid monday

Gorrad · Post Post #403 (isolation #36) » Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:46 pm

Back! No new input.

Gorrad · Post Post #428 (isolation #37) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:29 am

If I was scum, I'd have roleblocked Gob so Dahill would kill Fonz and the blame would fall on Gob. If for no other reason, than the fact that I did not do that should make y'all less suspicious.

Gorrad · Post Post #432 (isolation #38) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:21 pm

Oh, and the WIFOM-calling begins, naturally. Tell me, if you were scum, would YOU trade yourself in for two powerful roles as well as stopping anyone else from being confirmed? I sure as hell would.

Gorrad · Post Post #435 (isolation #39) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:20 am

You think too much.

Gorrad · Post Post #439 (isolation #40) » Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:15 am

Still happy with AK. I'll swap to Anderson if it's too close to deadline though.

Gorrad · Post Post #441 (isolation #41) » Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:52 am

I must have missed that post. Where was it?

Gorrad · Post Post #451 (isolation #42) » Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:19 pm

Sure I do. In my experience, one-shot vigs die really early, and you disagree. Fonz disagrees too, and that's not precisely making me feel good about him either, but you stand out.

Gorrad · Post Post #455 (isolation #43) » Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:12 am

Right, Fonz is confirmed. Yeah, I spaced on that.

Gorrad · Post Post #460 (isolation #44) » Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:13 pm

I like IAAU's post too, that's a solid case.

Unvote, Vote: andersonw

, L-1. Unless Fonz cares to respond to 440-441, I'll be vigging AK tonight.

Gorrad · Post Post #462 (isolation #45) » Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:41 pm

Really, I'm mostly just being stubborn. Not exactly the best play on my part, but I just plain old don't like his going against my nightchoice like he is. I stand by my decision.

Gorrad · Post Post #469 (isolation #46) » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:59 am

I see both your points and will consider them apropriately.

Gorrad · Post Post #482 (isolation #47) » Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:17 pm

...Well that was one of the most scummy posts I've seen all game.

And crap. He's the hider. I CAN'T NK him ><.

Gorrad · Post Post #486 (isolation #48) » Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:26 am

No, I am not referring to 187 and 192. Assigning Lawrence would be the worst idea since Olaf the hairy viking ordered 100 battle helmets with the horns on the inside.

Gorrad · Post Post #488 (isolation #49) » Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:39 am

No, I was refering to Gorborage.

Gorrad · Post Post #490 (isolation #50) » Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:34 am

Well, yes, but after that post of his I was considering it.

Gorrad · Post Post #507 (isolation #51) » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:33 am

Waitwaitwait. I Roleblocked IAAUN. Did that not go through?

Gorrad · Post Post #512 (isolation #52) » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:36 pm

Hahahahahno. There's a way to break this game. I have yet to think of it, but there is.

Gorrad · Post Post #513 (isolation #53) » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:46 pm

Hey, did you target AK or PEG, IAAUN?

Gorrad · Post Post #516 (isolation #54) » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:53 pm

Ok, every single one of my game-breaking ideas are flawless, except they all rely on my being confirmed town, which I am not. I am very interested in why Lawrence is alive and AK is not.

Gorrad · Post Post #521 (isolation #55) » Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:40 pm

Oh! Hey, I forgot that Fonz was confirmed.

Ok, then this is simple. We lynch IAAUN. Tonight, I kill Lawrencelot.

Think about it- if I'm scum, then either Lawrencelot won't die (in which case y'all lynch me) or he does die (in which case y'all lynch me). If I'm town, then we win.

Vote: IAAUN

Gorrad · Post Post #523 (isolation #56) » Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:40 pm

Go for it!

Gorrad · Post Post #532 (isolation #57) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:55 am

IAAUN IS dead, and Dahil is confirmed. There was, no doubt, a scum kill last night, and we have proof that Dahil used his ability. Scum cannot do both. Therefore he is confirmed.

Gorrad · Post Post #535 (isolation #58) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:27 am

I can NOT target two people. IAAUN has claimed SK. If I'm Mafia, then I cannot perform two actions.

Mod:

Can the Ice Climers use a night action if only one of them is killed?

If the answer is no, we win, if it's yes then I'm really sorry and let's hope for some good luck.

Gorrad · Post Post #542 (isolation #59) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:36 am

If IAAUN CAN still kill, a thought that honestly didn't occur to me when I voted, then I'll kill him and we have to hope that he and Lawrence target the same person with their kills. If they don't, we lose.

Wait. Huh.

Mod:

If ice climbers are death stumped, anti-town and alive with one other person (pro-town), do they win?

Gorrad · Post Post #544 (isolation #60) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:39 am

Once the mod answers my questions, I'll decide.

Dang, it might come to me deciding whether I want the mafia to win or the SK ><.

Gorrad · Post Post #546 (isolation #61) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:40 am

Gorrad wrote:
Mod:
Can the Ice Climers use a night action if only one of them is killed?

Gorrad · Post Post #574 (isolation #62) » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:43 am

GG everyone. Yeah, I was telling the truth. I figured I'd just vig Lawrencelot last night- SKs don't win enough games, and he had been very unlucky with Gorborage, so a break was caught.

Gorrad · Post Post #584 (isolation #63) » Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:09 pm

Because otherwise I'd be blocking a claimed doc. I blocked someone without a night ability (supposedly).