Spoiler: town pbpa from our last game
This post by town!Black pulls posts that support the reasons she SRs Elements. It's very clear cut and succinct. Like she identifies what is wrong with each post instead of repeating what the post says.In post 702, Black wrote:Terrible argument trying to clear herselfIn post 539, Elements wrote: I do think this whole thing means I can only be scum with Shadow
Cute discredit trying to undermine my pushIn post 556, Elements wrote:Dw gangIn post 117, Black wrote: Reading Elements is impossible
Black knows what she's doing
YepIn post 573, Elements wrote:If I'm scum, shadow is townIn post 571, Black wrote: I'm not sure about shaddow. I still wouldn't mind going here but my current paranoia is directed at Elements and that makes me think she's spewing shaddow as town
In post 580, Elements wrote:YikesBad AtEIn post 581, Elements wrote: Sorry for throwing so hard I guess?
Trying to get gob on shaddow when your wagons were neck and neckIn post 616, Elements wrote:Then why have you not voted shadow?In post 614, gob wrote:i dont care who dies day1 franklyIn post 613, Claptastik wrote: Gob what happened to you not wanting to lim elements on d1?
PR fishingIn post 689, Elements wrote: Who was roleblocked
VOTE: Elements
Spoiler: this game, more iioa than pbpa
In this game Black is walking us through Gamma's posts showing us a path - I think it's more characteristic of town!Black to tell us "Gamma is scum because she flip-flopped a lot around limming on or off the wagon and her reason to vote Dragon changed after she became aware the guilty didn't exist" and not overquote and say "in this post Gamma did X", "now here Gamma is doing the opposite of X", "Back to X" etc. From what I saw Black looks much more wordy as scum, like wants to have longer posts, and this case on Gamma is not only wrong but I think it's characteristic of how scum!Black cases. Like IIOA style - there's a little bit of "analysis" toward the end when she says she thinks this sequence is more likely to come from scum, but it doesn't feel or look the same as it does when she's townIn post 1993, Black wrote: Was looking at some ISO's and I want to know if anyone else thinks this progression is sus
^Here Gamma rejects my idea of looking off-wagonIn post 1099, Gamma Emerald wrote:Alternatively: that wagon was god-awful and we should kill on it.In post 1098, Black wrote: I don't think it's likely that all 3 scum were on the Naerys wagon
Which means there's at least one scum in {Gamma, Thomith, Jackson, Dragon}
^Gamma continues to argue that we should look on-wagonIn post 1244, Gamma Emerald wrote:Issue with your pool is, unless one or less scum was on Naerys, it is still statistically better to look at those on the wagon.In post 1237, Black wrote:These 4 were off the Naerys wagon and I don't think the entire scum team was on that wagonIn post 1228, Thomith wrote:Why has your read on me changed?
Still the Jackson thing from yesterday?
Aside from that though I'm having a similar problem that I had in Micro Normal 1094. Some of your posts just gut ping me the wrong way
^Gamma admits she only voted Dragon because she thought there was a guilty on him, and once again confirms that she wants to vote on-wagonIn post 1247, Gamma Emerald wrote: I only really voted you because I thought there was a guilty. I still want to look at those that voted Naerys most of all.
^Gamma says she doesn't think voting off-wagon has good odds of hitting scumIn post 1269, Gamma Emerald wrote: I’m feeling good about Thomith town so I disagree that the latter group has good odds of hitting scum
^Gamma suddenly reverses course when she finds an opportunity to hammer. Her reasoning for declaring intent is because she thinks Dragon is the only person who could be scum off-wagon. Despite constantly arguing that we should vote on-wagon, saying it's statistically better, and even telling Dragon she only voted for him originally because of the "guilty", she almost hammers hereIn post 1538, Gamma Emerald wrote:intent to hammer
I actually feel somewhat better about JV after our exchange, and since I already TR Thomith and know I’m town, that just leaves Dragon/Dannflor as the only person who can be scum off-wagon.
^This is Gamma's reasoning when called out on this behavior. She throws away statistics, odds, her entire belief that we should fade on-wagon, all because she wanted to take the easier road and hammer someone with 5 days remaining in the deadline. I feel like this sequence is more likely to come from scumIn post 1548, Gamma Emerald wrote: Whoever said sorting a smaller pool is easier was right *shrug*
There are a couple posts in between the last two quotes above that don't really track re: Gamma's read on Dragon
In post 1253, Gamma Emerald wrote: I do have some concerns with [Dragon's] D1 actions but I was substantially overstating things to try and push the presumed guiltyGamma's progression here doesn't make sense to me. She admitted earlier that she only voted Dragon because of the "guilty", and here she doubles down and says she has some concerns with Dragon's D1 but she overstated them due to the "guilty". Then out of no where, Dragon/Dann plummets to the bottom of her readslist and she has decided to push that from this point onwards. It doesn't feel natural at all. It feels like opportunistic scumIn post 1428, Gamma Emerald wrote:You do you, but I want to put [Dragon] to the fireIn post 1426, Black wrote: At this point I'm willing to leave Dannflor alive to let him cook
Can we fade Katsuki instead? I don't think her reads are real
VOTE: Katsuki
I'd like other opinions on this