I just bought the new Mos Def record. So far, its ok.
Not a random vote.
^^this.Mastin wrote: Look for who would kill the cow.
When I saw Hascow dead, I wondered about it.jammer wrote: @camn, why ask specificly VP's opinion about hascow, earlier?
Not necessarily. It could be a revenge kill. It could be someone that HASCOW is particularly good at reading....Battle Mage wrote: You must rate his play pretty highly if you think that anyone that knew him would have killed him instantly.
Of course not!Battle Mage wrote:Haha, you're including urself as a heavy hitter, amirite? xD
What does staring at me have to do with voting Mastin ??Benmage wrote:*Stare*camn wrote: Wheras policy-lynching GIEFF for being too awesome... that might be doable...
Vote Mastin
We will see how toothless it is when you hang, old friend..GIEFF wrote:Buddying is buddying, even if you try to hide it by also throwing in a toothless vote.camn wrote:Wheras policy-lynching GIEFF for being too awesome... that might be doable...
I had a problem with getting nightkilled right away all the time.alexhans wrote: @Camn: I like you... and I DONT like you at the same time... How's that possible? Acting crazy helps your meta? Try to help town...
You'll never get scum lynched that way.SensFan wrote: I vote for who I think is Scum. That's it, that's all.
If you have any doubts about my ability to read with my gut, ask GIEFF.
I have been looking forward to playing with you again! Now I remember why.GIEFF wrote:This shoots down camn's "integrity" theory, which seemed awfully contrived.
Camn, do you still want to leave the door open for a return to VP Baltar for these reasons, or will you take a firmer stand?
DGB, I am going to allow you a LITTLE bit of soft-claiming... but that is because I like you.
YOu know I will lynch you, right Zwet? I like you, but that doesn't mean you need to live.
And thats only, like 2/3 of the way through!Tenchi.. I am going to do my best to run you up to a lynch.....
PS.. I like your picture.
Anyway, I hope Spyrex gets into this game more. I was thinking about him last night, that I have enjoyed playing with him in the past.
SpyreX - Town who I love.
Mini 771- Incog, though I was only alive one day! Plus I buddied the SK that killed meVP Balthar comes out like a good replacement. I think town. If he is scum, we will see a scum-win, I think.
My loyalty remains with Incog.
camn@incog wrote:You are my favorite again.
Xylthixlm is out.
Incog was right... I was annoyed. (That why I like him.. he understands me!)
Medeival mafia - you already pointed some out. here they are for everyone else....Unvote : Green Crayons
You rule.
camn @ Xyl wrote:God you are the greatest replacement ever. This IS a total cluster.
And trust me.. I practically MAKE OUT with Tarlahindur by the end of that game.You are my favorite player ever, as of now.
Sorry, Incog.
alexhans wrote:more camn and Baltar irrelevant chatter. They should get married...
VP Baltar wrote: awww, will you pick out my dress? Smile
alexhans wrote:Sure... But only if I get an invitation. Razz
Not only is it not strong, it is totally incorrect! It isn't factual in any way. and your meta-investigation failed!GIEFF wrote: I do not think my "case" (I wouldn't even call it that) is strong, and I am not shoving it down your throat.
149 is THE VERY POST where I voted you based on your crap-case.I knew you spent a lot of time on the 11th making 4 posts, one of which was an in-depth investigation of your own meta - you are willing to spend all that effort to defend yourself, yet hardly any effort at all to follow up on your claim that you find me scummy.
Well, I will try and explain it to you.. even though I already did.GIEFF wrote: Why did you react so strongly to my investigation into your meta?
Why did you ignore me when I asked this question, instead trying to turn it into a joke?
How do you follow up on something in the same post that you first post it in? You realize that doesn't even make sense, right?GIEFF wrote:I am not saying you should have done it in the same post, although that would have been fine.camn wrote:Are you saying that I should have "followed up" on my accusations IN THE SAME POST that I MADE the accusations?
That is nonsense.
BM.VP Baltar wrote:@camn-since you've been reading along with interest in the alex/BM faceoff, I would like to hear some of your opinions regarding it. Who do you think looks scummier coming out of it?
That cuts both ways, though. If all 16 of us adressed every line of every post.. this would ALSO not be a game.alexhans wrote: If everyone played like you this would not be a game..
Didn't I replace into that game? And besides.. we were SCUM that game.. Day 1 for scum is a lot easier, I think.GIEFF wrote:I didn't think you were a poor Day-1 player in the game I played with you or your games that I read. Are you attempting to write off your lack of scumhunting to an early-game weakness?camn wrote:But I also admit, I am a very poor Day-1 player. My strength is endgame.
Who do you think is scum, and why?
I don't think that that is a logical conclusion.GIEFF wrote:Of course I am not implying a 5-person scum-team, camn. I am asking why 5 different people would do that, as I don't know, and I don't think it is a coincidence. And it is actually 6 people, not five - I left out kmd.
If I were to answer my own question, as you suggested, it would be that I suspect that there are two scum among those 6 people, especially considering how mutually supportive camn, Sens, and BM have been.
Also.. can we get some logic going in this game, please?Benmage wrote:Truealexhans wrote:YET. Unlike you, you never jumped on lurkers like broomhead and don't vote for them now.camn wrote:I support ANY lurkerlynch.
Yes, and a vig in one.GIEFF wrote:Were you scum in either of the two games in which you grudgekilled kmd?
You never even let them answer the question before you asked this.Gieff wrote:Was your question meant to reveal scummy behavior on their part?
Thats the whole joke.GIEFF wrote:So please, answer the following two questions.
- If you are town, you don't have the ability to kill him - why would you promise not to?
GIEFF wrote: [*]If you are town, why did you promise not to kill him, as he could be scum?[/list]
You see the lack of rationality to your questions? You persist in asking a question that you have already answered.GIEFF wrote: I know you don't think the word "kill" applies to lynches.
A) OMGUS is not a scumtell.GIEFF wrote:
- She has contributed little to no scumhunting.
- She has shown she is more concerned about how she is viewed by the town than about catching scum.
- She strongly over-reacted to my investigation of her meta, and OMGUS-voted me. Once again, this was NOT about scumhunting, but about protecting how she is viewed by the town, as evidenced by how weakly she pursued it.
Actually, no townie can say what it "probably" is.Mastin wrote:Like I said, it's probably due to the player having seen Hascow in many games, and/or seen him do *really* good in one.Camn wrote:Not necessarily. It could be a revenge kill. It could be someone that HASCOW is particularly good at reading....
It could be a lot of things.
But, no matter what, it has one thing in common:
The player has to KNOW Hascow.
I don't know if you saw it, but GEIFF brought a meta-filled 'case' against me that I only buddy people when I am scum.Kmd4390 wrote: [:oops:] Wasn't buddying one of my biggest points against you in tranquility? [/:oops:]
to make camn look bad, GIEFF wrote:You said:
camn wrote:@ Alex... I theorize that OMGUS is, if anything, a town-tell. Townies get mad when people call them scummy. Scum get scared.
Remember this ???but in reality, camn ACTUALLY wrote:@ Alex... I theorize that OMGUS is, if anything, a town-tell. Townies get mad when people call them scummy. Scum get scared.
But then again, I don't believe in town-tells, so I call it null.
GIEFF wrote: You even went so far as to edit out the part of my quote that mentioned your over-reaction.