Never trust a short name.
Also, to whomever is new, I wish you good luck and welcome you to the site!
Staeg wrote:How so? Are you a short-name-vote-above-poster hater?
Miss JJ wrote:LOL one thing I notice about this site is there seems to be a "playbook" where there are rules about what is a towntell or what is scummy, etc. I usually just make my own decisions about what I think. Not everyone is cut out of the same cloth and I can't see looking at it that way.
FireStorm wrote:Hmmm, I've read everything so far, and while I kinda want to vote Scumhunter for being scummy so far, I won't. That's only because I don't want to hammer when people still haven't seen the game.
Scumhunter wrote:I'm not scummy. You guys just play bad. Get it right. L-1 on page 4?
Scumhunter wrote:Meransiel, why don't you like that post I made? Is it because it is proposing a new idea of how to play this game that you are not used to? If you have a reason to think I am necessarily scum, please give it so I can defend myself. Otherwise, not really sure why you are voting me. We should be generating discussion, not quick lynching.
Scumhunter wrote:Personally, I like to generate my reads from reading interactions between players etc.
Miss JJ wrote:VOTE: Meransiel
For putting Scumhunter at L-1 unnecessarily at this early stage. This is a newbie game and not all of the newbies may understand not to hammer. I think it is a bad bad move.
TripMyWire wrote:That post didn't sit right with me either... but could you please elaborate on it and explain why it caused you to make the vote?
Putting someone at L-1 WITHOUT explaining why and then warning that the NEXT vote is what makes people scummy-looking.... well that just doesn't sit quite right with me. If you were mafia, it would seem like you're trying to secure some immunity that way by passing the burden/blame onto the next one.
This is only page 5. Thor isn't around. Some have barely posted. Putting someone that close at such an underdeveloped stage of the game bugs me. I agree with JJ.
Unvote, Vote: Meransiel
Scumhunter wrote:Ahaha, someone said seemed like I was trying too hard. I always try hard. I like winning, regardless of alignment. I probably take the game too serious at times too.
Elsa von Spielburg wrote:First I'll address Meransiel, who I am cautious of due to his position on the wagon AND his reasoning for voting. My vote on scumhunter had a grain of truth behind the idea, but it was still based off of a single post. To run someone up to L-1 for it is worrying. We don't need claims this early. Meransiel said he voted for Scumhunter because a certain post "doesn't feel right" and gave no further explanation. You have to give something more than that. It's always scummy to give weak or non-reasons to vote on someone. Meransiel is my number 2 for a vote right now.
Elsa von Spielburg wrote:First I'll address Meransiel, who I am cautious of due to his position on the wagon AND his reasoning for voting. My vote on scumhunter had a grain of truth behind the idea, but it was still based off of a single post. To run someone up to L-1 for it is worrying. We don't need claims this early. Meransiel said he voted for Scumhunter because a certain post "doesn't feel right" and gave no further explanation. You have to give something more than that. It's always scummy to give weak or non-reasons to vote on someone. Meransiel is my number 2 for a vote right now.
Elsa von Spielburg wrote:Staeg, when you vote someone, and then tell them this:
Also: Don't claim yet. I promise you won't be hammered until you do, but you can still wiggle out of the lynch without giving maf priceless info.
Don't get overdefensive -- just look for scumtells/scumslips and point them out.
It kind of defeats the purpose of putting pressure on someone. I don't think this is entirely scummy right now, but to coach someone when you're trying to pull reactions from them does not make much sense.
Quilford wrote:What Meransiel did was stupid, yes, but only once in my entire Mafia career, both here, face to face and on private forums, I have never ever seen a newbie hammer someone at L-1. So I think that perhaps there was a slight overreaction to Meransiel's fail. I'll take a closer look at why people are now voting for him.
I'll also try to get some thoughts up on FireStorm later today.
Staeg wrote:As long as there is no hammer and no claim, how is L-1 disastrous? Aside from SOME PEOPLE WHO INSTA-HAMMER CAUSE THEY CAN, I don't see what's the problem for pressure.
Quilford wrote:Also I would expect more frustration from town about to be hammered than I saw in Scumhunter, but I think this could probably be put down to disbelief in someone hammering.
EBWOP: YO EQUINOX WHAT UP
Staeg wrote:FireStorm wrote:Meransiel wrote:What other reasons?
This is gonna sound scummy, but I'll choose to wait until it completes its purpose before saying the reson for my vote.
It isn't.
TripMyWire wrote:@Meransiel... No, I didn't think that the L-1 on Scumhunter was deserved. That was the whole point of my post and vote changing..
Quilford wrote: I'm not seeing Scumhunter as scum at the moment either; I didn't really expect his wagon to grow to L-1. I voted him for pressure and to see how he would react - we've got those reactions now and the bandwagon is thinning out.Now all that's left to do is analyse the reactions themselves.
Quilford wrote:oh it's tempting
based on the evidence in front of you, who would you suspect if Staeg flipped town?
Miss JJ wrote:Hey guys. Just watched Survivor Finale and started reading Thor's post. Thor, I'm just gonna say that it's not really helpful to me to see statements like "page 2 - TripMyWire is town, banking on it." (just an example) I'd like to see what specifically on page 2 leads you to that. I'll get to more comments/questions about your post, as well as posts I just saw after yours, in a bit and I'm glad to see you think I'm "half-intelligent"... I think.
TMW wrote:Meransiel is a guy... just found out today. I've always thought he was a girl too... must be the name and the picture.
TMW wrote:I've never heard of the angel Meransiel... where does it come from?
Thor wrote:1 - WIFOM isn't scummy, it's just bad logic to be trapped within. This *might* be scummy, but it's a very large stretch to take a newbie doing WIFOM and calling it a scumtell. I'll take it by you doing this that you're accusing him of being an experienced enough player that he should know better than to WIFOM? Where do you come to that conclusion?
Elsa wrote:Scumhunter is largely due to how genuine his posts read to me.
Elsa wrote:Meransiel saying he’s okay with a Fire or Scumhunter lynch puts me on edge. It makes me think he’s scum just biding his time, waiting for the 'okay' from the town to drop a hammer.
Elsa wrote: Give me the short version on your case on Scumhunter
Elsa wrote:Also, why are you okay with voting Fire instead?
Elsa wrote:Again, not huge on the Fire wagon, but unlike TMW, Quil at least gave a reason for voting.
Thor wrote:
Are we dredging back into that world where not explaining a vote right away is a scumtell and doing so is a town one? You know I'm emotionally against that for religious reasons.
So you don't agree with the town reads Quill has been given by the rest of the players?
Thor wrote:@Everyone - newsflash - placing someone at L-1 isn't inherently scummy. I feel like everytime someone does it this game someone else is muttering that it's scummy. I'm pretty sure we'll have someone put someone else at L-1 when we're lynching scum, so... Please pay attention to motive more than votes, seriously. A vote is never scummy, it's a vote. Motive is scummy. If you can't explain the scummy motive than you probably don't actually have a scumtell.
Scumhunter wrote:If you are town, you are the one who is playing bad letting your annoyance with my playstyle affect your game play.
Scumhunter wrote:giving off obvious scumtells
Scumhunter wrote:For example, I'm having a hard time reasonably fathoming how a town-sided player could tunnel on me and focus just on me as hard as you have.
Elsa wrote:
And you don't see any of these as new player tells as opposed to scum tells?
Thor wrote:How about we lynch Meran - because other people have been calling Meran town, if Meran flips scum than those people are more suspect, but if he flips town than maybe it's a bit of a null tell.
TMW wrote:Hmm... on a second read of what I just wrote, it sounded rather insulting and quite jerky. Sorry about that.
Thor wrote:
Thor you actually had a lot of influence in getting me to vote Staeg.
Scumhunter wrote:Thor, you are being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative Stop it please. I'm speculating and brainstorming here, don't take my various theories too seriously yet. I'm thinking outloud here.
Thor wrote:Are you not voting either of us because you want people to chime in on whether or not they agree with you?
TMW wrote:etc etc etc scumhunter being wishy-washy etc ... it tends to strike me as more town than mafia though.
Elsa wrote:The combination of his constant need for catchup posts and jumping on the bandwagon idea of "a FS/Thor lynch will give us info on the other's alignment" feels out-and-out like scum play to me. Pair those with the fact that I've had no read on him all game (that's probably not an accident)... let's turn up the heat.
TMW wrote:he (Meransiel) tends to misinterpret a lot of things I say
Scumhunter wrote:as he would have had to justify a legitimate case on me for scum, which there just isn't since I'm obv town and all.
Scumhunter wrote:
That is L-1 I believe. Time for a claim.
Scumhunter wrote:
A claim isn't necessarily in order as I don't think a person's claimed role would affect my vote today all that much anyways.
Scumhunter wrote:Meransiel is very likely scum to be through PoE