Mini 624 - Game Over!
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
vote wumbo, as he was number 6
and do people not like my avatar? in my other game peopel complained i didn't have anything so voted me cause of that, so that day on Boing-boing they had a pic of a guy sticking most pins on his head. very colourful it was too. and that is the story of my avatar...are all the boys and girls happy?-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
no, you didn't mention the word lurking, but saying one player in in game a and not in game b sounds like lurking to me. sorry if i got mixed up thoughStrangerCoug wrote:
I was referring to the joke vote and have yet to bring up anything about lurking.geraintm wrote:
no, a player avoiding a game whilst posting elsewhere is nto ag odo sign. means they could be avoiding this one for a reasonStrangerCoug wrote:It was in the random voting stage, and just because someone was X in Game A does not mean he or she is also X in Game B.
Tom's fine for right now.
IGMEOY: geraintmfor taking my post out of context.
am interested in wumbo thouhg, who admits to lurking-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
agree with kenKenfucius wrote:
True.maxwellhouse wrote: but lurking isn't always necessarily a mafia thing to do. sometimes you just don't know what to say.
But then, it's rarely a pro-town thing to do either.
lurking not good for town. though my thought is that lurkers often get too much of a free ride in newbie games and the more vocal get the most pressure put on them.
at worst, if you have nothing to say, should be able to find something others are talking baout to give your opinion-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
no, that is where i strongly disagree with you. bad habitStrangerCoug wrote:
I largely agree with this. Being vocal is much better than lurking if you ask me. If you must resort to it, ask questions about what people think.
asking others questions to me means you look like you are particpating, but in actually fact all you re doing is boosting post count and getting others to voice their opinions. you dont add anything yourself. naughty.-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
hammering and mafia just dones't work anymore. just too obviousDark wingstalker wrote:
Then i unvoted when i realised that a member of the mafia could hammer his bandwagon easily, Which they didnt do. So if/when you lynch me and i turn up clean, you should look at the people already on Wumbo's bandwagon.
two thoughts
nhat - you seem way too eager to jump around. your posts have been an FOS on maxwell, an explnation of inactivity, vote wumbo, and day later a vote on dark.
chensi - you better start posting soon-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
nhat wrote:
You said this and did nothing in terms of serious business. I'm okay hopping on this wagon.Wumbo wrote:Indeed I do.
unvote: Tombtw. Lulz phase over, serious business now.
unvote
vote - wumbo
yeah, you had great reasons...well, i dont think they were that great, more oppotunisticnhat wrote:unvoteWe wanted pressure, you wanted to make an easy lynch.
vote - dark wingstalker-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
nhat wrote:^^^^^^Except you just cut out like 7/8ths of my explanation for dark wingstalker's vote. What's up with that?
ok, thats the whole quote. the bit about what happened in another game i didnt think was important to include. i only included the last line because i thought it was cheap of you to say that about dark when i felt you were looking for one yourselfnhat wrote:unvote
vote - dark wingstalker
Certainly Wumbo's inaction after his serious business comment rubbed me the wrong way, and the bandwagon developed from there, but wingstalker, was it really called for to put him at L-1? I played in a game where a townie hammered himself just because, and that was wack. Why risk it? And the "I'm gonna give you 12 hours to respond" ultimatum is lousy for an L-1 vote. In my experience, people who do this can just say that the response was insufficient, knowing good and well that they've decided beforehand to vote for the person. We wanted pressure, you wanted to make an easy lynch.
i included all of the post where you voted for wumbo, was that alright? the main part of my argument against you was that you fosed, voted, voted so quickly. i didn't include any quotes when i said that first.
"calling it as you see it" isnt a god enough excise for me i am afraid-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
i didnt post yesterday as there was nothing ot say, i come in this mornign to find a page worth of posts, and it is mostly junk cause Dark keeps getting confused. appreciate he is trying though, i get the impression of enthusastic newbie from him.
godot is playing to much under the radar, some others are too.-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Dark wingstalker wrote:
I didnt want to make an easy lynch. As geraintm said earlier in the thread, Mafia never hammer.
if that is how you interpreted it, then that is not what i meant. i meant to say that looking at who hammered to use that to catch scum is not a good way anymore to catch mafia. it is too well known for it to be any use-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
imaginality - i really don'tlike people putting u lists of questions for others to answer. i think t makes a player look like they are participating in a game when all they are doing is trying to force others to talk and incrimate themselves. you should at least answer the questions yourself
you still don't get me. i never said mafia don't hammer. what i said was that using the hammer as a way of going after mafia does not work. this makes no assumption on whether the hammerer is scumornot.Dark wingstalker wrote:to further on my "mafia never hammer" comments:
How so? I said "mafia never hammer" in much the same way Geraint did. Mafia dont, Because its far too obvious a move. That doesnt mean it never happens, but on Day 1 the mafia would be stupid for pushing the hammer themselves, when they could just target a scapegoat.
Dark wingstalker wrote:
I didnt want to make an easy lynch. As geraintm said earlier in the thread, Mafia never hammer.
i really did not say that-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
nope, fine to lynch a lurkerStrangerCoug wrote:
Pressure voting a lurker is fine. Lynching a lurker is not.
Unvote: nhat
Vote: Litral
makes the assumption that scum never lurk. falseStrangerCoug wrote:
There's a difference, Litral. If we went after every single lurker and lynched them, scum would win.Litral wrote:You hope to give pressure without the threat of lynching?-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
sorry, did i not make myself clearCass wrote:
Geraintm: Seems to be lurking in plain sight, I don't get much of a read on him. Lot's of posts with mainly very little content. He said one thing that rings alarm bells:
Forcing people to talk is good. Why would a townie be afraid of incriminating himself? This could also be a defense of Chenhsi. (Who doesn't deserve one.) Quite scummy.geraintm wrote:imaginality - i really don'tlike people putting u lists of questions for others to answer. i think t makes a player look like they are participating in a game when all they are doing is trying to force others to talk and incrimate themselves. you should at least answer the questions yourself
what i dont like is players making posts where they go "Hey cass, who do you think is scummy then at the moment? Who would you vote for?"
and they don't actually write anything of substance themselves. it is ok if the person is contributing but if they are just filling their posts with getting others to talk whilst not saying anything themselves, then that is bad.
and i know townies shouldnt have anything to fear, but i think you'll find scum are quiet good at twisting innocuous things into something.
disagree, lurking is bad.a lways has been, always will be. there is a difference between lurking and staying under teh radar perhaps, but lurking is bad.Wumbo wrote:
I don't believe that lurking is necessarily a bad thing, especially on a day 1 situation. I mean, I lurked for a little while, and look where that got me. So for now I'll stay off Chenhsi's back unless something happens.
don't ike thispostCass wrote:No, Chen, I don't want you to claim. Knowing you have a PR would make this only ten times as frustrating. How about you ask for replacement instead? Someone who'll actually do some work for whichever team (s)he's on. Jeeze.
On the other hand: if you're going to claim, claim doc. Then the scum can kill you if we don't.
firstly, you can't just ask people to drop a game cause you dont like playing with them
and the whole claim doc thing, just urgh. telling people what to claim? it only likemakes sense if you are the doc and wanted to counter claim immediatly!
chensi, your play hasb't been good. having such an important role, you shouldn't be getting yourself into posistion where you have to claim. just bad play to get yourself under so much pressure. you'll llikely cripple the game-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
i was not fishing. i was trying to work out cass' motives and this was what popped into my head. saying "it only" was too strong, but i felt cass' post was poor, either just a horrible post where they are trying to be helpful and give chen some strategy tips, or there was some ulterior motive. was it so wrong to say that i found cass' actions suspicous??imaginality wrote:
I actually find geraintm's post 267 more suspicious - where he says:
telling people what to claim? it only likemakes sense if you are the doc and wanted to counter claim immediatly!
That smells like fishing to me - could easily be something scum would say in order to get a better sense of whether Cass is doc from his reaction to this comment. I think I will have a re-read geraintm's posts. My vote, though, stays on Litral.-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
sorry, someone brought up my response to you as scummy so i had to talk about it some moreCass wrote:@geraintm: yes, the ulterior motive was that I really wanted Chenhsi to be gone from the game. I didn't think saying something stupid myself would make his stupid claim any worse. Feel free to disagree, it's not some kind of brilliant tactic that I'm very proud of. Can we stop talking about it now?-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
dislike people planning day 2 lycnhes when no info froma night has come in.imaginality wrote:Nice pic nhat.
Okay, happy to switch my vote to Dark wingstalker. If he flips scum Litral still looks very good to me for a day 2 lynch.
Unvote
Vote Dark wingstalker
dislike people being "persuaded" to switch their vote like that
right now, just not happy with nhat, think he has given me the impression of being the most opptunistic player
but imaginality is certainly close after that post-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
your post on the 4th fosing masxwell was one line
the vote on the 6th for wumbo was one line
your vote on teh 7th for dark was a bit more with one paragraph but it was coming so soon after another vote was why i thought this was oppotunistic
your post on the 15h just said "i thinky ou are scum, what else do i need to say"
then on the 17th you say you are going to vote for chensi. you havent said why you think dark isn't scum, so to me this look slike you are trying to get your vote somewhere else
you vote for chensi the on the 20th without explaining really why you now dont think dark is scum as you were so sure of before, except on the 21st you say dark isn't off the hook but you now seem to have cougar as equally scummy as dark who you were sure is scum
23rd, back to dark again
so, all that gives me the impression you are oppotunistic. very free with your votes, i am not always convinced that your explanations for voting are good, and when added all together to me at least give you a pretty poor looking voting record-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
i was away over the weekend, i feel like i missed out on the lynching
dark's post before the investigation report had me feeling odd about it, too something. you know you can't put your finger on it but it gives out vibes.
so maxwell's result isn't too much of a surprise.
but agree with the general tone of others going "2 cops? what on earth have the mafia got?"
godot, why you planning the pair of lynches like that? if dark comes up scum, surely that would give max a day off at least?-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
i think dark has to die
vote dark
we do have to kill one of them to get some order into the game, and allowing max another night alive to get another investigation has to be good. i think we get mor einfo with dark dead than max dead.
whether max ends up being pro/anti town or sane/insane or whatever, getting the results of his second night should give us much more to go on
i make that the 4th vote. woul dlike mod to poll though, today is going fast-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
just a quick post, but had to post to strongly disagree with your sumsBattousai wrote:
If we lynch DWS, there is a 66% of it being a mislynch (max could be sane cop, paranoid, or scum). I think we should at least pressure other players or this day will be wasted on whether or not max is a cop or not. Pressure has not been put on the people from D1, others thought were a little scummy. Remember your lists???
there is not a 66% chance of a mislynch.
that is only the case if you think the three options of cop, paranoid cop or scum are equally likely.
bad maths. bad bad maths-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
do you mean maxwell?Battousai wrote:If DWS gets guilty, then he's paranoid or scum.
as i said before, i disagree with your thinking that there is a 66% chance of a mislynch by going after darkBattousai wrote: If we lynch DWS, there is a 66% of it being a mislynch (max could be sane cop, paranoid, or scum). I think we should at least pressure other players or this day will be wasted on whether or not max is a cop or not. Pressure has not been put on the people from D1, others thought were a little scummy. Remember your lists???
Vote: Inspector Godot. You seem to be banking on max being cop. Is it because your scum and know he's not or are you trying to protect your partner?
you are making the assumption that max is equally likely to be sane cop, paranoid cop or scum.
i don't agree with that at all, and i think you have done some seriously misleading maths there
and i dont get you going after Godot?
you seem to be voting for him because either max is a cop and therefore godot is scum buddying up the the cop
or because max is scum and godot is buddying up to his partner
godot looks kinda scummy there whichever way max flips.
all in all, your bad maths and your non-dilemma with godot to me makes you look very very bad
agree with this. a cop getting guilty verdic is a very strong message to go luynch someoneCass wrote:I still think lynching DWS is the best option. Many of us thought he was scummy day 1. A claimed cop reports a guilty on him. I don't see any better evidence on anyone else.
am agreeing with the idea that max shouldnt invetigate himself.
we want more info on more people, self investigation just allows for more info on one person, we can hopefully work out more about max from dark flipping, and getting a guilty/not-guilty on anotehr member of the town from the cop, whatver his eventual alignment, is better than max giving us a result on himself-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
nhat, that seems a very powerful role. you get a confirmation a day late of who killed anyone.
so your role can wait and see if the player was town or not, and then go and invesigate them and see who targeted them. seems more powerful than cop to me!
cougar, that was an insanely quick vote, before anyone had chance to come in with their night results, unless you know something, either through a action or scumminess-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
he has had time to go to other threads, post there and then come back and not comment on the various claims. i just wanted to note that i found his eagerness noteworthy.
agree though nhat/godot is more interesting
am inclined to believe nhat, the fact that godot didnt mention which players he targetted and whether they were home or not so no one as of yet can cross check his claim is suspiscous-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
i know this is probably bad thinking, but the fact that you happened to invesitgate imaginality night one was awfully lucky for youInspector Godot wrote:So, you want my actions?
Night 1: Investigated imaginality.
Night 2: Investigated Wumbo. He hasn't posted much and I was interested to see if he was a scum trying to go under the radar or possibly a power role keeping quiet. Unfortunately I was told that he was at home, so I guess he's just a normal townie.
Anyway, with regards to nhat's role it seems really powerful, especially considering we've had two cops and all. I guess if I want to stay alive I have toVote nhat
need wumbo to post htough and confirm if they were in or out last night
that would be your death knell
oh, and even then you are still very lynchable and likely think wumb would get lynched if you do turn up as scum
Godot, i just dont beleive you
i will vote for you as soon as wumbo checks in-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
ok, have read the thread, my head hurts
i am vanilla townie, which i am very glad about. this game is way too messed up
too many cops.
i'll post my thoughts on the game later, but will quickly say i didnt like bat just going ahead and making the assumption i am vanilla
also dont like anyone who is making assumptions that there arent as many cops asappear to have been claimed, it seems to me that the game has been set up by the mod to be some sort of cop themed game.
with so many roles, i am making the assumption that there is a roleblocker on teh bad guys side
but i will comment more on the actualy claims in a secondary post, but had to get in my role as you all wanted it
sorry again for not being around sooner-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Ok, as promised, my thoughts
why? why did you want to hammer so badly. if you wanted to vote, then you should haveStrangerCoug wrote:I said I wanted to hammer, but whatever.
bat's claim
well, nice he got an innocent on me
which post did i edit though bat??
what did you mean by "If I'm naive, then scum will not kill me because they are afraid of my results"? am confused
agree that you have either found 3 townies or are naive
sorry, am confused hereLitral wrote:I want the last cop claim. I hope there is one.
what do you mean, you want the last cop claim. you mean you want the last cop to claim? and why are you so sure there is a cop to claim?
didnt counterclaim you, but your reaction to vote so quickly was interesting to put it mildlyStrangerCoug wrote:Since Battousai effectively counterclaimed me,Vote: Battousai.
i dont normally metagame, but this does seem like some sort of cop themed game the mod has set up, with it all to do with people wandering the streets at night. i must say, i am kinda surprised that there hasnt been a false positive result come up.Cass wrote:Did you just self-vote? Why?? Three cops... I guess that proves differing sanities.
huh, did you vote for wumbo because bat is claiming either you or wumbo is scum?StrangerCoug wrote:All right, fine! I don't care if I'm royally screwed over; I want to do something to move the game along, damn it!
Unvote: StrangerCoug
Vote: Wumbo
Stop sitting there.
why do you think there is a roleblocker wh is town? with so many investigation roles, seems only fair that the scum get a blocker to try and even things out.StrangerCoug wrote:Unvote: Wumbofor the moment. Now engage in discussion.
I find even three cops hard to believe, Cass. If there are four cops, then thereMUSTbe one sane, one insane, one paranoid and one naïve. If there are three cops, then I don't think we have both a sane and an insane cop.
I do believe the roleblocker should claim if he's town, as I believe. If there is a mass claim and the roleblocker doesn't claim such, then I'm pretty sure whoever the roleblocker is is scum.
whoa whoa whoaStrangerCoug wrote:
I find it hard to believe too, but I said ILitral wrote:Four cops, a tracker, a forensic investigator and a town roleblocker against only at most four (and probably three) scum? I find that very difficult to believe.THINKthe roleblocker is town (he or she may be scum). I also think Battousai is lying.
bat is lying? why is he lying? why are you voting for him? i dont see why you are, you havent explained at all!
cass - i would have liked you to have left cougar try and explain it for himself rather than you helpfully give your reasoning
S/N/P i can buyStrangerCoug wrote: If there are three cops, the two sanity distributions that I see most likely are sane/naïve/paranoid and insane/naïve/paranoid. Two cops, one sane and one insane, isn't exactly likely, but I do find it believable.
What's that one type of theme game where all the townie roles are cops with differing sanities?
I/N/P i find hard to believe, that basically cripples the town with 3 cops who are all getting wrong/unhelpful results doesnt it??
i keep getting the feeling that cougar knows more than he is letting on,
and cass' last post seems a good find to me
i am agreeing that wumbo looks like the person i wouldlike to get rid of most, unless there was a reason for thispost
because someone spotted him at home last night that i have missed. has anyone claimed to have seen wumbo at home at night?Wumbo wrote:Anyway, yes I was at home last night. I'm nilla townie as I always claimed, though it's a shame they didn't fall for my power role bid.-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
ok, that makes sense, they wouldnt kill you because if you are getting innocent every time they dont fear you, that is what you mean isnt it?Battousai wrote:Geraintm
If I'm naive, the scum would not be afraid of my results, thus lynching me would be like lynching a vanilla townie to them. (This was before mass claim, thus power roles could have been hidden still)what did you mean by "If I'm naive, then scum will not kill me because they are afraid of my results"?
geraintm wrote: which post did i edit though bat??
ok, got you know, i thought you meant i went in and rewrote one of my own postsBattousai wrote: This goes back to D1, I believe I read it during my initial read through.
yeah, to me it just looked bad. as he came up scum, to me you demanding that you be allowed to hammer him looks to me the sort of thing a partner would do, knowing that his partner is going to get lynched and wanting to be in on the vote so later on they can say "but i voted for him, i cant be bad"StrangerCoug wrote:
I was pretty sure that Inspector Godot was scum and not nhat, but I wasn't confident enough for a vote. Nobody likes lynching a claimed power role, but it's already had to be done twice. chenhsi was speedlynched because he failed to contribute much to discussion and maxwellhouse countered him. They both ended up being cops. As for nhat and Inspector Godot, they didn't claim the same role, but they still conflicted (nhat claimed Inspector Godot killed imaginality, while Inspector Godot claimed to have reported on that same person the night he died). Because Godot flipped scum, Wumbo is not cleared.geraintm wrote:Ok, as promised, my thoughts
why? why did you want to hammer so badly. if you wanted to vote, then you should haveStrangerCoug wrote:I said I wanted to hammer, but whatever.
I assumed the insane cop in an I/N/P distrubution would live long enough to find this out and report the opposite result from then on, but S/N/P does make better sense than I/N/P.[/quote][/quote]geraintm wrote:
S/N/P i can buyStrangerCoug wrote: If there are three cops, the two sanity distributions that I see most likely are sane/naïve/paranoid and insane/naïve/paranoid. Two cops, one sane and one insane, isn't exactly likely, but I do find it believable.
What's that one type of theme game where all the townie roles are cops with differing sanities?
I/N/P i find hard to believe, that basically cripples the town with 3 cops who are all getting wrong/unhelpful results doesnt it??
but mod isn't giving us the cops sanity on death, just saying town cop, so trying to work backwards to get what their results actually are doesn't seem very easy at all.
ok, probably being thick, why is litral cleared. can you point out to me why he is.StrangerCoug wrote:
If you can convince me of three cops, then I'll go ahead with Wumbo for his minimal contributions. He throws a vote on me without what I think is a good reason for it (then again, when I see votes I also need to see explanations or where I can get them to go with the votes). Litral's cleared, and I don't think geraintm has done anything majorly scummy.
what dont you beleive about bat? do you beleive he has got the results he has said he has got? do you just beleive he is sane or something like that?Cass wrote: I don't believe Battousai 100%. I am pretty sure that Batt isn't asanecop however. If there are three cops, I think none is sane. If there are two cops, Batt is by definition scum.-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
ah, i knew there was something i had forgotten that someone would be kind enough to remind me.Cass wrote:Why is Litral cleared?
We are assuming there is only one scum left. Last night, this scum killed someone, so they left their house. SC checked Litral last night, he didn't leave his house. Two options:
- SC is honest; Litral is now cleared.
- SC is lying scum; Litral (and everyone else) is now cleared.
seems good thinking to me, about where i am with him. just i dont think he is scum, too much of a gamble for him to come out like that. i've not been in a game like this before with so many roles, but i have a suspicion that we might end up having to lynch a claimed role before the end of the game, just to make sure their night actions/results are correctCass wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question. I believe Batt say... 90%. His results sound credible, but he isn'tgeraintm wrote:what dont you beleive about bat? do you beleive he has got the results he has said he has got? do you just beleive he is sane or something like that?confirmedby any means. So I'm keeping the option open that he is the last scum, but, like Stranger, I'm also willing to give him a chance to confirm himself tonight.
I believe he is either insane, or scum. Would be nice if I was wrong, but I don't see that happening. My opinion. Thus I dont see his results as relevant - except that I think we should kill someone that has not been investigated and have him check the other one (SC or Wumbo, I prefer Wumbo as lynch).-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
why do you not beleive that i am a blue as you put it? what has imaginality's death got to do with my being a blue?Wumbo wrote:I went back and reread, and though I still find the tracker role hard to believe, I'm willing to overlook Stranger's suspicious behavior in favor of a Cass/geratihm lynch.
Cass' "let's end this today" seems kind of strange to me.
But the biggest problem I have right now, as I look back, is with geratihm's blue claim. There's a cop claim, a tracker claim, and two blue claims. With imaginality being a dead blue already I find it hard to believe that gera is a blue.
Can anyone tell me what Cass claimed? I seem to have missed that somewhere.
you do realise i have voted for both dark and godot don't you? that is some pretty good distancing...-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
what have i done to gather so much suspiscion from you, besides be a townie? i am totally up for Cass' plan of people (including myself) being investigated at random, i know i am ok. you think i havent posted enough? well, i havent had any investigations to report so i cat really bulk out my posts with talk like that, but i have always been here and tryin to contribute as best i can.Wumbo wrote:It actually makes sense. Mafia will have likely claimed blue as it is the easiest role to claim and the easiest way to fly under the radar. I find it logical that if everyone else's role claims are true, then the mafia has to be somewhere in the blue claims. Lynching me is probably better for town anyway. Too many people have suspicions on me.
In the meantime, however,
vote: Cass
My suspicions still stand. Though I think Cass and geratihm have pulled ahead of SC.
you think there could be two scum left?Wumbo wrote:
If there is no town roleblocker claim, then that means the mafia has a roleblocker or SC is lying, which means he's scum and Litral is possibly scum.
you seem to be resigned to getting lycned, is that right?
i wish some of the players with claimed roles would step in with their opinions, at this poitn it feel slike those without info are the ones trying to work out the lynch-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
no one has commented on my lack of posting realyl before? i was away last week from wednesday to monday but apart from that i feel i have been here and contributing. cougar has just said i should speak up more, but what am i not talking about??Wumbo wrote:
Geraintm is also pretty high up on the list because of a general lack of activity. The town seemed pretty satisfied with attacking me for not posting much... go back and take a look at what geraintm's posted. And now he comes in with a "i think i might vote for you because there's no one better?"
SC's posts continue to rub me the wrong way, but I've already stated my reasons for not believing him.
I would support Litral's idea for a no lynch, but I honestly think it's better to get me out of the way.
sorry if my last post was bad and said i cant think of anyone else to vote for, but that was actually following a few posts where i was questioning you and waiting for your answers
bat, i dont follow your post. the daily posting average thing, is that how many posts i have made a day??
are you later claiming in post 596 that you think one of the peopel you have already investigated is scum, or are you saying you think it is cougar?
you do realise that it is practicalyl impossible to tell teh difference until teh game has finished, right?Battousai wrote:There's a big difference. Scummy is a move that is beneficial for scum, whereas anti-town is a move that hurts the town. but at the same time does not benefit scum if a scum member does it.-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
doesn't really leave many people you dont suspectBattousai wrote:
post 596 is me trying to tell SC that his points against Wumbo are anti-town, which they are. I feel that either Cougar is scum or someone I investigated is scum.Geraintm wrote: are you later claiming in post 596 that you think one of the peopel you have already investigated is scum, or are you saying you think it is cougar?
was that in reply to cass suggesting we lynch cougar and not you??Wumbo wrote:I would be far more happy with that as my suspicion with SC hasn't really diminished much.
Re Batt's post vs cougar - makes sense, will read on now to see if cougar responds
cougar replys next post. the two parts where he says "i dont know why i wasnt roleblocked" and the damn it at the end...if at the end of te game cougar turns out bad, then we will sit there and go "yeah, was so obvious"
why dont you want me cleared?? is there anything majorly different between me and cass' posistion in this game that i dont know about?Litral wrote:That's a remarkably weak devil's advocate
I'm going to suggest no lynch again. Suppose Coug is scum, he won't die, and he must tell us someone is town, which would confirm another one of us - preferably either Wumbo or Cass. That would make things much easier since we still have 2 lynches.
ok, just read 612. does the game go in a different direction if someone else is killed during the night? or does the whole it is better to no lynch thing only work if Batt's assumption that he gets killed work?
sorry for being dumb
and has no lynch won?? are we missing a mod or something?-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
-
-
geraintm Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales