Mini 774: Case Closed Mafia (One Truth Prevails!)
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
*****************millar13 wrote:Battousai wrote:Vote: Millar13for taking an anti-town policy in order to help his scum play.for applying "tactics" in the random voting stage
FOS:BATTUOSAI
So, by your own admission, your scum...millar13 wrote:
I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.PStrangerCoug wrote:
And the thing wrong with that is?millar13 wrote:Battousai wrote:Vote: Millar13for taking an anti-town policy in order to help his scum play.for applying "tactics" in the random voting stage
FOS:BATTUOSAI
so doing so was a scum tell
Towny doesn't feel akward around the random stage
Thank you..
UNVOTE; VOTE: millar13('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Hehe, Millar13, well done.
You've cracked the game, bravo...
Moreover, you've gone on to establish that a bit of pressure is scummy.
WRONG.
Pressure reveals quite alot, to ascertain who IS scummy under pressure/who IS town under pressure.
To be frank, there was no pressure at all, and your worry at appearing scummy if you had have voted is.. scummy
In the random stage no wagon will ever gather serious steam unless a scumbag does something catastrophic on their part.
So I would ask you to relax, and not get too carried away with yourself right now.
At this time, only scum can be sure of who's who, and with the little information gathered thus far, tonwies have no clue.
But pressure leads to info, and info is good for townies.
Morning tea seems to be done alright, and for this time I shall..
UNVOTE('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
May I ask you a question, I cant be bothered going to check...millar13 wrote:Scum on the retreat? Lurking back into the shadow at the first sign of attention.
Still very much 50/50 on you at the moment...as I'm not sure how that makes you look. But since we are still in the early stage of the day, and you are the only really the first person to stand up to the plate it could be a case that the real mafia are lurking in the wings.
How many games have you played here/completed?('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
The bolded part....millar13 wrote:Bandwagons are often used in early stages, by over-eager mafia members or town members looking to be part of an easy lynch so that they don't feel to guilty about it if they are in heavy unison.With that being said, I think Strangecoug your heart is in the right place just searching in the wrong direction.
Bandwagons, as Ive already stated are good for town, and in the random stage, they hardly gather momentum, unless, again as Ive already stated, a scumbag makes a complete fuck-up on their part.
Your also more wrong than right stating a townie led bandwagon is merely used for town to easy-lynch someone, unless the whole cast of the game is made up of noobs.
I find it hilarious that you already are discounting SC as scum, and me as town.
With so little info available already from those contributing, your statements are pretty darn "certain" right now.
FOS: millar13('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
I would prefer full participation from all, but since its a holiday period, grace is fairly granted.Sajin wrote:Slight FOS:
Rage
Pacman
Issac
Dubya
Now granted its Easter, thus the slight fos. I understand if you have not posted much as of yet. But come tuesday, I would like opinions from these people before this goes ANY farther.
agreed firestarter?('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
So, 2 of your fingers are broken, and you cannot help making mistakes???millar13 wrote:I am not perfect, and so I make mistakes. Doesn't help that two of my fingers are broken. If I make mistakes, I will continue you to correct them.
Mistakes aren't scummy, they are just a human quality
WHAT?('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Bollox-ology Im afraid...millar13 wrote:Basically if I make typing errors or, use the wrong word don't take it too mean something that it doesn't. Half full rather than half empty.
You dont mistakenly write the wrong word, wrong letter, yes, not the wrong word.
Upgrading to...
VOTE: millar13('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
In fact, it was the other way round..StrangerCoug wrote:Firestarter wrote:Hmm... Ok..
I agreed that the other players should at least post on whats been happening here before anything else happens...
UNVOTE: millar13
MAJOR FoS: millar13Minor FoS: Firestarter. Don't be so quick to retract a vote.
I was too quick to place the vote.
Look back on the other page, you'll see why.
('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Is there something special with your particular vote?millar13 wrote:SC looks town to me.
Whilst Pac doesn't give off anything to me.
My reason for Fire have already been given, but as yet I still don't actually have a vote out.
Its there for a reason, why are you even refusing to place it on me, after saying Im most scumlike???? Im still baffled as to your reasoning...
And with the arguments that have taken place beforehand, your still treating your vote as something sacred!!('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
The only solid stuff I see so far is your defensiveness, your wiki-mafia-knowledge (which was being applied in the random voting stage), your 2 broken fingers which are contributing to "Mistakes" and Strangercoug FoS'ing me for retracting a vote that I gave my word to Sajin I would not do until more players posted.millar13 wrote:At the moment I have only belive that these four players (including myself) have brought anything really solid to the game:
-Strangecoug
-Millar13
-Battousai
-FireStarter
the rest seem to be either Active Lurking, with the odd "I am still here post" or just off the radar completly. At the moment null tells is ultimatley all I have been given so far, and quite often in games it is only the null tells and little things that the mafia actually give away. Sometimes you have to be a little OTT and see the impossible as possible.
Now your saying that ALL you have to work off is null tells???
Obviously your mafia-wiki-knowledge isn't up to scratch...
How the hell can you make assumptions from null tells?
And why are you, admittedly, OTT?
('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Ok, in the random voting stage, and Ive mentioned this already, I like to be less serious, because when the game gets going, my serious-shades are placed upon the bridge of my nose...
Got it?
After that, my FoS's and votes count, which happened to only be on you, millar13.
After I FoS'd you, Sajin posted the following....
I then replied this...Sajin wrote:Now granted its Easter, thus the slight fos. I understand if you have not posted much as of yet. But come tuesday, I would like opinions from these people before this goes ANY farther.
agreed firestarter?
Afterwards, your posts got worse, scummy worse, and I placed a vote on you.Firestarter wrote:I would prefer full participation from all, but since its a holiday period, grace is fairly granted.
See where Im going millar?
I retracted after I granted grace for the other players to post, and I assure you millar, my vote WILL be going back on you unless someone else is scummier/you become more pro-town.
Am I clear now?
This also goes for Strangercoug... RE: retracting my vote so quickly..
('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
millar13 wrote:1.In this game you have to be a little over the top...you need to blow the small clues out of proportion otherwise really you need to leave mafiascum and go back to playing cluedo with your kid sister.
2.wiki-mafia-knowledge (I have none...I have never actually looked at the wiki unless via a specific link)
3.if you notice I said the word "ULTIMATLEY all" which means the majority, but not every single one. Dont' try and twist my words against me, because it won't work.1.If you are town, you do not need to be OTT. IMO, thats reserved for scum, thats how mis-lynches occur. By bending the truth, twisting words, etc, etc.
2.You sound to me like someone reading from mafia-wiki.
3.Ultimately All means you have nothing to go on?
Ultimately is described in any dictionary as...
as the end result of a succession or process
BTW, leave my little sister out of this...('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
OMG...millar13 wrote:The problem with you....is without being rude"you don't seem to have the guts" to vote for me yet, even though you have in as many words confirmed you will put your vote back on me anyway.
I however, believe you look the most scummy so far. Slight difference.
Pot and kettle, much!!('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Hang on for a second...StrangerCoug wrote:Firestarter does seem a bit off. Not to play both sides of the fence, but he is saying a lot of bad stuff about you yet hasn't revoted you. His quick retraction (which he defended as voting too soon) is not enough to warrant a vote, but I am looking at him, so don't call me tunnel-visioned even though I've mostly gone after you so far.
Ive explained why i retracted my vote, its as clear as day.
Other than what Ive explained, how else am I "off?('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
And how do you explain millar13 not even placing a vote yet?Battousai wrote:Vote: Firestarterfor post 108, OMGUS.That along with your waiting to vote seems scummiest to me right now.
Isaac has only looked at my posts, and turned them into something they are not.
He seems to go on meta for millar13, which is easy for a scumbuddy to summons up.
AND particularly if he's not going to look at other players meta's.
Its opportunistic at the least imo.
Ignoring millars actions in this game is extraordinarily baffling.. or scummy.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
millar13 wrote:1.He has done nothing, but read them as they are.Either you haven't quite comprehended what you have written or you have actually slipped up along the way.
2.Why haven't I voted yet...well I guess you can I was biding my time and now I think you certainly are scum.
3.How you reacted to just myself pointing the finger was one thing, but now that two others are also pointing you have be cut right open.1.Please try to explain to me what on gods earth you've just written in the bolded part of section 1 of your post?
Are you telling mewhy your voting for me?you dont know
2.What were you biding your time for?
Were you waiting for another player to post something just so you could hop on?
Again, what you are doing is utterly scummy and Im now convinced your scum.
* First off you come up with mafia-wiki tells early game, then you start to
* apply them to votes made in the RVS. You then suggest with fuck-all
* info that SC is town and Im scum.
* Afterwards you say that any tells you have are null tells?
* Throw into the mix that your blaming 2 broken fingers on writing the
* wrong words and that sometimes you need to act OTT at times in
* games for whatever reason, I dunno..
3.You say I need to be cut right open... Go ahead millar13, in your own words, whatever use that'll do, post your case aginst me.
Ill refute everything you have to say scum.
And may I also remind you and the rest of the players that you first mentioned me & the word scum in only your 5th post of the game, me having made only 4, all in the RVS.
So I want your case, in full and from the beginning please...
('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
millar13 wrote:You want my case....haven't you read anything I have posted earlier.
Haven't you read Battousai's post or Isaac's post.
The case is a collective case, and one that has grown since the start of the game. Nothing has changed, nothing knew has come to light. And you don't have the power to demand anything from me. If you don't know why you are seen as scum now, then I doubt you ever will.Your refusing?
I want to see your case on me in 1 post, clear & concise.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Before I get to millar13, there are a couple of things that need to be cleared up that I didn't get to before I rushed off earlier.
Korlash wrote:1.It's as easy for a scum buddy to find as a townie. And how in the hell is meta usage opprotunistic? you're arguements are kinda stupid you know.
2.and would you mind actually commenting on Issac's 107?1.I agree with the first part of your sentence. The 2nd part I meant "Isaac seemed opportunistic" in the way he put forward the post with its points against me.
2.
Isaac seems to think Im voting millar13 because he made a "typo"..... No, its more than that. He should read whats been written so far.Isacc wrote:Firestarter is scum. Typo's are not scumtells, nor is bad wording.
You unvoted not because people weren't posting, but because you were unsure as to whether or not you were on a popular enough wagon.
Your attitude is anti-town.
Firestarter claims null-tells can't give reads. Have you meta'd Millar yet? If so, you should know that he is an Empking, or a Zwet, meaning that most of the stuff you are accusing him of are null-tells.
Millar seems town to me. Going off attitude here, not actions (often more telling, as actions can be gambits or foolishness, but attitude usually remains constant.
He seems to think I unvoted millar13 because it "wasn't popular"... No, I agreed with Sajin that I'd wait until others posted. The funny thing is that millar13 isMOREguilty of this, because of his unwillingness to vote me, and then doing it ONLY after others had done so.
Isaac also thinks millar is town due to "attitude"... Thats a new one to me, I must admit.
I accuse players of being scum based on their actions in the actual game we're playing in.. Am I missing something?
Isaac thinks my "attitude" is anti-town.. but does not state why??? So.. Why??
*******************************************************
StrangerCoug wrote:1.Read what you quoted again, even if it's obsolete.
2.
And you're not saying who it is straight up because?Firestarter wrote:We just found millar13's scumbuddy...
3.
I don't think two hours is a fair time limit. Upgrade to anFirestarter wrote:Ok, millar13, you have 2 hours to post your case on me, Ill be gone for this time.HoS: Firestarter.1.I dont need to read it again, you explained that I answered about the vote/unvote of millar13, I wanted to know why you were still keeping an "eye" on me, as you did not make that 2nd point clear.
2.This post came straight after Isaac's post attacking me with the exact same horseshit millar13 posted. Not only that, but there was very little content about anyone else.. very little. Sounded defensive of millar13, and I like to pressurise where I can.
3.At the time, millar13 was online with me, and we were posting within minutes of each other. Is it so unreasonable to think he was still there when I posted that post?
Not only that, but he blatantly refused to post his case as requested by me several times. This is clear SC.
You placed a HoS on me for asking for millars case, which he blankly refused to do, yet I get the HoS... ?????
Ill post my reply to millar13 shortly.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
@ millar13
millar13, your making accusations, yet your not actually following them up with your reasons for them.millar13 wrote:Now you clearly are not just a plain vanilla townie...that is more than clear from post 121. Clearly you are sitting on some sort of power position (I doubt you pro-town, so the assumption almost concretes scum) otherwise you wouldn't be so frustrated and resorting to using offensive language. Why would someone with no real power feel the need to swear and your such horrible and disgusting I do not know.
Please do this so I can answer them.....
1. How do you percieve me more than being vanilla townie from post 121?
2. How am I clearly sitting on some sort of power position?
3. You say you doubt me as pro-town, then you say Im "Concrete Scum"... Only scum can be concrete about a players alignment, I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion?
4. There is,however, one part I can answer here, and its your accusation of me being offensive and frustrated.
Yes, I was frustrated because you refused to even say you'd post a case on me after I asked you. Twice.
If I was offensive, which I dont believe I was as I did not directly insult you, then I apologise.
Abusing someone or bringing their family members into a game is not something I ever do.
Both our posts up to now are under the scrutiny of who's reading them, I can only post what I think.millar13 wrote:The likelihood is that you actually believed in our back-and-forth confrontations that with the introduction of other players I would come off looking worse, and they would put their votes on me rather than yourself.What you have to understand, is that a large amount of my case is built upon the fact that people actually see you in the same way as I do...although their views are more valuable as they are very much out-side the box and therefore provide me with a more rational view of things.
If someone else thinks your scum, so be it. If someone else thinks Im scum, Ill answer their concerns/thoughts/accusations appropriatly.
Ive bolded a part of your quote above, because I dont understand what you trying to say.
Please re-phrase this or at least clarify it.
Acute obversation.millar13 wrote:You start off with post (24) aclear random vote, one that would be expected and you are just like every other player who "chooses" to particpate in the RVS. It isn't compulsory and therefore, be not taking part really should not be seen as some sort ofissue
Incorrect, It was still in the RVS stage for me. This is my post...millar13 wrote:afatchic and Strangecoug have some sort of RVS conflict, with what is clearly a case of you vote for me, I vote you. However, this if often just playful in the RVS and doesn't actually amount to anything solid. You then for some unknown reason suggest that both of them are scum, and then unvote andVote afatchic(by the time you have voted a second time, you have ended your personal random stage) and so this is just the beginning for you.
I think its very clear by reading this, my post was part of the "playfullness" as you put it.Firestarter wrote:afatchick & Strangercoug are both obv-scum.
Time I got me a wagon together!!
UNVOTE; VOTE: afatchick
Again, incorrect.millar13 wrote:Then me and Strangecoug have some sort of situation, where he suspects me as scum and at the time I didn't quite know what to think. Once again you you jumped on a altercation and made it your business to vote against for thethird timewith no real case.
Below is the quote pyramid...
And below is my post...millar13 wrote:
I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.PStrangerCoug wrote:
And the thing wrong with that is?millar13 wrote:Battousai wrote:Vote: Millar13for taking an anti-town policy in order to help his scum play.for applying "tactics" in the random voting stage
FOS:BATTUOSAI
so doing so was a scum tell
Towny doesn't feel akward around the random stage
I made this post to apply some light pressure on you and see your response, after you stated SC was the first player to try to end the RVS.Firestarter wrote: So, by your own admission, your scum...
Thank you..
UNVOTE; VOTE: millar13
My reading of who started getting serious first reads like this..
Battousai >> Post 23
millar13 >> Post 25
Strangercoug. >> Post 28
When you made this statement..."I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.P", and if you believed it to be true, you should have went after Battousai, as it could be argued that it was he who posted the first real serious post of the game, and not Strangercoug. In fact, Strangercoug was spot on when he said that you were guilty of what you accussed SC of, and in my book, even more so since your post came before SC's.
Is this meant to be part of your case?millar13 wrote:Despite this you actually seemed to be able to talk some sense with Post 49:
Firestarter:
"Hehe, Millar13, well done.
You've cracked the game, bravo...
Moreover, you've gone on to establish that a bit of pressure is scummy.
WRONG.
Pressure reveals quite alot, to ascertain who IS scummy under pressure/who IS town under pressure.
To be frank, there was no pressure at all, and your worry at appearing scummy if you had have voted is.. scummy
In the random stage no wagon will ever gather serious steam unless a scumbag does something catastrophic on their part.
So I would ask you to relax, and not get too carried away with yourself right now.
At this time, only scum can be sure of who's who, and with the little information gathered thus far, tonwies have no clue.
But pressure leads to info, and info is good for townies.
Morning tea seems to be done alright, and for this time I shall..
UNVOTE"
In a previous post to mine, Post 47, you state this...
In my post, I clearly state that I thought the RVS stage was done, "millar13 wrote:I don't want to vote now...because the "random stage" has stopped, and we are now very much past morning tea and gone into the seriousness of Day 1. Votes should be value not thrown around with no real reason.Morning tea seems to be done alright"
Your post previous referred to such. I removed the vote on you because we were moving to the serious part of the game.
The only difference being, you did not participate in the RVS.
Ok, Ive given the reason for this at least twice, once more shouldn't hurt...millar13 wrote:Then in Post 73 you vote for a4th timealthough this time it is very much for reason outside the came, or for reasons of "bollox-ology" what ever that words is actually meant to mean I do not know.
Only two posts later you have then unvoted me, and put me on MAJOR FOS. Making you undecisive but also seeming as the fact that pacman didn't actually seem to back you reason, as the reason why you felt you need to back off yourself.
my interaction with Sajin before voting/unvoting you are as follows.
Sajin wrote:I do agree on the amount of scumminess of millar13. A townie would not fear nearly as much about the RV stage as I have posted before. I would possibly be willing to push this to a soft claim, but before that I want posts by those who have not posted.
Slight FOS:
Rage
Pacman
Issac
Dubya
Now granted its Easter, thus the slight fos. I understand if you have not posted much as of yet. But come tuesday, I would like opinions from these people before this goes ANY farther.
agreed firestarter?
At this point, I made an agreement NOT to let anything go further...Firestarter wrote:I would prefer full participation from all, but since its a holiday period, grace is fairly granted.
But with your posts, Posts 70 & 72, you were talking nonsensically. 2 broken fingers accounting for mistakes, and then this...
After the scumminess you portrayed, and the nonsense you posted afterwards, I placed my vote on you.millar13 wrote:Basically if I make typing errors or, use the wrong word don't take it too mean something that it doesn't. Half full rather than half empty.
I retracted the vote because I agreed with Sajin I would not go any further.millar13 wrote:You state you were too quick to place the vote, when funnily enough this was the 2nd time you had already voted me. If it had been the first time it might have actually have made some sense, but second time is sort of suspicious.
And... Why would an agreement at the first time of voting you, in the RVS, be any different to the 2nd time?
And why was it suspicious?
I stated I would place my vote on you, what would you have thought if I didn't?millar13 wrote:It wasn't until page 5 however, that any real strong feeling to actually vote for you came into frutition
Then at Post 103, you vote for thefifth timethe 3rd time you have had a vote on me and seem to back it up with the fact that more people haved posted, even if it is only one post and therefore not really enough too:
Like the agreement I had with Sajin, I also kept my word about placing the vote back on you. I posted this...
The fact of the matter, and the main reason you are being voted by me is because no-one else is scummier than you right now, and has not been since I first stated I would be voting you.Firestarter wrote:I retracted after I granted grace for the other players to post, and I assure you millar, my vote WILL be going back on you unless someone else is scummier/you become more pro-town.
3 players account for 25% of the players in the game. Since 6 players were already posting, those 3 brought it up to 9 players or 75% of the players in this game. I took into account what they said, but you remain top of my scum list.millar13 wrote:Allow this post to actually occur. All that really happend was Rage, Korlash and Sejin surfaced for the first time (some more than others) but you didn't really take in what they said as you had already decided you were going to place your vote back on me either way.
This has been addressed in my previous post.millar13 wrote:Isaac made some good points, not all great or perfect, but some good points none the less and you didn't even challenge what he said but gave a week response of:
That post is convincing to anyone, and is pretty feeble at attempting what ever it was that psot was meant to accomplish.Firestarter wrote:We just found millar13's scumbuddy...
What is "convincing" about it, and what am I attempting to do?
Battousai's One-liner on me in 111 has been addressed in my Post 113.millar13 wrote:Then Battousai voted for you...and in many ways what was said in the start of Post 111 was exactly what you had done, as you have taken yourself from small tells and null tells to something much more open and readable. It was in many ways this post, that did enough to convince me that you were worth voting for. That is all I have against you at the moment.
Covering yourself much?Firestarter wrote:I am not saying I think your 100% scum, but you 60/40 at the moment in my mind.
Sorry, Im not buying this.millar13 wrote:Why I didn't give you a case straight away...simple. Because I was in the middle of writing it but also because I wanted to see your initial reaction. You are clearly someone who believes they should be in control.
These are your posts after I requested your case on me...
&millar13 wrote:You want my case....haven't you read anything I have posted earlier.
Haven't you read Battousai's post or Isaac's post.
The case is a collective case, and one that has grown since the start of the game. Nothing has changed, nothing knew has come to light. And you don't have the power to demand anything from me. If you don't know why you are seen as scum now, then I doubt you ever will.
I do not see anything in either post to suggest you were preparing a case, or otherwise.millar13 wrote:I'm not refusing, I am just inidicating that you case is long-running. It hasn't stopped and it still continues. If you clearly believe that a strong case doesn't already exist against you then you are clearly deluded. Your own posts are very much a key part of this case. You in many ways have proven to be your own worst enemy.
Your case is full of accusations without any reasoning.
Alot of it stems from the RVS, and you give wrong information about when it ended and by whome, which messes up alot of what you say here.
There are alot of questions I'd like you to answer stemming from the above.
Alot of your posts are confusing.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
After millar13's last post, I propose a trade off with him.
Lynch me, and when I flip town, lynch him.
Are we agreed millar13?
Im happy to take a hit for town here, your play is unbelievably scummy.
Not only that, but town have alot of info to work off on others who have blatantly ignored what Ive posted throughout the game.
millar13... What you say?('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
First of all millar13, answer my question in my response to your case that has fallen flat on its face.
Im not going to beat around the bush here anymore.
The questions in my post are easy to find, they generally end with ?
Please answer these, as all you've done is make accusations without reasoning.
When this is done, Ill post my case on you in a full clear and concise post.
I do not want anything else from you other than answers to my questions.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Please answer these questions regarding accusations you made of me.
You still have not done so...
They are part of "Your case", and you have not explained how you've come to any conclusions.
1.How do you percieve me more than being vanilla townie from post 121?
2.How am I clearly sitting on some sort of power position?
3.You say you doubt me as pro-town, then you say Im "Concrete Scum"... Only scum can be concrete about a players alignment, I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion?
BTW.. this...
Ive read every post in the game. Ive answered every question asked of me.millar13 wrote:1) It is quite clear that in fact you don't actually read all the posts, and you seem to pick out through the ones that suit you best. If you had read Strangecoug's Post 127. You will noticed that I actually admitted it wasn't actually a good opening and it was slightly floored.
4.How have you come to a conclusion that Ive only read certain posts?
I mean, most of your case has been explained in individual posts made in the game, yet you choose to ignore them...
And I take it you meant "Flawed" rather than "floored?
And I agree, it is flawed, and wrong.
******************************
This...
But prior, you posted this...millar13 wrote:2) I didn't say you were sitting on one, but rather you are acting in a mannerism as if you were.
Contradiction, you lied about NOT saying I was sitting on a power role, when in fact, you did. As of yet, I still have had no reason from you as to what you came to this conclusion.millar13 wrote:Now you clearly are not just a plain vanilla townie...that is more than clear from post 121.Clearly you are sitting on some sort of power position
****************************
millar13 wrote:
Could you twist me word anymore? What I actually said was...Firestarter:
"3. You say you doubt me as pro-town, then you say Im "Concrete Scum"... Only scum can be concrete about a players alignment, I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion?"
I did not twist your words, More lies.millar13 wrote: "(I doubt you pro-town, so the assumption almost concretes scum)
You can again clearly see the posts you and I made above.
Its a FACT that scum are the only faction in a town v scum mafia game that know alignment.
Again your phrasing is way off.
You doubt me as town usually equates that you have less doubt in me being scum.
Not >> I doubt you are town, you are therefore concrete scum.
******************************
The fact is millar, you called me likely scum in your 5th post, after my first 4 posts, which were in the RVS, like it or not.millar13 wrote:My case doesn't work with just my own opinion. The fact that Battousai and Isaac also appears to be on the same wavelenght as me (NOTE THIS IS NOT A WAGON, SO DON'T CLAIM IT IS) was a clear sign to me that I wasn't the only person to think you were coming off looking like scum. The reason their views are more valuable, is because are are indirectly involved and so their view are not biased. Easy enough to understand.
Your case goes back way further than Isaac's or Battousai's posts.
In any case, one or both could be a scumbuddy, and in the event of that being the case, well, you know where Im going with this.
*******************************
Why do you want to keep schtum as much as possible?millar13 wrote:That is all your getting from me, you are in fact very lucky that I changed my mind and decided to 'cater to your needs'. Don't expect the same again.
If you firmly believe in your case, or that of others, than posting info is good, regardless if your wrong or right.
Alot can be extracted from posts made, its what town have to go on in finding scum.
One more thing that needs to be said is that my first post out of the RVS that was serious was my 5th post, Post 49. I unvoted here because we were out of the RVS.
Not, as you claim, any of my first 4.
My full case on you will be posted today at some point, I dont have time for it now.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
MOD: apologies for the bolding right after your post, but its a wee bit pedantic don't you think?
?Sajin wrote:I like how firestarter bolds right after the mod warns about it....
******************
No, you did not answer all my questions.millar13 wrote:I answer all your questions...so be just deal with it. You already have you answers.
I am not giving you an in-depth 101 on how I play this game and what tactics I used to scum-hunt. This isn't just about you or me so deal with.
From now on I am IGNORING you. And yes you did twist me words especially concerning the "concrete" bit. Stop with your spin and accept your fate
You come across as "chastising" in some of your statements, and not answering my questions. There is a huge difference.
I am in no way looking for you to divulge your tactics for scumhunting, please point out where I made that request, instead of just blurting out more accusations and word-twisting.
Post by post, you've continually made accusations against me, as early as in the RVS, and blankly refuse to follow them up with any sort of reasoning...
And your entirely free to ignore me millar13, but it does not bode well for your "case"...
Its clear you cannot answer the questions Ive posed, questions that stem from YOUR case.
What fate is that millar.. lynching?
Im not afraid to be lynched if it catches scum.
And I will be posting a case on you shortly.
I however, will not be ignoring you.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
@ Isaac...
Just goes to show how much your reading the game Isaac....Isacc wrote:I would post a more content-rich post, however Millar seems to be doing well enough on his own, and we all know that Firestarter won't pay any attention to me anyways (as he still never even countered or acknowledged my original arguments against him).
Did you by any chance read post 131??
I guess you didn't, I imagine you may have missed some other posts too...
Go back and read..
*********************************
@ Sajin
Why did you feel it necessary to confirm your vote?Sajin wrote:confirm vote firestarter
Still at 2 below
I think we get more information out of a firestarter lynch at this point.
*********************************
@ Battousai
Here are my questions, its quite obvious now I need help, as you seem to know where the actual answers are hidden to these, would you mind pointing them out for me?Battousai wrote:Firestarter, come on. He answered all of your questions. You just didn't get the answers you wanted. I think the main problem you have is reading compehension.
1.How do you percieve me more than being vanilla townie from post 121?
2.How am I clearly sitting on some sort of power position?
3.You say you doubt me as pro-town, then you say Im "Concrete Scum"... Only scum can be concrete about a players alignment, I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion?
4.How have you come to a conclusion that Ive only read certain posts?
I mean, most of your case has been explained in individual posts made in the game, yet you choose to ignore them...
And I take it you meant "Flawed" rather than "floored?
And I agree, it is flawed, and wrong.
********************************
@ Strangercoug
When I flip town, does your "Idea" of millar & me bussing each other excuse him from a lynching?StrangerCoug wrote:Largely millar13's case. Yes, I just accused him of bussing you (and vice versa ), but as I said, the case is good. I'm looking at #126 minus the first paragraph. Most of what concerns me about millar13 is the early part of this game. You, on the other hand, have been responding very poorly to pressure lately.
You say Ive been responding poorly to pressure, and that Ive been going downhill...
At least have the balls to point to some examples, I cannot defend against the invisible.
********************************
@ Isaac..
Funny, there was a question in my post previous to this, it wasn't answered... But Im getting used to players NOT wanting to share any info they have/concoct.Isacc wrote: You see more unreasoned accusations?
Funny, because here I see more OMGUS.
This roughly translates to....Isacc wrote:I would post a more content-rich post, however Millar seems to be doing well enough on his own, and we all know that Firestarter won't pay any attention to me anyways (as he still never even countered or acknowledged my original arguments against him).
I would add more to lynching Firestarter apart from my vote, but when millar13 succeeds with his case, I can go after him. Yippee!
********************************
Honestly, town, you gotta be blind..
Not only are you sitting in the sidelines doing nothing, but your watching others make accusations that they have hardly followed up on.
Also, when a request, or a question has been asked, its either been blankly refused, or overlooked without being answered.
********************************
I shall be posting my case on millar13 shortly, if anyone is remotely interested in what I have to say, Ill be back with said post('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Isaac is on my list as scum also, I have a bad feeling about him, particularly the way he just pops in and posts.millar13 wrote:Firestarter I would like to see a case for Isacc, considering you accused him of being my scumbuddy. I won't give you a deadline, so don't worry to much about how long you take.
If Im around later on, a case may be made.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Case on millar13
Post 21
Post 23millar13 wrote:I don't vote in the random stage, but HIYA
Post 25Battousai wrote:Vote: Millar13for taking an anti-town policy in order to help his scum play.
Post 28millar13 wrote:FOS:BATTUOSAIfor applying "tactics" in the random voting stage
Post 33StrangerCoug wrote:And the thing wrong with that is?
The first serious post belongs to Battousai, 2nd belongs to millar13 and the 3rd belongs to Strangercoug.millar13 wrote:I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.P. So doing so was a scum tell.
Towny doesn't feel akward around the random stage
millar13 overlooks Battousai's original post as the first serious post of the game, but accuses SC of this exclaiming it was a scum-tell. This is the first falsity. Why was Battousai's post overlooked in favour of SC's? Distancing/bussing of either comes to mind.
*****************************************************************************************
I clearly seen this falsity, and applied light pressure on millar13 with...
millar13 then says...Firestarter wrote:So, by your own admission, your scum... Thank you..UNVOTE; VOTE: millar13
After initially stating that SC let slip a scum-tell, which was NOT. M13 then says SC looks townie trying to scumhunt?millar13 wrote:Strangecoug is probably a townie who believes he is a "scum-hunter" but is going in all gones blazing. You really don't need to put your vote down at the first possible chance. A town player doesn't need to rush into a vote, and FOS first normally work better in your favor.
As for Firestarter: I think that you are likely a scum partner who has seen this comment
And used it to your advantage by doing just that. Forming a wagon so early in a game really is quite a scummy thing to do, for the simple fact that at Page 2 wagons shouldn't form.Strangecoug:
"Hey, guys! I found a good wagon here!"
What makes me think your even more scummy is this earlier post.
Town players don't look to start or join wagon so early on in a game, unless they are genuinely sure. For this reason I think that Battousai in fact should not have been under my watch and that in fact you should be instead.Firestarter:
"afatchick & Strangercoug are both obv-scum.
Time I got me a wagon together!!
UNVOTE; VOTE: afatchick"
FOS: Firestarter
With my post M13's reaction is interesting. He flips straight onto me saying Im a "scum partner" and goes on quoting one of my RVS posts and believes I jumped on what SC posted... "Hey, guys! I found a good wagon here!". M13 then says that players should not be looking to place a vote as early as they can.... Why the hell not? Just because you didn't in the RVS?
Votes are the best source of forcing info from a player, yet you didn't use yours. Thats not a scum-tell, but telling others they shouldn't place a vote/start a wagon is. This is another falsity.
*****************************************************************************************
Sajin wrote:Your right don't feel awkward about the random stage....
So why would you not vote, like everyone else is doing?
And why would you FOS the 2 people who put a slight bit of pressure on you, millar13?millar13 wrote:If you read Post 42 Sajin you would have noticed, that I no longer FOS Battousai and instead I am looking at Firestarter in stead
And three people have put pressure on me so far, not including you...so I think you need to check your facts first and then come back to me.
I won't confirm and actually place my vote, until I am sure I that the person I am voting for appears the most scum looking. At the moment, I have suspicions but not hard factSajin wrote:Thanks for answering the questions millar13, looks townie.
You still don't want to vote in the random voting stage, looks neither alignment, in and of itself, but stops information, slightly scummy.
You still fear being suspected though, scummy.
I do agree that the wagon needs to back off more for post content though. Wagons are bad for us, especially this early. Town needs more posts with content.
This brief exchange between sajin and M13 does not seem right, it almost looks staged. sajin asks some good questions in his 1st post imo, M13 does everything but answer the questions, instead re-stating his reluctance to place a vote in the RVS. M13 says he wont vote for anyone until he's sure they're scum. So far, he's named 2 players as having scum-tells from the RVS, and failed to address questions directly. This pattern of dodging questions develops as the game goes on.millar13 wrote:I don't want to vote now...because the "random stage" has stopped, and we are now very much past morning tea and gone into the seriousness of Day 1. Votes should be value not thrown around with no real reason.
And yeah I do fear of being suspected being scummy, but then again must people do tend to feel that way now and again. I just want to help the town bring the scum down to its knees.
sajin, for me, loses the credit I awarded him for his 1st and subsequent remarks about M13 still looking scummy when he says wagons are bad for town. Wagons are not bad for town! Neither is using your vote. 2 crap-logic statements made in this exchange. And sajin does not follow up on his suspicions later on.
*****************************************************************************************
The first statement is out and out scummy considering M13 later states that my Post 49 is the first real sign of townieness from me which happened to be my first serious post of the game. He states he's still 50/50 on me, wouldn't town be 50/50 on anyone in game, especially after just coming out of the random stage? He then looks at lurkers, saying that scum may be contained within them, why not place a vote on one them to get them to post?millar13 wrote:Scum on the retreat? Lurking back into the shadow at the first sign of attention.
Still very much 50/50 on you at the moment...as I'm not sure how that makes you look. But since we are still in the early stage of the day, and you are the only really the first person to stand up to the plate it could be a case that the real mafia are lurking in the wings.
*****************************************************************************************
SC picks up on M13's earlier post, and claims M13 is feeling the prerssure. His early posts, especially after I changed my vote to him, back this statement up.StrangerCoug wrote:And I still think you should be bandwagoned. You're cracking under pressure. Town should not be doing that.
M13 uses the word "clearly". If the error was clear, SC would not have pointed the error out. He states then that Im a scum member rather than a scum partner. This is how scum is caught, by errors made in posts, if no-one made errors, lynches would be based on guesses. After saying my Post 49 is what he's feeling about wagons, which is lies as he stated he was opposed to them earlier, he then says Im still likely to be scum... This is a huge OMGUS. Its also very arguable that SC was placing more pressure on M13 than I was at this stage, yet M13 then goes on to say that SC is still likely Townie and that his heart is in the right place? At this point, its 5 posts past where the RVS stage finished for me. He claims Im scum, at this point, because I applied pressure with my vote. Nonsense.millar13 wrote:I clearly made an error...I meant to say that Firestarter was a scum member (not scum partner) I have no reason to beleive that yourself (Strangecoug) is actually aligned with that.
Am I cracking under pressure? Not that I noticed.
And believe it or not Firestarter comment in Post 49, actually indicate what i feel about wagon's in the early game...even if I am convinced he is the most likely scum member at the moment. Although, not enough active players have sprouted to give a fully loaded judgement.
Bandwagons are often used in early stages, by over-eager mafia members or town members looking to be part of an easy lynch so that they don't feel to guilty about it if they are in heavy unison. With that being said, I think Strangecoug your heart is in the right place just searching in the wrong direction.
*****************************************************************************************
Post 60
I FOS M13 for his crap-logic.Firestarter wrote: Bandwagons, as Ive already stated are good for town, and in the random stage, they hardly gather momentum, unless, again as Ive already stated, a scumbag makes a complete fuck-up on their part.
Your also more wrong than right stating a townie led bandwagon is merely used for town to easy-lynch someone, unless the whole cast of the game is made up of noobs.
I find it hilarious that you already are discounting SC as scum, and me as town.
With so little info available already from those contributing, your statements are pretty darn "certain" right now.
FOS: millar13
He then states that Im likely scum of the players participating in the game, when a few short posts earlier he says Im 50/50.millar13 wrote:Firestater if you actually go through what I said, you will not notice I I actually said; that out of those players that have actually played this game so far you have come off looking like you the player with the possible characteristics of scum. In terms of Strangecoug he is coming off as a generic town player, I have played with a number of times.
"Certain" i don't think is a word I have really placed on anyway so far of being scum. And I don't feel that way at all. Although, I do feel youFOSis a predicatable defensive mechanism
I made only 1 other post since he claimed this...
How he could determine I was more scum-like after asking him 1 question about games he's played on MS, and placing a FOS on him for his crap-logic is baffling. This is another OMGUS post by M13.Firestarter wrote:May I ask you a question, I cant be bothered going to check...
How many games have you played here/completed?
He has also clearly refused to tarnish SC with his accusations thus far, and seems certain that SC is Town. Again, with so little info available, he's making too bold statements at this stage.
*****************************************************************************************
More crap-logic. How is a player to be lynched in D1 without a Bandwagon? They are more than crucial, they're essential!!millar13 wrote:Also in terms of bandwagons. I do agree that they can be good for the town.
However, not so in Day 1.
They can really be crucial, once a scum member is dead otherwise they are often scum controlled even though it seems as if the town is making the power play.
BW's on a lynched townie can also be led by townies. More crap-logic.
*****************************************************************************************
Sajin in Post 63 and Pacman in 67 (FOS's M13) pick up on M13's crap-logic, contradictory posts and scuminess up to this point.
SC in 69 warns M13 that he needs to watch what he's doing in his posts, and M13 posts...
No-one is perfect. But what does having 2 broken fingers have anything to do with what you wrote? Im not buying this an excuse for you typing wrong words. This is mere filler.millar13 wrote:I am not perfect, and so I make mistakes. Doesn't help that two of my fingers are broken. If I make mistakes, I will continue you to correct them.
Mistakes aren't scummy, they are just a human quality
I further question this, as I found it a strange post, and again, didn't directly answer the questions asked of him.
M13...Firestarter wrote:So, 2 of your fingers are broken, and you cannot help making mistakes???
WHAT?
So if you wrote, "Im scum", and you came back half an hour later and told us it was a mistake, it should have read "Im town".. that were to allow you this based on the fact you've 2 broken fingers??? More rubbish and more nonsense.millar13 wrote:Basically if I make typing errors or, use the wrong word don't take it too mean something that it doesn't. Half full rather than half empty.
I then vote M13 for his persistant crap-logic, nonsensical posts, filler and general rubbish posts.
Again, pacman picks up on this...Firestarter wrote:You dont mistakenly write the wrong word, wrong letter... yes, not the wrong word.
Upgrading to...
VOTE: millar13
*****************************************************************************************pacman281292 wrote:millar13 wrote:Basically if I make typing errors or, use the wrong word don't take it too mean something that it doesn't. Half full rather than half empty.
This contradicts the principal principle of scumhunting "watch for scum slips (*cough*MISTAKES*cough*)".millar wrote:Mistakes aren't scummy, they are just a human quality
If we applied your phrase, there would be no reasonable way to catch a scumbag.
At this point, I read back and seen that I had an agreement with sajin that I would not go further on M13...
So, I retracted my vote. If I left my vote there after making an agreement, it would have been inherently more scummy than removing it. M13 sees an opportunistic time to make this post...
3 things here....millar13 wrote:Typing the wrong word is a scum-tell.
Well lah dee dah...I must be scum then.
Mhmmmm FireStarter you just more and more scummy, as you looking for the smallest of things to blow out of proportion, so you can "justify" your vote on me oncemore.
I'm not giving you the satifisfaction of voting for you yet though.
Great defense to previous accusations made...
He states I look more scummy now, when in fact all he's said throughout the game is that "I am likely scum", with no reasoning whatsoever, and trying to place pressure on me for retracting my vote. He then says he's not going to give me the satisfaction of voting for me?
Again, M13 does not want to be noticed by using his vote, he is still more worried about the way he'll look if he places his vote without actually having built a case, or indeed, pointing anything scummy out. He is clearly waiting for other to place a vote on me, in the hope they'll mistakenly see me scummy.
If M13 keeps screaming Im scum, he's hoping someone else will agree with him. We see later on that when someone else places a vote on me, he then places his.
*****************************************************************************************
SC in 77 places a Fos on me for quickly retracting a vote. And M13 states...
More filler, really says alot of the way M13 has been posting so far... Words without any substance.millar13 wrote:Good point considering, it has just been my name vote unvote, vote unvote. Zzzz
Ghostwriter weighs in finally, picking up on M13's 2 broken fingers malarkey...
GW states that SC & pacman picked up on M13's broken fingers post, but again, since the RVS, he only picks up on my post about it. This is a quickly becoming a continuing trend throughout the thread, ignoring other players with similar points to mine, while zeroing in on me.GhostWriter wrote:I don't like what you're doing here. The fact that you're typing, not just wrong word, but a scummy way of thinking, is what's the problem. And you try to chalk that up to broken fingers? No. Your words are typed reasonably well, as in they don't have many errors. That could be explained. Typing wrong words cannot. The brain chooses the word, not the fingers. You know what you'll type before your fingers do. That's biology. And then, when this is stated, you try to pass it off as FireStarter attempting to justify a vote on you. What about SC and pacman, who also find your choice of words to be not too townie?
M13 keeps saying the same thing....
What reason has M13 got for seeing me as scum?millar13 wrote:SC looks town to me.
Whilst Pac doesn't give off anything to me.
My reason for Fire have already been given, but as yet I still don't actually have a vote out.
So far, he only has the quick unvote I made, which has been explained on numerous occasions.... NOTHING ELSE.
Again, its a fallacy for him to suggest he has a case on me. He's ignoring players who are similarly, if not more, applying pressure to M13.
*****************************************************************************************
So, theres been 5 players considered active in the game, and he calls SC town, pacman as giving away nothing yet, and me as scum... YET, he clearly states he has only null tells to work with. He then says he has to be OTT sometimes to see the impossible. This is more rambling, and another contradiction of what he's been saying recently. Theres more flip-flopping with his thoughts than you'd find on a Brazilian beach!millar13 wrote:At the moment I have only belive that these four players (including myself) have brought anything really solid to the game:
-Strangecoug
-Millar13
-Battousai
-FireStarter
the rest seem to be either Active Lurking, with the odd "I am still here post" or just off the radar completly. At the moment null tells is ultimatley all I have been given so far, and quite often in games it is only the null tells and little things that the mafia actually give away. Sometimes you have to be a little OTT and see the impossible as possible.
*****************************************************************************************
Again, M13 spurts out more crap-logic. he's trying to justify him not voting as being unhelpful. This is not true.millar13 wrote:A vote is sacred.
People who vote, unvote, vote and unvote can actually be most unhelpful.
Imagine you survive to day 3 and you in total have gone through this unvote vote stage, and have either
a) Only voted for a small number of people, over and over again
or
b) Voted for every single player
How you play the game, effects how people read you. If I am more than 60% sure someone is scum, then that is when I will give my vote.
Votes in posts give info, and leave a trail for others to follow afterwards. He then goes on to justify why he will later vote for me by saying if he's 60% sure, he'll place a vote. This, imo, is another contradiction to something he posted previously.
Does 60% constitute enough "Surety", especially the way M13 has been so cautious NOT to place a vote? IMO, No. In the above quote, it seems that M13 needs to be alot more surer than just 60%. Not only that, but he still has not made a case, the reason being is that he doesn't have one. He is merely playing a waiting game, for others to vote first.millar13 wrote:I won't confirm and actually place my vote, until I am sure I that the person I am voting for appears the most scum looking.
*****************************************************************************************
I question M13 further about OTT & Null tells post.... He says...
Scum are the faction that need to blow the small details out of proprtion, not town. They are in the minority and need to blow the small details out of proportion. This is another factual error on M13's part. If town have a sound case, it will succeed, but they do not need to go OTT. And the words "Ultimately All" DOES mean all... END OF.millar13 wrote:In this game you have to be a little over the top...you need to blow the small clues out of proportion otherwise really you need to leave mafiascum and go back to playing cluedo with your kid sister.
If you notice I said the word "ULTIMATLEY all" which means the majority, but not every single one. Dont' try and twist my words against me, because it won't work.
*****************************************************************************************
At this point, M13 is still refusing to vote, regardless of the amount of times he's called me scummy...
He also says I dont have the guts to vote for him... After one of his most vocal traits in the game was the fact I voted, uvoted him already. This is clearly incitement, and I eventually placed the vote back onto him.millar13 wrote:The problem with you....is without being rude "you don't seem to have the guts" to vote for me yet, even though you have in as many words confirmed you will put your vote back on me anyway.
I however, believe you look the most scummy so far. Slight difference.
*****************************************************************************************
Post 96 sees me ask for a case from M13, one that I have not seen from him... He ignores this for the first time.
*****************************************************************************************
In Post 104, after I eventually voted M13 again, he gets the chance to say what he's been gunning to say....
I informed M13 that I had no reason to unvote him now in Post 105...millar13 wrote:As for you FireStarter, I want to know how many more times you will vote and unvote for me on Day 1...because its is just refreshing.
Sigh... Yet again he decides to change his mind on me. And tries a "get under the skin" tactic. He also says that the Vote/unvote period in my posting is an indication Im town???? More gobbledy-gook from M13.millar13 wrote:I knew your vote would stay on me, from the first time you un-voted me. The needless uvotes in-between just shows me that you may just be a townie who doesn't actually have full confidence in his scum-hunting abilities. In fact the more I think about it, it isn't that your coming off scummy but more that you just aren't a very good townie.
*****************************************************************************************
Isaac & Battousai, somehow find M13's case as the way to go.... But there actually wasn't a case provided.?
And in 114, M13 finally, after all his screaming about me being scum/town/scum, then town again....
This is another contradiction to a post M13 made shortly earlier when he said I was looking like a townie who coudn't scumhunt... We has seen 2 Votes placed on me, and low & behold, he goes and adds a 3rd. Again, Ill add that he made no case up to this point.millar13 wrote:Why haven't I voted yet...well I guess you can I was biding my time and now I think you certainly are scum. How you reacted to just myself pointing the finger was one thing, but now that two others are also pointing you have be cut right open.
Vote:Firestarter
*****************************************************************************************
In Post 116, I again state my desire to see a case from M13 regarding me.
In 117, he refuses to meet my request, and instead asks me to go read back... I already knew the content of the thread, there was no case. Just fallacies based in the RVS, and my quick unvote after an agreement NOT to vote.
In 118, I again request M13 to post a case, in 1 post, clear & concise.
In Post 120, he tells me to go looking for a case against his co-accusers of me. No mentione of requesting me a case however.
In Post 121, Im getting highly irritated with M13's continued refusal to post a case, and demand he post one so I could refute his claims.
Korlash, in 122, insists that a case should be posted.
In 123, I again demand M13 to post a case.
In 126, M13 finally posts a case. Lots af accusations without reasoning, and after I pursued him with questions from his post, he kept refusing to answer them... he made general statements in his subsequent posts, but did NOT answer the questions.
*****************************************************************************************
M13, from his Post No. 5, had been calling me scum with no reasoning.
He posts are riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions, not to mention gibberish and nonsense at times.
He failed to use Towns most potent weapon during the day, His Vote, until he thought it safe to do so, after others voted before him.
When I retracted my vote, he seen an opportunity to attack, but even then before voting me, he called me town!
There are also interactions Im not happy with between M13 and Issac and SC.
These I will look at later with great detail if I have the chance to.
But right now Millar13 needs to be lynched.
Whether its before me or after me, he needs to go.
Apologies for the long post, I did not want to leave out any details.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
SC, do you have nothing to add from the case I just posted, other than worry about yourself?StrangerCoug wrote:I do remember you accusing Isacc of being millar13's scumbuddy, and I've said several times that I'm not happy with some things I'm seeing out of the latter. What interactions between Isacc and me, however, are you referring to? I think this is the first time you've grouped the two of us together.
There were some things I noticed, that I'd come back to later....
Right now, the case is on M13, he is top of the pile for me.
And @ M13...
Im not even going to write anything in response to your last post, its just ridiculous.
OF COURSE THE CASE IS BASED ON MY OPINION!!!!!
Did you have help for your case???
('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Gotta love the reactions from the 3 of you...
Instead of analysing the case, you come on here and try and verbally beat me up...
Best of luck with that
Anyways, Isaac, if Im around later on, Ill look into you with better detail.
As should any other townies, after reading my post, if I do indeed end up lynched.
At the moment, Im L-2, and Ive got my thoughts on M13 outta the way.
Its there in B&W.
BTW M13, town never self-votes...
But then again, you already knew that('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
What are you talking about?Battousai wrote:What really happened was millar commented he didn't vote in the RVS, I voted him for it, Millar FOS'd me for voting him for it, SC asked why towards the FOS, and Millar explained. Millar never accuses SC of being scummy up to that point
He claims the following after SC asked him about it.
Read my quote again for clarity... The timeline is clear, I state that M13 says SC just gave off a scum-tell after SC asked him about it. NOT before it.millar13 wrote:
I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.PStrangerCoug wrote:
And the thing wrong with that is?millar13 wrote:Battousai wrote:Vote: Millar13for taking an anti-town policy in order to help his scum play.for applying "tactics" in the random voting stage
FOS:BATTUOSAI
so doing so was a scum tell
And why are you NOT addressing the real point of that post, that M13 ignored you in favour of SC?
Read it again.
**********
I seen I could add some light pressure on M13 after his post, His reaction would only deem it serious.Battousai wrote:
So are you saying your original vote on Millar, which you deem as adding light pressure, isn't serious?Firestarter wrote:The first statement is out and out scummy considering M13 later states that my Post 49 is the first real sign of townieness from me which happened to be my first serious post of the game. He states he's still 50/50 on me, wouldn't town be 50/50 on anyone in game, especially after just coming out of the random stage? He then looks at lurkers, saying that scum may be contained within them, why not place a vote on one them to get them to post?
**********
I was suspicious about M13 saying that D1 BW's were dangerous for town.Battousai wrote:
-In reference to bandwagons are not good for town in D1 by Millar.Firestarter wrote:I FOS M13 for his crap-logic.
You think Millar is suspicious because he has a different ideal than you? Why is this indictive of scum? From what I have read of Millar's posts, he feels D1 bandwagons are usually controlled by scum since there is so little information to go on.
Not his ideals.
The fact is that BW's bring about info, and we know info is good for town.
So he showed scuminess, yes.
Do you believe that D1 BW's are only controlled by scum Bat?
**********
WRONG. He said I was 50/50.Battousai wrote:
No he said you were the most likely scum member at the moment. There is a big difference.Firestarter wrote:He then states that Im likely scum of the players participating in the game, when a few short posts earlier he says Im 50/50.
I made only 1 other post since he claimed this...
Go check the posts please.
**********
WOW, where were you when I needed the dig out, RE: questions not being answered!!Battousai wrote:
So it is ok for you to skip questions, but for others it's scummy?Firestarter wrote:SC, do you have nothing to add from the case I just posted, other than worry about yourself?
There were some things I noticed, that I'd come back to later....
Right now, the case is on M13, he is top of the pile for me.
Also, the rest of your case does stand up a bit.
Ill get around to them, as I have done all game.
Also, did you post some critique on M13's case?
I might have missed it... Post number...?('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
M13...
RE: my 4 questions.
No. 1 & No. 2 are tied together.
You did not answer them.
No. 3..
"I doubt you pro-town, so the assumption almost concretes scum"
Ive highlighted this for obvious reasons. You may have answered it, but it doesn't wash.
No. 4
I had to post the question several times, and the text below the first one had nothing to do with the question. Read it again.
The 2nd time I asked, I added extra text in.
You didn't answer it.
************
Also, have you no questions you'd like to ask yourself about the case I posted?
Are you NOT gonna refute anything at all in 'em?
Im happy to answer any and all queries you have.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Uh.. how am I ignoring you, was there a question or 2 I didn't answer?
Ive defended myself... Ive responded to their questions, if I missed one, Ill gladly respond.Isacc wrote:Newsflash Firestarter: Effective ways of proving your innocence include defending yourself, working with your attackers and responding to their questions, and overall acting pro-town.
Why not make a case on someone I find suspicious?Isacc wrote:Things not in that list: making big cases on people who are suspicious of you, ignoring the interrogations of other players, continualy saying "be suspicious of those guys!"
How else can I get my message across?
What interrogations have I ignored?
I have suspicions on others, yes.
Ive already given reasons why I found you suspicious, your 3rd post of the game, responded to in my 24th post.
As for SC, my suspicions were founded when I was putting together the case on M13.
I did not continually say "be suspicious of those guys!"
Feel free to post Post numbers to back that claim up.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
First of all... Do Not Abuse Me.millar13 wrote:Stupid acting like an idiot with posts like this
Im not here to be abused by anyone...GOT IT?
Read Up.. ^^millar13 wrote:And what you you mean you haven't skipped any? Go trrough pages 5-8 and you will see Isacc had questioned you a number of times, with no actual response.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Post 138. You are debating with Korlash for the most part.
You then go on with opinions that is aimed at town in general.
Post 161. What exactly are you asking me in 161, did I read... Yes, I did.
Aren't you contradicting yourself with the next quote of yours?Isaac wrote:
You've STATED!? OMG. Guys heFirestarter wrote:Ive stated I didn't skip any...statedit, so it MUST be the truth. Throw away all evidence to the contrary boys, because Firestarterclaimshe hasn't ignored any posts.
Firestarter wrote: But you refuse to read my case on M13???
Only coz it suits ya not too!
Logical reasons?? Why would you NOT read a case built on another player?Isaac wrote:I didn't "refuse to read your case on M13." I just don't need to spend a wall of text analyzing it in game, for logical reasons I already presented. Did you read those ones?
BTW, Town need to read these posts. End of.
Ive referenced the post in my 180 already.Isaac wrote:
Oh really?Firestarter wrote:I did not continually say "be suspicious of those guys!"
"As should any other townies, after reading my post, if I do indeed end up lynched." (referencing looking into me) post 180
"There are also interactions Im not happy with between M13 and Issac and SC...But right now Millar13 needs to be lynched." post 170
"Honestly, town, you gotta be blind..
Not only are you sitting in the sidelines doing nothing, but your watching others make accusations that they have hardly followed up on." post 159
The 2nd one ive addressed.
Im making a statement to town in the 3rd one RE: My position nearing lynch.
Isaac, you need to calm down, I advise you to read the posts Ive made, particluarly the case on M13.
Whether you agree with it or not doesn't really matter.
Your tunnel vision is handicapping you.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Maybe, maybe not.millar13 wrote:Another fact that Firestarter needs to realize is:
If he flips town, this doesn't automatically mean that I will be lynched next. I don't quite understand this logic at all.
But my flip will tell alot.
Whether its you or someone else wont concern me if Im lynched.
My thoughts on how I percieve the game are out there.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Korlash, Im at L-2Korlash wrote:Man I'm almost ok with lynching one of you guys to slow the thread down a notch... ><
i seriously need to reread the entire Firestarter case because last time I checked in I didn't really think it looked all that impressive yet here it is... apparently catching on. I suppose My opinions at the time were more focused on Issac then Fire.
I do want to get a quick word in before I start my grueling process of trying to take this all in... Is Fire at L-2? has anyone asked him to claim or has a claim at all been covered? Did he claim already? I know I've only glanced at the new stuff recently but I don't remember seeing anyone even bring this matter up...
pacman checked in and said he wanted to recheck the case on M13 I posted prior to voting.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
I was offended by what you said.millar13 wrote:That wasn't abuse, I was just stating what you are doing...playing like an idiotic because your reasoning is idiotic. If i were to call you a mofo that would be abuse.
By read up, you mean you haven't skipped anything...then you are wrong....or should I say still wrong. Do I actually have to do it for you?
By read up, I mean read back up the thread, the post it concerns is above where you last posted.
Apology accepted...('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
I dont agree...Battousai wrote:Reading comprehension, millar fos's me for applying tactics, sc asks why is that suspicious, millar explains why it is a scumtell. Millar doesn't say SC commited the scumtell.
See the bolded part... That is suggesting that SC commited a scum-tell.millar13 wrote:I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.P
so doing so was a scum tell
I guess we both suffer with the same affliction, eh Bat?
Your posts in isolation....
Post 1.
By your theory, this is tactical voting.Battousai wrote:Vote: Millar13for taking an anti-town policy in order to help his scum play.
Post 4.
Yet you deny it...Battousai wrote:25– millar FOS's me for “applying tactics in RVS.”I don't see the merit in this FOS. I wasn't applying tactics, I was just random voting him because he's helping his scum play by never voting in the RVS
As you are suspicious of me in my personal belief in Mafia.Battousai wrote:Personnally I do not BELIEVE D1 bandwagons are controlled by scum, but it is just my opinion, part of my mafia ideals. Now the key word in the whole thing is D1. He believes D1 bandwagons are controlled by scum, which could stem from personal experience, I do not know. You are suspicious of him for something he believes to be true.
I became suspicious of M13 for his part in this by exclusively saying that BW's in D1 are controlled by mafia.
I pointed out the fact that this is wrong. Which it is.
This is M13's 8th post of the game.millar13 wrote:Scum on the retreat? Lurking back into the shadow at the first sign of attention.
Still very much 50/50 on you at the moment...as I'm not sure how that makes you look. But since we are still in the early stage of the day, and you are the only really the first person to stand up to the plate it could be a case that the real mafia are lurking in the wings.
The one you refer to is his 10th post. After the fact.
On the questions... I dont believe he answered them. He rambled, but he didn't answer them.
The Q's particularly relating to "Power Role"... He did not answer them.
The last part of your post I accept, RE: your stance being on firmly on me.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
Saying Im townie means 2 things... Im townie or Im lying.millar13 wrote:Saying your vanilla townie is this game, is like you have brown hair. It doesn't actually mean anything.
However, if you are a vanilla townie then you are the worst example and most scummy one I have ever...and I mean EVER come across
Of course it means something.
As for your 2nd statement, well, its only your opinion, and so far, i haven't valued that much.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
SC, I had a feeling that either you or Isaac is a scumbuddy with M13.
I have not gone through the posts again, Ive posted and read a huge amount so far today, tbh, I dont have the will to go through those posts again right now.
Ill be back tomorrow, lynch-permitting of course, and Ill delve deeper into why I made those connections.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=CAFUFFLEmillar13 wrote:Considering its is spelt:
-KAFUFFLE
-it is APPARENTLY
and the fact that the language is broken in places, I am willing to say that you used a minor characters name (who was a protagonist) and made up the role PM as well.
Look up the link please. And give it a break, will ya!!!
Is this an attempt to somehow get back at someone because your wording was off in places??? Unbelievable.
I missed a letter in a word? Big deal..
BTW, Im not permitted to directly quote a PM sent to me by the Mod, this is a ruling that if I went against it, I would be modkilled.('') (':') ('')-
-
Firestarter Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire