Because my avatar kills his avatar ...
Battle for Olympus - Game Over!
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Ok .. now that we seem to be getting into some actual content ..
Point 1– I’m going to do a partial claim. I amHated Townie. Per standard conventions I require 1 less vote to lynch. I claim this for two reasons.
1. So there is no possible mistake on me being lynched due to a ‘Oops, I thought I was putting him at L-1’.
2. I can’t be around for LYLO / MYLO. As we potentially get closer I’ll need to be vigged or lynched if I haven’t already been killed so that something akin to Kise’s Square Enix 4 does not occur.
--
Ok … so you are going to make me wade through your completed games to look for trends? Sigh … off to your games list I go …Snow wrote:Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. I usually do it on large games, though.
--
God damn it Dekes why are you softclaiming Zeebrus, the God of Blindness, Striped Shirts, and Referees? Now you are just asking for a NKDekes wrote:Delay of game. Clear infraction.
--
@Gandalf– Aside from potentially clogging up the thread with useless information I have a question on your survey theory –
Do you think you are going to be able to crack the ‘code’, as it were, that the Mods used to assign roles?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
So looking through Snow’s completed games–
East of Eden – RVS voted a player – Vanilla Town in game
Sly Cooper – RVS voted a player – Mafia Godfather in game (though she replaced out)
Ladies Night – First vote a player (although it was clearly not RVS) – Town Cop
Supernatural Mafia (Large Theme) – First vote a player (althoght it was clearly not RVS) – Town Paranoid Cop
Insane Asylum Mafia – RVS voted the Mod – Town Nurse in game (though she replaced out)
Picto Mafia 2 – First voted for a player (can’t tell if it was RVS but seems unlikely) – Town Tracker
Everyone’s a Hero Mafia – RVS voted for self – Town role
Greek Mythology Mafia – RVS voted a player – Town role
At this point I noticed only one Large Theme was present. So I went hunting exclusively for Large Themes …
Of Gods and Men – First vote for player (although it was clearly not RVS) - Mafia
Cross Edge Bastard – RVS voted for Mod – Town Tracker (I think … damn bastard games)
Karma Mafia – RVS voted a player - Slot was Vanilla Town (though she replaced out)
Mind Screw Mafia 4 – RVS voted for Mod - Town Inventor
Conclusion- with a very small sample size it is not impressive but Meta leans towards a Mod vote in a Large Theme game as being a small Town tell for Snow-Bunny.
Well, at least I don't feel like I wasted half an hour doing that now ..."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Actually I disagree since I was able to come to the conclusion that a Mod vote is a small meta Town tell for Snow Bunny. Recent events and past experience have shown that players without a propensity for doing a Mod / Invalid vote who open RVS with may be Scum-telling.quadz08 wrote: P-edit: MoI, USELESS POST. Just sayin'.
Additionally I usually find SnowBunny to be a lurky difficult read so any amount of info I can glean on her is helpful."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Feel free to disagree but I don’t perceive Snow Bunny as a player invested in ‘managing’ meta. And frankly if that was the case I would have expected at least 1 example of a Mod / Invalid vote in her games if that was the case. Going back basically at least a year we have none.AGar wrote:That as a small meta tell is so easily manipulable it isn't even funny. :/
The thread has been open for less than 24 hours. How much follow-up do you expect when none of the players involved have posted since Gemini made ISO 37 an hour ago?AGar wrote:But no vote, or followup.
Preview Edit - Quadz you Ninja!!!!"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
So who again is role-fishing? I'm confused since your post lacks any attribution. And if its Gandalf why unvote him?Chesskid wrote:rolefishing like a champ btw
Actually I want to find out if you even had one ‘shot’. I’m guessing no but let’s see …Chesskid wrote:Any more takers?
Does Chesskid have any more shots?
FIND OUT
--
So you invoke mythology from the Norse Mythos when clearly the scum element is Non-Greek Gods? Scumtastic.SD wrote:Hi, everyone. Time for some Götterdämmerung I guess.
UNVOTE: Mothrax
VOTE: ShadowDancer"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
This is what I call a Plum-tell … specifically from Andy’s last Mini Game LOTR.SD wrote:I take Magna as confirmed town, based on his claim.
1. Pick out a stronger player not on your scum-team you know is Town.
2. Find some flimsy excuse to call them obv-Town or confirmed.
3. ?????
4. Profit
Except the ???? is you getting lynched for botched buddy-up.
Plum pulled this exact move with a Fate-hydra in LOTR and eventually got lynched for it.
Ranger has it right – my claim far from confirms me as Town.
My vote looks very good where it is.
Did you miss the part where both pre-game dead bodies were Greek mythos gods / figures? Or the part in either the sign-up or original advertising that Andy specifically said the Greek Mythos was the Town faction?SD wrote:Doesn't this feel a bit like a prequel to you?
I’m pretty sure your role-Pm didn’t tell you …"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
LC’s reaction to Gemini’s question and SnowBunny’s vote is Town.
--
To quote the Princess Bride – “Get used to disappointment”.Chess wrote:I want a nameclaim
There is no Pro-Town reason for me to claim any more than I already have. Town has all the information they need to avoid mistakes while scum has no extra information.
BTW, I put this up top so you wouldn’t have to complain about reading.
--
Are you seriously telling me that you bought Chess’s ‘Tarp’ as real?Plum wrote:OhwowI'msofamous. I'm going to have to agree with you that, when applied correctly, this sort of buddying can be a concrete scumtell. So it's good he's been offed (???).
--
Of course I do. Please don’t presume that you are much smarter than everyone else in the room because you aren’t.SD wrote:You know what a figuratiive meaning or a metaphor is, Magna, right? It's not the exact literal meaning. Of course this is not Ragnarök. But there will be a great many of dead deities at the end of this.
The “Wrong Pantheon” angle was simply a way to kick off pressure on you. Anyone who sited that (and I will mention one specific person later in this post) as a good reason for a vote is scummy also.
Why my vote is a good vote has everything to do with the Plum-tell which you completely avoided in this initial response. Also you've begun a series of nitpicky attacks (going after Ranger for being 'mysterious', attacking CMAR on what is cleary a typo) as opposed to honestly scum-hunting.
You need to clarify what you are saying here. Who is the scum member being sacrificed and who are the easily impressed Townies?SD wrote:That's really bad WIFOM. Sacraficing a scum member right away to maybe gain some slight influence on some easily impressed townie is hardly an advantageous tactic for scum. Not convincing.
1. What scum-hunting purpose is there in pointing out a funny but otherwise innocuous typos in his post?SD wrote:Did you really just say cumslip O_o?!!?!? Twice!?
Anyway interesting how you come go all the way from "cumslip" via "reaching for" to "townfight"? Seems all over the place.
2. He’s pointed out that his statement makes clear sense and I overall agree. He’s calling “Wrong Pantheon” slip not a slip (it isn’t so he’s correct), says anyone pressing you on that issue is ‘reaching’, and that your interaction with Ranger is a Town on Town (this is the one aspect I don’t like as labelling an argument Town v Town so early is pulling a Zang). It is hardly all over the place.
--
You specifically asked this of LC but I am going to give you some insight. I personally have seen scum on multiple occasions specifically avoid voting any player in RVS. Two examples are IdiotKing in Prison Mafia and Tclaw in Magua’s recently ended Donner Party Part 2 Open game. Neither had an established history of making those kinds of votes. This is why I investigated SnowBunny’s history.Gemini-Katy wrote:Also, one more thing and then I will probably leave you alone - do you have any prior experience that makes you think this is a scum tell?
--
You’ve more or less hit the nail on the head but I want to clarify why I find SD’s statement scummy. Everyone else is exercising some level of scepticism even if they find it is a Pro-Town move. Shadow has none of that in his post – he calls me Confirmed, which is stronger language than logically should have been employed.CMAR wrote:I don't think that the him calling MoI town is necessarily scummy as I happened to do the same thing right up there ^ However I considered the possibility of him being scum, I just say that we need to consider him town so I guess there is a small difference.
--
Why? You are voting Shadow so you think he’s scummy. Chesskid fake-killed said scummy player. I don’t see why the daykill (which was obv-fake BTW) would be problematic in Chess’s hands under this set of circumstances.Quadz wrote:If chess really has a daykill, I might smack the mods.
--
If we decide not to lynch ShadowDancer here is where my vote is immediately moving.Baby wrote:Vote SD
Lets start with the person who raises the wrong mythology.
1. Lack of content in post when there is already plenty to discuss? Check.
2. Horrible bandwagon vote for the absolute wrong reason? Check.
FOS – BabySpice
--
Let’s discuss some, shall we AV?AV wrote:@Chess I can think of another hated god but I'm not sure how far we're getting if we supply MoI with names before he's had a chance to claim it. Why exactly someone's already offered another name, I fail to understand.
I’m not name or full or whatever claiming. The explanation to Chess above is exactly why.
But I want to get into your thought process here. You don’t know why people are supplying me with names? That sounds all nice and Pro-Town on the surface. But looking deeper it’s either bad logic or posturing.
1. We are in a game specifically crafted with Greek Gods and mythological figures as Town.
2. A mass claim would break the game unless the standard counter-measure is used – Mod provided fake claims.
Are you suggesting that scum don’t have Mod provided fake-claims? If you do think they have them and think I was gambitting scum I'd already have a name provided as safe and thus your statement above isn't logical at all."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
All of these (and more I’m sure but I’m too lazy to work on them with this list already made) are reasons why a Mass-name claim would likely be bad.Axelrod wrote:If that trend follows, then there might not be a huge amount of risk in "Name" claiming. And it forces the scum to lie or use up whatever fake claims they have been given, which is something. Potential downside is if (1) there are scum roles that get advantaged by knowing someone's role-name (2) possibility that the bigger names have the best powers and also then become high profile targets (3) if all the scum have prefect safe claims, we've not actually accomplished much.
Andrius in Themed games has a history of providing fake-claims – those of you who didn’t play in LOTR Mafia should know he provided a list of available options and would flesh out PMs as needed. The total fake-claim names exceed the amount of scum roles.Axelrod wrote:If anyone knows the ways these particular mods have handled this issus in the past that might answer the question right there.
Dana has a history of providing fake-claims for each scum player when necessary. See Blackest Night Mafia where each scum member had a Color / Name available to them. In that case the mechanics of the game made those fake-claims rather weak but every scum got a fake-claim.
--
I was wondering if you would go this way. Neither of those arguments holds any water.SD wrote:You want an answer why your so caled "Plum-tell" is invalid.
i. Because it's based on one single incident.
ii. Because I am not Plum.
The tell in itself is very common – buddying. It’s not a “single event” or only something Plum does / is capable of. Just because I dressed it up in fancy clothes because your use matches well with Plum’s doesn’t suddenly make it not buddying.
So no, it isn’t based on a ‘single incident’ and isn’t invalid because you aren’t Plum.
Your argument breaks down then as you were the only player to suggest I was confirmed in the least. And you clearly aren’t following me.SD wrote:Scum member would be you. Easily impressed townie would be any one who's blindly following you due to your supposed confiremd town status.
Ok, so it was pure fluff. Understood.SD wrote:Zero. None. Nada. It's just plain funny.
1. The accusations against you at that stage when CMAR posted were two-fold – firstly that you ‘slipped’ and didn’t realise Greek Gods were Town because you were scum and second that you buddied up. CMAR addresses the buddying angle as Null so he can only be referring to the Pantheon slip.SD wrote: How do you know which supposed "scumslip" he adresses, he doesn't say so specifically.
--
Hey since you don’t want to elaborate on why Axel is suspicious (and Pro-Tip pretty much everything is a small deal this early) why don’t you articulate why you like SD as scum. Because I’d like to see what specifically you like about him as scummy.SnowBunny wrote: Baby is looking plain awful. That sheep vote is as bad as it can get, but I rather like my vote on SD for now.
Oh, and small FoS: Axelrod. I'll elaborate on this later on. It's weak now, more like a small gut feeling. But I want to leave this here noted."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I’ve observed you displaying a behavior that I have seen scum do many times over in the past – specifically buddying up to someone with little reasoning. In this case you didn’t just say “Oh, MoI is likely Town based on his claim”. Nope. You said I was CONFIRMED Town. I capsed and bolded the important word for you. The level of 'read' you are showing is not in any logical proporation to the reasons you give for said read. I haven’t seen anything significant from you since that is having me question that read.SD wrote:So how about this one: Your whle argument is based on the preassumption that I was in deed buddying scum - in case I am not the whole things falls apart to "I don't agree with Shadow -> Shadow is scum." And that should make you reconsider the whole thing twice.
I breaks down because it applies to not a single player in the game. You were using it to attack Ranger in your short-lived vote on him. It's an invalid argument.SD wrote:How does my argu7ment break down there? It leads to the valid deduction that I am not an easily impressed townie right now.
Then why did you bring it up in the first place?SD wrote:I don't see much sense in discussing with you, what Cry meant.
SD – “How do you know what Cry was saying????”
MoI – “For this reason it was the logical conclusion”
SD – “I don’t see the point of discussing it with you!!!”
That’s exactly the sequence we just had. I’ve played with you before at some point SD and don’t remember you being so Pants on Head ….
Do you normally flail under pressure?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
So Shadow has claimed a very prominent role in the game and AGar has role-vouched that he isn’t fake-claiming (barring a Posedien counter-claim from a lurker).
UNVOTE: ShadowDancer
AGar has linked himself to Shadow if Shadow isn’t Town. At this stage I’m don’t think it is worth pressuring either any further.
Axelrod’s 178 smells of fake-Townie posturing. It’s chock full of obvious information (quicklynching isn’t always good …we need to take it slow) that really didn’t need spoken.
Gandalf’s 223 to 224 makes my head hurt. In 223 he continues to push the concept that one of the Big Three are a fake-claim which has been the hallmark of his ‘don’t buy SD’s claim’ commentary. In 224 he says he trusts AGar … who already cleared SD.
Diddin’s reactions post pressure I’m going to have to do some meta-research on. I’m not sold that diddin’s Chesskid vote was anything but stupid-Town reaction but 244 screams “Hey look … I’m scumhunting”.
@Diddin– You found AV as contributing no original content. What made him a better vote than Chronopie or Iecerint who have contributed arguably just as little if not less content than AV?
My vote will be going on either BabySpice, diddin or CMAR pending responses to some of my questions in this post.
--
But you didn’t vote him even though you say he’s making the wagon on him look good? And then a few posts later you choose instead to vote LC for no reason other than Chesskid said so?BabySpice wrote:Got ninja'd four times for that post, and a scumtell is a scumtell reguardless of how many point it out.
Way to go Diddin. Make the sus wagon on you look good. Well done that lad.
Scummy as hell. As is your response 271 where you attempted to justify your bad SD vote based on flavor spec when it has been made clear it can’t possibly be a scum-tell.
--
Eager to offer up something that probably has no significance unbidden? Check.Chrono wrote:And if it would help, my Role PM has a pale pinky colour.
Chess may be on to something here …
--
I love me some Cognitive Dissonance as a solid scum tell. Lay me out where you are seeing it please AGar.AGar wrote:CMAR had a lot of cognitive dissonance in his posting about SD, which was the main backing for my vote,
--
ITT Gemini mistakes Greek Mythology with DragonBallZ or Superman mythology (specifically Doomsday).Gemini wrote:One reason I can think of is because you have a power that makes you revive and become stronger, so perhaps he WANTS to be killed at some point.
Lulz. Yes this is pure fluff.
--
Why do you think this is important at all, especially given the different colors associated with the ‘Town’ pre-game deaths?Plum wrote:What color is your rolename and such in, please?
--
Pointless outguessing the Mod. You need to spend less time worrying about set-up and more time actually looking for scummy play if you are indeed Town.SD wrote:The most prominent gods are more likely in the game and thus not scum fake claims...
SD’s 195 is more pointless speculation. Where you grab 40+ roles I have no idea. This clearly isn’t a normal U-Pick. Very likely that Mods made the set-up and slotted people based on the questionaiire. Further the multiple Cop roles in the mini have little to do with this set-up.
--
Umm, no they couldn’t. Those were their roles, not fake-claims. It would have simply been outguessing the Mod that source flavor = game flavor.diddin wrote:Two of my scummates in KoL Mafia could fakeclaim two of the Ancient Heroes from that game.
--
This makes me itch. I don’t like the very soft implication it is a gambit or done for any reason other than to make Town fully aware of the situation.Dekes wrote:@MoI
Nice way to avoid the natural N1 kill, btw.
@Dekes– please explain how you think the claim (and only the claim) somehow reduces my chance of being NKed.
Conditional relationship noted – if BabySpice ever flips scum Dekes seems like a very smart place to start looking for a partner.Dekes wrote:Baby Spice's vote was definitely the worst attempt at clinging to a forced RVS vote. More input needed.
Unvote; Vote: CMAR
Good wagon. But I want everyone to consider joining a diddin wagon for me. And that latest post wasn't even needed for claiming scum, diddin."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Don't worry Chess. I know your propensity for being worthless vis-a-vi reading actual game content so I'll slot anything directly at you right at the top so you can see it.chesskid3 wrote:Hey magna before all your walls can you indicate if there's anything about me at the top so I know if I do/don't have to read it?
TIA
That way you don't have to let logic get in the way of whatever it is you do."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
@AGar –
I wouldn’t call the Coginitive Dissonance but I see where you are going there. I have similar thoughts on him being scummy for those quotes in light of the working assumption that SD is Town."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
@MOD – I’ll be V/LA from Friday at 4pm EST until Monday morning for Easter weekend and my usual family weekend duties.
Consider me less than impressed with Iec’s catch-up post. I’ve seen him do them before as Town before and they usually consist of more content (reasons why, etc) for his reads and didn’t suffer from having approximately 25% of game relevant text being struck-through.
CMAR’s 294 strikes me as an exercise in uselessness. We understand all that you made the point of highlighting CMAR. The issue I see is the MOTIVATION for soft-defending SD.
--
And look you did it again. Going to get stuck in some Groundhog Day style cycle?Gandalf wrote:Crap, forgot to unvote.
VOTE: Diddin
--
1. Why didn’t you mention said post when describing why you voted AV originally?diddin wrote:^Because I also agree with this, MoI.
However I noticed something about Gemini in ISO. They have 3 FoS's and have expresses suspicion on a few others. They have NEVER voted. Looks like someone doesn't want to be called out for wagoning.
Unvote Vote: Gemini
2. So you agree with Gemini’s posts regarding AV and suddenly noticed that the hydra hadn’t voted yet which they specifically addressed in several posts was going to happen since they are a hydra? And that is vote-worthy?
To put it bluntly … so what? Lack of content is lack of content. How do you know AV wasn’t catching up? Why is only posting in RVS an excuse?diddin wrote:EBWOP: @MOI: At the time I voted AV, all Iece did was post in RVS and Chrono was still catching up.
--
1. Again, with expected Mod provided Fake-claims how do you expect to catch any scum?Plum wrote:Magna - it was potentially a piece of information worth using as a basis for comparison and fleshing things out. I did notice the different colors in the pre-game character deaths and, comparing them with my own color information, thought that a color-claim at this time could potentially help confirm or weaken the claim in the eyes of at least specific player-roles.
2. Isn’t asking for a mass color claim just potentially giving scum a free pass to more effectively hunt for roles they might think are more dangerous?
--
Go and look at the initial vote from Baby please.Quadz wrote:He says he's happy with his vote on Baby Spice, citing her pushing the blame for voting Chronopie instead of LC onto her children.
Chess says at 270 thet “Chronos isn’t leaning Town”.
Baby in post 272 says “Agree. Nothing in what he has posted reads as Town” and votes Chronopie.
Ostensibly the second sentence in 272 means Baby has reviewed Chronopie’s ISO. Yet when you yourself question it she simply says “My mistake” and changes her vote to LC.
That doesn’t read to me as Town who made a mistake and when informed went back to recheck. That reads to me as Baby trying to buddy up to Chess’s reads and blowing it big-time. BabySpice does have a history as scum of buddying, BTW.
VOTE: BabySpice. The exercise of this discussion solidifies my read I formed based on her earlier play.
Pretty easy actually. Voting for someone other than a player allows scum to RVS without fear of identifying a partner or clearing Town. Also it prevents tit-for-tat OMGUS RVS votes which have led to real wagons in the past.Quadz wrote:Explain the scum motivation for shifting the game to a non-game entity to me, cause I think that it's a huge reach.
Certainly not overwhelmingly strong motivations but certainly not non-existent either."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
BabySpice has 7 votes. 11 are needed to lynch. Hardly the time for "CHILLAX EVERYBODY".chesskid3 wrote:BS is near lynch can we chill plz kthx?
Do you object with her being wagonned for reasons other than your personal wagon is being ignored?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Whut? You have no problem with a potential Baby lynch but you doubt she's flip scum??????chesskid3 wrote:I've got no problem with the lynch, though it would be my first choice.
What I have a problem with is it's the loleasy wagon and some of the people who have hopped on make me seriously doubt ole Babah Spice is going to flip scum
And if you see people who you think are scum on the wagon point out who and why."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I disagree with your assessment. I can't see some 'mistyping' LordChoronos into Chronopie when being distracted. Their names are clearly distinct.quadz08 wrote: I think that sentence was referring to LordChronos (as in, she went back and read LC's posts) and then proceeded to accidentally vote for Chronopie. But that's besides the point anyway; I'm not saying that BS isn't scummy. Rather, LC's reasoning for confirming his vote was really poor, and felt forced and scummy.
I think you missed my point here. (For one, "game" should be "blame," which probably doesn't help.) I was pointing out that there's no scum motivation for BS to say "My kids distracted me so I typed the wrong player's name."
I believe that Baby saw Chess's post, pretended to ISO said player, and voted for the wrong one. When called on it she said 'Oops, kids distracted me'. If she had ISOed LordChoronos I have serious doubts she's accidently vote Chronopie.
I do fully admit my views may well be colored by my suspicion. But I still don't think it's the kind of mistake you make when distracted."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Back to the vote you sandwiched between AV and Gemini? It couldn't be possibly because it is the top wagon, am I right?diddin wrote: Just making sure. This caution is a slight scumtell, but I was just curious to see if you were voteless.
BACK TO BSunvote, Vote: Baby Spice
UNVOTE: BabySpice
VOTE: diddin"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Gandalf’s 342makes me face-palm. Gandalf are you seriously this lost in a game without Fate that this is going to be the result?
Quadz’s 344is scummy. With several players who are actively being scummy you suddenly are Ok with what you feel is a Town lynch? Really?
Quadz’s 410is also scummy.
Iecerint’s 382– so you don’t approve of either Top current wagon (Baby or diddin)?. I’ll go back and look at SA3 to see if you actually pushed BabySpice.
Iecerint’s 387is pretty scummy. You are using incomplete meta to vote a player? On the heels of Chesskid’s call? Possible distancing noted if LC is scum (which I don't buy)
--
Then do a better job of explaining why he’s scum. So far you are failing at it. Asking players to justify not pressuring him as scum when BabySpice and diddin are flying around doesn’t cut it.Chesskid wrote:now
movign along to the next order of business
I want LordChronos at L-3 please thanks
--
Hmmm … what does this post lack? That’s right .. any stance that diddin is actually scummy for doing so. This is at best stupid mudslinging fluff. Pending knowledge of diddin’s alignment it also has possibilities of soft distancing.Quadz wrote:"Hi, I'm diddin, and I've been tunneling Chess all game even though he's actually been useful and playing decently."
--
No .. if you don’t think it is strong enough to mention it isn’t anything. Stop wasting our time with this.SnowBunny wrote:No. It is too weak, not worthy enough now, but it is something.
--
The following posts illustrate why I will support an SD wagon if there comes sufficent evidence that we face a non-compatible 3rd Party in the game.
SD at 155 wrote: @Gemini: I won't discuss any bullshit issue any more. Lynch me or lynch me not based on my claim. Your decision.
Pre-Mod correction of the rules he leans so heavily on the fact that his claim confirms him and this reaction are suspect. The reaction to the Mod correction is not in proportion to the "damage" done. He is in no danger of being lynched today. AGar's claim confirms that still despite the Mod correct. Add in his reaction to each little vote lately and I don't have any sort of Town read.SD at 349 wrote:@Charon: And thanks for really seriously invoke the impression that you put this up because my clain would have faultily confirmed. You know, if some wannabe smartasses lynch me now, that's way too close to a mod error.
All that said -He’s certainly not the lynch for today since he CAN’T be Mafia.
@SD– Your play has been craptacular. Stop whining and start scum-hunting if you aren’t some 3rd party role.
--
I see you completely dodged my questions at 305. Here – I’ll requote them for you so you ABSOLUTELY can’t miss them.diddin wrote:Umm considering I got off that top wagon to pressure Gemini, it's not just because it's the top wagon. I still consider BS the scummiest player.
--1. Why didn’t you mention said post (Gemini’s post casting suspicion on AV) when describing why you voted AV originally?
2. So you agree with Gemini’s posts regarding AV and suddenly noticed that the hydra hadn’t voted yet which they specifically addressed in several posts was going to happen since they are a hydra? And that is vote-worthy?
To put it bluntly … so what? Lack of content is lack of content. How do you know AV wasn’t catching up? Why is only posting in RVS an excuse?
Yeah I see this explanation all the time, more often regarding Millers. It doesn’t hold water. Dayplay > Role. If the Mafia feels a player is a big enough threat to them that they can’t get easily lynched they will NK them. Role or not. I only have to go the Night before MYLO / LYLO. I do a good enough job of hanging / pressuring scum and that deadline gets further and further back.Dekes wrote:Because no scum in their right mind will waste a kill on somebody that has to be killed by the town sooner or later.
Once again – if BabySpice is scum kill Dekes with fire. I don’t recall seeing any mention of how SD’s wagon went ‘too fast’ (which is HORRIBAD reasoning, BTW).Dekes wrote:About the Baby Spice wagon. Basically what chess said. The wagon flew right past diddin's wagon which makes me even more confident in diddin-scum. Luckily people seem to be coming to their senses.
Why ask obv-questions? She’s been scummy as hell –Dekes wrote:Why is the BS-wagon still that big?
1. Jump on to SD for the scummy reason – the whole “Other Mythos” crap that was just used as a RVS springboard and was in NO WAY an alignment tell.
2. Calling a player (diddin) scummy but not voting them and then jumping (incorrectly) on another bandwagon because someone asked them to do so.
--
I quoted the whole thing to demonstrate I didn’t use the word impposible anywhere.BabySpice wrote:
What makes it impossible MoI? Would that be Agar's comment on the topic well after my vote?MoI wrote:But you didn’t vote him even though you say he’s making the wagon on him look good? And then a few posts later you choose instead to vote LC for no reason other than Chesskid said so?
Scummy as hell. As is your response 271 where you attempted to justify your bad SD vote based on flavor spec when it has been made clear it can’t possibly be a scum-tell.
Dodge dodge dodge BabySpice. You don’t directly address the issues.
1. You called diddin scum (since he was making his wagon look good aka valid) and didn’t bother to vote for him. Yet you were more than willing to hop (incorrectly) onto a wagon based on a single Chess post.
Why in the hell would you bother replacing LC with anything when posting to this game? LC is a clear indicated of one player – Lord Chronos. A Vote: LC post is much more unambiguous than what you did, supposedly by accident.BabySpice wrote:But they can make you confuse Chronus with Chronopie when you go to check spelling LC.
--
At best this sort of speculation MIGHT be usefull much later in the game when he have more data to use. Day 1 it is pointless mechanic speculation that doesn’t benefit Town.Plum wrote:1. It's possible various color-groups will be able to determine whether a given color claim is plausible or not. This depends on how color information varies in the Role PMs. It's possible it will do little to help in any given instance, but when someone is run up and pressed to claim I see no general downside to color-claiming as well, even if the information payoff is less likely."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Then let’s discuss your read on SD. First the facts –Gandalf wrote:No, fate actually fucks up my reads. I do MUCH better without him, and this is something I actually have empirical evidence of.
1. SD has claimed Poseiden – Town JK effectively.
2. AGar has claimed role-based info that confirms Poseiden is actually in the game.
3. Mod has confirmed that Greek Gods CANNOT be Mafia, but may be some nebulous 3rd party role.
So unless AGar was willing to lie to get his Mafia partner off (which I doubt very highly he would do so early Day 1) SD can’t be Mafia. Either that or AGar would have to be completely stupid Town to lie about that. AGar isn't stupid.
That leaves the only non-Town realistic possibility about SD is 3rd Party.
1. Claiming Jailkeep makes little sense as a Serial Killer from a Power standpoint. Firstly it doesn’t USUALLY match the powers available to the role. I’m not ruling out 100% that a Serial Killer couldn’t have a role-blocking secondary power.
2. Claiming Jailkeep puts SD directly in the line of sight of the Mafia team as Serial Killer. Even with expected NK protection that isn’t a good spot. All it takes is the first caught scum who know SD is Bulletproof to state so in thread.
In summary I’m saying that even if your gut on SD is right and he is the Serial Killer he isn’t getting lynched today for the above reasons. Pick another scummy player to press and come back to SD when evidence suggests we have a Serial Killer floating around.
--
The push element goes to credibility of your statements, IMO. As to your impression – is using a single game of Meta the backbone of your reasoning? What do you think about the elements of her play I laid out briefly in 474?Iec wrote:I didn't push her, really, but I thought she was scum back then. I think my replace-in posts will reflect it IIRC. The relevant part is that there is a difference in my impression (i.e. whether I pushed my scum reads as a town player in the past seems pretty irrelevant to me, at least).
So CK floats into the thread and says “Iecerint is scum, we need to put him at L-3” and it makes sense to just vote that way because you don’t like the two leading wagons? I don’t think so.Iec wrote:I didn't like any of the existing wagons, so CK's pressure request looked good to me. The meta information was just a bonus.
Why is LC scum? Haven’t seen anything significant from anyone on the issue and I have a gut Town read so far based on his SnowBunny thoughts and Gemini interaction."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I've bolded why I'm not going to listen to you for an extended period of time. You've not bothered to explain why SD being 3rd Party ASSURES he is a Serial Killer. Come back when you can make a reasonable attempt at communication.gandalf5166 wrote:@MoI:I don't care what logic says. I'm looking at SD's actions, and they don't make sense from the perspective of a town role. They're EXACTLY what I would expect from third party. Also, in a vanillaless game, fakeclaiming JK has little risk. I AM SAYING: TOMORROW, IF WE DO NOT LYNCH SD, AN EXTRA TOWNIE DIES"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I’m having a hard time getting an Iec read. His posts are stuffed full of laziness and not scum-hunting, as evidenced by his 498 as of late. It certainly doesn’t scream the Iec as Town I’ve come to expect. I’m going to have to look over my Iec as scum experiences to see what I can take from that.
Aside from BabySpice and diddin I’m at this juncture willing to vote Dekes. Mothrax, or Quadz if a wagon of any size can be formed. Do not have a Town read on them at all.
Chronopie’s choice to push diddin (lead wagon) over BabySpice at 518 when both are scummy establishes possible linkages.
--
I’d like a sample of games where following logic has lost you the game.Gandalf wrote:And my point is that I'm tired of losing games because people are figuring out shit logically instead of following their gut.
--
SD wrote:Uuhh... All those walls. I have a headache. Maybe later...Go die in a fire …
Reading isn’t a hardship. Your play this game is so increadibly Anti-Town (which is only bad if you aren’t scum) it boggles my mind.
AGar’s pass o’ freedom only extends so far. Continue to play this way and I’ll throw logic out the window and get you lynched.
--
So we’ve come full circle to my original question. You’ve just stated that you didn’t see Gemini’s post until after you voted AV. So we are back to the reason you voted AV to begin with – lack of content. What characterized AV’s lack of content as scum driven compared to Chronopie or other lurkers?diddin wrote:1. I only saw it on a second skim, but agreed with it.
Caution isn’t a scum-tell. Stop pretending it is.diddin wrote:2. I saw it. I just don't and didn't like all the extreme caution coming from the hydra. I also dislike how they voted in the post replying to my suspicion for not voting. Thy crumbled under my pressure.
Do you still think AV was scummy based on Gemini’s point (which you agreed with) if you now have a scum read on Gemini?
How did they ‘crumble’ to your ‘pressure’? Please provide examples.
--
This reaction which occurs approximately 10 minutes after Chess calls for his prod is suspect.Mothrax wrote:Hey chesskid, can you provide real content instead of worrying about prods? I would be more likely to agree with your reads if you provided some backing for them. You aren't Fate.
The soft acknowledgement in the bolded that he was lurking is scummy. Chess isn’t wrong for calling him on it … chess is wrong because ‘it isn’t his job’ and he’s not providing content.Mothrax wrote:A1: not madhe called me out on lurking, good on him, however, it ain't his job to keep up w/ prods. If he had been providing content, I would give less than a rat's ass.
--
Let’s examine this statement. BS is saying that in a Large Game she will buddy to survive.BabySpice wrote: I'll buddy regardless in a large. It's a way to survive D1. (See Locke's wrestling mafia if you doubt me)
1. Not a Pro-Town thought process to be more worried about survival than scum-hunting.
2. Who would you buddy as Town? Scum to prevent a NK? Can you demonstrate a history of being killed early that would justify that sort of play as Town?
3. You also buddy as scum in Larges. See Stars Aligned 3. Null self-meta defenses are useless, IMO.
Deflect deflect deflect. You’ve failed to answer the central question – why would you spell check away LC when it is a clear indicator of Lord Chronos?BabySpice wrote:MoI #474. argueing semantics and synonoms instead of reasonings. Bad MoI.
I also find it interesting that you have the phrase “Spelling is an optional extra” in your sig when you are claiming to be spell-checking your posts ….
You also haven’t been able to justify why you didn’t vote diddin after calling him scum.
UNVOTE: Diddin
VOTE: BabySpice
I think my vote was better placed where it was originally.
--
AGar wrote:I suddenly feel very uneasy about diddin and BS lynches.
Fantastic. Who is scum? Having a hard time seeing any significant suspicions from your ISO.AGar wrote:I'm also of the opinion that Gandalf is probably just really, really stupid town in this case.
--
1. Yup. Bad players can’t possibly be scum. Noted.Dekes wrote:I think first and foremost, BS is a bad player. Confusing the two Chrono's is entirely possible. But she said she doesn't want to get diddin lynched. What scum wouldn't want the counterwagon get lynched, especially if so many things are speaking for diddin-scum?
2. Since you miss the obvious possibility they are partners I’ll just stuff this into my further pile of BabySpice defense from you and ignore the WIFOM here.
And sure as hell in a 20 player game with all sorts of powers there is no possibility that scum might have a protective role, right? Right? Thought so.Dekes wrote:We have 20 players all equipped with two kinds of powers. I highly doubt that there isn't some form of vig in there. Like others suggested let the vig deal with BS and we focus on lynching scummier people."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
LOTR Mafia was not lost due to 'logic'. Fate's play was anything but logical. LOTR was lost by the combination of incomplete information and ego.gandalf5166 wrote:@MoI: LOTR Mafia. Advance Wars Mafia that recently ended(although technically we won/drew by accident).
Any other examples?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Lulz. All I can say is lulz.Gandalf wrote:Uh, yes it is. Logic only produces accurate output if it has accurate input. Gut instinct is based purely on yourself, and you know your motives are pure. So yes, I do think that logic in a non-open setup is useless.
--
I don’t have a meta read on you Baby. I don’t know why you keep saying I do. Showing that your self-pronouncements about meta are invalid isn't a meta read. I have a scum-read because you are paying very scummy.BabySpice wrote:MoI, nice mis rep, again.
Correcting your faulty meta read of me is not a null meta defense. It's showing your lies.
again you deflect and actually you yourself don't answer the question.
What question am I dodging again? The one about SD’s Norse Mythos comment not possibly being a scum-tell? It’s clearly not possibly as slip for the following reasons, which I’ve made clear before.
1. In this game the Greek Gods are MOD confirmed Town. Mods have repeatedly confirmed that other Mythos Gods are scum. Mod are going to ‘guaranteed’ have safe-claims for scum. Otherwise a Day 1 mass claim breaks the game. Both Mods have documented history of providing full safe-claims. So there is NO WAY that the scum could possibly not understand that any other Gods are Town. Thus SD's comment about Ragn. just a Null-tell.
Now once again I’m going to ask you all the questions you’ve dodged / deflected in one spot.Not answering is a direct scum claim from you.
1. Why did you spell check LC into Chronopie when LC is a nicely clear indicator of the player in question in the first place.
2. Why did you suspect LC? Specific reasons are required.
3. Why didn’t you vote diddin at ISO 2 when you said he was “making the sus wagon on you look good” and you had no active vote?
--
I gave you one quite clearly in the post you are responding to … they are partners together. Now you are out-of-hand dismissing a possibility. Of course they are scummy for independent reasons. That doesn’t mean they can’t be partners. Your reaction is why I suspect you.Dekes wrote:1. Even by the highest stretch of imagination I didn't say or imply that. I know too well that bad players can be scum. I learned that the hard way. You can't give me a solid reason why scum-BS would object the diddin-wagon, when it's clear that no matter what one flips it doesn't exonerate the other. They're scummy for independent reasons. So you brush it off as WIFOM.
1. You say BabySpice is a bad player.
2. You say they are scummy for independent reasons.
3. You are trying to argue that BabySpice can’t be scum because he’s just a bad player and he has no reason to not push diddin’s wagon. Clearly he has a reason if they are partners. Or, for that matter, if he wants someone to be able to say “Look, he isn’t jumping on the alternate wagon, he must be Town”. That you are willing to just dismiss her scummy play I find suspect.
Yes, so the you are advocating the Vig out themselves if they shoot BS and fail in a power-role rich game where any number of possibilities exists for why the shot failed. That’s bad reasoning.Dekes wrote:Since no town role will protect BS, if at some point a vig claims a failed killing attempt on BS, she goes down, easy as that. Why wouldn't scum use the opportunity to bus the hell out of scum-BS and her atrocious game now?
What makes you assume that none of the votes on BS aren’t from scum?
And what do you make of the large levels of resistance to a BabySpice wagon as compared to the ease with which ShadowDancer was brought to L-1?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Here's a question - WHO IS SCUM?Shadow Dancer wrote:Meh. It all feels so much like lynch the usual VIs... D0s...
All you've done is play badly, get run up, and then coast on AGar's clear of you.
If you think the candidates up for lynch are Town why aren't you doing ANYTHING to find scum and lynch them instead?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
No that’s not happening. At all. DoGandalf wrote:The fact that he can only be scum if he's the SK doesn't mean he's not scum. What you guys are doing is essentially AtP.know what an Appeal to Probability is? An Appeal to Probability is saying “The odds that the Town Cop scanned a Miller Day 1 and a Godfather Day 2 are so slim it couldn’t have happened!!!” (taken directly from a game situation.?YOU
You are shouting “SD’s reaction means he is a Serial Killer”.
Everyone is effectively saying “No, it means he may be a 3rd party role”
Do you have anything that indicates that a Serial Killer must be in the set-up other than your gut?
If the answer is No then don’t bother banging that drum again. No-one is really going to care until there is more to go on."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
593 is fence-sitting on an epic scale.
"I don't think BabySpice is Town or Scum. I suppose you could lynch her if you want. Here's a mostly bogus list of reasons why I'm backing off my earlier position""I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Not sure about that. My understanding is present thinking runs along the following lines – early game SK hunting as opposed to Mafia hunting is more likely to come from Mafia than Town. Something about not wanting to be worried about a wild-card killing your team off.AGar wrote:Isn't there some ridiculous tell where early signs of SK hunting probably lead to an SK?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
PREVIEW EDIT- Interesting.
My vote is staying with BabySpice.
1. Dribbles out as little as possible about her role and only provides more when prodded.
2. Hider that doesn’t die hiding behind scum? Where have I seen that before? Oh that’s right – NoPoint scum in Blackest Night Mafia.
--
Chesskid’s reaction chain to Baby is very suspect –
612 – BS is obvtown for including color details after Plum made a huge deal about it with SD’s claim.
622 – PR claims are useless in non-Vanilla games.
655 – Suddenly Hider is a easily verifiable role.
--
If it is Mod given (almost certainly it is) and the game is non-Vanilla (it is), then there is a limited amount of role-types to go around. Would you except the Mod to provide fake-claims that directly conflict with Town PRs?ooba wrote:- If it's a mod given fakeclaim, then since they gave multicolored role name bit, I don't see why they would shaft a good fakeclaim by giving a role that doesn't fit
- If it is something scum came up with, I'd expect that the team which came up with the multicolor bit could do much better than hider
Scum don’t have Daytalk. Any talk of “scum team would come up with better” goes out the window unless you are arguing that they spent every second of Pre-game making additional fake-claims when all Mods assuredly provided them.
--
That’s very poor thinking in context of Plum making an issue of it with SD’s claim.Quadz wrote:Yeah, but I don't think she would have thought to bother telling us about the color.
--
Unless you can provide direct quotes to prove the first part that’s a complete lie.Baby wrote:But since MoI seems to be keen to retroactively change what his beef was about, and incapable of reading threads ...
Nice use of insulting rhetoric Baby. Yes, I’m incapable of reading
I notice you didn’t bother to answer the direct questions to you. Dodge dodge dodge.
Post numbers to back this up. Pronto.Baby wrote:With something like two or three pages preceeding refering to LC as Chronos, it is an easy mistake to make. Especially as at least one other has admitted to making it.
I'd also suggest it that Chess's post you sheeped blindly couldn't have been hard to understand given that Quadz immediately corrected you on your 'misvote'
Yes, I am playing differently than SA3 where I was effectively a Serial Killer. Thanks for noticing.Baby wrote:What should be mentioned/investigated is the difference in MoI from that game to this one. In SA3 he was town.
Yeah, any chance I had of buying this claim went out the door with this post. Dying behind scum is one of the distinct hallmarks of a Hider. Otherwise Mods just provide players with Commuter or Bulletproof roles. My guess now is that BabySpice is a Bulletproof scum of some sort.BabySpice wrote:Dont die if hide behind scum.
--
Then my impression of the level of your Town play was in error. Also, self-meta is useless. We’ve had this discussion before.Iec wrote:1. I am a town fencesitter. You could prove this with science if you wanted to.
Yes, there is clear backing off.Iec wrote:2. There is no backing off in that post. I am sticking to my earlier opinion that the BS's are different.
Original statement – Baby I don’t see as scum because she isn’t as scummy as she was in SAIII.
593 statement – I can’t say I get a Town read from her but I still get a different vibe than in SAIII.
In the original you were saying she was Town based on meta. Now you’ve shifted to say that your ‘vibe’ is different but you can’t read her as Town.
Bolded the scum claim. Town wanting to let 'clever scum' live just because they are clever? I don't think so.Iec wrote:I think BS looks pretty good unless the fakeclaims in this game come in the form of "full" PM fakeclaims. That, or BS is a clever enough scum thatI'd be willing to let her live a few days on principle.
Also the assumption that the Mods didn’t provide fake-claims is hilarious. We’ve already discussed how both Andy and Dana have a history of providing fully formed fake-claims.
--
So you find it only remotely possible when the last Large Theme game you played in was Clash of Kings where the Mods did just that.Axelrod wrote:She doesn't strike me as the type to come up with that multi-colored claim on her own, and it's hard to imagine the Mods providing a complere fake role PM complete with colors (though I suppose it's still remotely possible)"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
1. Andrius and Dana have a proven history of providing full fake-claims. You don't address this at all.Axelrod wrote:Did they? Differen't mods, and this was close to a year ago, but I seem to recall that the Mods said in that game they would provide the scum with a fake claim upon request - which is not the same thing as providing a fully formatted role PM (complete with colors, and presuambly a picture) for the player to reference as their "fake" claim.
2. Even if they chose to provide it 'on request' why would you assume that the entire scum team didn't immediately request one? I know we did in Clash the second we got our role Pms. And those provided fake-claims had full formatting, flavor text, and everything else that Town role Pms had.
Your argument was the full-fake claim Pms is a rarity. I'm providing you with just one example. I can provide others of Mods here on site providing full-fake-claims for Mafia in Large Theme games."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
This has already been discussed in thread. The quote from the rules -ooba wrote:
How are you so certain about this?Magna wrote:Scum don’t have Daytalk.
I suppose you can make the argument that it doesn't explicitly say they can't talk during the day phase. But given the phrasing that seems likely to be hair splitting.II) All groups with Quicktopics (QTs) will be able to converse during the NP."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
In LOTR Mafia (Mini Version) Andrius provided me with a full-fake claim including flavor text.Axelrod wrote:It's one thing to give someone a fake "name" claim. Another thing to give someone a fake "ability" claim, and yet another thing to give someone a fully formatted fake role PM.
In Blackest Night Mafia Dana provided me with a full-fake claim including flavor text, power description, fake win condition and Role name colors consistent with other Blue Lanterns.
You are the one assuming that Mods are not giving out full-fledged role Pms. I’m simply trying to explain why I don’t see that as a logical and valid assumption.Axelrod wrote:That was a different game with different Mods. Are you saying that I, having been in Clash of Kings, should be assuming that all mods do what those mods did?
Yes, I have no trouble at all believing that.Axelrod wrote:Are you saying, bottom line, that you have no trouble at all believing that the Mods would give out a fake role PM to the scum with "Goddess of Rainbows" and even put it in multi-colors.
Why the colors? To make the claim even more believable? Did they anticipate that people would be talking about the "color" of their role PMs? This does not strike you as far fetched at all?
Why the colors? Because if they went to the trouble to do it for Town role Pms (and all evidence including the pre-game flips and my own PM indicate they did) then not doing it for scum fake-claims is open to mass-breaking the game. Why go to the effort of spending all that time designing the game and making detailed Town role-Pms to just make the game easily broken.
And furthermore – even if the scum don’t have full fake-pms – please answer me this:
Do you think someone with a fake role-name of Iris- Goddess of Rainbows would not include a tidbit in their claim about color after Plum SPECIFICALLY asked ShadowDancer the question when he claimed earlier in the Day? Further do you believe that a color claim of Rainbow isn't the obvious way to go?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Because the traditional Hider very much limits who a fake-claiming Hider can 'target'. When a regular Hider targets someone and doesn't die they clear that person as 100% Town.Axelrod wrote:This may be a bit WIFOMish, but why would BS, as scum, claim a non-traditional version of a role like Hider? If she were scum, she doesn't ever have to explain why she didn't die when she hid behind X (scum). Because she'd just never claim to have hidden behind a scum in the first place. She knows who the others are. It's not like she's going to get caught in a mistake there. What does she benefit?
A fake-claiming scum is in a dilemma - do they 'fake' clear their partners? If they chose to do so and via Vig or other method said partner flips scum they immediately are lynched as a liar. If they don't clear their partners then they have to only target Town players.
Additionally if there are 3rd Party roles about a fake-claiming scum using a traditional Hider has even more complications to mull over.
Removing the "Die if I hide behind scum" clause simplifies that matter. BabySpice as scum would be free to craft their target without worry if they later flip scum.
Yes, there is Tons of inherent WIFOM there.
And outguessing the Mod. I can only say that I have never seen a Hider that didn't die when hiding behind scum on site. The only time I've ever seen that claim came from scum NoPointinActingUp in Blackest Night Mafia."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Fully formated does not equal great. That's a bad argument. Again ... in crafting fake-claims the Mods in a Non-Vanilla game have limited sets of roles to choose from. So each fake-claim may be crafted to avoid having too many Town versus Scum duplicate powers also.Axelrod wrote:Also, this does seem to go against the idea that the Mods are giving out these great false claims, doesn't it? Or do you think she's using the false name but NOT whatever false ability claim they gave her to go with the name? That doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
@MOD – I’ll be V/LA for regular family duties from 4PM EST today until Monday morning.
--
Iec wrote:I've been a town hider who doesn't die if he hides behind scum.
Link to the MS game where this happened. I’d very much like to see what kind of game it was.
If it happened elsewhere don’t bother as that’s not useful in the least.
--
SnowBunny wrote:God, no. Well, Dekes have good vibes, but AV is another story. I meant I saw your town list and I'm disappointed. But don't worry, those scumradars stop working once in a while. It's normal. That's why you should use that coupon to fix it. For once, you have diddin in the town list. That can't be good. :-/ And you have me in the scum list. Pfft, that's even worst.
This post combined with your lack of scum-hunting (Pro-Tip – yelling ‘diddin is scum’ isn’t scum-hutning) makes me want to lynch you on principal. Be glad there are tons of scummy players out there today.
--
ooba wrote:The two people who you think are scum are both voting each other when there are (probably) better-easier mislynches around .. How can down for a lynch on either one?
This strongly makes me question my Town read on you ooba. Because it makes no sense.
With BabySpice and diddin as strong wagons already established there is little chance AV or Iec are going to be lynched today. That's reality. So now is the perfect time to do a little safe distancing with cross-votes such as those if they are indeed scum. Throwing out the possibility of having them be partners isn't logical.
--
Dekes wrote:a) A person can claim a result on Baby without claiming his role. "BS is scum, trust me!" doesn't tell scum if it's a track/watch/cop/block/failed vig/whatever result.
Ok, so softly claiming your role that can effectively find scum certainly wouldn’t get you killed also …
Dekes wrote:b) In an all-PR game, scum's NK preference will be getting rid of dangeorus players over PR-hunting.
Disagree on some level. Scum will be looking out for Powerful Roles (Cop, Vig, etc) while also looking to take out players they perceive as dangerous. With a PR heavy game there are going to be a large number of more or less useless Town powers.
--
@AGar- Do you believe Baby is confirmed by the messenger ability?
--
ShadowDancer wrote:Baby, can you confirm yourself via your special power?
How exactly does having a Messenger ability confirm Baby as Town again?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Shadow Dancer wrote:
It makes Iris most likelky not a fake claim. And Iris is definitely dreek and can hardly be considered anti-town/SK/3rd party. thus she must be town.
And thus there is no possibility that the Mods gave scum a Messenger role and appropriately gave them Iris as a fake-claim?
I give up ..."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
ATTENTION ALL PLAYERS – Given the mechanics of Today’s lynch any players form this point forward (until such a time as we have both lynches properly decided) should know it is considered a scum claim.
Lynch1 – AV
I’m currently leaning towards following Chess’s Choronopie push for Lynch 2. I also could be convinced that Quadz might be a good choice.
--
AV wrote:SUPER - "Strategic Assault"
A one-shot kill which cannot be prevented, but fails against Greek Gods.
Ok AV– here is you one chance to have any possibility of surviving the day.
Publicly state your target and then use your Super on them. Supers can be used at any time. You MUST state who you target beforehand.
Unless your shot ‘works’ and you kill a Non-Greek God you are taking the rope.
No Pressure.
--
I’m going to venture the assumption based on diddin’s flip and SnowBunny’s push on him that he was the reason SnowBunny died.
--
Chrono wrote:@Charon: How would a tie for 2nd be resolved?
I’m going to not be charitable and assume you are asking this on the off chance the scum needs to push a second wagon on Town over scum.
Chrono wrote:And did anyone get a pm related to the word "Grace"? Or perhaps that they had been Granted something for today?
Just to be clear – you are claiming to have given out something related to the name ‘Grace’ last night?
--
AGM wrote:I also vote that we use our secondary lynch on mothrax.
trim the fat.
Nope. We used our policy lynch yesterday on BabySpice.
AGM wrote:Your ability gives you a false result. Andrius decided it would be LULZY to name me Jesus because of the backstory in those two games.
Yeah, the second sentence there is all sorts of crap. Andy isn’t going to mess with something on the fly just to be lulzy."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Axel wrote:Is there a reason for SD to not say who he "jailed" last Night?
This would at least presumably be someone who didn't do any killing.
This man makes sense. And there are other possibilities I’d like to mull over also.
@SD– Your N1 Jailkeep target. Go!
Axelrod wrote:I could possibly get behind this. The person she shoots should not be the person who is #2 to Lynch though, as it defeats the point of an ability that "clears" the person it fails on if we then lynch that person along with AV.
Eh I’d rather not draw it out. I want AV firing off the cuff for several reasons. I don’t want a solid #2 consensus formed before he fires for several reasons."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
AGM wrote:Anywho, we're both getting to the same conclusion, so NO HATIN.
Also...why weren't you a N1 kill? Suspicious.
Because I’m the Black Lantern Bulletproof recruiter, duh, Oops, wrong Dana-Mod game.
I find the irony of the those two sentences coming back to back funny as all get out.
--
Mothrax wrote:Lynch two not so much.I agree that chrono is a good candidate, but am not sold on it.
I’ve bolded the fence-sitting for everyone to see. The direct conflict between the first and second clauses there is scumtastic.
--
ooba wrote:This game gets a whole lot interesting ..
SD you go any flavor on your JK?
1. He explained the flavor previously. Pay attention.
2. Why did it get more interesting? Elaborate please.
ooba wrote:Ideally the best plan to resolve the 1 vs 1 on Iece and AV is to have
- AV shoot Iece. Since Iece claims to be a greek god, it should fail. Otherwise, Iece scum should die.
However, the only way to differentiate between AV using super and it failing and AV not having an ability is if there is a in-thread flavor confirmation of the flavor of somebody shooting.
Directing the scum-Vig theoretical shot robs us of AV actively choosing himself. Bad thought proves.
--
Iec wrote:A regular redirect doesn't make sense because they'd have to randomly guess that I was investigative, and then redirect me. It's much more likely that they used a busdrive to protect AV.
Goodposting …."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
All the ‘Insert Power X means I’m confirmed Town’ talk needs to stop. There are no such thing as Powers that 100% confirm someone as Town by their use.
Chronopie and Gandalf seem very likely to be Town based on how the Powers work but do not get “ignore play even if it is terribly scummy and refuse to look at near MYLO / LYLO” cards.
--
Based on Chronopie’s answers regarding ‘Grace’ and the doublevote I’m putting my Lynch2 vote down on
Lynch2 – quadz
Although based on play so far I would support AGM as my second choice.
--
Chesskid wrote:common sense would indicate dekes is RB immune
Really … that’s the most obvious conclusion? What does being RB immune say about Dekes’ alignment?
Chesskid wrote:Also no I am not a fucking retard but thanks for playing w/ regards to blocking a Jailkeeper
Elaborate … GO!!!
Chesskid wrote:NEVER SEEN iT AS TOWN ROLE
Then you need to expand your game experience. Ythan in Weeds Mafia was a Town JOAT with a 1-shot Executioner ability.
--
AGM wrote:Are we ACTUALLY discussing this "JESUS" result as being legitimate?
The game is called the BATTLE. FOR. OLYMPUS.
NOT BATTLE OF RANDOMASS RELIGIOUS FIGURES.
OLYMPUS.
JESUS ISN'T IN THE FUCKING GAME
You clearly aren’t this stupid. I know better. Not liking this at all.
--
Gandalf wrote:LOLOLOLOLOL WHO WAS RIGHT
Ok … I’d like you to point to the kill that comes from Poseidon.
--
mothrax wrote:@MoI:when I say things like that it generally means I have seen others points but need to reread for myself.
Then the Pro-Town play would be to not clutter the thread with fluffy statements that have no meaning and just reread and actually come to a conclusion.
--
ooba wrote:Claims and counter claims are always interesting ..
Only when it involves Roles and not use of powers. Because there are several explanations as to why SD can be telling the truth about his target and Dekes still took his ‘action’
ooba wrote:Are you trying to be to Iece what Agar was to you? To reiterate, Iece is one of my strongest town reads. However, if AV is town, he should shoot Iece:
You are approaching this from a AV is Town scenario. Likelyhood of that is slim given what we have witnessed (Iec’s claim and AV’s response). So forcing AV to choose a “suspect” gives us potential relational information.
ooba wrote:Iece - I'm townas always- not sure what you're seeing ..
Oh really? Bolded – been hitting the Weed too hard ooba?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
–Unofficial Lynch 1 / Lynch 2 Counts
If you didn’t bold yours I might well have missed them …
Lynch 1–
AV – ooba, ShadowDancer, MoI, LordChornos, AGar
Lynch 2–
Quadz – ooba, MoI
Chronopie – chesskid
Gandalf – ShadowDancer
AGM – AGar
@PLAYERS – Everyone needs to get a Lynch 2 vote down.If you are Town and not participating you are doing it wrong. Once we get a concensus on the second lynch we can actually vote off AV-scum and our second candidate.
--
Chesskid wrote:really? really? What's the probability 3 consecutive players on the playerlist are all scum. fuck i'll be generous, 7 scum. PIck any scum. 6/10*5/19 lowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww you lose
Anyone who spends any more time on this crap needs a slap.
This is a pure Appeal to Probability – “the odds that randomly generated roles would slot three scum next to each other is so low it couldn’t have happened”. Pure fallacy.
It’s a stupid argument and Chess looks to be flailing around looking for any tidbit he thinks he can find to implicate ooba."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Dekes wrote:Does anyone want to come forward and claim that he or she might be responsible for SD's jailkeep not working on me last night? If not, SD is a liar and needs-a-lynchin'.
So you think that SD is an absolute liar if he is Town and scum doesn’t come forward to claim blocking him? I'd like to see you explictly state you don't think that is a possibility.
Dekes wrote:Whoever said, "Jesus is a God". Wtf? I mean, Iece claimed beforehand that his results may not be accurate. And then he gets a result of a non-God? I see no reason whatsoever to see AGM as scum based on Iece's claim alone.
1. If you want to get into a Divinity discussion with someone as to whether Jesus, part of the Holy Trinity, counts as a God please do so. Outright dismissing the possibility is rather short sighted.
2. AGM’s play is terribly bad because he’s focusing purely on the aspect that “Jesus as foreign God” can’t possible exist because this is the ‘Battle for Olympus’ as opposed to scum-hunting."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Shadow Dancer wrote:
How about you explaining first and finally why you are so sure your normal worked? Or sis it because your scum kill went through?
Pressing this issue isn't Good SD. I'd drop that angle. Both Town and Scum players have every reason not to narrow down the reason why they know their power 'worked'.
If you want to get after Dekes I suggest you dig into his ISO."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Shadow Dancer wrote:He only needs to claim that it's been confirmed by mod PM or that the effect is obvious or whatever, I am not asking him to claim his power.
MS standard is for only certain kind of powers to be Mod confirmed as successful. We have no reason to assume Charon isn't following those norms. The rules don't indicate anything to the contrary.
Continuing to press the issue is not Pro-Town. Stop it."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
@Gandalf- if you can replicate 1057 in a readable form that would be great!
--
Dekes wrote:Yet the main focus on AGM seems to be due to the cop result which was confirmed to not be sanity confirmed. Terribly bad = scummy. See Baby Spice.
You are purposely avoiding the subject. My focus has nothing to do with the actual Cop result, which Iec has already said was not sanity confirmed.
My focus has been on AGM’s reaction. He’s spending far too much focus trying to discredit the possibility of the result even existing in the game. His argument that “It can’t be in this game, this is Battle for Olympus’ is so stupid that I can’t believe he’s honestly making it.
Also … AGM =/ BabySpice. Trying to excuse AGM’s play by giving Baby as an example is bad. Those two are not in the same ballpark involving skill level and any attempt to say otherwise is driven by ulterior motives.
Dekes wrote:Plus, I actually see bits of scumhunting in AGM's ISO
ISO Numbers stat.
--
AGar wrote:MoI - do you have any other reasoning behind that (I'm guessing you do?) other than Chrono's "grace" thing?
My reasons have nothing to do with Chronopie. At all. Sorry if the way it was presented gave that impression.
My thoughts on Quadz–
I’m operating on a gut basis partially. I just can't reconcile what I am seeing here with Town Quadz at a gut level. I just don’t see serious scum-hunting and opinions flowing form his slot. Look at his ISO for himself.
Lots of short, jovial posting. Lots of open ended questions that don’t amount to anything.
AV Relationship –
At ISO 13 he places a vote on AV (his biggest scum-read) and does nothing with it. No hounding of AV as scum. No directed questioning and explanation of scum motivations. It just sits there until he finds reasons to move it elsewhere. Given Iec’s result it reads as distancing. And then we have this –
ISO 50 wrote:AV's catchup post was decent, though not spectacular. I'm reading null on him now. (NEEDS MOAR POSTING)
Nice way to back of his suspicion while keeping the door open to return.
ISO 61 wrote:See, this is tough. Iecerint is scummy as hell, but AV's misrep on Iece is scummy as all hell too.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Iece
FoS Partner, Vote other.
Finally, he was increadibly eager to jump back on AV today. Before AV could claim. Doesn’t read as logical given his suspicion Day 1 of Iec as scummy as hell.
Also,
Happily joined in on the BabySpice wagon for policy reasons as opposed to actively thinking he was scummy. Hell, Quadz made a point of defending Baby during the whole Chrono / LC fiasco.
--
SD wrote:Dekes already claimed that much, though. Do you really think a little bit of further elaboration would bring scum any significant WIFOM bonus over alleged Dekes town?
I think continually harping on it only can benefit scum. So yes, I do. There is NO PRO-TOWN REASON FOR IT. STOP."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I didn’t read the Chesskid – Gandalf exchange on page 44 and part of 45. It was obviously stupid after 2 posts.
AV’s “oh, catch me up” post is officially notice he’s going to do nothing. He is lynch number 1 … no doubt at this stage.
--
AGM wrote:I have no idea what is going on in this giant shithole.
Classic AGM scum. Keep your head low when a modicum of suspicion is on you and avoid commenting if possible.
Lynch2 - AGM
--
Chess wrote:today's lottery nuimbers
9 26 13 34 43
more or less believable than
1 2 3 4 5
No, its not. You clearly know nothing about statistics. Fact – given five numbers randomly selected from 1 to 45 in order with no replacement the pattern of
9 26 13 34 43 happening in that order is EXACTLY EQUALLY AS LIKELY as 1 2 3 4 5 in that order. In fact the odds of any five number set happening in a specific order is exactly the same.
You are falling victim to a flaw in human psychology – the need to assign meaning to patterns when none necessarily exists.
If you want to argue that Andrius didn’t randomly select the roles / alignments and hand-crafted the list then you can argue that. But there is no evidence that happened so your probability arguments are simply fallacies.
--
AGar wrote:Why are we still sitting here?
Because we don’t need to rush the Day. This isn’t a game with a time sensitive mechanic. I’ll be doing a Lynch 2 count again later on.
What do you think about my Quadz thoughts? Given you aren’t advocating him as lynch 2 I am curious why. Since you were very interested in them I’d like feedback please.
--
Gandalf wrote:And as for my role looking like it should be for scum, you're right. If not for the fact that I have extensive knowledge of Greek mythology and knew that my character was town, I probably would have assumed I was scum with an OP superpower.
Actually I didn’t make that point. In fact I thought your Super is certainly possible as Town. I simply am not going to give you a game-long free pass simply based on your Powers. That’s how Towns throw away games.
@Gandalf– I’m suspect of your answer to Shadow Dancer given you offered power use. Why didn’t you redirect ShadowDancer to Iec given you suspected SD of being a Serial Killer and Iec of being scum? Your choice of redirecting Iec to Ranger / AGM makes little sense."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Unofficial Lynch 2 Count –
Because AV is obv Lynch 1 today …
Lynch 2 –
Quadz (2)– ooba, Dekes
LordChronos (1) - Chesskid
AGM (1) – MoI
Dekes (2)– AGar, ShadowDancer
Chesskid (1) - Gandalf
Not voting (8) – Iecerint, Chronopie, Gemini, AGM, Axelrod, Quadz, Mothrax, LordChronos
We really don’t care since it is likely WIFOM bait (1) – AV
--
– Now I’m confused. I didn’t realize your had moved your Lynch2 vote to Dekes. Why are you asking why AGM isn’t dead when you aren’t even voting him Lynch2?
@AGar"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
AurorusVox wrote:MoI - check my activity. I've not been online since my claim kthx so this is hardly a "lurker" tactic. Has anyone ever seen me intentionally lurk, ever? No? Thanks.
As for why I'm asking someone to catch me up, ten pages is too much to read properly in the little time I'm able to get, espcially when I have other games and (shock horror) other things I need to use the internet for (paying bills, booking trains, etc.)
Do y'all want me to declare who I will use my power on before I use it?
1. Yes if you are going to 'use' your super specifically say who you are using it on before hand.
2. If you don't have time for the game stop signing up for large games. 10 pages in the time you were gone is hardly unexpected or out of the ordinary."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
AurorusVox wrote:I was meant to have internet on the 26th April. They inexplicably pushed it back to 6th May. When I signed up, as far as I knew, I was getting consistent access.
You know that this post lacks?
Your target for your 'Super'.
And instead of spending time explaining why you haven't been reading why aren't you using that precious time to read instead? You can more or less ignore pages 44 to 46 whenever Gandalf or Chesskid post."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
AurorusVox wrote:Are you not even putting my votes into your VC?
No, you are confirmed scum. Go sit in the corner till we decide who else to hang with you.
@ALL PLAYERS -"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
EBWOP -
@ALL PLAYERS - PLEASE IGNORE EVERYTHING AV SAYS FROM THIS POINT ON. HE'S FULLY CLAIMED SCUM AND INTERACTING WITH HIM CAN ONLY RESULT IN HIM SPINNING WIFOM."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
ATTENTION ALL PLAYERS NOT AV–
NOW THAT WE HAVE CONFIRMED AV IS SCUM THE FOLLOWING WILL BE THE VOTING PROCEDURE ONCE WE DECIDE ON LYNCH 2. ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THIS WILL BE CONSIDERED CLAIMING SCUM. TOWN HAS NO REASON TO NOT FOLLOW THIS PLAN, EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT THRILLED WITH THE SECOND LYNCH.
Once we have a second lynch that is viable (and getting someone to 7 or 8 Lynch2 votes should meet this criteria) we will be voting in the following manner –
Players will alternate voting between AV and Lynch2 candidate. This is absolutely critical to prevent scum from rushing a second lynch that Town does not agree to by quickhammering AV. Remember - the threashold is low today so it doesn’t take much for scum to pull this off and claim “Oops, I thought we wanted AV killed”
Yes I know the likelihood that scum would out themselves in mass but I am taking ZERO chances with the lowered threshold for voting
Yes, if you do not agree with voting for the Lynch2 candidate simply waiting until someone else has voted for them and then voting AV is your prescribed course of action.
Voting in this manner assures that AV and Lynch2 candidate both rise at equal rates and when one reaches Lynch the other is assured to be the second choice.
--
MOD – I’ll be V/LA after 3pm EST today for my normal weekend family duties.
--
Gemini wrote:Boy am I on pins and needles to discover if Ooba dies.
This makes little sense to me. Clearly by not outright attacking Iec AV had claimed the Iec Cop action was accurate and thus he was scum.
Scum will not have a Super Vig that only kills Non-Greeks ….
--
Gandalf wrote:I can't answer this question, as once again, it involves someone else's role.
Bzzzt, wrong answer. I’m directly asking you why you didn’t use YOUR role which you have claimed in a manner consistent with YOUR claimed views Day 1.
I’m going to give you one more chance to answer – you would be good to take it.
Why didn’t you redirect SD, who you spent ALL DAY ranting was a Serial Killer, to Iec who you have explained you targeted because you had a scum read on him?
--
Axel wrote:I apologize for my laziness, but can someone paraphrase the case on Quadz?
I just made my thoughts on Quadz known at ISO 52, Read there if you want a summary of why I think he is scummy."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Updated Lynch2 Tally–
Lynch 2 –
Quadz (4)– ooba, Dekes, Gemini, MoI
LordChronos (1) - Chesskid
Dekes (2)– AGar, ShadowDancer
Chesskid (1) - Gandalf
Not voting (7) – Iecerint, Chronopie, AGM, Axelrod, Quadz, Mothrax, LordChronos
We really don’t care since it is likely WIFOM bait (1) – AV
--
I’ve officially moved my Lynch2 back to Quadz at this point. AGM seems to be not viable at this stage.
@Anyone not AV not voting Lynch2 – You need to do so in your next post We don’t benefit as Town from stretching the day out with scum AV willing to spam the thread with stupid posts."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...