Animal Rescue: petsPick (Game Over!)
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I think VP over reacted to Quilford's town read of me. KK kinda latched on there as well but not as strongly. That wagon was pretty bad.
Jason's xvart vote was terrible but his posting after that feels more townish to me, so we'll see where that goes.
Vi's pressure on Lew is good, Xvart's deflection back to Quilford is not.
Vote: Xvart
Not quite ready to place Lew at L-1 at this point.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 83, VP Baltar wrote:You're really that gullible, Sotty? since when?
lol You can stop this right now.
Well when I read what he said about my vote I thought it was pretty weak and silly really. If anything I think it was his way of agreeing with my gut vibes on Jason's first post. What I don't see is how quickly you build the bridge from silly to scummy. Quliford wasn't trying to say I'm confirmed town or anything, and it's not like it's a read that's locked in. From what I have seen of Quliford he does this kinda thing, it's a null tell. But you were all over it like it was a massive thing. I don't see it. I think you blew it up.
Jason, I feel you over justified a throw away random vote, just twinged my gut which is why I voted you. I like to figure you out ASAP so I know if we can team up to destroy the world or not.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Buddying how? Quilscum/metown?
In post 88, VP Baltar wrote:Only scum are gonna have town reads at that point in the game because they know who the town is.
This isn't strictly true. The reads just won't be very strong.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 96, Ghostlin wrote:In post 92, VP Baltar wrote:Well, I'm operating under the premise that whoever has Roxie can vote in secret since no one has fessed up to having that pet. If it's a public vote, then clearly what I said is moot. If no one comes forward to claim Roxie, then I think it's worth being cautious around.
I feel funny about this post. It reads like passive aggressive rolefishing to me. I'm not ok with someone going 'I have Roxie and my pet can vote', particularly since if Roxie is in the votecount, we should be able to see where Roxie's vote is.
So you are happy there is a potential unclaimed vote out there? You realize it doesn't matter that we can see this vote if we don't know who is using it and why.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
It was page one of the game. What more could"Sotty reads town Vote: The same person she is voting"mean other than Quilford also agreed with my initial gut scum read of Jason?
Expecting him to have a whole slew of reasons for an early game read outside this one thing, is pretty freaking mind blowing to me at this point.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 116, xvart wrote:So your vote on Jason here was not RVS but a "gut scum read"? I know gut reads are by definition hard to explain, but I have a hard time swallowing that you had a gut scum read on anyone based on one purely RVS post.
Yup I had a gut scum read off one post. Gulp it down.
In post 116, xvart wrote:Again, I don't really care about Quilford's vote. It is the lack of explanation when the explanation was supposedly so simple, plus the fact that anyone could have any sort of read on Jason based on his first post. Trying to explain that post as having any affiliation to alignment is ridiculous, and in this context, scummy.
So... I'm scummy for finding Jason's first post in this game scummy? Your logic is getting really poor here. Every single post has a bearing on a players alignment. Also why didn't you pick on this apparently scummy move from me when I first mentioned it?
Amrun's post is ugh, I'm not seeing xvart town or glowball town for that matter. She seems very skittish which is giving me some light scum reads.
In post 139, Llamarble wrote:The point was to look town.
More specifically to be transparent about my reactions to THE UNIVERSE.
inb4towniesdon'tneedtobeworriedaboutlookingtown
Why are you still voting Reck Llama?
Also Vi is always one looking for a prompt lynch Lew, it's not scummy to me. Do you have any other scum reads? You seem to be whining a lot instead of actually scum hunting.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I have less issue with Lew's claim than I do with his actual behavior. He keeps saying the case on him is built on nothing and yet his vote on Vi seems completely out of spite rather than anything else. I don't know why Lew was asking for another dog claim when we had one early in the day, one he singled out and talked directly down to.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 200, Llamarble wrote:If we outlaw guns, then only criminals will have vigs.
Or something.
Basically if we say NEVAR LYNCH A VIG D1 vig instantly becomes the best D1 claim for scum because making D1 scumlynch impossible slants gameodds SIGNIFICANTLY in scum's favor.
And then there's the whole 'he changed his claim' thing.
I haven't actually read yet though. So I'll be doing that soon.
Yo Amrun. How about we lynch Llama instead of Jason?
In post 208, Llamarble wrote:Lewarcher also has done surprisingly minimal scumhunting for somebody under so much pressure and interacting significantly with the game.
Sometimes being under attack kind of freezes up scumhunting and engages defense-mode, I guess.
Please direct me to the scum hunting you have done in this thread. All I have seen is you set up spec'ing and promising to read. The game isn't even that long and you seem to be up to date.
In post 211, Llamarble wrote:In post 206, xRECKONERx wrote:lewarcher as some kind of "dog that hates cats SK" is starting to look more and more plausible. Get rid of all the cats in the game and achieve third party wincon.
Hehe, D1 SK speculation is such an awesome scumtell.
May actually be warranted here though since that's kinda a good point.
What kind of setup with an SK could make sense? 1 v 4 v 11? Sounds painful for town but I suppose this is likely a PR-loaded game.
Are you kidding me with this?
Vote: Llama
Delayed reads are delayed, doesn't make me feel any better about your start in this game.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 279, Kublai Khan wrote:
I'm still not understanding why you want to give him a night of mafia-talking.
1) He posted something suspicious and got called on it.
2) He flustered under questioning and tried to mountanize something minor as a desperate distraction.
3) Made a false claim.
4) OMGUSed his main accuser as scum (and no one else)
5) Changed his claim.
6) Changed flavor of claim to match details that didn't make sense.
7) Avoided answering direct questions about his claim that didn't make sense.
8) Heavily pushing a "just let me live one night" plan when his role clearly isn't helpful enough to warrant that plan even if his claim wasn't crap to begin with.
How are you *that* blind to his scumminess?
This is probably the most compelling case on why we should lynch Lew, his behavior leading up to and after the claim is just terrible. Making excuses to keep him alive "just in case" seem poor when Lew himself isn't willing to actually do anything to help the town.
Yes, this is an intent to hammer.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 361, Amrun wrote:SOTTY HELP
I think we need to hear from Lew. I understand where you are coming from because that was my initial reaction to the quote about killing cats. The more I read the more I could see it as a slip from Lew where he forgot the flavor and made a quick post without checking. I don't think it is overly damming as some people do though.
Still you are over defending him a bit here, even if I think you are coming from a good place. I really want to see what Lew has to say about it all and I feel like you are giving him ammo.
And I'm not losing my scum vibes from Llama at all.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 427, VP Baltar wrote:lol, dis game.
Jason, you are the only person on glowball while there is three of us on Llama. If you would lynch any of your top three why are you being useless?-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 464, Untrod Tripod wrote:Where was that criticism yesterday? Oh, you had to wait until after the flip for it to become a bad thing. Spare me this opportunistic bs.
I re-read some pieces. I had little no idea who you thought was scum, still don't.
Fill me in?-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 472, Untrod Tripod wrote:
Your response is a non sequitar. You didn't call me on role speculation while we were talking about it, you waited until after the flip. That's opportunistic. It seems like you only thought it was an issue when he flipped town.In post 467, Sotty7 wrote:In post 464, Untrod Tripod wrote:Where was that criticism yesterday? Oh, you had to wait until after the flip for it to become a bad thing. Spare me this opportunistic bs.
I re-read some pieces. I had little no idea who you thought was scum, still don't.
Fill me in?
No.
I called everyone on role/set up spec while it went down if you remember. After the flip I tried to figure out what info it gave me with how people were reacting, I looked at your ISO and saw that you only started pushing on Lew after his claim and then seemed overly focused on the claim itself. I find that scummy.
So I'll ask you again. Who is scum?-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Llama is already so much better today. I like his VP pressure a lot.
Unvote
In post 502, glowball wrote:Exactly, JasonT you are looking for reasons to add to both of us being scum. It's confirmation bias.
Talk me thought what you mean when you say "confirmation bias".
In post 505, jasonT1981 wrote:thats how you look for scum, you make connections between people.
When you've had a scum flip sure. You're missing a step here.
Vi and Quil are town. Amrun as well. This is good.
Not sure who I like for scum the most right now. I need to do more re-reading.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 431, Ghostlin wrote:Jason, Amrun, and CES are all very content to let a scummy player with a Vig claim, no matter how limited; do whatever he wants tonight. Noted. It's quite likely one of these players is scum.
What happened to this Ghostlin?
I was actually feeling iffy on Jason, but further reading has him leaning town for me, just townWRONG. The only real twitch I got was him listing a 3rd party in the big catch up post of 426. I would like him to look into Ghostlin and explain the gut scum read though.
In post 524, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:The main downside to claiming Census Taker results is probably having to claim Census Taker, so yeah.
Sotty wrote:Not sure who I like for scum the most right now.
VP
Alright. Who else?
Vote: VP
The way he started this game gave me scum vibes. His whole interaction with Quilford over a early town read feels really fake. I also don't like how he belittles the points Llama brought up against him. He took a similar shot at me early day one by calling me gullible.
UT's first reaction to me mentioning his name today felt really town. But then he continued to dodge posting reads. I really don't like that.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 557, glowball wrote:hahahahahaha, I avoided a Sotty question as well, good to know you're paying attention >_>
You...answered my question. Or are you telling me you fed me a line of crap?
In post 562, Ghostlin wrote:I still think it's the case, and Quilford's census results back this up; scum would be looking for the third party (particularly if they think it's an SK) and would be happy for the easy town cred. I'm leaning towards Jason due to his glowball clusterbomb where he tries to declare her scum with another player.
Okay but I don't get your point. Weren't you the one talking about LewSK yesterday? How would the scum have known there was an SK on day one? If we are to believe Quilford's result, which I do, a four man scum team seems reasonable in a 16 player game give or take powers.
In post 562, Ghostlin wrote:If I was to choose another? CES. Depending on how you read it, the fake governor didn't really do anything for Town last night, it changed no one's mind, and would be wonderful real estate to prove how townie he was today. In fact, and I'll doublecheck the thread, I call him out for the gambit and he's not answered. He's been mute most of day two.
Okay, so why are you voting for Llama, a player who wasn't on this list of “there is scum here”?-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 601, Llamarble wrote:Overall VP is poking at logic-holy-things instead of at scummy-things.
This pretty much sums up my feelings on VP.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 609, VP Baltar wrote:In post 608, Sotty7 wrote:In post 601, Llamarble wrote:Overall VP is poking at logic-holy-things instead of at scummy-things.
This pretty much sums up my feelings on VP.
You said this about me in DDD's game too where I was legitimately scumhunting (and successfully I might add). I think it's a pretty bunk accusation.
umm, you were scum in that game.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
VP I don't care how many scum you caught, the fact is you were scum which means you were playing differently to when you are town. Trying to discount my point because you caught some scum doesn't work. It still fitsyourscum meta which was my point.
I don't think it is a bad case, but it's not a super strong one. Magic mafia and Pie mark two (maybe the later of SA III, but not as much) are all examples of VPscum latching onto things that aren't scummy and NOTEVERLETTINGGO. It's like you need to find something to attack so it looks like you are doing something. As scum you tend to blow things out of proportion, like you did here with Quilford's early town read of me.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 633, Ghostlin wrote:Sotty, let me answer your question with a question: what do you believe is the most likely third party role in this game, plus or minus powers?
I think I have answered this already, a serial killer. Just because that's the most common/coolest 3rd party role.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 659, Kublai Khan wrote:Debonair Danny DiPietro's case on Untrod Tripod is insane. Though I do agree with glowball in that I can sorta wrap my head around the concept, but to make a case like that this early in the game is ludicrous. Plus his vague hintings at potential "other reasons" means that he's not seriously looking to lynch Untrod Tripod, he's just looking busy for the cameras.
The thing is, Triple D hasn'tmadea UT case. He was just commenting on me finding him scummy and then people kept poking at his reasoning. Case suggests he's trying to lynch UT which isn't actually happening.
I'm slightly tempted by a possible Ghostlin vote, I haven't liked much of what he has done today. But I think an xvart one would be better.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 430, jasonT1981 wrote:In post 428, VP Baltar wrote:Jason - I don't know what your actual position on lewarcher is since you vacillate throughout that post. Is he town or scum?
I don't get why you think Ghostlin is scum either, can I get the sparknotes version of that?
Neither on instinct, I believe him to be 3rd party but not worth the lynch. We can cut a head of scum and weaken them, rather than lynch a role that can end up killing itself in the night.
Jason, why did you think Lew was 3rd party over mafia?
Also can you elaborate on your Ghostlin read? I'm interested.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Xvart, I see what you are driving it RE: Llama/Glow/Jason, but what do you think about Amrun and VP's heated back and forth earlier today? At the time neither of them were voting for the other just like Jason and Glow. Is the difference just that you have scum reads on one set of players and not on the others?
Jason needs to get in here and do something. This lurking is making me uneasy and I have a few outstanding questions to him.
Ghostlin, I still don't really know why you are voting for Llama over one of Amrun/Jason/CES who you said very likely contained one scum. I asked you this before but you danced around the question. I would think Lew's town flip would have made this even stronger for you.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 742, jasonT1981 wrote:Alright, I guess my 3rd party views on Lew where more because of suggestion from others saying we should lynch etc right away 3rd party. It got me thinking he was 3rd party or at least I did believe he was in anti-town role, just not scum.I agree he had things to answer, and can understand the push for his lynch however Ghost pushing lets lynch 3rd party now! was off.
Show your working.
Ghostlin, what's your case on Llama? Bullets points will be fine.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 752, xvart wrote:
Honestly I haven't thought too much about it but I would say I picked up on what I did because of my D1 suspect pool and I think it was a little more obvious from what I recall because jason explicitly said "these two dudes are scum" and voted one and started arguing with the other. I don't recall either VP or Amrun saying at the start of their exchange that the other was scum but I could be wrong.In post 741, Sotty7 wrote:Xvart, I see what you are driving it RE: Llama/Glow/Jason, but what do you think about Amrun and VP's heated back and forth earlier today? At the time neither of them were voting for the other just like Jason and Glow. Is the difference just that you have scum reads on one set of players and not on the others?
Well the whole point of the Amrun/VP exchange was that Amrun agreed with Llama and stated VP was scummy.
I think you are tunneling super hard here in that you are finding any reason you can to call Jason and Glow scum together. Jason didn't vote one and then hunt down the other, he voted Llama, further pushed him on replies and it wasn't until Glow showed up with this unhelpful post did the argument start.
To be blunt, I don't get your point at all and I don't see how it is different from what happened between Amrun and VP. It feels like fake scum hunting, picking and preening "facts" that best help your already formed premise.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Post 753 reasons Ghostlin's Llama vote well enough for me. Although I don't agree that everything he has listed is scummy, (number two for example) but there are other people I would much rather we lynch instead of Ghost. (VP/Llama/Xvart/Glow)
I'm struggling a little because a lot of my scum reads suspect each other. I don't know if that is some kind of major ploy or if I'm just in the wrong ball park or what. It's making me generally uneasy.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 767, xvart wrote:And furthermore, I find it especially interesting that you are going to all this effort to undermine my scum read of jason when two posts later you even say that you would rather lynch jason over ghostlin. Are you jason's buddy, too? Does jason have a sweet scum PR that you want to save? It seems to fit with the pattern of you jumping in on D1 when I was talking about jason being scum then.
Again, you are missing the point. I have no issue with you finding Jason or Glow scummy the way you are trying to build a case is extremely poor. A pattern for you this game, one that doesn't fit with townXvart. Yes, I saw what you were driving at but it wasn't until I took a closer look at the whole Jason/Llama/Glow exchange did I realize how badly you were misrepping what went down. It doesn't matter that I have varying scum reads on all three of those players, a shit case is a shit case and makes me really want to lynch you.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 772, Vi wrote:I actually would not be averse to trading a Ghostlin wagon for a Llamarble or glowball wagon.
No chance of an Xvart wagon?
If not, I'd join you on a Llama wagon.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
We need to make this game a double lyncher just to get though all these people that need the noose.
I'm not protecting Jason as evidence my questioning of him and willingness to lynch him. Xvart is just interested in getting him lynch any which way as demonstrated by his ridiculous case. I'm interested in finding scum. That's the huge difference between us here.
Vi isn't scum. It's that simple.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 882, saulres wrote:And boy was that a flashback when Sotty and VPB were going at each other on D1) and I was hoping for a chance to replace in.
I hope it wasn't as bad as Magician mafia
Welcome saulres, glad to have you aboard. Now we can actually get some content out of a mostly content-less slot.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 928, VP Baltar wrote:Last time I was paying attention to this game, I was under the impression you thought he was p. town overall. How willing are you to lynch him?
Because I said as much. It boils down to him lurking it makes me very uneasy. I feel like he is coasting.
In post 928, VP Baltar wrote:Wait...so now you're bashing xvart for trying to get him lynched?
Nope, that's not why I'm bashing Xvart.
In post 928, VP Baltar wrote:you're either okay with lynching Jason or you're not. I don't know how relevant xvart's reasoning, good or bad, should be to your willingness to move in that direction necessarily.
So just because I have a scum read on someone that means I have to agree with any and all cases made up against this person? Err no, I don't think so VP. Xvart's case on Jason is absolute tosh are you going to disagree?
This puts Xvart at a higher lynch propriety than Jason. Now with Xvart proclaiming I am Jason's partner I feel like he's laying in the ground work for setting me up down the road. Shame it won't shake out for him that way.-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota