alexhans wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Alex Hans
Serious vote. Serious wagon required.
BM
I'm sensing bullshit coming my way... The fact that you left mastin's waggon to the one who is "defending him" is noted.
Again, you consistently assume he is town. If you're a cop, you should claim now, and save us some time.
Alex wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:
Nah, i disagree. Jammer can be Jammer. SpyreX can be Spyrex. Kairyuu can be Kairyuu. Hasdgfas can be Has. Cephrir can be Cephrir. You can be Lynchbait.
It is a way to organize things so it's easier to make searchs afterwards. Has is not a good short form, at all. Hasd is better in that case but hascow is just 2 letters longer and that joke is NOT funny because you seem intent in pulling it off.
Lol, it wouldnt be funny if i didnt actually want you dead. And if im not willing to put my money where my mouth is, i wont be a great asset to the town now, will i?
Hasdgfas is fine for a short form. Alot of the players here i dont even know. You asking everyone to abbreviate their names, is immensely unhelpful.
Lynchbait wrote:
BM wrote:
The flaw you have is, that any motive you give to a scumkill is automatically WIFOM. Thus, no conclusion you can draw from the kills can make a strong case.
*sigh*
You all seem to be ignoring my words... argumenting about a kill is NOT definite to finding scum. But it can provide a base from where to start. Why is people so unconfortable around this idea? WHy are YOU so against it? Because it signaled you as posible player?
Yep, i've never made any attempt to deny that it seems scummier from my perspective, because i know that the conclusion of such a policy will NOT result in a scum lynch. So of course there is an element of OMGUS. But anyone can see that it is logically flawed, and you yourself must realise that with people like you tailing Mastin like a lost little puppy dog, the rest of us are BOUND to be edgy about craplogic actually leading somewhere.
Also, argumenting isnt a word. Bet you wish i'd ignored that.
Alex wrote:
I'm usually told that setup-speculation is bad, but here we are, wondering how many scum there is and no one has said anything there was anything wrong about it.
Because it's totally and utterly, IRRELEVANT. Commenting on the number of scum we might have on Day 1, is the most pointless exercise i can imagine. Maybe look at it lately, and by all means, err on the side of caution, but your attempts to bully everyone into believing there are 4 scum, when there is no way in hell you could know that as town, have not gone unnoticed by me. What annoys me is, i cant even see a logical reason to make that argument as scum, unless you are just deliberately out to mislead at every turn, or you wanna get your chips in quick, so you can later cry "I told ya so!"
Alex wrote:
What's the HUDE deal with nk speculation then? Also, Note that I said that futher NK would not be useful because they will be probably covered with WIFOM but I think the n0 kill allows a reason...
I dunno how much clearer i can be. You're wrong. Please stop wasting everybody's time.
Alex wrote:
Did scum knew that the RVS was gonna be avoided like that? if not... why would they think of wifom?
What is the obsession with the RVS about? It's like you portray it as something bad, when in reality, it serves us just fine. Granted, this conversation has induced discussion, but if it wasnt for Mastin, you wouldnt be in this position right now. Maybe you should think again as to whether his plan was quite so good.
Personally speaking, i only left the RVS with my vote for you. I expect the vast majority are still there, because you dont have anywhere near enough votes.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
It's really wierd how you are desperate to push the 4 scum theory, but it is in the interests of the town anyway to promote cautiousness.
Ok... this kind of posts always scream scummy to me. This is called SOFT-PUSHING or SOFT-IMPLYING or whatever. You agree with me in the quid of the matter but still call me "weird" for it. Weird is used when you want others to think... oh...
if it's weird it must be scummy...
Uncool tactic.
Pure, unadulterated OMGUS. It's probably the one nice comment i made about you. If you wanna have a strop about it, knock yourself out.
Ask any other player here if they find your consistent protests about the number of scum wierd, and every single one (probably even your buddies, if they have any sense) will agree with me.
You're just squirming now. lol
Squirmy Scumbag wrote:
BM wrote:
What's with all the rhetorical questions??
I know SF has a strong personality. I'm just testing the waters. What's wrong with them, anyway? are you just adding fluff to an otherwise lame case?
I'm pointing out that you arent really acting in a protown manner. Rhetorical questions are a classic method of persuasion-you arent trying to find scum, you are trying to make someone look scummier than they actually are. You do it again here. You're trying to come across as an aggressive townie, but it's pretty apparent that it is just a front.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Alex Hans wrote:
VP Baltar wrote:
The kill would be most likely to come from someone who knows hascow. Furthermore, I believe that a senior player on the scum team would have more sway and would help direct the kill toward someone like hascow, as opposed to someone a newer person might be more inclined to kill based on overall site rep alone.
I agree with this.
Convenient? Whats your relationship with Hasdgfas?
I'd appreciate if you read what I said a long time ago before asking that SAME question.
Alexhans FIRST post wrote:I've played with Hascow before and he was not a very active scum player... at least in that game. Maybe it was because the town had 80 % of lynchable material (Empking, Zwets, Dejkha, Wall-e and Hewitt). Anyway... If I had to kill... knowing there were no protections whatsoever... I would've killed... sensfan? Mastin?
someone random that I don't know?
Probably I wouldn't have had a voice in a scumteam....
Lmfao.
Confirm Vote: Alex
You cant seriously try and tell me that you believe this Mastin bullcrap is consistent with your own confession-that you might have killed someone random who you dont know? xD
Alex wrote:
2) I say that I would probably have no voice on a scumteam so that means that there's no kill that could rule me out or make me townier because it wouldnt probably be my choice.
Aww, arent you CUTE!
So modest. *pinches cheek*
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Trying to appear pro-town, whilst not actually saying anything.
BM... you're really starting to annoy me and you're really starting to look like trying to fake a case instead of actually scumhunting.
Admittedly, sometimes i do that. I get fixated on someone, and go a little overboard. But, i'm feelin pretty happy with my vote atm.
Alex wrote:
I said the whole healthy thing to avoid a Sensfan flame up for nothing. We are not going to lynch him, you or whoever just for a nk theory.
Haha, dont kid yourself bro. YOU aren't going to lynch ME, full stop.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Possibly the least intelligent thing i have ever read. ^
Why coach Zach? And who is Steph?
^ Possibly the less useless comment I've ever heard.
Please have the courtesy of quoting the entire backlog of conversation. I have a life outside of the game, and making me go back and read extra every time i come on, is not very friendly.
Ftr, i do apologise if i offended you on a personal level. I just get really annoyed when people say stuff that is clearly wrong. When i disagree with you, just back down, and we'll get on fine. *hugs*
Alex wrote:
If you had meta-ed me... you would find that I usually try to coach everyone into playing in a way wich I think is the optimal way... I may be mistaken but it's what I think is good. A player can take it or leave it.
Got a link for me here?
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
In any case, my vote was not without reason. Mastin came right out of the gate pushing an argument that was not only completely illogical, but was also likely to lead to the lynch of AT LEAST 1, and possibly 3 or 4, townies. What do you expect me to do?
Ok. I didnt take it that seriously but I guess it's somewhat valid to vote for him. But... would you lynch him for it?
If i intended to lynch him for it, you'd think i'd still be voting for him now, no?
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Active and great player, as he may be, it doesnt mean he is town
I know
BM wrote:, or worth keeping around.
I wouldn't be so sure about that as I've explained before.
I guess if your argument is that he will be readable later in the game, then yes, there is merit to keeping him around. But that isnt what you said. By that token, you should be voting for VP Baltar. I seem to recall you saying that he was unreadable.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:Nor does it make people who are suspicious of him, automatically scummy.
No, BUT, I think one may always sense if a vote is forced or not. Benmage's vote, for example, sounded forced to me.
Benmage seems ok to me.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
The only way you can claim that Mastin destroyed the RVS, is if you assume that he is scum, and/or the wagon on him is legitimate. You don't seem to believe this, thus you cannot claim that we have left the RVS.
what??? I don't follow your logic that the only way in wich RVS was destroyed is if mastin is scum... Could you rephrase it in a way a 5 year old could understand?
Ok. In terms of votes, what Mastin achieved, instead of a random selection of reasonless votes, was a wagon on himself. Now, if you dont think that wagon was legit, then effectively, we are no better off than we would have been with the random stage. If you believe Mastin has destroyed the RVS, then you are, by definition, acknowledging that the wagon on Mastin is valuable, and most probably, that he is scum.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:How many times have you played with Mastin? I've gotta admit, he strikes me as the kinda guy who probably attracts more attention than he deserves, not the other way around. Why then, should it be wierd that he would get that attention here. In a game of this size, a 3rd vote is nothing, yet you appear to have shat a brick.
Is it because Mastin is your scumchum, or more likely, because he is town, who you feel can be manipulated?
woah... Loaded questions... (Bolded for emphasis)
"Are you scum because of A or are you scum because of B?"
Brain explodes...
Ugh, awkward. I actually giggled out loud when i read this. *facepalm*
Alex wrote:
1) I know it's wifom but thinking I would defend a scumpartner on D1 with such a great enthusiasm is underestimating me. Greatly.
2) While this is not totally unthinkable. I know that defending a player doens't help to go unnoticed and you may get heat for it (like YOUR F%&% senseless Vote!). I've learned that scum is safer being mild on the first stages of the game and then attacking with "great" and "bombastic" cases faking conviction. Also, I DONT think Mastin is so easyly influenciable. And why would I feel the need to manipulate him when he is throwing flowers in my direction before I do?
1. I know. If it makes you feel better, ive concluded that this probably isnt the case.
2. Maybe you dont want to manipulate him. Maybe you just really want to keep him alive. Who doesnt love flowers?
Alex wrote:
btw, BM, when did you stop beating your wife?
When she got a restraining order. How the f*** did you know about that?!?!?
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:Thats funny, because you did the exact same thing with Mastin, and myself. The only difference is, it appears you were being serious
Oh... so you were joking?
that explains your sudden change to an Alexhans vote...
It wasnt a complete joke. But it wasnt a vote i was intending to keep for long without any more developments.
BM wrote:
Can you please explain the bit in bold?
"If you dont Help Dont criticize"
there's a way to critic constructively that has an intended goal. There's another that only creates violence. We should avoid the latter. This is a game after all and I don't want to get worked up like I did before. Flaming me to get reactions is not a valid recourse. I will just ignore you and I advise anyone else to do the same. Let's play, inspect, scumhunt, retort and all that jazz... but keep up the positiviness so we can make it an enjoyable experience.[/quote]
*nods*
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Damnit bro. Could you BE any more transparent? I'm intrigued to hear what Mastin makes of this. You quite clearly KNOW that Mastin is town, because you wouldnt defend your buddy like this. What i dont understand is the passion behind it. Are you and Mastin a couple irl?
So... what I get from this is...
1) You've JUST STATED Mastin is town by saying I KNOW mastin is town.
2) You think I'm scum buddying up to mastin (fail, you're more plain than I am for thinking that a defense means someone is scum).
1. Its an assumption im making, based on the premise that you are scum.
2. You admitted above that defending someone looks scummy. Ive been nailed for it in the past, so if you're town, you have my sympathy. But, your buddying is based on nothing, and is completely illogical. You've basically decided he is town off the bat, and then used that claim to lead your suspicions.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:
Maybe if you quit whinging and listen to the points against Mastin with an open mind, you might fare better in the game.
I don't understand you... You accuse me of buddying a TOWN mastin but then you coach me to open my mind?
If you're town, you should see what i see. Or thats how i view things anyway.
Will reply to the rest later, when i have more time.
BM