Mini 774: Case Closed Mafia (One Truth Prevails!)
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
b]Unvote[/b] my random vote.
25– millar FOS's me for “applying tactics in RVS.”I don't see the merit in this FOS. I wasn't applying tactics, I was just random voting him because he's helping his scum play by never voting in the RVS
33– millar explains that trying to make a game serious ASAP is scummy because townies shouldn't feel akward around the RVS.He misunderstood my vote as being serious and not a random vote. But his explanation seems contradictory. How is not participating/voting in the RVS not feeling akward in the RVS?
34,35- strangercoug and firestarter sees contradiction in millar's FOS and places votes.
36- Korlash disagrees and says millar can't be trying tostartserious discussion if I already started it and claim “Johnny”? Was twisting words.Could you comment on the fact that millar called me suspicious for applying tactics, which he saw as me being nervous in RVS/starting discussion to get out, and the whole not voting in RVS
38- Korlash explains his last post. Said my vote was me starting discussion and thus when Millar FOS'd me he can't start something that already started and since that part of the argument is false he doesn't care about the rest of SC's argument.Why do you not think that Millar not participating in the RVS is a tactic?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Something that I have noticed...
-Millar wrote scum partner towards firestarter
-Strangercoug sees that as a contradiction
-Millar explains he made a mistake and meant scum member
-Millar later says “Strangecoug he is coming off as a generic town player, I have played with a number of times. “
-Strangercoug sees that as Millar saying he has played with him a number of times
-Millar explains that he meant he played with the generic town player type and strangercoug is coming off as one
-Then strangercoug comes up with post 69.
All I have to say is, strangercoug is taking this way too seriously. The first blunder, yes I can see how it could be seen as scum mistake or even a Freudian slip with Firestarter, but the second one. Come on, I understood what he meant, and even if you didn't how is saying I played with you a lot scummy. And then you threaten him for not being as clear.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Vote: Firestarterfor post 108, OMGUS. That along with your waiting to vote seems scummiest to me right now.
Korlash-
anddon't actually understand what you want me to comment on... It doesnt seem like a question I can answer and uh... I really don't see what or how I can comment on what you're talking about in this bold. Would you mind clearifying it for me?
First off, you implyed you believed not voting in the RVS is not a tactic by saying I started acting serious first. It is tied to my above quote where I asked you to comment on millar's lack of a vote in the RVS to see what your actual stance was and not guess it from what you implyed. I'll make the questions simplier:Did I say that? If so where. If not why are you putting words in my mouth?
1) Do you feel not participating in the RVS with a vote is a tactic, regardless of alignment?
2) If so, would my vote on him for this tactic still be considered "starting it"?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Because you voted for millar before and took it off for others to post. To me, I think you wanted more people's opinions to support your vote. Townie shouldn't be afraid to push a lynch on a person by themselves. Millar, on the otherhand, hasn't voted at all as is part of his playstyle apparently, so that doesn't make him as scummy.Firestarter wrote:
And how do you explain millar13 not even placing a vote yet?Battousai wrote:Vote: Firestarterfor post 108, OMGUS.That along with your waiting to vote seems scummiest to me right now.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Firestarter, come on. He answered all of your questions. You just didn't get the answers you wanted. I think the main problem you have is reading compehension. One sentance millar13 writes can be influenced by others he has written before/after, especially question 3. He didn't say the word mannerism, but infered it by talking about the way you posted (insults and what not).
Also, how are all the lurkers (afatchic, dubya) and those who haven't commented much on the firstarter v millar13 cases (and taken a stance).
Mod: Could you please prod dubya and afatchic if you haven't? And if you have, are replacements needed?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Firestarter concerning post 170:
That is what you wrote, but what really happened was millar commented he didn't vote in the RVS, I voted him for it, Millar FOS'd me for voting him for it, SC asked why towards the FOS, and Millar explained. Millar never accuses SC of being scummy up to that point.... Which then lessens your case against him until you remark about millar saying rushing to a vote is bad, when a FOS is better.Firestarter wrote:The first serious post belongs to Battousai, 2nd belongs to millar13 and the 3rd belongs to Strangercoug.
millar13 overlooks Battousai's original post as the first serious post of the game, but accuses SC of this exclaiming it was a scum-tell. This is the first falsity. Why was Battousai's post overlooked in favour of SC's? Distancing/bussing of either comes to mind.
So are you saying your original vote on Millar, which you deem as adding light pressure, isn't serious?Firestarter wrote:The first statement is out and out scummy considering M13 later states that my Post 49 is the first real sign of townieness from me which happened to be my first serious post of the game. He states he's still 50/50 on me, wouldn't town be 50/50 on anyone in game, especially after just coming out of the random stage? He then looks at lurkers, saying that scum may be contained within them, why not place a vote on one them to get them to post?
-In reference to bandwagons are not good for town in D1 by Millar.Firestarter wrote:I FOS M13 for his crap-logic.
You think Millar is suspicious because he has a different ideal than you? Why is this indictive of scum? From what I have read of Millar's posts, he feels D1 bandwagons are usually controlled by scum since there is so little information to go on.
No he said you were the most likely scum member at the moment. There is a big difference.Firestarter wrote:He then states that Im likely scum of the players participating in the game, when a few short posts earlier he says Im 50/50.
I made only 1 other post since he claimed this...
So it is ok for you to skip questions, but for others it's scummy?Firestarter wrote:SC, do you have nothing to add from the case I just posted, other than worry about yourself?
There were some things I noticed, that I'd come back to later....
Right now, the case is on M13, he is top of the pile for me.
Also, the rest of your case does stand up a bit.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
"Read my quote again for clarity... The timeline is clear, I state that M13 says SC just gave off a scum-tell after SC asked him about it. NOT before it.
And why are you NOT addressing the real point of that post, that M13 ignored you in favour of SC?
Read it again."
Reading comprehension, millar fos's me for applying tactics, sc asks why is that suspicious, millar explains why it is a scumtell. Millar doesn't say SC commited the scumtell.
"I seen I could add some light pressure on M13 after his post, His reaction would only deem it serious."
So you applied a tactic then, pressuring Millar into get a scummy or town response. Guess what? Tactics aren't random and thus are considered serious....
"I was suspicious about M13 saying that D1 BW's were dangerous for town.
Not his ideals.
The fact is that BW's bring about info, and we know info is good for town.
So he showed scuminess, yes.
Do you believe that D1 BW's are only controlled by scum Bat?"
Personnally I do not BELIEVE D1 bandwagons are controlled by scum, but it is just my opinion, part of my mafia ideals. Now the key word in the whole thing is D1. He believes D1 bandwagons are controlled by scum, which could stem from personal experience, I do not know. You are suspicious of him for something he believes to be true.
"WRONG. He said I was 50/50.
Go check the posts please."
Please tell me where he DOESN'T say you are the most likely scum member at the moment.millar13, post 55 wrote:And believe it or not Firestarer comment in Post 49, actually indicate what i feel about wagon's in the early game...even if I am convinced he is the most likely scum member at the moment. Although, not enough active players have sprouted to give a fully loaded judgement.
"WOW, where were you when I needed the dig out, RE: questions not being answered!!
Ill get around to them, as I have done all game.
Also, did you post some critique on M13's case?
I might have missed it... Post number...?"
Where was I? I was there saying he did answer your questions. The reason I pointed it out is because you keep calling millar out on it, but you are doing it too.
I did not post a critique of Millar's case. The reason is because it was not directed at me, and my vote is on you, so I have already have my stance on the subjected planted firmly in.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Firestarter- "Logical reasons?? Why would you NOT read a case built on another player?
BTW, Town need to read these posts. End of."
Reading comprehension. You need to slow down and read everything correctly before posting. He didn't say he didn't read the case, but rather wouldn't analyze it the way you presented it (aka wall of text).-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Millar- Did you say SC committed the scum-tell in the quote or was it to SC ABOUT me?
No, other people claimed my vote was serious, but it was just random voting. I had a reason for it, but I wasn't trying to achieve anything from it.
No, I am not suspicious from your personal mafia ideals. I am suspicious for the REASONING behind some of them, and/or if you are lieing about your ideals.
This is your original post in your case. Now at the end you say he claims you're scum, in which I then say he didn't. We were both refering to this post which is after the 50/50 post.Firestarter wrote:
M13 uses the word "clearly". If the error was clear, SC would not have pointed the error out. He states then that Im a scum member rather than a scum partner. This is how scum is caught, by errors made in posts, if no-one made errors, lynches would be based on guesses. After saying my Post 49 is what he's feeling about wagons, which is lies as he stated he was opposed to them earlier, he then says Im still likely to be scum... This is a huge OMGUS. Its also very arguable that SC was placing more pressure on M13 than I was at this stage, yet M13 then goes on to say that SC is still likely Townie and that his heart is in the right place? At this point, its 5 posts past where the RVS stage finished for me.millar wrote:I clearly made an error...I meant to say that Firestarter was a scum member (not scum partner) I have no reason to beleive that yourself (Strangecoug) is actually aligned with that.
Am I cracking under pressure? Not that I noticed.
And believe it or not Firestarter comment in Post 49, actually indicate what i feel about wagon's in the early game...even if I am convinced he is the most likely scum member at the moment. Although, not enough active players have sprouted to give a fully loaded judgement.
Bandwagons are often used in early stages, by over-eager mafia members or town members looking to be part of an easy lynch so that they don't feel to guilty about it if they are in heavy unison. With that being said, I think Strangecoug your heart is in the right place just searching in the wrong direction.He claims Im scum, at this point, because I applied pressure with my vote. Nonsense.
Understand the word "didn't" as in he didn't refuse to read your case. Which means he read it.Isacc wrote: I didn't "refuse to read your case on M13." I just don't need to spend a wall of text analyzing it in game, for logical reasons I already presented. Did you read those ones?
And yes, I do mean character name.
Isaac- "QFT!!!
***Am I correct in getting your name? =P"
Close, off by 3 *'s-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Unvote
I want afatchic and dubya to be replaced or post before we go into the next day.
Since Firestarter claimed Vanilla, it would be best just to lynch him. If he is town, then the scum know he is not a powerrole, which then give them a better chance of hitting one.
While we wait, I think we should play the rest of today under the assumption we lynch Firestarter and he turned up vanilla townie. I will post tomorrow as it is getting late and I gotta get up early for my first class tomorrow.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Actually the show is over 500 episodes... (Too bad I can only watch 2 at a time at the site I watch them at )
Wow Millar, first you complain that making a mistake in wording isn't scummy, it just makes you human. Now that it has happened to Firestarter (spelling or wording), you jump on his case for it.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
My flavor is in the English version ala Jimmy over Shinichi. Looking at Firestarter's flavor, he uses the English version for the role name, but switches over to the Japanese version for the flavor...
Millar- you don't believe his nameclaim to be true, but you zeroed on on the misspelling or different word to support your claim.
Still waiting for afatchic and dubya to contribute before I vote (which might effectively hammer considering pacman looks to be wanting to vote Firestarter from my interpretation of his recent posts).-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Regardless of whether your claim makes since, I will vote you. Why? You claimed vanilla townie. Whenever someone on the chopping blocks claims that on D1, my policy is to lynch them. The reason is because the scum now know Firestarter isn't a powerrole, which increases their chance to NK a powerrole if we lynch/out another role.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
This is D1, our best guess would only be a guess. There isn't a lot of informationt o go off of. If we choose not to lynch Firestarter and say run up a wagon on millar, we could possibly out a powerrole or he'll claim vanilla. We then would probably lynch one of the two claimed vanilla players.
If there are 3 scum and both firestarter and millar are vanilla, that means when it comes to night the scum have a 1:7 chance of hitting a powerrole. It is best to lynch the Firestarter because it lessens the chance from 1:8 to 1:7 for the scum to find and kill a powerrole before they get to use their ability or if we run up a wagon on a powerrole, it almost guarantees their death unless there is a protective role. IMO, D1 you lynch the claimed vanilla.
Plus, more than likely we will end up lynching him later...-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
1) Then why post it? It is useless information, as I'm most confident no one planned on no lynching until endgame...Sajin wrote:2: I did not say to lynch people I thought were town. I mean random lynching. The 10-3 town scum math odds of winning as town become a lot better RL twice then NLing 4 times, even with a cop accounted for in the period before LY/LO
3: His flip gives us more information regardless of what direction the flip is. Obviously it would help more if he is indeed scum.
2) You didn't answer the question. The question was what information would be gained, not what flip would give us information.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
I guess I could replace in as all three of those players, that would bring me to the cap. Just send me their rolesGorrad wrote:Sajin wrote:mod any word on the 3 non posters?No, sorry. If any friends wish to help out, that would be helpful.
Compare those to the case on firestarter brought by millar13 and others. You had your vote on firestarter at one point, IIRC. What has firestarter done to lessen your suspicion on him or do you think that what you have listed above is stronger than the one on Firestarter?Sajin wrote:The 2 main points I though firestarter had:
The quote [SC] saying no one suspected millar depending on firestarters flip. As I recall it was [SC] who theorized them as scumbuddys.
Also when [SC] pointed out the supposed contradiction: There was no contradiction.
I think [SC is] misrepresenting firestarter with the quotes provided.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Yes, yes it does. It does if your points are vague.Sajin wrote:
sorry, I perfer shorter posts. I still explain stuff. Just because I don't write mafia essays does not make my few points less valid.StrangerCoug wrote:
This is crap. I know Firestarter's case on me to be serious, but your case on me is a joke and can be summed up as you telling me "Yeah, whatever, scaredy cat." If you're going to vote me, at least present me with something worth defending like Firestarter did. Don't be skimping on scumhunting to see what you can get away with.Sajin wrote:
he had 2 votes I had a fos. The person under pressure he refered to was likely himself, freudian slip.Battousai wrote:How?
Unvote: alexhans
Vote: Sajin-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Hi, I'm still here guys...
I find it weird that all this hate on Korlash has stayed solely on him. I mean, just about everything he has said that people are voting him for, I have already said. Notice I commented that Fire needs to die today, even if he is townie. Notice I never gave my scum list to Lin. That because I see no merit in it at this stage of the day.
I think the only reason some people (forgot who all is on the wagon right now) are voting Korlash is because he is being more outspoken about it, which, imo, is more townie.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
To appear more townie so as not to get lynched? Is it possible you, as scum, thought if you dragged out the day and added some posts that you could save yourself from being lynched?Firestarter wrote: Scum want more than anything else to lynch a townie, correct?
I didn't say I wanted to hang around for 2 weeks just so I could lynch someone, I wanted to stick around and help town after my inevitable lynch, as at that time, I requested the deadline based on me being lynched. Go back to the time I posted that, I did want the deadline to be reached, I was expecting to be lynched... I had NO hidden agenda, why as scum, would I post more content if my lynch was inevitable???
?Doing what?Firestarter wrote:And you aren't doing it because...?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Sorry for not refreshing my page right before I posted...
The main reason is because I haven't been all to active. The main reason is becausse.... FINALS! Right now, I'm working on a microeconomic analysis of Brazil. Once I get done with that I have to finish my paper on why should the United States establish a National Language. Then I have to finish my multi-state data network that utilzes frame-relay, ospf, and access lists for a made up company that stores data for companies in an off-site storage facility. Not to mention studying for the written finals themselves... Yeah, my plate is pretty full right now.
When I saw votes coming on Korlash for something I also agree with, I had to post what I thought of it.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
You wanted my reason, I don't care if you take it one way or the other, as it is the truth.Firestarter wrote:
Did you make this known in an earlier post that your time was limited?Battousai wrote:The main reason is because I haven't been all to active. The main reason is because.... FINALS! Right now, I'm working on a microeconomic analysis of Brazil. Once I get done with that I have to finish my paper on why should the United States establish a National Language. Then I have to finish my multi-state data network that utilzes frame-relay, ospf, and access lists for a made up company that stores data for companies in an off-site storage facility. Not to mention studying for the written finals themselves... Yeah, my plate is pretty full right now.
If so, I did not see it, and apologise wholeheartedly...
If you haven't, then I guess it could have been taken that your were not pursuing your idea's... whereas Korlash was, profusely.
When I get access to the internet (like right now), I skim the thread after I do X amount of work, then possibly make a short post, then go back to work. Right now, I'm posting more than I want to, because my project I'm currently working on is so boringFirestarter wrote:
Are you reading the entire game, with your limited time?Battousai wrote:When I saw votes coming on Korlash for something I also agree with, I had to post what I thought of it-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
M13's case wasn't weak...
Also, it is not scummy to try and get someone lynched by changing your method of attack to garner more support. He was trying to garner support from people that think you may be town, to lynch you. I don't recall him ever saying you are town or thinking you are town. Just saying IF you are town and IF you are left alive. I don't think he wavered on thinking you are scum, nor have I.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Firestarter wrote:Theres too much WIFOM for me to be allowed to live now, and NOT be lynched later.
Started rereading these last few pages on my off day. I found this and thought it is interesting. Contradiction? Possibly. Firestarter admits that if he is left alive today, he will be lynched later. That, with claiming vanilla townie, means that he forsees his mislynch in the future. Now when Korlash wants him lynched because if Fire is town, him being around would result in being mislynched at an inappropriate time (end game), Fire uses it in his case against him.Firestarter wrote:
You are basing this ridiculous theory on me being scum right now, and continuing to be scum right the way through the game, presumably, if Im left alive that long after the aforementioned continuing scum-like actions.Korlash wrote:If you are town you need to be lynched now. Otherwise, if you survive until LYLO or any other endgame scenario, you will probably either be one of the top two candidates or the most likely candidate by yourself. Either way you would then have a good chance of being the lynch, and if town, would lose us the game.
You say that if I'm town, I need to die???? WTF?
Earlier in the game I was being battered by almost everyone in the game, so drawing connections will be quite easy if I flipped town, thats a BS reason, end of.
Your case on me seems to be with the claim Ive given, you've continually said I need to be lynched, culminating in "If I'm Town, you need to be lynched". THAT alone should see you higher in the spotlight, as we are still in a healthy position to catch scum before D1 ends. You want this day to end quicker than anyone else, and your reluctance to discuss, calling it anti-town along the way, makes you scummier too. SC has done this to a lesser extent than you, but has backed off after the posts Ive made, joined with most of the replacements posts. For these reasons then, I must...
UNVOTE: VOTE: Korlash.
Korlash thought the same thing Fire did, but now the wagon has stalled, Fire doesn't see his lynch as inevitable and is now fighting to stay alive (which some has called what scum would do, by saying town would give up).-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Korlash-
Why do you assume this? Especially after I noted how Fire's claim uses both, yet you thought it was suspicious then.Korlash wrote:search your guy on google and find him in any Case Closed Character wiki, as in the page on Wikipedia for example. It normally lists japanese names and english names. (i assume there may be some characters who have both.)
Korlash wrote:
I can't believe I missed that... Wow... I can;t believe Gorrad would use both English and Japanese versions int he same PM, I definitly can't see him using different versions of Jimmy for PMs either.Battousai wrote:My flavor is in the English version ala Jimmy over Shinichi. Looking at Firestarter's flavor, he uses the English version for the role name, but switches over to the Japanese version for the flavor...
Sadly based entirely on that I'm ready to vote him but I don't want to until I have contributed something more then I already have.
SC & Alex-
See Korlash's post
Alex-
You're confusing me...
"He actually resigned to the fact that he wouldn't be lynched. That's different."
"Haven't you ever seen town accept their lynch? Scum would be more desperate to survive."
I think the first one is a typo?? Other than that, it seems you are defending Fire on one issue, then when his position changes on that, you defend it the opposite way. When Fire was "resigned to being lynched", you say that is townie to do. Which would mean not resigning to being lynched is scummy (otherwise it would be a null tell). Now that Firestarter is not resigned to being lynch, you say something along the lines of "Why shouldn't a player not fight to not be lynched, why should they crawl up and die?" Doesn't that make the first thing scummy or at least a null tell?
Firestarter-
"Note the contradiction... he "random voted him for not voting"???"
How is that a contradiction? I random voted him, and my reason was that he didn't want to vote. How is that different from voting someone for, I don't know, just finishing a game containing an enemy to town, named Rage?
"Note that Battousai just makes a general statement, and does not commit to one side or the other regarding BW's on D1.
Instead he questions me about M13's crap-logic saying BW's are only driven by scum.
If Battousai questions me and not M13, isn't it likely he agrees with M13's stance on D1 BW's? That they are only driven by scum?"
I was defending Millar's right to believe that way and that it isn't scummy to believe it.
"He is ignoring everything else, while singling out me with his illogical behaviour/posts."
I believe the only people talking at this stage were you, firestarter, and people that agreed w/ you or agreed w/ millar. Also, it is ironic since you were focused on Millar this entire time.
"Not standing up a bit"
I said DOES not DOES NOT...
"Again, no vote....."
I gave my reason for the unvote. You want to know why it is different from yours on, what page 3? Simple, you were close to a lynch, millar wasn't.
"Again, no vote.....
I refer to this quote of Battousai's...."
Please tell me how saying we need to lynch Fire not pushing a lynch?
"Posts stats about scum not hitting a PR, if I’m lynched, but neglects to post the alternative, that if we catch scum in D1, it lessens the scums numbers, and preserves a townie, which is what this lynching assumption is based off of."
What would you, as an objective player, want- an outted powerrole and a scum lynch D1, or a scum lynch D2?
"This question has been asked many many times, M13, Korlash, Sc and Battousai clearly cannot back this up as to why its a good idea.
Yet Battousai pursues this further on another player?"
I never wanted you lynched for " a lot" of information. What the hell? I thought I was tunnelling on you. I guess I made a mistake and actually questioned someone other than Fire
"And why not say he agrees with Firestarter?
Korlash agreed with you?
You cannot put sanctions on players in this way."
Did Korlash say, "I agree with Battousai." Then end his post? I was just wanting Sajin to post what he thought. If he thought similar to you, he could have posted word for word what you posted. That way, there is no vaguness at all. Not tunnelling you again...
"Clearly Battousai does not like the direction my supposed lynch is taking at this point.
With fresh impetus from the replacements, and previous cases on me being shot down, he then starts to question those taking their votes from me, without actually adding anything as to why I should be lynched.
In Korlash' case, he changed his method of attack once one let him down, but Battousai isn't doing anything to pressure my lynch, he's merely trying to pressure those who have unvoted me."
This is where I can definately see you already made up your mind before you got to this point. I was pressuring Sajin, because he so easily moved his vote to SC, which I felt SC hadn't done anything too scummy (at least not enough to vote). I wasn't trying to get Sajin to revote you. Again, I'm not tunneling you here....
"What points are vague?
Again, pressurising those who believe scum lie elsewhere"
The point where he said he saw a slip. If you bothered to read up a post or so, which I think you did, so you conviently left it off. Why? See where you attacked me for only posting the downside of lynching a vanilla townie, now compare that to here where you leave off the post I question in order to expand your attack and/or some other reason to make your case stronger.
"Again, Battousai doesn't commit to anything here, he is merely making generic statements that may be true, but he doesn't try to back them up.
The fact he ignored Korlash similar post...."
That is how I feel, I was just trying to get whoever I was asking, to admit that it could be a possibility.
"Is another example of his tunnelling and scumminess."
This attack of Korlash seems out of place...
"Having being called out on his infrequent posting by me, he comes across as attacking in his post about doing finals...
If your busy, that’s fair enough, but why did you only feel the need to post this now? After being called out on it?"
As I already said, because you asked me a question, so I answered. I was quite content in not telling anyone I was doing Finals since my semester was going to end soon.
"Battousai states, in so many words, that he's happy about the way Korlash is going about trying to get me lynched. Whether I’m town or scum.
For me, either both or one of them know my alignment, the push on me being lynched cannot be solely town driven, imho.
It seems to be without consideration of what everyone else has posted, and that is anti-town in my book. Everyday."
If I was scum and new you to be not scum, I would assume you told the truth and then proceede to try and get you lynched. Why? Because as I have already said, I think that vanilla townie claim on D1 needs to be lynched, and not following that as scum would be suspicious.
"1. I was otherwise engaged with the now missing M13..."
You were tunnelling? I thought my supposed tunnelling on you was scummy? So is it ok if you do it, but not me?
Alex (again)-
I was also gone when the whole thing happened, so if I wasn't I would have said my vote was random earlier. But of course we can't know that, and can only speculate if I would have.
Refreshed the page this time-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Then by that token, do you think SC is feeling pressure from you. SC has only 1 vote on him, and is no where near being lynched. Do you think SC is only attacking you for attacking him? Do you think what you said about Fire is scummy or that saying that it is, is not a valid point?Sajin wrote:OMGUS- Sudden voting or pressuring of someone as a response to that someone voting/pressuring you. Usually done in greater amounts then original pressure in an attempt to get pressure off.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Your attempt to make him look townie for just anything is noted.alexhans wrote:He is still first in the votecount if I'm not mistaken so it wouldn't be a good tactic if he were scum... However, your attempt to make him look scummy for just anything is noted.
But seriously, WIFOM completely. In fact scum could skip out while ahead to dodge any last minute questions and discussion, and to leave their vote on someone without having to explain why it was kept to deadline. I'm pretty sure it is a nulltell.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
"id he question me? NO! he just fosed me before I could even post my thoughts. I believe he saw it as a threat to the assembled Fire lynch.
dude... You said SC and me were scum and that I OMGUS him??? How does that make sense?"
I'd like to point out this is wrong. SC fos'd you after your second post, where you call Fire town and the threat to anyone who hammers (I believe that would be consider a thought of yours). Therefore, SC had a right to Fos you if he found that scummy.
"Do you know what that FoS is for? For saying "smart mislynch". Serious dude..."
So this states you know SC FoS'd you for one of your thoughts, its just that you don't agree with SC that it was scummy.
"You're saying nothing here. You're just tossing accusations dude. If you say something explain why... I could just go with...
"kairyuu sucks, he doesn't make sense, his vote is crap, he is scum" but that wouldn't be valid because I wouldn't be backing up my statement. "
I don't get what was wrong with that. My interpretation was that you were basically testing the waters by making as many cases as you can, which is more likely to come from scum than town.
FoS: Alex
These answers have really taken away from your defense of Kairyuu's case.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
I was talking about the first half of the quote you listed -You don't see what's wrong with saying my cases are crap and that Im buddying, bussing, talking crap, without saying what he is referring to?
When I'm testing the waters? How?
And if you mean that asking questions and investigating more than 1 person is scummy then you're the one who's making scummy statements... What do you want me to do? Tunnel vision? That IS scummy. I'm gonna be open minded and look for evidence for myself. Not follow up on another guy's post without saying anything relevant.
I see nothing wrong with that. Playing mafia, you have to take into account how other players play it. Now, from his POV, he sees you doing that and saying that is scummy, from his perspective, is ok. Also note that I never agreed with the statement, just that there is nothing wrong with it.Now we get to your "long post," which is allll over the place. There is no cohesive argument in there. It's pretty much just you trying to fling as much crap on as many people as you can. Possibly trying to see what sticks so you can press further.
The reason why I FoS'd you was not based on Kairyuu's case, but more of your defense of it. I found it suspicious how you word things, as in-
Did he question me? NO! he just fosed me before I could even post my thoughts. I believe he saw it as a threat to the assembled Fire lynch.
dude... You said SC and me were scum and that I OMGUS him??? How does that make sense-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
EBWOP:
Accidentally hit entered prematurely... continuing off last quote...
Before you could post thoughts. You make it sound like you didn't even make a statement before he FoS'd you, while in actuallity you had a post about Fire being town and wanting to stop a smart mislynch. Then when Kairyuu mentioned it, you dismissed the reason of SC's FoS.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Answered that in my last post. "You make it sound like you didn't even make a statement before he FoS'd you, while in actuallity you had a post about Fire being town and wanting to stop a smart mislynch."Why is the wording suspicious?
I saw nothing wrong with the case, did I agree with it? No. Notice I said I gave you a FoS because of your defence to the accusations and not the accusations themselves. If you make a clear, explained case, more often then not the only one who has a problem with the case is the person the case is against. From POV, you can see how they come to that conclusion, and if you can't then something is wrong with the case.So, you're gonna excuse him for POV? Then no one is responsible for making clear, explained cases because they're entitled to a point of view?
See last quote. I found your response questionable, as from your point of view, I don't see why you would exaggerate a case/defense the way you did.Ok. Then why you never excused fire like that? Why don't you excuse me like that? Isn't it my POV?
I never disputed that. Why would looking at someone's POV excuse from making a case with no meaning? I wanted Kairyuu to make a case or unvote. You aren't making any sense.NO. We should be obliged to present cases that explain what we mean. otherwise we're just being anti-town.
Kairyuu made an opionated case WITH support. Now if you do what you suggested, that would be scummy since you accuse everyone without reasoning.In the same lines of Kairyuu's post... I could make every single player in the game scummy if I wanted... even those who havent posted. You just gotta say some unsupported, opinionated stuff and look really convinced.
The italicized is irrelevant to the point at hand (SC fos'ing you). I believe he FoS'd you for already calling Fire town at the page you were at. How does anything you just posted in response to that quote relate to you lieing/exagerating on the "Before you could post thoughts."? Nothing, you are just going around the issue.Exactly. He fosed me for saying "smart mislynch"! come on...and then when I accused him he suddenly starts seeing me as more and more scummy. He thinks the "everyone" thing called out by millar is a "very good" (without saying why of course) when he had previously said that Fire was only a good case and finally he votes for me.If you don't find that highly relevant then I don't know what else to say to you.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Weird.
Kairyuu says something along the lines of "town would react to a crap case against them with a sense of saying the person is confused town and not scum pushing a crap case." Then when Alexhans hears this, he completely drops the issue with Kairyuu and says something along the lines of "Kairyuu is the kind of person who would try that." And then he drops the subject all together.
1) scum points for Kairyuu. Trying to act scummy to get reactions is scum defence for making a mistake.
2) I would say if I thought someone was pushing a crap case against me, I wouldn't be calling them confused town, I would be calling them suspicious, and then vote them depending on how long they push it. Actually, I think I would call them confused town, but only if I knew they were town and I wanted them to ease off of the attacks on me. But this is all WIFOM, so null points to Alexhans.
3) If someone pushed a crap case against me, and then say "I was just trying to get a reaction!" I wouldn't excuse them and drop the subject. I would pursue them further, put them on the defensive for their supposed gambit. Alexhans gets scum points for just dropping it.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
So his meta is like that, so it is not strange he would do this as townie? What about Millar? Supposedly (I say supposedly because I haven't used meta this game), Millar's play has been improving each game he plays in, and this game he hasn't done anything scummy do to his meta. Do you not believe in Millar's meta?alexhans wrote:Look dude... based on his meta It doesn't seem totally weird that he does something like that. Besides, me dropping the case has to do with me being ABSOLUTELY TIRED of that back and forth I'm suspecting few will read.
Why should I make a case? I didn't call you scum or Kairyuu scum. I just pointed out what I found suspicious. You wanted more information, and when I give it you don't like me sharing (probably because it reads negatively against you). What do you want me to do? Sit back and watch two people fight and not comment on it?Alexhans wrote:You assign scum points to everyone in your judge like manner. Instead of making a case you attack people who are fighting... and if they stop fighting you attack them because of it. You're looking similar to SC in that you keep your distance but trash others when it's convenient regardless of what they might say. And, in this case, you try to make us both look bad.
Now when you say "they", you are talking about yourself and Kairyuu as I haven't "attacked" anyone else because they stop fighting.
I found it suspicious, so what? I see no, feesible reason why a townie would just shrug off what Kairyuu did to you, especially after your reaction to it. You went from outraged to calm with just a "scummy to get reactions" post.Alexhans wrote:and regarding this point
I had a town feel on him, what's your read?. You give me scumpoints because I don't follow your playstyle? Wasn't that your case on Fire... that he was attacking millar's playing theories instead of millar himself?3) If someone pushed a crap case against me, and then say "I was just trying to get a reaction!" I wouldn't excuse them and drop the subject. I would pursue them further, put them on the defensive for their supposed gambit. Alexhans gets scum points for just dropping it.
Here is your thought process:
YOU wouldn't do that... I don't do what you would... I gain scum points...
Cool.
And you know nothing of my case. You took one thing I said to Fire and make it my "case"? What the hell? I was defending Millar, not attacking Fire. Get your facts straight next time.
You were trying to get reactions, you presented a crap case (or a meh case to get his ire up, as you call it) and determined him townie for not thinking you are scum (which is a counterattack, you wouldn't counterattack someone who is town). Same thing I said, but more "nicer"? I guess.Kairyuu wrote:
That is not what I said at all. I determined that, based on alexhans' reactions, I believe him to be town. It has nothing to do with the validity of either case, and everything to do with his reactions to the statements I made that provided nothing in the line of a case, but everything in the line of pressure. That he dropped the issue says nothing about him, because he did not call me scummy at any point. He was on the defensive, not on a counterattack.Battousai wrote:Weird.
Kairyuu says something along the lines of "town would react to a crap case against them with a sense of saying the person is confused town and not scum pushing a crap case." Then when Alexhans hears this, he completely drops the issue with Kairyuu and says something along the lines of "Kairyuu is the kind of person who would try that." And then he drops the subject all together.
Kairyuu wrote:
I was not acting scummy to get reactions. Hell, I wasn't acting scummy at all. I was providing hyperaggressive pressure in order to determine his alignment. This is what I do.Battousai wrote:1) scum points for Kairyuu. Trying to act scummy to get reactions is scum defence for making a mistake.Tags Fixed! -Mod
So you think attacking someone with a "meh" case isn't scumm?
I found three points of interest and I addressed three points. Why bring this up if you don't find me bringing it up scummy or town motivation?Kairyuu wrote:
This is totally speculation, and there is absolutely no point in bringing it up if your decision is that it's null anyway.Battousai wrote:2) I would say if I thought someone was pushing a crap case against me, I wouldn't be calling them confused town, I would be calling them suspicious, and then vote them depending on how long they push it. Actually, I think I would call them confused town, but only if I knew they were town and I wanted them to ease off of the attacks on me. But this is all WIFOM, so null points to Alexhans.
But you don't think heKairyuu wrote:
Note that he never once called me scummy while I was attacking him. If he would have changed his stance as soon as I dropped the case,Battousai wrote:3) If someone pushed a crap case against me, and then say "I was just trying to get a reaction!" I wouldn't excuse them and drop the subject. I would pursue them further, put them on the defensive for their supposed gambit. Alexhans gets scum points for just dropping it.thenthat would have looked like opportunism to me.knewyou were a townie and wanted you to ease off of the attacks by calling you townie?
I didn't know you were pressuring alexhans with a "meh" case to get his reactions until you told us you were pressuring alexhans with a "meh" case to get his reactions. I never said your case was crap, I was talking in the perspective of Alexhans as he thougt your case was crap. Though, your case wasn't strong, it did have points that held merit.Kairyuu wrote:Also, why bring this upafterI have dropped the case. If you thought my case was crap, then why did you FoS alexhans instead of going after me?
Alexhans-
How am I keeping my distance? I'm pretty sure me posting my thoughts has brought attention to myself.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Sorry I haven't posted much today. I've been sick, so since I feel better today I will try and catch up.
I'm not in support of getting Lin to claim, at least not until madeofphail says why.
madeofphail you need to claim, I have reasons to believe you to be scum! See that doesn't make you want to go as scum: "damn, I'm scum and better make a case as to not claim or come up with a fake claim" or as town: "I don't want anyone to think I am scum, I better claim that I'm town."-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Either not understanding what I typed or misrep. I'm thinking it's the former for now. I do not agree with Sajin at all on that subject.alexhans wrote:@624: Battou agrees wit Sajin, apparently.Battou wrote:He either has a night action, or is interested in Fire's flip. I wonder which...?
Disagree. Lurking = nulltell, unless they are actively lurking. Hmm... Madeofphail posted right after the Kairyuu post on lurking. Then he doesn't answer kairyuu's question:Kairyuu wrote:I am highly confident that there is at least one scum among that list of lurkers.
and instead wants Lindis to claim, which gets Kairyuu to unvote and go with his plan, and forgetting his own question.Kairyuu wrote:How many people need to disagree with you before you listen to reason?
FoS: madeofphail
Lindis claims, and surprise, surprise, surprise (cookie for anyone who gets the quote ) he claims a powerrole.
Madeofphail: Lindis is scum because there can't be two trackers in a detective show themed game? Note that this is a detective show themed game, you became another role so there technically was only 2 trackers during N1, Kairyuu didn't die last night. Why did none of these things go through your mind before you wanted lindis to claim (I know the 2 tracker is after the claim bit) and for everyone voting Lindis- or through your mind before voting Lindis?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Ok, you never said when you reread, so I assumed you would reread during night/right after night flip. I also did notice apparently. You may have thought it to be odd, you still said I agreed.
Anyways....
You said yesterday that by me not going into the fight and only commenting on it afterwards all that was scummy about it, I was trying to stay in background (paraphrasing). Do you still believe that, even though by me saying what I thought brings out people to defend themselves/attack me for it?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Not trying to outguess the mod, but why would Hershel make the drug that turns Jimmy to Conan? In the show, Conan tries to get a sample of the drug so that Hershel can make an antidote. It makes no sense in that fashion. Another thing, why would a player be given the task to use the drug on another player? The player would only have a 1 in 11 chance of finding Jimmy. What I think is that Jimmy was turned into Conan by... THE MOD after N1 or by the scum (We would like to turn Jimmy into Conan tonight).
I was on the fence, especially since I feel it is bad play by madeofphail to try and out someone on D2 because they targeted someone (and that person wasn't the deceased). Then Lin claimed tracker and later as what I would call an inventor (makes since with role), but when you claimed you turned Jimmy into Conan, that just screams liar.
Vote: Lindisfarne
Alexhans- From yesterday only, my biggest suspects were (not including Fire): Sajin and millar13.-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
Bad logic. Maybe if you would have called them out on it by name and not some people, they would have gladly done it. We won't know now, but maybe if you ask for it tommorrow they will.Sajin wrote:A couple people on this vote said they would post cases today and did not. They are likely scum regardless of the flip of the lynchee.
Alex- Why the hammer? Why not use today for discussion like you wanted us to do yesterday? Why was the Firewagon stalled so much and this one was over so quick?-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana