Luca was pretty much tunneled on Oats, who flipped town. And this is probably the worst post in his ISO:
In post 3768, Luca Blight wrote: I'll let oats hammer and claim that precious towncred. He's gonna need it.
In post 3768, Luca Blight wrote: I'll let oats hammer and claim that precious towncred. He's gonna need it.
It's not about the hammer. What was bothering me on the reread was that you spent more time arguing on why Oats was town, among other things, over pushing gob over the edge. I am not used to this passivity from you, but it would make more sense given that we're offsite.In post 4264, DarthPunk wrote:Vivax, was this actually a legit read from you?In post 4253, DarthPunk wrote:You realise he got hammered while I was asleep right?In post 4252, Vivax wrote: The Dann kill clears most of my suspicions regarding Ninja and Luca.
I'm eyeing Hu Tao + DP now.
Hu Tao mostly because of her D1. I think that in the context of what I now know to have been a lot of townies and gob scum, her posts struck me as very noncommittal when there was a lot to talk about.
DP because on the day Oats got limmed, he was rather passive about it. Meaning, he had gob as lock mafia and Oats he said would have had to be supermafia for him to believe he was mafia, basically. Either way, I didn't see a lot of conviction on his part.
Luca's first post in the context of this Dann NK was spot on.
It's not about the hammer. What was bothering me on the reread was that you spent more time arguing on why Oats was town, among other things, over pushing gob over the edge. I am not used to this passivity from you, but it would make more sense given that we're offsite.In post 4264, DarthPunk wrote:Vivax, was this actually a legit read from you?In post 4253, DarthPunk wrote:You realise he got hammered while I was asleep right?In post 4252, Vivax wrote: The Dann kill clears most of my suspicions regarding Ninja and Luca.
I'm eyeing Hu Tao + DP now.
Hu Tao mostly because of her D1. I think that in the context of what I now know to have been a lot of townies and gob scum, her posts struck me as very noncommittal when there was a lot to talk about.
DP because on the day Oats got limmed, he was rather passive about it. Meaning, he had gob as lock mafia and Oats he said would have had to be supermafia for him to believe he was mafia, basically. Either way, I didn't see a lot of conviction on his part.
Luca's first post in the context of this Dann NK was spot on.
Made me think of you tbh.In post 4265, DarthPunk wrote:I am basically assuming Dann was a blue snipe or a respect kill from someone who is familiar with him. He is apparently a very strong player on this site.In post 4263, Vivax wrote: Maybe I should stick to Luca despite the Dannflor kill. It just seems like an unlikely pick for Luca if he's mafia here. Dannflor wasn't really threatening to anyone in particular. Maybe the Ninja townread gave him away?
Luca was pretty much tunneled on Oats, who flipped town. And this is probably the worst post in his ISO:In post 3768, Luca Blight wrote: I'll let oats hammer and claim that precious towncred. He's gonna need it.
So you are saying that you just couldn't bake your posts out in time to be more determined? Fair enough I suppose.In post 4270, DarthPunk wrote:Ok, then I call bullshit vivax.In post 4266, Vivax wrote:It's not about the hammer. What was bothering me on the reread was that you spent more time arguing on why Oats was town, among other things, over pushing gob over the edge. I am not used to this passivity from you, but it would make more sense given that we're offsite.In post 4264, DarthPunk wrote:Vivax, was this actually a legit read from you?In post 4253, DarthPunk wrote:You realise he got hammered while I was asleep right?In post 4252, Vivax wrote: The Dann kill clears most of my suspicions regarding Ninja and Luca.
I'm eyeing Hu Tao + DP now.
Hu Tao mostly because of her D1. I think that in the context of what I now know to have been a lot of townies and gob scum, her posts struck me as very noncommittal when there was a lot to talk about.
DP because on the day Oats got limmed, he was rather passive about it. Meaning, he had gob as lock mafia and Oats he said would have had to be supermafia for him to believe he was mafia, basically. Either way, I didn't see a lot of conviction on his part.
Luca's first post in the context of this Dann NK was spot on.
And you did end up with Hu Tao on gob at the end of the day, which is a convenient optic if you're both mafia.
I'm good with taking this day slowly and see what everyone finds.
If you read that section of the day, then you would know that I had said that I wanted to use the full time, talk to OOO and I was directly concerned about exactly what happened, which was a quick hammer and an OOO nk without him posting up to date reads.
Why would I hard push a yeet when we had 3-4 days left and I specifically wanted to talk to OOO?
I am pretty sure the last thing I said before everyone yeeted oates was that I didn't want to yeet anyone right now.
So are you just making this shit up or what?
And the E-1 was Naerys.
Do you mean the Roden JK dumbtell? Or another one?In post 4278, DarthPunk wrote:Do you think Nearys could fake not knowing who the NK was when if she was scum she would 100 percent know?In post 4277, Vivax wrote:And the E-1 was Naerys.
I don't see it as clear cut that she's town as you do. That gob would hammer is obvious, but why don't you question who made it possible? I also put him at -1 then unvoted to get more info.
I'd even go so far as to say that this might just be one of those games where mafia just chilled while we self destructed and made ourselves look worse by being too active.
I'm still undecided, anyway. More reading, less writing.
That is really hard for me to get past.
I'd say that's unpredictable. Neither likely nor unlikely. What I do think unlikely is that me, Oats and Ninja had one scum when we were off wagon during gob vs you and gob vs Oats.In post 4280, DarthPunk wrote:So vivax, in your HT and DP scum team world, you think that only mafia are on gob here and only town yeeted Oats?
That seems really unlikely no?
In post 3367, Vivax wrote:This VC lol
Both DP and gob should be able to extract lots of info from this
In post 3369, Vivax wrote: Like that Oats + me + ninja can hardly be teamed here.
And also that 1 between DP and gob is likely mafia.
Oats just made a post that suggested he could‘ve made Gob -1.
Then Dannflor voted him taking away from that opportunity.
Lots lf thoughts to be had.
In post 3374, Vivax wrote: I think if gob is mafia that switch by Dann looks awful here.
Dann, Grack, gob with Dann instead of Luca? Is that it?
In post 3378, Vivax wrote: Thinking Oats is mafia is a bit silly in this wagon formation unless he's exactly teamed with DP
In post 3460, Vivax wrote:I operated from both perspectives as evidenced by me also trying to take gob's perspective on who he should scumread if he was analyzing both wagons knowing he was town and believing that DP was mafia.In post 3457, Luca Blight wrote:In post 3383, Vivax wrote:I don't know about that but he should form the two following thoughts:In post 3380, DarthPunk wrote:Do you think dann could fake the introspection and adjustment to his approach with the TL players this game?In post 3379, Vivax wrote: Ergo Dannflor is mafia, cause he ignores that, votes Oats, but still should rather vote DP if he was town adhering to his stated beliefs.
The gob vote was a distancing attempt.
I found that really townie to be honest.
Are these wagons town on town?
He voted gob previously so clearly he doesn't think that.
If he thought gob was mafia, why vote Oats who was just coming around to vote gob (unless he assumed that was a setup for a bus)?
If Oats isn't bussing he can only be partnered with you, so if he thinks gob is the mafia being wagoned, how can he ever suspect Oats for prepping a vote on him?
I don't get this way of looking at the game at all. You can hold two separate scumreads on the two main wagons and change your mind based on subsequent posts. I don't get your point about oats only being able to be partnered with Darth, either. You seem to be operating from the perspective than Gob is definitely scum, even though you townread him not too long ago?
What is so hard to understand ?
If me and Oats and Superfluousninja had at least two mafia we would both be working to hammer the town of the two wagons instead of delaying.
Then you show up and randomly say me and Oats can be mafia together because you haven't put a shred of decent analysis into the wagon formation. That's another reason for me to be unable to townread you.
This sequence. @DPIn post 3462, Vivax wrote:You can't be town and in good faith argue that two mafias didn't at least attempt to hammer the townie one of DP and gob.In post 3455, Luca Blight wrote:In post 3378, Vivax wrote: Thinking Oats is mafia is a bit silly in this wagon formation unless he's exactly teamed with DPIn post 3379, Vivax wrote: Ergo Dannflor is mafia, cause he ignores that, votes Oats, but still should rather vote DP if he was town adhering to his stated beliefs.
The gob vote was a distancing attempt.
Or maybe Vivax is scum with oats.
None of the above analysis makes sense to me, especially the last part when Dann clearly expressed his suspicion of oats prior to this.
Maybe I should just stick with DP/Grack/Luca after all.
In post 4287, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4252, Vivax wrote: The Dann kill clears most of my suspicions regarding Ninja and Luca.
How? Walk me through this.
In post 4288, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4261, DarthPunk wrote:I have Nearys and Ninja as lock town. I think HT/Luca, HT/Grack, HT/Vivax all make sense in some way.In post 4260, Vivax wrote:That post from scum Grack would be Oscar worthy.In post 4034, Grackaroni wrote: Oats if you get eliminated now and flip scum you're going to get me shot.
It's really going to bolster my reputation.
He did have gob and Hu Tao in his last list previously. I can see Hu Tao.
Hu Tao and ???
Is this a sort by postcount, become mafia pro game?
What about Grack / Vivax?
OoO softed being town investigative. Or maybe he got rolecopped.In post 4289, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Hey Vivax, since you are showing some new enthusiasm for talking about why people got killed...
WOULD YOU LIKE TO TALK ABOUT WHY OUTOFORDER WAS KILLED?
Because I sure would!
Fire support for OoO . Same way we attempted to go after Luca D1.
In post 4152, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4145, Vivax wrote:If gob is town you can see why they‘re in a hurry with Oats too.
Luca said he doesn‘t buy gob‘s claim then votes Oats.
Wrong again.
It was Darth who said that. I raised the possibility of Gob being a mafia tracker.
I was voting oats already before Gob's claim. Oats has always been my stronger scumread.
In post 3768, Luca Blight wrote: I'll let oats hammer and claim that precious towncred. He's gonna need it.
I was voting oats already before Gob's claim. Oats has always been my stronger scumread
Now, what's wrong with this?I'll let oats hammer and claim that precious towncred. He's gonna need it.
Probably. Not 100%.In post 4326, DarthPunk wrote:Do you think she is not cleared?In post 4318, Vivax wrote:Fire support for OoO . Same way we attempted to go after Luca D1.
But also cause the way you acted surprised about Dunn getting wagoned as if he was so obviously town made me go scumscum on you.
Do link a scum game of yours please. I'm curious if you're as hyperactive in such a case.
You can add those to the mix but my concern is really just simpler than that. And now pretend I'm an angry Italian man who just saw you put parmesan on tuna pasta.In post 4368, DarthPunk wrote:No, not really.In post 4366, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4362, DarthPunk wrote:Cause his reads and actions don’t alignIn post 4361, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4359, DarthPunk wrote:I am scared of this and I am taking what you say seriously as you are basically cleared.In post 4358, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Town misreads town as scum in a game of mafia, more at 11!
Otherwise I would have voted already.
For real, why do you think this means something? How many townies have incorrectly voted to yeet town in this game so far? Why is this one instance of Luca doing it so notable?
Are you concerned at all that the guy you are sheeping posted those quotes in the wrong order, or that he didn't tell you how many posts were inbetween, so that you wouldn't get a sense of how much time and how much post material he had to change his mind?
Luca said oats was always his bigger scum read and that he also thought gob could be mafia tracker .
Then why does he Think his strongest scum read would hammer his buddy?
Why would he not hammer his other scum read?
All of those are fair questions that vivax is pointing to.
Let me take a page out of your book for a change?In post 4369, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Look, if you are content to let Vivax play you like a fiddle, I guess I don't need to intervene. Hu Tao, Naerys, Luca and myself can handle the game from here so I don't really see much value in trying to get through to you at this point.
Not in this particular case.In post 4374, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4305, Vivax wrote: Ninja, everyone is inconsistent. The trick is finding who is trying their hardest not to be.
I guess that doesn't apply to Luca, huh?
Though of course you get to conveniently decide for all of us that he's "trying his hardest not to be" in that case, right?
I would if I could find it.In post 4379, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I am sorry I lost my cool but I do want you to answer the question.
You mean when you assumed 1-3 mafias to have been on the Dunnstral wagon? I did look at it, and I thought you were making it all up a while after OoO began to push you.In post 4382, SuperfluousNinja wrote:Here you go Vivax. Explain.In post 3474, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 3464, Vivax wrote: I see you writing a lot but not much substance behind it when you could just look at the wagons and draw conclusions in a more rational way.
Why are you suddenly saying this? I do this massive amount of work to describe the full history of votes on Dunnstral, and correct me if I'm wrong, but you said nothing about it, at all. (I remember because it seemed like nobody gave a shit about that analysis, and that made me sad, because I really did put a lot of work into that, even marking page numbers and such) But now suddenly you're arguing that this is important? At the very least, since my analysis was ignored by everyone, this opinion that looking at wagons matters so much is seemingly not shared by anyone. To me this feels like you're only arguing that it matters when it is convenient for you to make a case on someone.
At the time you were sayingIn post 4383, Luca Blight wrote: I've only skimmed through, but wanted to answer this:
In post 4368, DarthPunk wrote:No, not really.In post 4366, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4362, DarthPunk wrote:Cause his reads and actions don’t alignIn post 4361, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4359, DarthPunk wrote:I am scared of this and I am taking what you say seriously as you are basically cleared.In post 4358, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Town misreads town as scum in a game of mafia, more at 11!
Otherwise I would have voted already.
For real, why do you think this means something? How many townies have incorrectly voted to yeet town in this game so far? Why is this one instance of Luca doing it so notable?
Are you concerned at all that the guy you are sheeping posted those quotes in the wrong order, or that he didn't tell you how many posts were inbetween, so that you wouldn't get a sense of how much time and how much post material he had to change his mind?
Luca said oats was always his bigger scum read and that he also thought gob could be mafia tracker .
Then why does he Think his strongest scum read would hammer his buddy?
Why would he not hammer his other scum read?
All of those are fair questions that vivax is pointing to.
Because Gob was pretty much a consensus scum read by that point and his death was inevitable. It's common practice for scum to bus their partners when this is the case, and I thought oats' earlier response to you about Gob was awkward and possibly indicative of someone failing to bus their partner in a natural looking way. Obviously I was wrong about oats in this case.
The reason I made that post was because I wanted to put oats, who I thought was scum, in another awkward position where he would have to make a decision on whether or not to hammer his partner.
Of course I argue when it's convenient for me, ergo when it helps me to murder mafia, which replying to you about that particular point isn't doing, because looking at the Dunnstral wagon isn't going to help me case Luca.In post 4385, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4384, Vivax wrote:You mean when you assumed 1-3 mafias to have been on the Dunnstral wagon? I did look at it, and I thought you were making it all up a while after OoO began to push you.In post 4382, SuperfluousNinja wrote:Here you go Vivax. Explain.In post 3474, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 3464, Vivax wrote: I see you writing a lot but not much substance behind it when you could just look at the wagons and draw conclusions in a more rational way.
Why are you suddenly saying this? I do this massive amount of work to describe the full history of votes on Dunnstral, and correct me if I'm wrong, but you said nothing about it, at all. (I remember because it seemed like nobody gave a shit about that analysis, and that made me sad, because I really did put a lot of work into that, even marking page numbers and such) But now suddenly you're arguing that this is important? At the very least, since my analysis was ignored by everyone, this opinion that looking at wagons matters so much is seemingly not shared by anyone. To me this feels like you're only arguing that it matters when it is convenient for you to make a case on someone.
Are you allergic to answering questions or something
You seem pretty sure of yourself after neither me nor Oats 'bussed' gob at the end of the day.In post 4394, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4389, Vivax wrote:At the time you were sayingIn post 4383, Luca Blight wrote: I've only skimmed through, but wanted to answer this:
In post 4368, DarthPunk wrote:No, not really.In post 4366, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4362, DarthPunk wrote:Cause his reads and actions don’t alignIn post 4361, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4359, DarthPunk wrote:I am scared of this and I am taking what you say seriously as you are basically cleared.In post 4358, SuperfluousNinja wrote: Town misreads town as scum in a game of mafia, more at 11!
Otherwise I would have voted already.
For real, why do you think this means something? How many townies have incorrectly voted to yeet town in this game so far? Why is this one instance of Luca doing it so notable?
Are you concerned at all that the guy you are sheeping posted those quotes in the wrong order, or that he didn't tell you how many posts were inbetween, so that you wouldn't get a sense of how much time and how much post material he had to change his mind?
Luca said oats was always his bigger scum read and that he also thought gob could be mafia tracker .
Then why does he Think his strongest scum read would hammer his buddy?
Why would he not hammer his other scum read?
All of those are fair questions that vivax is pointing to.
Because Gob was pretty much a consensus scum read by that point and his death was inevitable. It's common practice for scum to bus their partners when this is the case, and I thought oats' earlier response to you about Gob was awkward and possibly indicative of someone failing to bus their partner in a natural looking way. Obviously I was wrong about oats in this case.
The reason I made that post was because I wanted to put oats, who I thought was scum, in another awkward position where he would have to make a decision on whether or not to hammer his partner.
1. Me and Oats were mafia together.
2. Gob was your weaker scumread.
Rhetorically elegant way to weasel yourself out by appealing to thread consensus and common practice but doesn't hold with what has transpired.
Read on me please.
I was pretty sure of oats/Vivax/Gob being the scum team by that point, but independently oats was my more certain scum read and if I was wrong on one then I would have picked Gob, but I didn't think I was wrong.
Right now I think you must be scum, not only for the reasons I mentioned yesterday regarding the wagon analysis but also by PoE. I'm going to take some time later to review properly before placing my vote, though.
I can agree with that.In post 4399, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4397, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4396, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4391, SuperfluousNinja wrote: @Luca, who are your top 2 scum reads at the moment?
Vivax is the only clear scumread I have, but I would imagine the other would be in Naerys/Grack. I still think Hu Tao and Darth are more likely town, but I need to review again.
Naerys picked up on the fact that Dannflor said "SuperfluousNinja is my strongest town read" yesterday and deduced that he was almost certainly saying it because he checked me. There's no way a scum Naerys points out a thing like that. So IMO Naerys is also basically confirmed town at this point.
I completely disagree, because if she didn't point it out then someone would have. I noticed Dann's comment myself and suspected he might have had an inno result at the time.
It gives her a reason to be townread, which she needs at this point if she is scum.
I think you're right.In post 4406, DarthPunk wrote:not grack?In post 4404, Vivax wrote: I really think it's Luca and Naerys though.
Mostly from the way and timing Naerys switched from Gob to Oats. I'll have to revisit her posts at the time, still.
Could use some expanding on this one though.In post 3458, Naerys wrote: I think if Oats is town then atleast one of Dann/Luca is scum
Here, have a token of attention
Hu Tao and Grack I‘d guessIn post 4419, DarthPunk wrote: Vivax who is mafia if Luca is town?
Only me wallahIn post 4421, DarthPunk wrote: How many mislims do we have?
No that was a joke.In post 4429, DarthPunk wrote:so 1?In post 4425, Vivax wrote:Only me wallahIn post 4421, DarthPunk wrote: How many mislims do we have?
Yeah, Vivax, why can‘t you just do everything at once ?In post 4438, Grackaroni wrote:Then why didn't you say any of that in the previous phase?In post 4435, Vivax wrote: I‘m not fond of the way Grack adressed Oats regarding HT‘s fakeclaim and all.
The way he reacted to said claim was one of the reasons I had him as town.
As I recall, you and Grack were a thing in it. Just an insignificant detail of course.In post 4445, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4442, Vivax wrote:Yeah, Vivax, why can‘t you just do everything at once ?In post 4438, Grackaroni wrote:Then why didn't you say any of that in the previous phase?In post 4435, Vivax wrote: I‘m not fond of the way Grack adressed Oats regarding HT‘s fakeclaim and all.
The way he reacted to said claim was one of the reasons I had him as town.
I was busy with Luca and Oats and his zany theory about us being partnered.
Is it more or less zany than your theory that me and Darth are partnered?
Yeah that‘s why my vote is on Luca Blight.In post 4452, Grackaroni wrote:It is why I'm doubting you though.In post 4442, Vivax wrote:Yeah, Vivax, why can‘t you just do everything at once ?In post 4438, Grackaroni wrote:Then why didn't you say any of that in the previous phase?In post 4435, Vivax wrote: I‘m not fond of the way Grack adressed Oats regarding HT‘s fakeclaim and all.
The way he reacted to said claim was one of the reasons I had him as town.
I was busy with Luca and Oats and his zany theory about us being partnered.
When I played with you on mafia universe you were actively trying to get people to yeet me throughout the game. In the last phase you were placing me in teams, but you weren't trying to convince anyone to yeet me or even mentioning the things I was doing that you found scummy - and obviously I'm the front runner to be yeeted now and you mention this for the first time.
Extorting attention is a form of violence I am familiar with.In post 4459, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I'm not using violence or coercion dude. Where is this coming from?
I think I have been vocal about assuming gob was too scummy to be scum for most of the game.In post 4467, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4465, Vivax wrote:Extorting attention is a form of violence I am familiar with.In post 4459, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I'm not using violence or coercion dude. Where is this coming from?
I will not answer your question.
Will you answer my question in 4461?
Mostly I was trying to convince everyone that you‘d have been a better target than him.In post 4472, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4470, Vivax wrote:I think I have been vocal about assuming gob was too scummy to be scum for most of the game.In post 4467, Luca Blight wrote:In post 4465, Vivax wrote:Extorting attention is a form of violence I am familiar with.In post 4459, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I'm not using violence or coercion dude. Where is this coming from?
I will not answer your question.
Will you answer my question in 4461?
I wasn‘t really floating him as a mafia member, but also not really opposed to hin being yeeted if we exclude the diarrhea joke.
I still don't understand the question in the context of what we were talking about. We were discussing your points about the wagons, and then you suddenly throw in your question about Gob which was irrelevant to what we were discussing.
Were you trying to convince me Gob was town?
lolIn post 4484, Grackaroni wrote: I think it's Dp and Vivax.
Yeah I think his approach to the game today reeked of a malicious angle.In post 4494, DarthPunk wrote:I am not sure who the last mafia is TBH. I think grack is mafia though.In post 4488, Vivax wrote:lolIn post 4484, Grackaroni wrote: I think it's Dp and Vivax.
Okay, sign this please:
We convince everyone in the game that it's either DP and me or you and Luca and each day we yeet one from each team.
Guess who wins?
Once you understand, you know what to do.In post 4498, DarthPunk wrote:ok lost cause lol.In post 4497, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 4488, Vivax wrote:lolIn post 4484, Grackaroni wrote: I think it's Dp and Vivax.
Okay, sign this please:
We convince everyone in the game that it's either DP and me or you and Luca and each day we yeet one from each team.
Guess who wins?
Which of you and DP do we yeet first in this scenario?
Very nice writing.In post 4516, Grackaroni wrote:You just copied the last two people and the previous two didn't make any sense either!In post 4515, Vivax wrote: I thought I was greenchecked to Grack tbh.
You are witnessing scum under pressure boxing themselves into a corner against the ones pushing them.
What happened to Gracks Naerys read? She stopped posting after calling him mafia, so not relevant for him.
Exhausting. I'll hammer myself at this point.
Don‘t threaten me with a good timeIn post 4518, Grackaroni wrote:If you do it'll be you tomorrow.In post 4517, Vivax wrote:Very nice writing.In post 4516, Grackaroni wrote:You just copied the last two people and the previous two didn't make any sense either!In post 4515, Vivax wrote: I thought I was greenchecked to Grack tbh.
You are witnessing scum under pressure boxing themselves into a corner against the ones pushing them.
What happened to Gracks Naerys read? She stopped posting after calling him mafia, so not relevant for him.
Exhausting. I'll hammer myself at this point.
Do I have to already ?
This one ?In post 2802, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I almost forgot the homework assignment I pursued over the night phase. I documented the vote wagon on Dunnstral to see if anything interesting came up. The full history of votes on Dunnstral on Day 1:
Grack - 1st vote on Dunnstral (pg 29)
Darth - 2nd (pg 29)
Hu Tao - 3rd (pg 35)
Oats - 4th (pg 36)
Dannflor - 5th (pg 36)
Then OOO yells at Oats and Dannflor, and Dannflor immediately switches off Dunnstral and votes Roden
Then Darth unvotes (pg 37), followed by Oats (pg 38), followed by Hu Tao (pg 39)In post 893, outoforder wrote: That's absolutely very fucking stupid, both of you!!!
Only Grack is voting Dunnstral at this point
Much later, Grack switches to Gob (pg 62), 0 votes on Dunnstral
On Wednesday, a new Dunnstral vote begins:
Gob - 1st (pg 79)
Vivax - 2nd (pg 79)
Then Vivax switches his vote to Roden (pg 80) which puts Roden at -1
Only Gob on Dunnstral
Voting continues some pages later:
Luca - 2nd (pg 92)
OOO - 3rd (pg 93)
Then OOO hops off Dunnstral to vote Hu Tao, then Darth immediately votes Hu Tao, then OOO immediately puts his vote right back on Dunnstral (pg 94)
Darth - 4th (pg 95), after light encouragement from Oats to vote Dunnstral
Oats - 5th (pg 95)
Vivax - 6th (pg 95) which puts Dunnstral at -1
Dannflor - 7th (pg 97), hammer vote
The tone mostly+the jk thing.In post 4560, Grackaroni wrote: Why is Naerys town to you Vivax?